Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2013, Article ID 383957, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/383957
Research Article

Three-Dimensional Dirac Oscillator with Minimal Length: Novel Phenomena for Quantized Energy

1Laboratoire de Physique Mathématique et Subatomique (lpmps), Départment de Physique, Faculté des Sciences Exactes, Université Constantine1, 25000 Constantine, Algeria
2Laboratoire de Physique Quantique et Systémes Dynamiques, Département de Physique, Faculté des Sciences, Université Ferhat Abbas Sétif 1, 19000 Setif, Algeria
3Department of Radiologic Technology, Daegu Health College, Yeongsong-ro 15, Daegu 702-722, Republic of Korea

Received 3 July 2013; Accepted 17 August 2013

Academic Editor: Gongnan Xie

Copyright © 2013 Malika Betrouche et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. Veneziano, “A stringy nature needs just two constants,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 199–204, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  2. D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni, and G. Veneziano, “Can spacetime be probed below the string size?” Physics Letters B, vol. 216, no. 1-2, pp. 41–47, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  3. K. Konishi, G. Paffuti, and P. Provero, “Minimum physical length and the generalized uncertainty principle in string theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 234, no. 3, pp. 276–284, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  4. M. Kato, “Particle theories with minimum observable length and open string theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 245, no. 1, pp. 43–47, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  5. R. Guida, K. Konishi, and P. Provero, “On the short distance behavior of string theories,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 6, no. 16, pp. 1487–1504, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  6. L. J. Garay, “Quantum gravity and minimal length,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 145–166, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  7. S. Capozziello, G. Lambiase, and G. Scarpetta, “Generalized uncertainty principle from quantum geometry,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. M. R. Douglas and N. A. Nekrasov, “Noncommutative field theory,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 977–1029, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  9. S. Minwalla, M. Van Raamsdonk, and N. Seiberg, “Noncommutative perturbative dynamics,” The Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2, article 020, 30 pages, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  10. R. J. Szabo, “Quantum field theory on noncommutative spaces,” Physics Reports, vol. 378, no. 4, pp. 207–299, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  11. F. Scardigli, “Generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity from micro-black hole gedanken experiment,” Physics Letters B, vol. 452, no. 1-2, pp. 39–44, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  12. F. Scardigli and R. Casadio, “Generalized uncertainty principle, extra dimensions and holography,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 20, no. 18, pp. 3915–3926, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  13. Y. Chargui, A. Trabelsi, and L. Chetouani, “Exact solution of the (1+1)-dimensional Dirac equation with vector and scalar linear potentials in the presence of a minimal length,” Physics Letters A, vol. 374, no. 4, pp. 531–534, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  14. C. Quesne and V. M. Tkachuk, “Dirac oscillator with nonzero minimal uncertainty in position,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1747–1766, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  15. S. Hossenfelder, “The minimal length and large extra dimensions,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 19, no. 37, pp. 2727–2744, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  16. S. Hossenfelder, “Running coupling with minimal length,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, no. 10, Article ID 105003, 11 pages, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  17. Hossenfelder, “Suppressed black hole production from minimal length,” Physics Letters B, vol. 598, no. 1-2, pp. 92–98, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  18. R. R. Sastry, “Quantum mechanics of smeared particles,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 33, no. 46, pp. 8305–8318, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  19. M. Maggiore, “The algebraic structure of the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physics Letters B, vol. 319, no. 1–3, pp. 83–86, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. A. Kempf, “Uncertainty relation in quantum mechanics with quantum group symmetry,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 4483–4495, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  21. A. Kempf, G. Mangano, and R. B. Mann, “Hilbert space representation of the minimal length uncertainty relation,” Physical Review D, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 1108–1118, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. A. Kempf, “Non-pointlike particles in harmonic oscillators,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 2093–2102, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  23. H. Hinrichsen and A. Kempf, “Maximal localization in the presence of minimal uncertainties in positions and in momenta,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 2121–2137, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  24. L. N. Chang, D. Minic, N. Okamura, and T. Takeuchi, “Exact solution of the harmonic oscillator in arbitrary dimensions with minimal length uncertainty relations,” Physical Review D, vol. 65, no. 12, Article ID 125027, 8 pages, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  25. T. V. Fityo, I. O. Vakarchuk, and V. M. Tkachuk, “One-dimensional Coulomb-like problem in deformed space with minimal length,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 2143–2150, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  26. F. Brau, “Minimal length uncertainty relation and the hydrogen atom,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 32, no. 44, pp. 7691–7696, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  27. R. Akhoury and Y. -P. Yao, “Minimal length uncertainty relation and the hydrogen spectrum,” Physics Letters B, vol. 572, no. 1-2, pp. 37–42, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  28. S. Benczik, L. N. Chang, D. Minic, and T. Takeuchi, “Hydrogenatom spectrum under a minimal-length hypothesis,” Physical Review A, vol. 72, no. 1, Article ID 012104, 4 pages, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  29. Kh. Nouicer, “Casimir effect in the presence of minimal lengths,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 38, no. 46, pp. 10027–10035, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  30. U. Harbach and S. Hossenfelder, “The Casimir effect in the presence of a minimal length,” Physics Letters B, vol. 632, no. 2-3, pp. 379–383, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  31. Kh. Nouicer, “Effect of minimal lengths on electron magnetism,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 2125–2135, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  32. Kh. Nouicer, “Pauli-Hamiltonian in the presence of minimal lengths,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 47, no. 12, Article ID 122102, 11 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  33. L. N. Chang, D. Minic, N. Okamura, and T. Takeuchi, “Effect of the minimal length uncertainty relation on the density of states and the cosmological constant problem,” Physical Review D, vol. 65, no. 12, Article ID 125028, 7 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  34. S. Benczik, L. N. Chang, D. Minic, N. Okamura, S. Rayyan, and T. Takeuchi, “Short distance versus long distance physics: the classical limit of the minimal length uncertainty relation,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 2, Article ID 026003, 11 pages, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  35. Kh. Nouicer, “An exact solution of the one-dimensional Dirac oscillator in the presence of minimal lengths,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 39, no. 18, pp. 5125–5134, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  36. M. Moshinsky and Y. F. Smirnov, The Harmonic Oscillator in Modern Physics, Harwood, Amsterdam, 1996.
  37. R. P. Martínez-y-Romero, H. N. Núñez-Yépez, and A. L. Salas-Brito, “Relativistic quantum mechanics of a Dirac oscillator,” European Journal of Physics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 135–141, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  38. J. Benítez, R. P. Martínez y Romero, H. N. Núñez Yépez, and A. L. Salas-Brito, “Solution and hidden supersymmetry of a Dirac oscillator,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 64, no. 14, pp. 1643–1645, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  39. J. Benítez, R. P. Martínez y Romero, H. N. Núñez Yépez, and A. L. Salas-Brito, “Erratum: solution and hidden supersymmetry of a Dirac oscillator, Physical Review Letters, vol. 64, pp. 1643–1645, 1990,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 65, no. 16, pp. 2085–2085, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. R. P. Martrinez-y-Romero, M. Moreno, and A. Zentalla, “Supersymmetric properties and stability of the Dirac sea,” Physical Review D, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 2036–2040, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  41. F. Dominguez-Adame and M. A. Gonzalez, “Solvable linear potentials in the Dirac equation,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 193–198, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  42. D. Ito and E. Carrieri, “An example of dynamical systems with linear trajectory,” Nuovo Cimento A, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 1119–1121, 1967. View at Google Scholar
  43. M. Maggiore, “A generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 304, no. 1-2, pp. 65–69, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  44. M. Maggiore, “Quantum groups, gravity, and the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physical Review D, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 5182–5187, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  45. P. Strange, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998.
  46. A. Erdélyi, W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, and F. G. Triconi, Higher Tran-Scendental Functions, vol. 2, McGraw-Hill, NY, USA, 1953.
  47. C. Quesne and V. M. Tkachuk, “Lorentz-covariant deformed algebra with minimal length and application to the (1+1)-dimensional Dirac oscillator,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 39, no. 34, pp. 10909–10922, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  48. C. Quesne and V. M. Tkachuk, “Lorentz-covariant deformed algebra with minimal length,” Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, vol. 56, no. 10-11, pp. 1269–1274, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet