Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Volume 2010, Article ID 956918, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/956918
Research Article

Online User Feedback in Early Phases of the Design Process: Lessons Learnt from Four Design Cases

1SINTEF, P.O. Box 124, Blindern, 0314 Oslo, Norway
2The Oslo School of Architecture and Design, Institute of Design, Maridalsveien 29, 0175 Oslo, Norway

Received 3 September 2010; Accepted 15 November 2010

Academic Editor: Anthony Savidis

Copyright © 2010 Asbjørn Følstad and Jørn Knutsen. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. Buxton, “Performance by design: the role of design in software product development,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Usage-Centered Design (forUSE '03), pp. 1–15, Portsmouth, NH, USA, October 2003.
  2. I. Sommerville, Software Engineering, Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, UK, 5th edition, 1995.
  3. D. J. Mayhew, “Requirements specification within the usability engineering lifecycle,” in The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, A. Sears and J. A. Jacko, Eds., pp. 917–926, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  4. D. Schuler and A. Namioka, Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, CRC Press, London, UK, 1993.
  5. J. Nielsen and R. L. Mack, Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  6. J. Rubin and D. Chisnell, Handbook of Usability Testing, Wiley, Indianapolis, Ind, USA, 2nd edition, 2008.
  7. ISO 9241-210, Human-Centred Design for Interactive Systems, Geneva: International Standards Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
  8. M. Muller, “Participatory design,” in The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, A. Sears and J. A. Jacko, Eds., pp. 1061–1081, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  9. M. Maguire, “Methods to support human-centred design,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 587–634, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. B. Rosson and J. M. Carroll, Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based Development of Human-Computer Interaction, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2002.
  11. H. Beyer and K. Holtzblatt, Contextual Design, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1998.
  12. M. B. Catani and D. W. Biers, “Usability evaluation and prototype fidelity: users and usability professionals,” in Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 1331–1335, October 1998. View at Scopus
  13. R. A. Virzi, J. I. Sokolov, and D. Karis, “Usability problem identification using both low- and high-fidelity prototypes,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems (CHI '96), pp. 236–243, Vancouver, Canada, April 1996.
  14. M. Walker, L. Takayama, and J. A. Landay, “High-fidelity or low-fidelity, paper or computer? Choosing attributes when testing web prototypes,” in Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society (HFES '02), pp. 661–665, Baltimore, Mass, USA, September-October 2002.
  15. R. Sefelin, M. Tschelegi, and V. Giller, “Paper prototyping-what is it good for?: a comparison of paper-and computer-based prototyping,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems (CHI '03), pp. 778–779, Fort Lauderdale, Fla, USA, April 2003.
  16. J. P. Chin, V. A. Diehl, and K. L. Norman, “Development of an instrument for measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems (CHI '88), pp. 213–218, Washington, DC, USA, May 1988.
  17. J. Kirakowski and M. Corbett, “SUMI: the software usability measurement inventory,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 210–212, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  18. M. Schulte-Mecklenbeck and O. Huber, “Information search in the laboratory and on the Web: with or without an experimenter,” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 227–235, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. H. Krantz and R. Dalal, “Validity of web-based psychological research,” in Psychological Experiments on the Internet, M. H. Birnbaum, Ed., pp. 35–60, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  20. U. D. Reips, “Standards for Internet-based experimenting,” Experimental Psychology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 243–256, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. L. Roberts, N. Barrett, and E. Marr, “How much to share with users during usability testing?” in Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society (HFES '08), pp. 2013–2017, New York, NY, USA, September 2008.
  22. T. Tullis, S. Fleishcman, M. McNulty, C. Cianchette, and M. Bergel, “En empirical comparison of lab and remote usability testing of web-sites,” in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Usability Professionals Association (UPA '02), Orlando, Fla, USA, July 2002.
  23. D. Ezzy, Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation, Routledge, London, UK, 2002.
  24. J. Knutsen and A. Morrison, “Have you heard this? Designing mobile social software,” FORMacademics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 57–79, 2010. View at Google Scholar