Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2011, Article ID 204576, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/204576
Research Article

Chern-Simons: Fano and Calabi-Yau

1Theoretical Physics Group, Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK
2KITP, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4030, USA
3Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, Oxford University, 1 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3NP, UK
4Collegium Mertonense in Academia Oxoniensi, Merton College, Oxford OX1 4JD, UK
5Mathematical Institute, Oxford University, 24-29 St. Giles', Oxford OX1 3LB, UK

Received 13 October 2010; Accepted 6 March 2011

Academic Editor: André Lukas

Copyright © 2011 Amihay Hanany and Yang-Hui He. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Bagger and N. Lambert, “Modeling multiple M2-branes,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 4, Article ID 045020, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. J. Bagger and N. Lambert, “Gauge symmetry and supersymmetry of multiple M2-branes,” Physical Review D, vol. 77, no. 6, Article ID 065008, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. J. Bagger and N. Lambert, “Comments on multiple M2-branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 2, article 105, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Gustavsson, “Algebraic structures on parallel M2 branes,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 811, no. 1-2, pp. 66–76, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Van Raamsdonk, “Comments on the Bagger-Lambert theory and multiple M2-branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 5, article 105, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Mukhi and C. Papageorgakis, “M2 to D2,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 5, article 085, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis, and J. Maldacena, “N = 6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 10, article 091, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. M. Benna, I. Klebanov, T. Klose, and M. Smedbäck, “Superconformal Chern-Simons theories and AdS/CFT correspondence,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 9, article 072, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Kim, S. Lee, S. Lee, and J. Park, “M2-brane probe dynamics and toric duality,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 797, no. 1-2, pp. 340–370, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. K. Hosomichi, K. -M. Lee, S. Lee, S. Lee, and J. Park, “N = 5, 6 superconformal Chern-Simons theories and M2-branes on orbifolds,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 9, article 002, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. M. Schnabl and Y. Tachikawa, “Classification of N = 6 superconformal theories of ABJM type,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 9, article 103, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. D. Martelli and J. Sparks, “Moduli spaces of Chern-Simons quiver gauge theories and AdS4/CFT3,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 12, Article ID 126005, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. A. Hanany and A. Zaffaroni, “Tilings, Chern-Simons theories and M2 branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 10, article 111, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. A. Hanany, D. Vegh, and A. Zaffaroni, “Brane tilings and M2 branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 3, article 012, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y. Imamura and K. Kimura, “On the moduli space of elliptic Maxwell-Chern-Simons theories,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 509–523, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. Imamura and K. Kimura, “N = 4 Chern-Simons theories with auxiliary vector multiplets,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 10, article 040, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. Y. Imamura and K. Kimura, “Quiver Chern-Simons theories and crystals,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 10, article 114, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. K. Ueda and M. Yamazaki, “Toric Calabi-Yau four-folds dual to Chern-Simons-matter theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 12, article 045, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. S. Franco, A. Hanany, J. Park, and D. Rodriguez-Gomez, “Towards M2-brane theories for generic toric singularities,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 12, article 110, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  20. A. Hanany and Y. H. He, “M2-branes and quiver Chern-Simons: a taxonomic study,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.4044.
  21. O. Aharony, O. Bergman, and D. L. Jafferis, “Fractional M2-branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 11, article 043, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. C. Krishnan, C. MacCaferri, and H. Singh, “M2-brane flows and the Chern-Simons level,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 5, article 114, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Y. Imamura, “Charges and homologies in AdS4/CFT3,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.3095.
  24. S. Franco, I. R. Klebanov, and D. Rodríguez-Gómez, “M2-branes on orbifolds of the cone over Q1,1,1,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 8, article 033, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. Davey, A. Hanany, N. Mekareeya, and G. Torri, “Phases of M2-brane theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 6, article 025, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Amariti, D. Forcella, L. Girardello, and A. Mariotti, “3D Seiberg-like dualities and M2 branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 5, article 025, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. BO. Feng, A. Hanany, and Y. H. He, “D-brane gauge theories from toric singularities and toric duality,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 595, no. 1-2, pp. 165–200, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. B. Feng, A. Hanany, and Y. H. He, “Phase structure of D-brane gauge theories and toric duality,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 5, no. 8, article 040, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Hanany and E. Witten, “Type IIB superstrings, BPS monopoles, and three-dimensional gauge dynamics,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 492, no. 1-2, pp. 152–190, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. Hanany and K. D. Kennaway, “Dimer models and toric diagrams,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0503149.
  31. S. Franco, A. Hanany, D. Vegh, B. Wecht, and K. D. Kennaway, “Brane dimers and quiver gauge theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 1, pp. 2401–2448, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. K. D. Kennaway, “Brane tilings,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 22, no. 18, pp. 2977–3038, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. Lee, “Superconformal field theories from M-theory crystal lattices,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 10, Article ID 101901, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. Lee, S. Lee, and J. Park, “Toric AdS4/CFT3 duals and M-theory crystals,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 5, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. B. Feng, A. Hanany, Y. H. He, and A. Iqbal, “Quiver theories, soliton spectra and Picard-Lefschetz transformations,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1265–1297, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  36. B. Feng, S. Franco, A. Hanany, and Y. H. He, “Unhiggsing the del Pezzo,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1385–1420, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. Wijnholt, “Large volume perspective on branes at singularities,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1117–1153, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  38. J. Davey et al., “M2 theories from Fano threefolds,” to appear.
  39. G. Székelyhidi, “Greatest lower bounds on the Ricci curvature of Fano manifolds,” Compositio Mathematica, vol. 147, pp. 319–331, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. B. Feng, A. Hanany, Y. -H. He, and A. M. Uranga, “Toric duality as Seiberg duality and brane diamonds,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 5, no. 12, article 28, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  41. S. Mori and S. Mukai, “Classification of Fano 3-folds with B2≥2, I,” in Algebraic and Topological Theories, M. Nagata et al., Ed., pp. 496–545, Kinokuniya Company, Tokyo, Japan, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  42. J.-P. Murre, “Classification of Fano threefolds according to Fano and Iskovskih,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Session of the Centro Internazionale Matematico Estivo (C.I.M.E.), vol. 947 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pp. 35–92, Varenna, Italy, June 1981.
  43. S. D. Cutkosky, “On Fano 3-folds,” Manuscripta Mathematica, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 189–204, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. V. V. Batyrev, “Toroidal Fano 3-folds,” Mathematics of the USSR-Izvestiya, vol. 19, pp. 13–25, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  45. V. V. Batyrev, “On the classification of toric Fano 4-folds,” Journal of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 1021–1050, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. L. B. Anderson, Y.-H. He, and A. Lukas, “Heterotic compactification, an algorithmic approach,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 7, article 049, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. J. Gray, Y. H. He, A. Ilderton, and A. Lukas, “STRINGVACUA. A Mathematica package for studying vacuum configurations in string phenomenology,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 180, no. 1, pp. 107–119, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. J. Gray, “A simple introduction to Grobner basis methods in string phenomenology,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.1662.
  49. J. Kollar, Y. Miyaoka, and S. Mori, “Rational connectedness and boundedness of Fano manifolds,” Journal of Differential Geometry, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 765–779, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  50. A. M. Kasprzyk, M. Kreuzer, and B. Nill, “On the combinatorial classification of toriclog del Pezzo surfaces,” LMS Journal of Computation and Mathematics, vol. 13, pp. 33–46, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  51. http://grdb.lboro.ac.uk/.
  52. D. Forcella, A. Hanany, Y.-H. He, and A. Zaffaroni, “The master space of N = 1 gauge theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 8, article 012, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. D. Forcella, A. Hanany, Y. H. he, and A. Zaffaroni, “Mastering the master space,” Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 85, no. 2-3, pp. 163–171, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. B. Feng, S. Franco, A. Hanany, and Y. H. He, “Symmetries of toric duality,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1769–1798, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. S. Franco, A. Hanany, and P. Kazakopoulos, “Hidden exceptional global symmetries in 4d CFTs,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1475–1530, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  56. O. Aharony, A. Hanany, K. Intriligator, N. Seiberg, and M. J. Strassler, “Aspects of N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theories in three dimensions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 499, no. 1-2, pp. 67–99, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. S. Benvenuti, B. Feng, A. Hanany, and Y.-H. He, “Counting BPS operators in gauge theories: quivers, syzygies and plethystics,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 11, article 050, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. B. Feng, A. Hanany, and Y.-H. He, “Counting gauge invariants: the plethystic program,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 3, article 090, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar