Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 5781363, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5781363
Research Article

UbiCompass: An IoT Interaction Concept

1Lund University, P.O. Box 118, 221 00 Lund, Sweden
2Sony Mobile Communications, Nya Vattentornet, 221 88 Lund, Sweden
3Axis Communications, Emdalavägen 14, 223 69 Lund, Sweden

Correspondence should be addressed to Günter Alce; es.htl.ngised@ecla.retnug

Received 26 September 2017; Accepted 5 February 2018; Published 12 April 2018

Academic Editor: Thomas Mandl

Copyright © 2018 Günter Alce et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Mann, “Wearable computing as means for personal empowerment,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Int. Conf. on Wearable Computing (ICWC), pp. 51–59, 1998. View at Scopus
  2. Global Standards Initiative on Internet of Things (IoT-GSI), “Internet of Things Global Standards Initiative,” 2015.
  3. S. Poslad, Ubiquitous Computing: Smart Devices, Environments and Interactions, Wiley, 2009. View at Scopus
  4. B. Johanson, A. Fox, and T. Winograd, “The interactive workspaces project: Experiences with ubiquitous computing rooms,” IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 67–74, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Yuanchun et al., “The smart classroom: merging technologies for seamless tele-education,” IEEE Pervasive Comput, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 47–55, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  6. D. Molyneaux et al., “Interactive environment-aware handheld projectors for pervasive computing spaces,” in Pervasive Computing, pp. 197–215, Springer, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  7. Y. Rogers, The changing face of human-computer interaction in the age of ubiquitous computing, Springer, 2009. View at Scopus
  8. L. Atzori, A. Iera, and G. Morabito, “The internet of things: a survey,” Computer Networks, vol. 54, no. 15, pp. 2787–2805, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. Ledo, S. Greenberg, N. Marquardt, and S. Boring, “Proxemic-Aware Controls: Designing Remote Controls for Ubiquitous Computing Ecologies,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 187–198, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. A. Norman, “Natural user interfaces are not natural,” Interactions, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 6–10, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Rogers, “Moving on from Weiser’s Vision of Calm Computing: Engaging UbiComp Experiences,” in Proceedings of the UbiComp: Ubiquitous Computing - 8th International Conference, P. Dourish and A. Friday, Eds., pp. 404–421, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. Q. Sun, W. Yu, N. Kochurov, Q. Hao, and F. Hu, “A Multi-Agent-Based Intelligent Sensor and Actuator Network Design for Smart House and Home Automation,” Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 557–588, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  13. H. Wirtz, J. Rüth, M. Serror, J. Á. B. Link, and K. Wehrle, “Opportunistic interaction in the challenged internet of things,” in Proceedings of the 9th ACM MobiCom Workshop on Challenged Networks, pp. 7–12, 2014. View at Scopus
  14. Fibaro Group, “Fibaro Homecenter 2 Z-Wave controller,” 2015.
  15. SmartThings Inc., “Smart Home. Intelligent Living,” 2014.
  16. Apple Inc., “iOS 9 - HomeKit,” 2015.
  17. Google Inc., “weave - google developers,” 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Ringwald, “Ubicontrol: providing new and easy ways to interact with various consumer devices,” in Proceedings of the Adjunct Proceedings, p. 81, 2002.
  19. M. Budde et al., “Point & control--interaction in smart environments: you only click twice,” in Proceedings of the ACM conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication, pp. 303–306, 2013.
  20. D. Fleer and C. Leichsenring, “MISO: A context-sensitive multimodal interface for smart objects based on hand gestures and finger snaps,” in Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pp. 93-94, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. A. De Freitas, M. Nebeling, X. Chen, J. Yang, A. S. K. K. Ranithangam, and A. K. Dey, “Snap-To-It: A user-inspired platform for opportunistic device interactions,” in Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 5909–5920, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Nassani, H. Bai, G. Lee, and M. Billinghurst, “Tag it!: AR annotation using wearable sensors,” in Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH Asia Mobile Graphics and Interactive Applications, p. 12, Japan, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Mayer and G. Soros, “User Interface Beaming--Seamless Interaction with Smart Things Using Personal Wearable Computers,” in Proceedings of the Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks Workshops (BSN Workshops), 11th International Conference, pp. 46–49, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Boring, D. Baur, A. Butz, S. Gustafson, and P. Baudisch, “Touch projector: Mobile interaction through video,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2287–2296, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. T. Seifried et al., “CRISTAL: a collaborative home media and device controller based on a multi-touch display,” in Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pp. 33–40, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. Lund University, “EASE - Embedded Applications Software Engineering,” http://ease.cs.lth.se, [Accessed: 16-Jan-2018].
  27. Lund University, “MAPCI - Mobile and Pervasive Computing Institute Lund University,” http://mapci.lu.se/, [Accessed: 16-Jan-2018].
  28. Axis Communications, “Axis Communications,” https://www.axis.com/, [Accessed: 16-Jan-2018]. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. Sony, “Sony Mobile,” http://www.sonymobile.com, [Accessed: 16-Jan-2018].
  30. K. Lyons, “What can a dumb watch teach a smartwatch? Informing the design of smartwatches,” in Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pp. 3–10, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Sony, “Sony SmartWatch 3 SWR50,” 2014.
  32. ASUS, “Dual-Band Wireless-N600 Gigabit Router,” 2015.
  33. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD, “Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge,” 2015.
  34. Sonos, “PLAY:1 Wireless Speaker- Compact & Powerful,” 2013.
  35. Zipato, “Zipato RGBW bulb,” 2015.
  36. Aeotec, “Z-Wave LED Bulb with RGBW,” 2015.
  37. Fibaro Group, “Wall Plug Switch Indoor,” 2015.
  38. Fibaro Group, “FIBARO Motion Sensor,” 2015.
  39. Fibaro Group, “Google Play - Fibaro,” 2015.
  40. V. Jean-Christophe, “GDomotique Fibaro - SONOS Remote V1.0.0 beta pour Fibaro HC2,” 2016.
  41. Nasa, “Nasa TLX homepage,” 2016.
  42. S. Hart, “NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later,” in Proceedings of the Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet, 2006.
  43. J. Brooke, “SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale,” Usability Evaluation in Industry, vol. 189, no. 194, pp. 4–7, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  44. T. Tullis and W. Albert, Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics (Interactive Technologies), Morgan Kaufmann, 2008.
  45. A. Jean-Marie, “BeSpoon,” 2015.
  46. M. Harris, “MIT turns Wi-Fi Into Indoor GPS,” 2016.
  47. J. Sauro, “Click Versus Clock: Measuring Website Efficiency,” 2011.
  48. Y. Rogers and H. Sharp, Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, Wiley, 2002.