Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2011, Article ID 593423, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/593423
Research Article

Bell's Inequalities, Superquantum Correlations, and String Theory

Department of Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA

Received 18 April 2011; Accepted 7 October 2011

Academic Editor: Yang-Hui He

Copyright © 2011 Lay Nam Chang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. S. Bell, “On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox,” Physics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 195–200, 1964. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, 1987.
  3. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, “Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 23, no. 15, pp. 880–884, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Polchinski, String Theory, vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  5. K. Becker, M. Becker, and J. H. Schwarz, String Theory and M-Theory: A Modern Introduction, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  6. M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten, Superstring Theory, vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, 1988, where it was suggested that string field theory can be viewed as a generalization of quantum theory.
  7. S. J. Freedman and J. F. Clauser, “Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 28, no. 14, pp. 938–941, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne, “Experimental consequences of objective local theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 526–535, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Aspect, P. Grangier, G. Roger et al., “Experimental tests of realistic local theories via Bell's theorem,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 460–463, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. A. Aspect, P. Grangier, G. Roger et al., “Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm gedankenexperiment: a new violation of Bell's inequalities,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 91–94, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, G. Roger et al., “Experimental test of Bell's inequalities using time- varying analyzers,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 49, no. 25, pp. 1804–1807, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. S. Cirel'son, “Quantum generalizations of Bell's inequality,” Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 93–100, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. L. J. Landau, “On the violation of Bell's inequality in quantum theory,” Physics Letters A, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 54–56, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Popescu and D. Rohrlich, “Quantum nonlocality as an axiom,” Foundations of Physics, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 379–385, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. J. Summers and R. Werner, “Maximal violation of Bell's inequalities is generic in quantum field theory,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 247–259, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. S. J. Summers and R. Werner, “Bell’s inequalities and quantum field theory. I. General setting,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2440–2448, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. D. Dieks, “Inequalities that test locality in quantum mechanics,” http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0206172.
  18. Y. Aharonov and D. Rohrlich, Quantum Paradoxes: Quantum Theory for the Perplexed, Wiley-VCH, 2005.
  19. D. Rohrlich, “Three attempts at two axioms for quantum mechanics,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.5322.
  20. W. van Dam, Nonlocality and communication complexity, D.Phil. thesis, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, 2000.
  21. W. Van Dam, “Implausible consequences of superstrong nonlocality,” http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0501159.
  22. G. Brassard, H. Buhrman, N. Linden, A. A. Méthot, A. Tapp, and F. Unger, “Limit on nonlocality in any world in which communication complexity is not trivial,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 96, no. 25, Article ID 250401, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. G. Brassard, “Is information the key?” Nature Physics, vol. 1, pp. 2–4, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. S. Popescu, “Quantum mechanics: why isn't nature more non-local?” Nature Physics, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 507–508, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. Barrett, “Information processing in generalized probabilistic theories,” Physical Review A, vol. 75, Article ID 032304, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  26. N. Brunner and P. Skrzypczyk, “Nonlocality distillation and postquantum theories with trivial communication complexity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, no. 16, Article ID 160403, 4 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. G. Ver Steeg and S. Wehner, http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0811/0811.3771v2.pdf.
  28. L. D. Faddeev, “On the Relationship between Mathematics and Physics,” Asia-Pacific Physics News, vol. 3, pp. 21–22, June-July, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  29. L. D. Faddeev, “Frontiers in physics, high technology and mathematics,” in Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary Conference, H. A. Cerdeira and S. Lundqvist , Eds., pp. 238–246, World Scientific, Trieste, Italy, 1989.
  30. B. S. Dewitt, “Quantum theory of gravity. I. the canonical theory,” Physical Review, vol. 160, no. 5, pp. 1113–1148, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. W. S. Bickel, “Mean lives of some excited states in multiply ionized oxygen and neon,” Physical Review, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 7–11, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. E. Witten, “Non-commutative geometry and string field theory,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 268, no. 2, pp. 253–294, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. Dijkgraaf, “The mathematics of M-theory,” in Proceedings of the 3rd European Congress of Mathematics, Progress in Mathematics, Birkhuser, Barcelona, Spain, 2000.
  34. D. Minic and H. C. Tze, “Background independent quantum mechanics and gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 68, no. 6, Article ID 061501, 5 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. D. Minic and C. H. Tze, “A general theory of quantum relativity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 581, no. 1-2, pp. 111–118, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. V. Jejjala, M. Kavic, and D. Minic, “Time and M-theory,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 22, no. 20, pp. 3317–3405, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. V. Jejjala, M. Kavic, D. Minic, and C. H. Tze, http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0804/0804.3598v1.pdf.
  38. V. Jejjala, M. Kavic, D. Minic, and C. H. Tze, “On the origin of time and the universe,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 2515–2523, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. L. M. Brown, Ed., Feynman's Thesis: A New Approach to Quantum Theory, World Scientific, 2005.
  40. M. A. Vasiliev, http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/9910/9910096v1.pdf.
  41. X. Bekaert, S. Cnockaert, C. Iazeolla, and M. A. Vasiliev, http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/0503/0503128v2.pdf.
  42. M. R. Douglas, L. Mazzucato, and S. S. Razamat, http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1011/1011.4926v2.pdf.
  43. E. Komatsu, K. M. Smith, J. Dunkley et al., “Seven-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (Wmap) observations: cosmological interpretation,” Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, vol. 192, no. 2, article 18, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  44. G. Efstathiou, C. Lawrence, and J. Tauber, Eds., Planck Collaboration, astro-ph/0604069.
  45. P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud et al., Planck Collaboration, http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1101/1101.2022v2.pdf.