Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Volume 2013, Article ID 902316, 17 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/902316
Review Article

A Review of Mobile Robotic Telepresence

Center of Applied Autonomous Sensor Systems, Örebro University, Fakultetsgatan 1, 70182 Örebro, Sweden

Received 30 August 2012; Revised 29 December 2012; Accepted 5 February 2013

Academic Editor: Eva Cerezo

Copyright © 2013 Annica Kristoffersson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Citations to this Article [140 citations]

The following is the list of published articles that have cited the current article.

  • Ambre Davat, Veronique Auberge, and Gang Feng, “Integrating Socio-Affective Information in Physical Perception Aimed to Telepresence Robots,” 2018 5th International Conference on Behavioral, Economic, and Socio-Cultural Computing (BESC), pp. 24–29, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Nouha Ghribi, Boudour Ammar, and Adel M. Alimi, “Regimdroid: Framework for customize Android platform to act as a brain for telepresence robot,” 2015 IEEE/ACIS 14th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS), pp. 113–118, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Kei Kawahara, and Satoshi Suzuki, “Enhancement of spatial awareness on vehicle driving using transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation,” 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), pp. 1967–1972, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Sebastien Laniel, Dominic Letourneau, Mathieu Labbe, Francois Grondin, Janice Polgar, and Francois Michaud, “Adding navigation, artificial audition and vital sign monitoring capabilities to a telepresence mobile robot for remote home care applications,” 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), pp. 809–811, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jianqiao Li, Zhi Li, and Kris Hauser, “A study of bidirectionally telepresent tele-action during robot-mediated handover,” 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 2890–2896, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Sebastien Laniel, Dominic Letourneau, Mathieu Labbe, Francois Grondin, and Francois Michaud, “Enhancing a beam+ telepresence robot for remote home care applications,” 2017 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR), pp. 1–2, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Krit Janard, and Worawan Marurngsith, “Accelerating real-time face detection on a raspberry pi telepresence robot,” Fifth International Conference on the Innovative Computing Technology (INTECH 2015), pp. 136–141, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jiajun Shen, Bin Xu, Mingtao Pei, and Yunde Jia, “A low-cost tele-presence wheelchair system,” 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 2452–2457, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Daniel J. Rea, and James E. Young, “Backseat Teleoperator: Affective Feedback with On-Screen Agents to Influence Teleoperation,” 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 19–28, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Bogdan Kreczmer, Filip Grzeszczak, Dorota Szczesniak-Stanczyk, Krzysztof Arent, and Bartlomiej Stanczyk, “Video conferencing applications for robotic system designed for remote medical examination,” 2015 8th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI), pp. 148–154, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Wang Yuan, and Zhijun Li, “Development of a human-friendly robot for socially aware human-robot interaction,” 2017 2nd International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Mechatronics (ICARM), pp. 76–81, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Paul Bremner, Miriam Koschate, and Mark Levine, “Humanoid robot avatars: An ‘in the wild’ usability study,” 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 624–629, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Josca van Houwelingen-Snippe, Jered Vroon, Gwenn Englebienne, and Pim Haselager, “Blame my telepresence robot joint effect of proxemics and attribution on interpersonal attraction,” 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 162–168, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Elizabeth Cha, Samantha Chen, and Maja J Mataric, “Designing telepresence robots for K-12 education,” 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 683–688, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Elizabeth Cha, Jillian Greczek, Ao Song, and Maja J Mataric, “My classroom robot: Exploring telepresence for K-12 education in a virtual environment,” 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 689–695, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Javier Monroy, Francisco Melendez-Fernandez, Andres Gongora, and Javier Gonzalez-Jimenez, “Integrating olfaction in a robotic telepresence loop,” 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 1012–1017, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Roberto Rangel, Leonardo Romero, and Moises Garcia, “Paynal, a low cost telepresence robot,” 2015 IEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power, Electronics and Computing (ROPEC), pp. 1–4, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Noritaka Funada, and Satoshi Suzuki, “Preliminary verification of spatial perception support using emphasized single-camera view,” 2017 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), pp. 734–739, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Lin Zhang, Rong Liu, and Ming Yue, “Shared control of robot based on Fuzzy Discrete Event System,” Proceeding of the 11th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, pp. 537–542, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Andrey Kiselev, Mårten Scherlund, Annica Kristoffersson, Natalia Efremova, and Amy Loutfi, “Auditory Immersion with Stereo Sound in a Mobile Robotic Telepresence System,” Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts - HRI'15 Extended Abstracts, pp. 55–56, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Irene Rae, Bilge Mutlu, Gary M. Olson, Judith S. Olson, Leila Takayama, and Gina Venolia, “Everyday Telepresence,” Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA '15, pp. 2409–2412, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Patrik Björnfot, and Victor Kaptelinin, “Probing the Design Space of a Telepresence Robot Gesture Arm with Low Fidelity Prototypes,” Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI '17, pp. 352–360, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Daniel J. Rea, Stela H. Seo, Neil Bruce, and James E. Young, “Movers, Shakers, and Those Who Stand Still,” Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI '17, pp. 398–407, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Victor Kaptelinin, Patrik Björnfot, Karin Danielsson, and Mikael U. Wiberg, “Mobile Remote Presence Enhanced with Contactless Object Manipulation,” Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA '17, pp. 2690–2697, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Unknown, Karin Danielsson, and Patrik Björnfot, “A semantic scale for evaluating the UX of a MRP system,” Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2017 - ECCE 2017, pp. 59–60, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Unknown, Victor Kaptelinin, Andrey Kiselev, Amy Loutfi, and Thomas Hellström, “Robots in Contexts,” Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2017 - ECCE 2017, pp. 203–204, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • William A. Hamilton, Nic Lupfer, and Andruid Kerne, “LiveDissent,” Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork - GROUP '18, pp. 257–266, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Patrik Björnfot, Azadeh Farshidi, and Victor Kaptelinin, “Employing the secondary task technique for measuring MRP pilots' cognitive load,” Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction - NordiCHI '18, pp. 706–710, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jan Kolkmeier, Emiel Harmsen, Sander Giesselink, Dennis Reidsma, Mariët Theune, and Dirk Heylen, “With a little help from a holographic friend,” Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology - VRST '18, pp. 1–11, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Kohei Okuoka, Yusuke Takimoto, Masahiko Osawa, and Michita Imai, “Semi-Autonomous Telepresence Robot for Adaptively Switching Operation Using Inhibition and Disinhibition Mechanism,” Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction - HAI '18, pp. 167–175, . View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Annica Kristoffersson, “Using Presence, Spatial Formations and Sociometry to Measure Interaction Quality in Mobile Robotic Telepresence Systems,” KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Katherine M. Tsui, and Holly A. Yanco, “Design Challenges and Guidelines for Social Interaction Using Mobile Telepresence Robots,” Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 227–301, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Dylan F. Glas, Kanae Wada, Masahiro Shiomi, Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita, “Never too old for teleoperation: Helping elderly people control a conversational service robot,” Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 703–710, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Francesco Furfari, Michele Girolami, Filippo Palumbo, and Stefano Chessa, “The Integration of ZigBee with the GiraffPlus Robotic Framework,” Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 413, pp. 86–101, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Coradeschi, Palumbo, Pecora, Von Rump, Stimec, Ullberg, Otslund, Cesta, Cortellessa, Coraci, Gonzalez, Karlsson, Furfari, Loutfi, and Orlandini, “GiraffPlus: Combining social interaction and long term monitoring for promoting independent living,” 2013 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions, HSI 2013, pp. 578–585, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann, and Zhijun Zhang, “Assistive social robots for people with special needs,” International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI), vol. 1, pp. 11–17, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Inga-Lill Boman, and Aniko Bartfai, “The first step in using a robot in brain injury rehabilitation: patients’ and health-care professionals’ perspective,” Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, pp. 1–6, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann, and Zhijun Zhang, “Social robots and virtual humans as assistive tools for improving our quality of life,” Proceedings - 2014 International Conference on Digital Home, ICDH 2014, pp. 1–7, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Tristan Lewis, Jill L. Drury, and Brandon Beltz, “Evaluating mobile remote presence (MRP) robots,” Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 302–305, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Masanori Yokoyama, Masafumi Matsuda, Shinyo Muto, and Naoyoshi Kanamaru, “PoliTel: Mobile remote presence system that autonomously adjusts the interpersonal distance,” UIST 2014 - Adjunct Publication of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 91–92, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Christian Becker-Asano, Kai O. Arras, and Nebel Bernhard, “Robotic tele-presence with DARYL in the wild,” HAI 2014 - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, pp. 91–95, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ritta Baddoura, Gentiane Venture, and Guillaume Gibert, “Evaluating an intuitive teleoperation platform explored in a long-distance interview,” HAI 2014 - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, pp. 233–236, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Nouha Ghribi, Boudour Ammar, and Adel M. Alimi, “Architectural proposal for a mobile telepresence robot, REGIMTEL,” 6th International Conference on Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition, SoCPaR 2014, pp. 359–364, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Sachiko Nakagawa, Hideya Osawa, Kensuke Asakura, Noriko Obara, Yosuke Tsuchiya, and Masahiko Narita, “Web application technologies for integration of remote operation, camera image and voice communication into a cloud-based robotics platform,” 10th France-Japan Congress, 8th Europe-Asia Congress on Mecatronics, MECATRONICS 2014, pp. 256–261, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann, and Zhijun Zhang, “Assistive social robots for people with special needs,” Proceedings of 2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics, IC3I 2014, pp. 1374–1380, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Muhammad Sikandar Lal Khan, Haibo Li, and Shafiq Ur Réhman, “Embodied tele-presence system (ETS): Designing tele-presence for video teleconferencing,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 8518, no. 2, pp. 574–585, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Haibo Li, Muhammad Sikandar Lal Khan, and Shafiq Ur Réhman, “Embodied tele-presence system (ETS): Designing tele-presence for video teleconferencing,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 8518, no. 2, pp. 574–585, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Cesar Lucho, Francisco Cuellar, Dante Arroyo, and Pedro Cisneros, “Prime: Towards the design of a small interactive office robot,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 8755, pp. 34–43, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Byron V. Galbraith, Frank H. Guenther, and Massimiliano Versace, “A neural network-based exploratory learning and motor planning system for co-robots,” Frontiers in Neurorobotics, vol. 9, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jan B. F. van Erp, and Alexander Toet, “Social Touch in Human–Computer Interaction,” Frontiers in Digital Humanities, vol. 2, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Juan Antonio López-Riquelme, Juan Jesús Pinuaga-Cascales, Joaquín Ferruz-Melero, Nieves Pavón-Pulido, and Raul Morais Dos Santos, “Cybi: A smart companion robot for elderly people: Improving teleoperation and telepresence skills by combining cloud computing technologies and fuzzy logic,” Proceedings - 2015 IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions, ICARSC 2015, pp. 198–203, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Bogdan Kreczmer, Filip Grzeszczak, Dorota Szczesniak-Stanczyk, Krzysztof Arent, and Bartlomiej Stanczyk, “Video Conferencing Applications for ReMeDi Robotic System,” Journal Of Medical Imaging And Health Informatics, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 1622–1630, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Kaiko Kuwamura, Takashi Minato, Shuichi Nishio, and Hiroshi Ishiguro, “Inconsistency of personality evaluation caused by appearance gap in robotic telecommunication*,” Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 249–271, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jorge Solis, Teshome D. Teshome, and Jose Pablo De La Rosa, “Towards developing a multipurpose assistive vehicle robot capable of providing assistance to caregivers and support to elderly people,” IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 2015-, pp. 1145–1150, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Veronika Domova, Elina Vartiainen, and Marcus Englund, “Expert on wheels: An approach to remote collaboration,” HAI 2015 - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, pp. 49–54, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • David F. Duftypp. 55–78, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Marc Denojean-Mairet, Qing Tan, Frederique Pivot, and Mohamed Ally, “A ubiquitous computing platform - Affordable telepresence robot design and applications,” Proceedings - 17th IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, CSE 2014, Jointly with 13th IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Communications, IUCC 2014, 13th International Symposium on Pervasive Systems, Algorithms, and Networks, I-SPAN 2014 and 8th International Conference on Frontier of Computer Science and Technology, FCST 2014, pp. 793–798, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Leila Takayama, “Telepresence and Apparent Agency in Human-Robot Interaction,” The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology, pp. 160–175, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Sven Kratz, Bee Liew, Don Kimber, Patrick Proppe, Jim Vaughan, Don Severns, and Weiqing Su, “Polly: Telepresence from a guide’s shoulder,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 8927, pp. 509–523, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Andrey Kiselev, Annica Kristoffersson, Amy Loutfi, Andrey Kiselev, Annica Kristoffersson, and Amy Loutfi, “Combining semi-autonomous navigation with manned behaviour in a cooperative driving system for mobile robotic telepresence,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 8928, pp. 17–28, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Tom Goeckel, Stefan Schiffrt, Hermann Wagner, Gerhard Lakemeyer, Tom Goeckel, Stefan Schiffrt, Hermann Wagner, and Gerhard Lakemeyer, “The Video Conference Tool Robot VICToR,” Intelligent Robotics And Applications (Icira 2015), Pt Ii, vol. 9245, pp. 61–73, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Karina R. Liles, Jenay M. Beer, Rachel E. Stuck, and Allison A. Kacmar, “Understanding retirement community employees' perceived benefits and concerns of smart presence technology,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol. 2015-, pp. 75–79, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jun Yamaguchi, Christian Parone, Deborah Di Federico, Pierluigi Beomonte Zobel, and Giorgio Felzani, “Measuring Benefits of Telepresence robot for Individuals with Motor Impairments,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 217, pp. 703–709, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jorge Solis, and Jose Pablo De La Rosa, “Development of a human-friendly walking assistive robot vehicle: System integration and preliminary stability tests,” 2015 IFToMM World Congress Proceedings, IFToMM 2015, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Masahiko Narita, Toru Izui, Sachiko Nakagawa, Yosuke Tsuchiya, Nobuto Matsuhira, and Yuka Kato, “Development Framework for Non-experts targeting the Network Robot Service,” Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 807–817, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Irene Rae, Gina Venolia, John C. Tang, and David Molnarpp. 1552–1566, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Sotiris Avgousti, Eftychios G. Christoforou, Andreas S. Panayides, Sotos Voskarides, Cyril Novales, Laurence Nouaille, Constantinos S. Pattichis, and Pierre Vieyres, “Medical telerobotic systems: current status and future trends,” BioMedical Engineering OnLine, vol. 15, no. 1, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Yoshifumi Kokubo, Eri Sato-Shimokawara, and Toru Yamaguchi, “Relationship Between Personal Space and the Big Five with Telepresence Robot,” Intelligent Robotics and Applications, vol. 9835, pp. 257–265, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Xiang Lu, Linlin Tu, Xinyun Zhou, Naixue Xiong, and Limin Sun, “ViMediaNet: an emulation system for interactive multimedia based telepresence services,” The Journal of Supercomputing, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jung Ju Choi, and Sonya S. Kwak, “Who is This?: Identity and Presence in Robot-mediated Communication,” Cognitive Systems Research, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Hyelip Lee, Yeon-Ho Kim, Kwang-ku Lee, Dae-Keun Yoon, and Bum-Jae You, “Designing the Appearance of a Telepresence Robot, M4K: A Case Study,” Cultural Robotics, vol. 9549, pp. 33–43, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Kaiko Kuwamura, Shuichi Nishio, and Shinichi Sato, “Can We Talk through a Robot As if Face-to-Face? Long-Term Fieldwork Using Teleoperated Robot for Seniors with Alzheimer's Disease,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 7, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Andrea Orlandini, Malin Nilsson, Lasse Odens Hedman, Eleni Odontidou, Lorenza Tiberio, Patrik Björkman, Cipriano Galindo, Andrey Kiselev, Amy Loutfi, Francisco Melendez, Jose-Raul Ruiz-Sarmiento, Mårten Scherlund, Stephen von Rump, Annica Kristoffersson, Silvia Coradeschi, Lena Almquist, Amedeo Cesta, Gabriella Cortellessa, Javier Gonzalez-Jimenez, and Kalle Gustafsson, “ExCITE project: A review of forty-two months of robotic telepresence technology evolution,” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 204–221, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Alessandro Di Nuovo, Ning Wang, Frank Broz, Tony Belpaeme, Ray  Jones, and Angelo Cangelosi, “Experimental Evaluation of a Multi-modal User Interface for a Robotic Service,” Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems, vol. 9716, pp. 87–98, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Victor Kaptelinin, “Supporting Referential Gestures in Mobile Remote Presence: A Preliminary Exploration,” Inclusive Smart Cities and Digital Health, vol. 9677, pp. 262–267, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Guglielmo Gemignani, Roberto Capobianco, Emanuele Bastianelli, Domenico Daniele Bloisi, Luca Iocchi, and Daniele Nardi, “Living with robots: Interactive environmental knowledge acquisition,” Robotics And Autonomous Systems, vol. 78, pp. 1–16, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Eduard Clotet, Dani Martínez, Javier Moreno, Marcel Tresanchez, and Jordi Palacín, “Assistant Personal Robot (APR): Conception and Application of a Tele-Operated Assisted Living Robot,” Sensors, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 610, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Carman Neustaedter, Gina Venolia, Jason Procyk, and Daniel Hawkins, “To beam or not to beam: A study of remote telepresence attendance at an academic conference,” Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW, vol. 27, pp. 418–431, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Yohei Yamaguchi, Eri Sato-Shimokawara, Toru Yamaguchi, and Yoshifumi Kokubo, “Influence of approaching patterns of Telepresence Robot for personal space,” TAAI 2015 - 2015 Conference on Technologies and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 221–226, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Kataru Venkata Kavya, Suresh, and Umamakeswari, “A telepresence mobile robot controlling and real time detection using internet of things,” Indian Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 48, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Susan C. HerringEmerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp. 1–16, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Krit Janard, and Worawan Marurngsith, “Usability Evaluation of a Raspberry-Pi Telepresence Robot Controlled by Android Smartphones,” Robotics in Education, vol. 457, pp. 193–205, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • M.S.L. Khan, Haibo Li, and Shafiq ur Réhman, “Telepresence Mechatronic Robot (TEBoT): Towards the design and control of socially interactive bio-inspired system,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 2597–2610, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Zachary Henkel, Jesus Suarez, Vasant Srinivasan, and Robin R. Murphy, “Medical field exercise with a social telepresence robot,” Paladyn, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Sebastiaan Koenen, and Jos van Hillegersberg, “Adoption of web-based group decision support systems: Experiences from the field and future developments,” International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 49–64, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Veronica A. Newhart, Leonard S. Sender, and Mark Warschauer, “Virtual inclusion via telepresence robots in the classroom: An exploratory case study,” International Journal of Technologies in Learning, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 9–25, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Haibo Li, Muhammad Sikandar Lal Khan, and Shafiq Ur Réhman, “Tele-immersion: Virtual reality based collaboration,” Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 617, pp. 352–357, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Mahmoud Afifi, Mostafa Korashy, Ali H. Ahmed, Zenab Hafez, and Marwa Nasser, “Telepresence robot using microsoft kinect sensor and video glasses,” Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 407, pp. 91–101, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jorge Solis, “Pilot Experiments with the Human-Friendly Walking Assisting Robot Vehicle (hWALK),” CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, Courses and Lectures, vol. 569, pp. 395–402, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ashalatha Kunnappilly, Cristina Seceleanu, and Maria Lindén, “Do we need an integrated framework for ambient assisted living?,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 10070, pp. 52–63, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Alessandro Di Nuovo, Frank Broz, Ning Wang, Tony Belpaeme, Angelo Cangelosi, Ray Jones, Raffaele Esposito, Filippo Cavallo, and Paolo Dario, “The multi-modal interface of Robot-Era multi-robot services tailored for the elderly,” Intelligent Service Robotics, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Alexander D. Shevyakov, Nikolay U. Dema, Sergey A. Kolyubin, and Aleksei I. Shchekoldin, “Adaptive head movements tracking algorithms for AR interface controlled telepresence robot,” 2017 22nd International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics, MMAR 2017, pp. 728–733, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Gabriella Cortellessa, Francesca Fracasso, Alessandra Sorrentino, Andrea Orlandini, Giulio Bernardi, Luca Coraci, Riccardo De Benedictis, and Amedeo Cesta, “ROBIN, a Telepresence Robot to Support Older Users Monitoring and Social Inclusion: Development and Evaluation,” Telemedicine and e-Health, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • William Gu, Gerald Seet, and Nadia Magnenat-Thalmanna, “Perception-Link Behavior Model: Supporting a Novel Operator Interface for a Customizable Anthropomorphic Telepresence Robot,” Robotics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 16, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Paul Adam Bremner, Oya Celiktutan, and Hatice Gunes, “Personality Perception of Robot Avatar Teleoperators in Solo and Dyadic Tasks,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 4, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Mina Choi, Leila Takayama, Bilge Mutlu, and Rachel Kornfield, “Movement matters: Effects of motion and mimicry on perception of similarity and closeness in robot-mediated communication,” Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, vol. 2017-, pp. 325–335, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Natasa Koceska, Saso Koceski, Vasko Sazdovski, and Domenico Ciambrone, “Robotic Assistant for Elderly Care – Development and Evaluation,” International Journal of Automation Technology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 425–432, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Uriel Martinez-Hernandez, Luke W. Boorman, and Tony J. Prescott, “Multisensory Wearable Interface for Immersion and Telepresence in Robotics,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 2534–2541, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Yoshifumi Kokubo, Eri Sato-Shimokawara, and Toru Yamaguchi, “Movement support system of Telepresence Robot based on operating skill,” 2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence, SSCI 2016, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Benjamin Gleason, and Christine Greenhow, “Hybrid learning in higher education: The potential of teaching and learning with robot-mediated communication,” Online Learning Journal, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 159–176, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Francisco Melendez-Fernandez, Cipriano Galindo, and Javier Gonzalez-Jimenez, “A web-based solution for robotic telepresence,” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 172988141774373, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Brittany Bice-Urbach, Tom Kratochwill, and Aaron J Fischer, “Teleconsultation: Application to Provision of Consultation Services for School Consultants,” Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, pp. 1–24, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Urska Arnautovska, Tamara Ownsworth, Wendy Moyle, and Cindy Jones, “Potential of telepresence robots to enhance social connectedness in older adults with dementia: An integrative review of feasibility,” International Psychogeriatrics, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1951–1964, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Stefanie Baisch, Thorsten Kolling, Arthur Schall, Saskia Rühl, Stefanie Selic, Ziyon Kim, Holger Rossberg, Barbara Klein, Johannes Pantel, Frank Oswald, and Monika Knopf, “Acceptance of Social Robots by Elder People: Does Psychosocial Functioning Matter?,” International Journal of Social Robotics, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Elizabeth Broadbent, “Interactions with Robots: The Truths We Reveal about Ourselves,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 68, pp. 627–652, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Xian Wu, Jenay M. Beer, Tracy L. Mitzner, Rebecca C. Thomas, and Emma C. Drobina, “Telepresence heuristic evaluation for adults aging with mobility impairment,” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol. 2017-, pp. 16–20, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Biruk A. Gebre, and Kishore Pochiraju, “Ball drive configurations and kinematics for holonomic ground mobility,” ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE), vol. 14, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Yulin Xu, Xin Li, Aolei Yang, Chunli Zhu, Yanbo Liu, Yuzhang Jin, Ling Chen, and Yanran Long, “Design of Remote Medical Care Service Robot System,” Xitong Fangzhen Xuebao / Journal of System Simulation, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 3238–3248, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Yuichi Tsumaki, Hyun-Tae Han, and Yoshimune Nonomura, “Communication capability of telepresence system with the miniature humanoid MH-2,” Artificial Life and Robotics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 328–337, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Aaron J. Fischer, Bradley S. Bloomfield, Racheal R. Clark, Amelia L. McClelland, and William P. Erchul, “Increasing student compliance with teacher instructions using telepresence robot problem-solving teleconsultation,” International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, pp. 1–15, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Tetsuo Tomizawa, Masato Shibuya, Ryodo Tanaka, and Takeshi Nishida, “Developing a Remotely Operated Portable Mobile Robot,” Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 584–590, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Christoph Stahl, Thibaud Latour, and Dimitra Anastasiou, “Social telepresence robots - the role of gesture for collaboration over a distance,” ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 409–414, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Núria Vallès-Peris, Cecilio Angulo, and Miquel Domènech, “Children’s Imaginaries of Human-Robot Interaction in Healthcare,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 970, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Sina Radmard, AJung Moon, and Elizabeth A. Croft, “Impacts of Visual Occlusion and Its Resolution in Robot-Mediated Social Collaborations,” International Journal of Social Robotics, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Tanya Holt, Nazmi Sari, Gregory Hansen, Matthew Bradshaw, Michael Prodanuk, Veronica McKinney, Rachel Johnson, and Ivar Mendez, “Remote Presence Robotic Technology Reduces Need for Pediatric Interfacility Transportation from an Isolated Northern Community,” Telemedicine and e-Health, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Amir Yazdani, Tucker Hermans, Roya Sabbagh Novin, and Andrew Merryweather, “Dynamic Model Learning and Manipulation Planning for Objects in Hospitals Using a Patient Assistant Mobile (PAM)Robot,” IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 7172–7178, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Thorsten Kolling, Frank Oswald, Monika Knopf, Stefanie Baisch, Barbara Klein, and Johannes Pantel, “Dynamic interplay between general experience and robot-specific expertise at older adults' first encounter with a robot: Role for robot acceptance and implications for robot design,” Gerontechnology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 215–231, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Muhammad Sikandar Lal Khan, Alaa Halawani, Shafiq Ur Rehman, and Haibo Li, “Action Augmented Real Virtuality: A Design for Presence,” IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 961–972, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Arsenio Reis, Isabel Barroso, Maria Joao Monteiro, Rui Xavier, Hugo Paredes, and Joao Barroso, “The usage of telepresence robots to support the elderly,” TISHW 2018 - 2nd International Conference on Technology and Innovation in Sports, Health and Wellbeing, Proceedings, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Lillian Yang, Brennan Jones, Carman Neustaedter, and Samarth Singhal, “Shopping Over Distance through a Telepresence Robot,” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 2, no. CSCW, pp. 1–18, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Argyris Argyrou, Antonis Jossif, Panicos Masouras, Cyril Novales, Sotiris Avgousti, Andreas S. Panayides, Eftychios G. Christoforou, and Pierre Vieyres, “Medical telerobotics and the remote ultrasonography paradigm over 4g wireless networks,” 2018 IEEE 20th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services, Healthcom 2018, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jianfeng Xu, Emi Myodo, Hideaki Kuzuoka, and Etsuko T. Harada, “Putting Pressure: Influence of Telepresence Robot in Communication between Teleworking Boss and Subordinates,” RO-MAN 2018 - 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 605–611, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ville Kyrki, Roel Pieters, Alexandre Angleraud, and Quentin Houbre, “Human-Robot Interactive Learning Architecture using Ontologies and Symbol Manipulation,” RO-MAN 2018 - 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 384–389, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Minkyeong Lee, Okyu Choi, Hyelip Lee, Minsoo Han, Andrea Bianchi, and Bum-Jae You, “Designing On-Body 2D Patterns to Enhance Subsidiary Communication for Telepresence Robots,” RO-MAN 2018 - 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 222–227, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Ming Lei, Ian M. Clemente, and Ying Hu, “Student in the shell: The robotic body and student engagement,” Computers & Education, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Patrik Björnfot, Victor Kaptelinin, and Joakim Bergqvist, “Non-technical users' first encounters with a robotic telepresence technology: An empirical study of office workers,” Paladyn, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 307–322, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Emi Myodo, Jianfeng Xu, Kazuyuki Tasaka, Hiromasa Yanagihara, and Shigeyuki Sakazawa, “[Invited Paper] Issues and Solutions to Informal Communication in Working from Home Using a Telepresence Robot,” ITE Transactions on Media Technology and Applications, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 30–45, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • William Kristian Juel, Norbert Krüger, and Leon Bodenhagen, “Robots for elderly care institutions: How they may affect elderly care,” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 311, pp. 221–230, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Mingshao Zhang, Pengji Duan, Zhou Zhang, and Sven Esche, “Development of telepresence teaching robots with social capabilities,” ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE), vol. 5, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Jenay M. Beer, and Otis L. Owens, “Social agents for aging-in-place,” Aging, Technology and Health, pp. 237–259, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Banu Saatçi, Roman Rädle, Sean Rintel, Kenton O’Hara, and Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose, “Hybrid Meetings in the Modern Workplace: Stories of Success and Failure,” Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing, vol. 11677, pp. 45–61, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Dimitra Anastasiou, Christoph Stahl, and Thibaud Latour, “The Role of Gesture in Social Telepresence Robots—A Scenario of Distant Collaborative Problem-Solving,” Social Robots: Technological, Societal and Ethical Aspects of Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 61–83, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Sai Krishna Pathi, Andrey Kiselev, Annica Kristoffersson, Dirk Repsilber, and Amy Loutfi, “A Novel Method for Estimating Distances from a Robot to Humans Using Egocentric RGB Camera,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 14, pp. 3142, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Conor McGinn, “Why Do Robots Need a Head? The Role of Social Interfaces on Service Robots,” International Journal of Social Robotics, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Marketta Niemelä, and Helinä Melkas, “Robots as Social and Physical Assistants in Elderly Care,” Human-Centered Digitalization and Services, vol. 19, pp. 177–197, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Masahiko Osawa, and Michita Imai, “A Robot for Test Bed Aimed at Improving Telepresence System and Evasion from Discomfort Stimuli by Online Learning,” International Journal of Social Robotics, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Leon Bodenhagen, Stefan-Daniel Suvei, William Kristian Juel, Erik Brander, and Norbert Krüger, “Robot technology for future welfare: meeting upcoming societal challenges – an outlook with offset in the development in Scandinavia,” Health and Technology, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Sami Haddadin, Lars Johannsmeier, and Fernando Diaz Ledezma, “Tactile robots as a central embodiment of the tactile internet,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 471–487, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Federica Bazzano, Fabrizio Lamberti, Andrea Sanna, and Marco Gaspardone, “The Impact of Field of View on Robotic Telepresence Navigation Tasks,” Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics – Theory and Applications, vol. 983, pp. 66–81, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  • Hee Doo Yang, Brandyn T. Greczek, and Alan T. Asbeck, “Modeling and Analysis of a High-Displacement Pneumatic Artificial Muscle With Integrated Sensing,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 5, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar