Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 790304, 7 pages
Research Article

Decision Aiding to Overcome Biases in Object Identification

College of Engineering and Computer Science, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435, USA

Received 1 November 2011; Revised 10 February 2012; Accepted 17 February 2012

Academic Editor: Kerstin S. Eklundh

Copyright © 2012 Mary Fendley and S. Narayanan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. C. Muller and S. Narayanan, “Cognitively-engineered multisensor image fusion for military applications,” Information Fusion, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 137–149, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. M. Huey and C. D. Wickens, Workload Transition: Implications for Individuals and Team Performance, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1993.
  3. A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, “Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and Biases,” in Judgment and Decision Making, T. Connolly, H. R. Arkes, and K. R. Hammond, Eds., pp. 35–52, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  4. I. K. Ash, “Surprise, memory, and retrospective judgment making: testing cognitive reconstruction theories of the hindsight Bias effect,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 916–933, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. B. Cook and H. S. Smallman, “Human factors of the confirmation bias in intelligence analysis: decision support from graphical evidence landscapes,” Human Factors, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 745–754, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Hayibor and D. M. Wasieleski, “Effects of the use of the availability heuristic on ethical decision-making in organizations,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 151–165, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. A. McCann, “SSRN-It's Not About the Money: The Role of Preferences, Cognitive Biases and Heuristics Among Professional Athletes by Michael,” 2007,
  8. R. F. West, M. E. Toplak, and K. E. Stanovich, “Heuristics and Biases as measures of critical thinking: associations with cognitive ability and thinking dispositions,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 930–941, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Swift and M. Minardi, “Target recognition,” The Journal of Net-Centric Warfare, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 38–40, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  10. S. Swift, “Personal communication,” in Phone Interview with Steve Swift, Jim Morgan, and Jim Leonard, M. E. Fendley, Ed., Dayton, Ohio, USA, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  11. D. Arnott, “Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: a design science approach,” Information Systems Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 55–78, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. M. Duvall, Accounting for Human Information Processing: A Critical Element for Future United States Air Force Command and Control Systems, Air University, Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala, USA, 2005.
  13. I. Biederman, “Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding,” Psychological Review, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 115–147, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. J. Maule, “Strategies for adapting to time pressure,” in Decision Making under Stress: Emerging Themes and Applications, R. Flin, E. Salas, M. Stub, and L. Martin, Eds., pp. 271–279, Ashgate Publishing Company, Brookfield, Vt, USA, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  15. J. W. Payne, J. R. Bettman, and E. J. Johnson, “The adaptive decision maker: effort and accuracy in choice,” in Insights in Decision Making: A Tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn, R. M. Hogarth, Ed., pp. 129–153, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  16. W. W. Zachary, “Decision support systems: designing to extend the cognitive limits,” in Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, M. Helander, Ed., Elsevier Science, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  17. P. Croskerry, “Achieving quality in clinical decision making: cognitive strategies and detection of bias,” Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1184–1204, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus