Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2013, Article ID 452978, 26 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/452978
Review Article

QCD Thermodynamics on the Lattice

Fakultät für Physik, Universität Bielefeld, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany

Received 11 April 2013; Accepted 3 June 2013

Academic Editor: Jan E. Alam

Copyright © 2013 Sayantan Sharma. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Hoelbling, “Light hadron spectroscopy and pseudoscalar decay constants,” in International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE '10), PoS, Villasimius, Italy, June 2010, http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.0410.
  2. F. Karsch, “Lattice QCD at finite temperature: a status report,” Zeitschrift Fur Physik C, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 147–155, 1988, http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.3028. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. P. F. Kolb and U. W. Heinz, Quark Gluon Plasma 3, Edited by R. C. Hwa and X.-N. Wang, World Scientific, Singapore, 2003.
  4. M.-P. Lombardo, “High Temperature QCD,” in International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE '12), PoS, Cairns, Australia, June 2012.
  5. G. Aarts, “Complex Langevin dynamics and other approaches at finite chemical potential,” in International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE '12), PoS, Cairns, Australia, June 2012.
  6. S. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, “Absence of neutrinos on a lattice: (I). Proof by homotopy theory,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 20–40, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. K. G. Wilson, “Confinement of quarks,” Physical Review D, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 2445–2459, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. J. Kogut and L. Susskind, “Hamiltonian formulation of Wilson's lattice gauge theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 395–408, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Morningstar and M. J. Peardon, “Analytic smearing of SU(3) link variables in lattice QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 69, no. 5, Article ID 054501, 9 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. E. Follana, Q. Mason, and C. Davies, “Highly improved staggered quarks on the lattice, with applications to charm physics,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, Article ID 054502, 23 pages, 2007, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0610092. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. J. Engels, R. Joswig, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, M. Lütgemeier, and B. Petersson, “Thermodynamics of four-flavour QCD with improved staggered fermions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 396, pp. 210–216, 1997, http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.2215. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. K. Orginos and D. Toussaint, “Testing improved actions for dynamical Kogut-Susskind quarks,” Physical Review D, vol. 59, no. 1, Article ID 014501, 7 pages, 1998, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9805009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J. F. Lagae and D. K. Sinclair, “Improved staggered quark actions with reduced flavor symmetry violations for lattice QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 59, no. 1, Article ID 014511, 6 pages, 1998, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9806014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. G. P. Lepage, “Flavor-symmetry restoration and Symanzik improvement for staggered quarks,” Physical Review D, vol. 59, no. 7, Article ID 074502, 4 pages, 1999, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9809157. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. R. Narayanan and H. Neuberger, “Chiral fermions on the lattice,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 71, no. 20, pp. 3251–3254, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  16. H. Neuberger, “Exactly massless quarks on the lattice,” Physics Letters B, vol. 417, no. 1-2, pp. 141–144, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. D. B. Kaplan, “A method for simulating chiral fermions on the lattice,” Physics Letters B, vol. 288, no. 3-4, pp. 342–347, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. M. Cheng, S. Ejiri, P. Hegde et al., “Equation of state for physical quark masses,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 5, Article ID 054504, 8 pages, 2010, http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.2215. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. S. Borsanyi, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor et al., “The QCD equation of state with dynamical quarks,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, article 77, 2010, http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.2580. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. G. Cossu et al., “Finite temperature QCD at fixed Q with overlap fermions,” in International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE '10), PoS, Villasimius, Italy, June 2010, http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.0257.
  21. S. Borsanyi, Y. Delgado, S. Durr et al., “QCD thermodynamics with dynamical overlap fermions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 713, no. 3, pp. 342–346, 2012, http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.4089. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. M. Cheng, N. H. Christ, P. Hegde et al., “The finite temperature QCD using 2+1 flavors of domain wall fermions at Nt=8,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 5, Article ID 054510, 14 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. T.-W. Chiu, “Simulation of lattice QCD with domain-wall fermions,” In press, http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.6918.
  24. A. Bazavov, C. Bernard, C. DeTar et al., “Nonperturbative QCD simulations with 2+1 flavors of improved staggered quarks,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 1349–1417, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. G. Boyd, J. Engels, F. Karsch et al., “Thermodynamics of SU(3) lattice gauge theory,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 469, no. 3, pp. 419–444, 1996, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9602007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. F. Karsch, “Lattice QCD at finite temperature and density,” Nuclear Physics B-Proceedings Supplements, vol. 83, Article ID 990900, p. 14, 2000, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9909006. View at Google Scholar
  27. F. Karsch, E. Laermann, and C. Schmidt, “The chiral critical point in 3-flavour QCD,” Physics Letters B, vol. 520, p. 41, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  28. P. de Forcrand and O. Philipsen, “The QCD phase diagram for three degenerate flavors and small baryon density,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 673, pp. 170–186, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. D. Smith and C. Schmidt, “On the universal critical behavior in 3-flavor QCD,” in International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE '11), vol. 216 of PoS, 2011.
  30. X.-Y. Jin and R. D. Mawhinney, “Lattice QCD with 12 degenerate quark flavors,” in International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE '11), PoS, 2011.
  31. M. Cheng et al., “Study of the finite temperature transition in 3-flavor QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 3, Article ID 034506, 11 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. M. D’Elia, A. Di Giacomo, and C. Pica, “Two flavor QCD and confinement,” Physical Review D, vol. 27, no. 11, Article ID 114510, 27 pages, 2005, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0503030. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. C. Bonati, G. Cossu, M. D’Elia, A. Di Giacomo, and C. Pica, “A test of first order scaling in Nf =2 QCD: a progress report,” in International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE '08), vol. 204 of PoS, July 2008, http://arxiv.org/abs/0901.3231.
  34. S. Ejiri, F. Karsch, E. Laermann et al., “Magnetic equation of state in (2+1)-flavor QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 9, Article ID 094505, 16 pages, 2009, http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.5122. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. S. Gavin, A. Gocksch, and R. D. Pisarski, “QCD and the chiral critical point,” Physical Review D, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. R3079–R3082, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. Bernard, T. Burch, C. DeTar et al., “QCD thermodynamics with three flavors of improved staggered quarks,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 3, Article ID 034504, 11 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. M. Cheng, N. Christ, S. Datta et al., “Transition temperature in QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 5, Article ID 054507, 15 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. Y. Aoki, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szabó, “The order of the quantum chromodynamics transition predicted by the standard model of particle physics,” Nature, vol. 443, no. 7112, pp. 675–678, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. H. Saito, S. Ejiri, S. Aoki et al., “Phase structure of finite temperature QCD in the heavy quark region,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, no. 5, Article ID 054502, 9 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. H.-T. Ding, A. Bazavov, P. Hegde, F. Karsch, S. Mukherjee, and P. Petreczky, “Exploring phase diagram of Nt=3 QCD at μ=0 with HISQ fermions,” in International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE '11), vol. 191 of PoS, 2011, http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.0185.
  41. G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szabo, “The nature of the finite temperature QCD transition as a function of the quark masses,” in International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE '07), vol. 182, 2007.
  42. S. L. Adler, “Axial-vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics,” Physical Review, vol. 177, no. 5, pp. 2426–2438, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. J. Bell and R. Jackiw, “A PCAC puzzle: π°γγ in the σ-model,” Nuovo Cimento A, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 47–61, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. K. Fujikawa, “Path integral for gauge theories with fermions,” Physical Review D, vol. 21, no. 10, p. 2848, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. R. D. Pisarski and F. Wilczek, “Remarks on the chiral phase transition in chromodynamics,” Physical Review D, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 338–341, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. Engels, J. Fingberg, F. Karsch, D. Miller, and M. Weber, “Non-perturbative thermodynamics of SU(N) gauge theories,” Physics Letters B, vol. 252, no. 4, pp. 625–630, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. L. Giusti and H. B. Meyer, “Thermal momentum distribution from path integrals with shifted boundary conditions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 106, no. 13, Article ID 131601, 4 pages, 2011, http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.2727. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. P. Petreczky, “On trace anomaly in 2+1 flavor QCD,” in International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE '12), vol. 069 of PoS, 2012, http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.1678.
  49. A. Bazavov, T. Bhattacharya, M. Cheng et al., “The chiral and deconfinement aspects of the QCD transition,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 5, Article ID 054503, 37 pages, 2012, http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.1710. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. S. Borsanyi, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor et al., “The QCD equation of state and the effects of the charm,” in International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE '11), vol. 201 of PoS, July 2011, http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.0995.
  51. T. Umeda, S. Aoki, S. Ejiri et al., “Equation of state in 2+1 flavor QCD with improved Wilson quarks by the fixed scale approach,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 9, Article ID 094508, 11 pages, 2012, http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.4719. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. F. Burger, M. Kirchner, M. Muller-Preussker et al., “Pseudo-critical temperature and thermal equation of state from Nf=2 twisted mass lattice QCD,” in Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE '12), vol. 68 of PoS, Cairns, Australia, June 2012, http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.0982.
  53. P. de Forcrand and O. Philipsen, “The chiral critical line of Nf=2+1 QCD at zero and non-zero baryon density,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, article 77, 2007, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0607017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. M. Cheng, N. Christ, S. Datta et al., “QCD equation of state with almost physical quark masses,” Physical Review D, vol. 77, no. 1, Article ID 014511, 20 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling et al., “Is there still any Tc mystery in lattice QCD? Results with physical masses in the continuum limit III,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, article 73, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  56. M. Creutz, PoS CONFINEMENT8, article 016, 2008.
  57. C. Bernard, M. Golterman, Y. Shamir, and S. R. Sharpe, “'t Hooft vertices, partial quenching, and rooted staggered QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 77, no. 11, Article ID 114504, 11 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. S. Borsanyi, S. Durr, Z. Fodor et al., “QCD thermodynamics with continuum extrapolated Wilson fermions I,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, article 126, 2012, http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.0440. View at Google Scholar
  59. Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szabo, “Dynamical overlap fermions, results with hybrid Monte-Carlo algorithm,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2004, article 3, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. S. Aoki, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, and T. Onogi, “Finite volume QCD at fixed topological charge,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 5, Article ID 054508, 11 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. A. Bazavov, T. Bhattacharya, M. I. Buchoff et al., “The chiral transition and U(1)A symmetry restoration from lattice QCD using Domain Wall Fermions,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 9, Article ID 094503, 30 pages, 2012, http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.3535. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. F. Karsch, E. Laermann, and A. Peikert, “The Pressure in 2, 2+1 and 3 Flavour QCD,” Physics Letters B, vol. 478, no. 4, pp. 447–455, 2000, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0002003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. P. Petreczky, “Review of recent highlights in lattice calculations at finite temperature and finite density,” in Proceedings of the Xth Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum conference (ConfinementX '12), vol. 28 of PoS, 2012, http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.6188.
  64. M. Laine and Y. Schroeder, “Quark mass thresholds in QCD thermodynamics,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 8, Article ID 085009, 13 pages, 2006, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0603048. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. M. Cheng, “Charm quarks and the QCD equation of state,” in International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE '07), vol. 173 of PoS, 2007.
  66. C. DeTar, L. Levkova, S. Gottlieb et al., “QCD thermodynamics with nonzero chemical potential at Nt=6 and effects from heavy quarks,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 11, Article ID 114504, 17 pages, 2010, http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.5682. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. M. Hindmarsh and O. Philipsen, “WIMP dark matter and the QCD equation of state,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 8, Article ID 087302, 4 pages, 2005, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0501232. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. M. McGuigan and W. Soldner, “QCD cosmology from the lattice equation of state,” In press, http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.0265.
  69. J. Engels, S. Holtmann, T. Mendes, and T. Schulze, “Equation of state and Goldstone-mode effects of the three-dimensional O(2) model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 492, no. 1-2, pp. 219–227, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  70. D. Toussaint, “Scaling functions for O(4) in three dimensions,” Physical Review D, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 362–366, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. J. Engels and T. Mendes, “Goldstone-mode effects and scaling function for the three-dimensional O(4) model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 572, no. 1-2, pp. 289–304, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. P. Hasenfratz, V. Laliena, and F. Niedermayer, “The index theorem in QCD with a finite cut-off,” Physics Letters B, vol. 427, no. 1-2, pp. 125–131, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. Z. Lin, PoS Lattice, article 084, 2012.
  74. S. Aoki, H. Fukaya, and Y. Taniguchi, “Chiral symmetry restoration, the eigenvalue density of the Dirac operator, and the axial U(1) anomaly at finite temperature,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 11, Article ID 114512, 18 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. G. Cossu, S. Aoki, S. Hashimoto et al., “Topological susceptibility and axial symmetry at finite temperature,” in International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE '11), vol. 188 of PoS, July 2011, http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.4519.
  76. G. Cossu, S. Aoki, H. Fukaya et al., “Finite temperature study of the axial U(1) symmetry on the lattice with overlap fermion formulation,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.6145.
  77. H. Ohno, U. M. Heller, F. Karsch, and S. Mukherjee, “U_A(1) breaking at finite temperature from the Dirac spectrum with the dynamical HISQ action,” in The 30th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE '12), vol. 95 of PoS, Cairns, Australia, June 2012, http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.2591.
  78. B. B. Brandt, A. Francis, H. B. Meyer, H. Wittig, and O. Philipsen, “QCD thermodynamics with two flavours of Wilson fermions on large lattices,” in Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE '12), vol. 073 of PoS, Cairns, Australia, June 2012, http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.6972.
  79. P. Hasenfratz and F. Karsch, “Chemical potential on the lattice,” Physics Letters B, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 308–310, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. J. Kogut, H. Matsuoka, M. Stone et al., “Chiral symmetry restoration in baryon rich environments,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 225, no. 1, pp. 93–122, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. R. V. Gavai, “Chemical potential on the lattice,” Physical Review D, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 519–521, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  82. D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, “QCD at finite isospin density,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 592–595, 2001, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0005225. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. K. Splittorff, “Lattice simulations of QCD with μB= 0 versus phase quenched QCD,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0505001.
  84. J. Han and M. A. Stephanov, “A random matrix study of the QCD sign problem,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 5, Article ID 054507, 7 pages, 2008, http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.1939. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. M. P. Lombardo, K. Splittorff, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, “Distributions of the phase angle of the fermion determinant in QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 5, Article ID 054509, 19 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. I. M. Barbour, S. E. Morrison, E. G. Klepfish, J. B. Kogut, and M.-P. Lombardo, “Results on finite density QCD,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 60, pp. 220–234, 1998, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9705042. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. Z. Fodor and S. D. Katz, “A new method to study lattice QCD at finite temperature and chemical potential,” Physics Letters B, vol. 534, no. 1–4, pp. 87–92, 2002, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-lat/0104001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  88. Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szabo, “The QCD equation of state at nonzero densities: lattice result,” Physics Letters B, vol. 568, no. 1-2, pp. 73–77, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  89. F. Csikor, G. I. Egri, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, K. K. Szabo, and A. I. Toth, “Equation of state at finite temperature and chemical potential, lattice QCD results,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2004, article 46, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  90. C. R. Allton, S. Ejiri, S. J. Hands et al., “Equation of state for two flavor QCD at nonzero chemical potential,” Physical Review D, vol. 68, no. 1, Article ID 014507, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  91. C. Allton, M. Doring, S. Ejiri et al., “Thermodynamics of two flavor QCD to sixth order in quark chemical potential,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 5, Article ID 054508, 20 pages, 2005, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0501030. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  92. R. V. Gavai and S. Gupta, “Pressure and non-linear susceptibilities in QCD at finite chemical potentials,” Physical Review D, vol. 68, no. 3, Article ID 034506, 6 pages, 2003, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0303013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  93. J. Engels, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, and E. Laermann, “The quenched limit of lattice QCD at non-zero baryon number,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 558, no. 1-2, pp. 307–326, 1999, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9903030. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. K.-F. Liu, “Finite density algorithm in lattice QCD—a canonical ensemble approach,” International Journal of Modern Physics B, vol. 16, no. 14, Article ID 020202, p. 2017, 2002, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0202026. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  95. A. Alexandru, M. Faber, I. Horvath, and K.-F. Liu, “Lattice QCD at finite density via a new canonical approach,” Physical Review D, vol. 72, no. 11, Article ID 114513, 13 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  96. P. de Forcrand and S. Kratochvila, “Finite density QCD with a canonical approach,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 62–67, 2006, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0602024. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  97. M. G. Alford, A. Kapustin, and F. Wilczek, “Imaginary chemical potential and finite fermion density on the lattice,” Physical Review D, vol. 59, no. 5, Article ID 054502, 4 pages, 1999, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9807039. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  98. M.-P. Lombardo, “Finite density (might well be easier) at finite temperature,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 83, p. 375, 2000, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9908006. View at Google Scholar
  99. M. D’Elia and M.-P. Lombardo, “QCD thermodynamics from an imaginary μB: results on the four flavor lattice model,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, no. 7, Article ID 074509, 11 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  100. P. de Forcrand and O. Philipsen, “The QCD phase diagram for small densities from imaginary chemical potential,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 642, no. 1-2, pp. 290–306, 2002, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0205016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  101. G. Parisi, “On complex probabilities,” Physics Letters B, vol. 131, no. 4–6, pp. 393–395, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  102. F. Karsch and H. W. Wyld, “Complex langevin simulation of the SU(3) spin model with nonzero chemical potential,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 55, no. 21, pp. 2242–2245, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  103. J. Ambjorn and S.-K. Yang, “Numerical problems in applying the langevin equation to complex effective actions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 165, no. 1—3, pp. 140–146, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  104. G. Aarts, F. A. James, E. Seiler, and I. O. Stamatescu, “Adaptive stepsize and instabilities in complex Langevin dynamics,” Physics Letters B, vol. 687, no. 2-3, pp. 154–159, 2010, http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.0617. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  105. G. Aarts, E. Seiler, and I. O. Stamatescu, “Complex Langevin method: when can it be trusted?” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 5, Article ID 054508, 13 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  106. S. Chandrasekharan, “Fermion bag approach to lattice field theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 2, Article ID 025007, 15 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  107. C. Gattringer, “Flux representation of an effective Polyakov loop model for QCD thermodynamics,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 850, no. 2, pp. 242–252, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  108. R. V. Gavai and S. Gupta, “Lattice QCD predictions for shapes of event distributions along the freezeout curve in heavy-ion collisions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 696, no. 5, pp. 459–463, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  109. A. Bazavov, H.-T. Ding, P. Hegde et al., “Freeze-out conditions in heavy Ion collisions from QCD thermodynamics,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, no. 19, Article ID 192302, 5 pages, 2012, http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.1220. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  110. M. Golterman, Y. Shamir, and B. Svetitsky, “Breakdown of staggered fermions at nonzero chemical potential,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 7, Article ID 071501, 5 pages, 2006, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0602026. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  111. M. Luscher, “Exact chiral symmetry on the lattice and the Ginsparg-Wilson relation,” Physics Letters B, vol. 428, no. 3-4, pp. 342–345, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  112. J. Mandula, “Note on the lattice fermion chiral symmetry group,” In press, http://arxiv.org/abs/0712.0651.
  113. J. C. R. Bloch and T. Wettig, “Overlap dirac operator at nonzero chemical potential and random matrix theory,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 97, no. 1, Article ID 012003, 4 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  114. D. Banerjee, R. V. Gavai, and S. Sharma, “Thermodynamics of the ideal overlap quarks on the lattice,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 1, Article ID 014506, 13 pages, 2008, and PoS (LATTICE 2008), 177. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  115. R. Narayanan and S. Sharma, “Introduction of the chemical potential in the overlap formalism,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, article 151, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  116. R. V. Gavai and S. Sharma, “Exact chiral invariance at finite density on the lattice,” Physics Letters B, vol. 716, no. 3–5, pp. 446–449, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  117. S. Jeon and V. Koch, “Charged particle ratio fluctuation as a signal for quark-gluon plasma,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, no. 10, pp. 2076–2079, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  118. M. Asakawa, U. W. Heinz, and B. Muller, “Fluctuation probes of quark deconfinement,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, no. 10, pp. 2072–2075, 2000, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0003169. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  119. S. A. Gottlieb, W. Liu, D. Toussaint, R. L. Renken, and R. L. Sugar, “Quark-number susceptibility of high-temperature QCD,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 59, no. 20, pp. 2247–2250, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  120. A. Bazavov, T. Bhattacharya, C. E. DeTar et al., “Fluctuations and Correlations of net baryon number, electric charge, and strangeness: a comparison of lattice QCD results with the hadron resonance gas model,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 3, Article ID 034509, 15 pages, 2012, http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.0784. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  121. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz et al., “Fluctuations of conserved charges at finite temperature from lattice QCD,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, article 138, 2012, http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.4416. View at Google Scholar
  122. J. O. Andersen, S. Mogliacci, N. Su, and A. Vuorinen, “Quark number susceptibilities from resummed perturbation theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 87, no. 7, Article ID 074003, 6 pages, 2013, http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.0912. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  123. N. Haque, M. G. Mustafa, and M. Strickland, “Quark number susceptibilities from two-loop hard thermal loop perturbation theory,” In presshttp://arxiv.org/abs/1302.3228.
  124. S. Gupta, “Finding the critical end point of QCD: lattice and experiment,” in Proceedings of Critical Point and Onset of Deconfinement (CPOD '09), vol. 25 of PoS, 2009, http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.4630.
  125. F. Karsch and K. Redlich, “Probing freeze-out conditions in heavy ion collisions with moments of charge fluctuations,” Physics Letters B, vol. 695, no. 1–4, pp. 136–142, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  126. V. Koch, A. Majumder, and J. Randrup, “Baryon-strangeness correlations: a diagnostic of strongly interacting matter,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 95, no. 18, Article ID 182301, 4 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  127. R. V. Gavai and S. Gupta, “Fluctuations, strangeness, and quasiquarks in heavy-ion collisions from lattice QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 1, Article ID 014004, 11 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  128. J. Cleymans, H. Oeschler, K. Redlich, and S. Wheaton, “Comparison of chemical freeze-out criteria in heavy-ion collisions,” Physical Review C, vol. 73, no. 3, Article ID 034905, 10 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  129. M. Kitazawa and M. Asakawa, “Revealing baryon number fluctuations from proton number fluctuations in relativistic heavy ion collisions,” Physical Review C, vol. 85, no. 2, Article ID 021901, 5 pages, 2012, http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.2755. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  130. M. Asakawa and K. Yazaki, “Chiral restoration at finite density and temperature,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 504, no. 4, pp. 668–684, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  131. J. Berges and K. Rajagopal, “Color superconductivity and chiral symmetry restoration at non-zero baryon density and temperature,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 538, no. 1-2, pp. 215–232, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  132. A. M. Halasz, A. D. Jackson, R. E. Shrock, M. A. Stephanov, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, “Phase diagram of QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 58, no. 9, Article ID 096007, 11 pages, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  133. Z. Fodor and S. D. Katz, “Critical point of QCD at finite T and μ, lattice results for physical quark masses,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2004, article 50, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  134. M. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, and E. Shuryak, “Signatures of the tricritical point in QCD,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 81, no. 22, pp. 4816–4819, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  135. R. V. Gavai and S. Gupta, “The critical end point of QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 11, Article ID 114014, 21 pages, 2005, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0412035. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  136. R. V. Gavai and S. Gupta, “QCD at finite chemical potential with six time slices,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 11, Article ID 114503, 15 pages, 2008, http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.2233. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  137. S. Datta, R. V. Gavai, and S. Gupta, “The QCD Critical Point: marching towards continuum,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 904-905, pp. 883c–886c, 2013, http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.6784. View at Google Scholar
  138. A. Li, A. Alexandru, and K.-F. Liu, “Critical point of Nf=3 QCD from lattice simulations in the canonical ensemble,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, no. 7, Article ID 071503, 5 pages, 2011, http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.3045. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  139. Ph. de Forcrand and O. Philipsen, “The Chiral critical point of Nf=3 QCD at finite density to the order (μ/T)4,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, article 12, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  140. J. T. Mościcki, M. Woś, M. Lamanna, P. de Forcrand, and O. Philipsen, “Lattice QCD thermodynamics on the Grid,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 181, no. 10, pp. 1715–1726, 2010, http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.5682. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  141. O. Philipsen, “Status of the QCD phase diagram from lattice calculations,” Acta Physica Polonica, vol. 5, p. 825, 2012, http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.5370. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  142. O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, E. Laermann et al., “The phase boundary for the chiral transition in (2+1)-flavor QCD at small values of the chemical potential,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 1, Article ID 014504, 9 pages, 2011, http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.3130. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  143. G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. Katz, and K. Szabo, “The QCD phase diagram at nonzero quark density,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, article 1, 2011, http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.1356. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  144. M. A. Stephanov, “Non-gaussian fluctuations near the QCD critical point,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, no. 3, Article ID 032301, 4 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  145. M. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, and E. Shuryak, “Event-by-event fluctuations in heavy ion collisions and the QCD critical point,” Physical Review D, vol. 60, no. 11, Article ID 114028, 32 pages, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  146. S. Ejiri, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, and C. Schmidt, “The isentropic equation of state of 2-flavor QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 5, Article ID 054506, 6 pages, 2006, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0512040. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  147. Sz. Borsanyi, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor et al., “QCD equation of state at nonzero chemical potential: continuum results with physical quark masses at order μ2,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1208, article 53, 2012, http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.6710. View at Google Scholar
  148. T. Takaishi, P. de Forcrand, and A. Nakamura, “Equation of State at Finite Density from Imaginary Chemical Potential,” in International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE '09), vol. 198 of PoS, 2009, http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.0890.
  149. R. V. Gavai and S. Sharma, “Faster method of computation of lattice quark number susceptibilities,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 5, Article ID 054508, 8 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar