Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Volume 2016, Article ID 3676704, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3676704
Research Article

Appraisals of Salient Visual Elements in Web Page Design

Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, University of Jyvaskyla, Mattilanniemi 2, 40100 Jyväskylä, Finland

Received 29 November 2015; Revised 9 March 2016; Accepted 16 March 2016

Academic Editor: Thomas Mandl

Copyright © 2016 Johanna M. Silvennoinen and Jussi P. P. Jokinen. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. Mullet and D. Sano, Designing Visual Interfaces: Communication Oriented Techniques, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1995.
  2. T. Schlatter and D. Levinson, Visual Usability, Principles and Practices for Designing Digital Applications, Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, Mass, USA, 2013.
  3. J. Silvennoinen, M. Vogel, and S. Kujala, “Experiencing visual usability and aesthetics in two mobile application contexts,” Journal of Usability Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 46–62, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  4. L. Hallnäs and J. Redström, “From use to presence: on the expressions and aesthetics of everyday computational things,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 106–124, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Hassenzahl and A. Monk, “The inference of perceived usability from beauty,” Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 235–260, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. Tractinsky, A. S. Katz, and D. Ikar, “What is beautiful is usable,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 127–145, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. van Schaik and J. Ling, “Modelling user experience with web sites: usability, hedonic value, beauty and goodness,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 419–432, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Moshagen and M. T. Thielsch, “Facets of visual aesthetics,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 689–709, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. Tsonos and G. Kouroupetroglou, “Modeling reader's emotional state response on document's typographic elements,” Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 2011, Article ID 206983, 18 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. Tractinsky, “Visual aesthetics: in human-computer interaction and interaction design,” in Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, M. Soegaard and D. Rikke Friis, Eds., The Interaction Design Foundation, Aarhus, Denmark, 2012, http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/visual_aesthetics.html. View at Google Scholar
  11. R. W. Veryzer Jr. and J. W. Hutchinson, “The influence of unity and prototypicality on aesthetic responses to new product designs,” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 374–394, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. W.-K. Hung and L.-L. Chen, “Effects of novelty and its dimensions on aesthetic preference in product design,” International Journal of Design, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 81–90, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  13. P. Hekkert, D. Snelders, and P. C. W. Van Wieringen, “'Most advanced, yet acceptable': typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design,” British Journal of Psychology, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 111–124, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. I. Reppa and S. McDougall, “When the going gets tough the beautiful get going: aesthetic appeal facilitates task performance,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1243–1254, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Silvennoinen, “Towards essential visual variables in user interface design,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advances in Human-Computer Interactions, pp. 229–234, Barcelona, Spain, March 2014.
  16. N. H. Frijda, “The laws of emotion,” American Psychologist, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 349–358, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. S. Lazarus, “Relational meaning and discrete emotions,” in Appraisal Processes in Emotion, K. L. Scherer, A. Schorr, and T. Johnstone, Eds., pp. 37–67, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  18. K. R. Scherer, “The dynamic architecture of emotion: evidence for the component process model,” Cognition & Emotion, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1307–1351, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. N. Tractinsky, A. Cokhavi, M. Kirschenbaum, and T. Sharfi, “Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 1071–1083, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K.-C. Hamborg, J. Hülsmann, and K. Kaspar, “The interplay between usability and aesthetics: more evidence for the ‘what is usable is beautiful’ notion,” Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 2014, Article ID 946239, 13 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Sonderegger, G. Zbinden, A. Uebelbacher, and J. Sauer, “The influence of product aesthetics and usability over the course of time: a longitudinal field experiment,” Ergonomics, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 713–730, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Thüring and S. Mahlke, “Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human-technology interaction,” International Journal of Psychology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 253–264, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering, Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1993.
  24. J. Iivari, H. Isomäki, and S. Pekkola, “The user-the great unknown of systems development: reasons, forms, challenges, experiences and intellectual contributions of user involvement,” Information Systems Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 109–117, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. B. Bygstad, G. Ghinea, and E. Brevik, “Software development methods and usability: perspectives from a survey in the software industry in Norway,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 375–385, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. Cyr, “Emotion and website design,” in Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, M. Soegaard and D. Rikke Friis, Eds., The Interaction-Design Foundation, Aarhus, Denmark, 2013, http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/emotion_and_website_design.html. View at Google Scholar
  27. P. Desmet, K. Overbeeke, and S. Tax, “Designing products with added emotional value: development and appllcation of an approach for research through design,” The Design Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 32–47, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. E. Demir, P. M. A. Desmet, and P. Hekkert, “Appraisal patterns of emotions in human-product interaction,” International Journal of Design, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 41–51, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. P. P. Jokinen, “Emotional user experience: traits, events, and states,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 76, pp. 67–77, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. P. Saariluoma and J. P. P. Jokinen, “Appraisal and mental contents in human-technology interaction,” International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–32, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. Karvonen, “The beauty of simplicity,” in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability (CUU '00), pp. 85–90, Washington, DC, USA, November 2000.
  32. G. Lindgaard, C. Dudek, D. Sen, L. Sumegi, and P. Noonan, “An exploration of relations between visual appeal, trustworthiness and perceived usability of homepages,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 18, no. 1, article 1, 30 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. Cyr, M. Head, and H. Larios, “Colour appeal in website design within and across cultures: a multi-method evaluation,” International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 68, no. 1-2, pp. 1–21, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Wiberg and E. Robles, “Computational compositions: aesthetics, materials, and interaction design,” International Journal of Design, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 65–76, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  35. L. Hallnäs, “On the foundations of interaction design aesthetics: revisiting the notions of form and expression,” International Journal of Design, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 73–84, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  36. D. Norman, Emotional Design, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
  37. J. Dewey, Art as Experience, Capricorn Books, New York, NY, USA, 1958.
  38. P. Hekkert, “Design aesthetics: principles of pleasure in design,” Psychology Science, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 157–172, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  39. K. R. Scherer, “What are emotions? And how can they be measured?” Social Science Information, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 695–729, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C. A. Smith and P. C. Ellsworth, “Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 813–838, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. P. Saariluomaand and J. P. P. Jokinen, “Emotional dimensions of user experience: a user psychological analysis,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 303–320, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Hassenzahl, “User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality,” in Proceedings of the 20th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine (IHM '08), pp. 11–15, ACM, Metz, France, September 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. L. Berkowitz, “Frustration-aggression hypothesis: examination and reformulation,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 59–73, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. Folkman and R. S. Lazarus, “If it changes it must be a process: study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 150–170, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. R. S. Lazarus and B. N. Lazarus, Passion and Reason, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1994.
  46. D. E. Berlyne, Aesthetics and Psychobiology, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, NY, USA, 1971.
  47. D. Curtiss, Introduction to Visual Literacy: A Guide to the Visual Arts and Communication, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1987.
  48. M. Tähti and L. Arhippainen, “A proposal of collecting emotions and experiences,” in Interactive Experiences in HCI, vol. 2, pp. 195–198, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  49. M. Tähti and M. Niemelä, “3E—expressing emotions and experiences,” in Proceedings of the WP9 Workshop on Innovative Approaches for Evaluating Affective Systems. HUMAINE (Human-Machine Interaction Network on Emotion), Stockholm, Sweden, February 2006.
  50. CSS Zen Garden Gallery, http://www.csszengarden.com.
  51. E. Raita and A. Oulasvirta, “Too good to be bad: favorable product expectations boost subjective usability ratings,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 363–371, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. P. Bell, “Content analysis of visual images,” in Handbook of Visual Analysis, T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt, Eds., Sage, London, UK, 4th edition, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  53. H. Zettl, Sight, Sound, Motion: Applied Media Aesthetics, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Boston, Mass, USA, 1999.
  54. M. Collier, “Approaches to analysis in visual anthropology,” in Handbook of Visual Analysis, T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt, Eds., Sage, London, UK, 4th edition, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  55. K. Krippendorf, Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodologies, Sage, London, UK, 1980.
  56. T. van Leeuwen, “Semiotics and iconography,” in Handbook of Visual Analysis, T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt, Eds., Sage, London, UK, 4th edition, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  57. C. Jewitt and R. Oyama, “Visual meaning: a social semiotic approach,” in Handbook of Visual Analysis, T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt, Eds., Sage, London, UK, 4th edition, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  58. G. Rose, Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials, Sage, London, UK, 2005.
  59. R. Poulin, The Language of Graphic Design: An Illustrated Handbook of Understanding Fundamental Design Principles, Rockport Publishers, Beverly, Mass, USA, 2011.
  60. T. van Leeuwen and G. Kress, Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design, Taylor & Francis, 2nd edition, 2006.