Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2013, Article ID 692505, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/692505
Research Article

Total Conserved Charges of Kerr-Newman Spacetimes in Gravity Theory Using a Poincaré Gauge Version of the Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity

1Centre for Theoretical Physics, The British University in Egypt, P.O. Box 43, Shorouk City, Cairo 11837, Egypt
2Mathematics Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt

Received 18 July 2012; Revised 24 October 2012; Accepted 31 October 2012

Academic Editor: Kadayam S. Viswanathan

Copyright © 2013 Gamal G. L. Nashed. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. P. Kerr, “Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 11, pp. 237–238, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  2. J. Plebański and M. Demiański, “Rotating, charged, and uniformly accelerating mass in general relativity,” Annals of Physics, vol. 98, pp. 98–127, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1973.
  4. T. Ortín, Gravity and Strings, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. G. W. Gibbons, M. J. Perry, and C. N. Pope, “The first law of thermodynamics for Kerr-anti-de Sitter black holes,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1503–1526, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  6. E. C. G. Sudarshan and N. Mukunda, Classical Dynamics: A Modern Perspective, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, USA, 1974.
  7. C. Itzykson and J. B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory, International Series in Pure and Applied Physic, McGraw-Hill International Book, New York, NY, USA, 1980.
  8. S. Weinberg, Quantum Theory of Fields, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
  9. E. Abers and B. Lee, “Gauge theories,” Physics Reports C, vol. 9, pp. 1–2, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  10. T. P. Cheng and L. F. Li, Gauge Theory of Elementary Particle Physics, The Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1984.
  11. K. Moriyasu, An Elementary Premier for Gauge Theory, World Scientific, Singapore, 1985.
  12. H. Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, Mass, USA, 2nd edition, 1980.
  13. A. Ashtekar and A. Magnon, “Asymptotically anti-de Sitter space-times,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. L39–L44, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. A. Ashtekar and S. Das, “Asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes: conserved quantities,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. L17–L30, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  15. T. Regge and C. Teitelboim, “Role of surface integrals in the Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity,” Annals of Physics, vol. 88, pp. 286–318, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  16. L. F. Abbott and S. Deser, “Charge definition in non-abelian gauge theories,” Physics, vol. 88, p. 286, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Deser, I. Kanik, and B. Tekin, “Conserved charges of higher D Kerr-AdS spacetimes,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 17, pp. 3383–3389, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  18. S. Deser and B. Tekin, “New energy definition for higher-curvature gravities,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 8, p. 084032, 3, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. G. W. Gibbons, S. W. Hawking, G. T. Horowitz, and M. J. Perry, “Positive mass theorems for black holes,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 295–308, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. G. W. Gibbons, C. M. Hull, and N. P. Warner, “The stability of gauged supergravity,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 173–190, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. V. Iyer and R. M. Wald, “Some properties of the Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy,” Physical Review D, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 846–864, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. R. M. Wald and A. Zoupas, “General definition of “conserved quantities” in general relativity and other theories of gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 61, no. 8, Article ID 084027, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  23. S. Hollands, A. Ishibashi, and D. Marolf, “Comparison between various notions of conserved charges in asymptotically AdS spacetimes,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 14, pp. 2881–2920, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  24. R. Cai and L. Cao, “Conserved charges in even dimensional asymptotically locally anti-de Sitter space-times,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 603, p. 83, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. I. M. Anderson and C. G. Torre, “Asymptotic conservation laws in classical field theory,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 77, no. 20, pp. 4109–4113, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  26. G. Barnich and F. Brandt, “Covariant theory of asymptotic symmetries, conservation laws and central charges,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 633, no. 1-2, pp. 3–82, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  27. J. Katz, J. Bičák, and D. Lynden-Bell, “Relativistic conservation laws and integral constraints for large cosmological perturbations,” Physical Review D, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 5957–5969, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. N. Deruelle and J. Katz, “On the mass of a Kerr—anti-de Sitter spacetime in D dimensions,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 421–424, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  29. A. N. Aliev, “Electromagnetic properties of Kerr—anti-de Sitter black holes,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, no. 8, Article ID 084041, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. B. Julia and S. Silva, “Currents and superpotentials in classical gauge-invariant theories. I. Local results with applications to perfect fluids and general relativity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 2173–2215, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  31. S. Silva, “On superpotentials and charge algebras of gauge theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 558, no. 1-2, pp. 391–415, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  32. B. Julia and S. Silva, “Currents and superpotentials in classical gauge theories. II. Global aspects and the example of affine gravity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 17, no. 22, pp. 4733–4743, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  33. R. Aros, M. Contreras, R. Olea, R. Troncoso, and J. Zanelli, “Conserved charges for gravity with locally anti-de sitter asymptotics,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 84, no. 8, pp. 1647–1650, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. E. W. Mielke, “Ashtekar's complex variables in general relativity and its teleparallelism equivalent,” Annals of Physics, vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 78–108, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  35. R. Aros, M. Contreras, R. Olea, R. Troncoso, and J. Zanelli, “Conserved charges for even dimensional asymptotically AdS gravity theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 62, no. 4, Article ID 044002, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. Y. Obukhov and G. F. Rubilar, “Invariant conserved currents in gravity theories with local Lorentz and diffeomorphism symmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, Article ID 064002, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. M. Henningson and K. Skenderis, “The holographic Weyl anomaly,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 9807, p. 23, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, “A stress tensor for anti-de Sitter gravity,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 208, no. 2, pp. 413–428, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  39. G. Barnich and G. Compère, “Generalized Smarr relation for Kerr-AdS black holes from improved surface integrals,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 4, Article ID 044016, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. E. W. Mielke, “Affine generalization of the Komar complex of general relativity,” Physical Review D, vol. 63, no. 4, Article ID 044018, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. M. Banados, R. Olea, and S. Theisen, “Counterterms and dual holographic anomalies in CS gravity,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 510, article 67, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  42. R. Olea, “Regularization of odd-dimensional AdS gravity: Kounterterms,” Journal of High Energy Physics, Article ID 073, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. D. K. Wise, “Symmetric space Cartan connections and gravity in three and four dimensions,” Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry, vol. 5, Article ID 080, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  44. G. G. L. Nashed, “General spherically symmetric nonsingular black hole solutions in a teleparallel theory of gravitation,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 6, Article ID 064015, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. G. G. L. Nashed, “Charged dilaton, energy, momentum and angular-momentum in teleparallel theory equivalent to general relativity,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 291–302, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. T. Shirafuji, G. G. L. Nashed, and K. Hayashi, “Energy of general spherically symmetric solution in the tetrad theory of gravitation,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 665–678, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. G. G. L. Nashed and T. Shirafuji, “Reissner-nordström space-time in the tetrad theory of gravitation,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 65, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. Y. N. Obukhov, G. F. Rubilar, and J. G. Pereira, “Conserved currents in gravitational models with quasi-invariant Lagrangians: application to teleparallel gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 10, Article ID 104007, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. Y. N. Obukhov and G. F. Rubilar, Physical Review D, vol. 73, Article ID 124017, 2006.
  50. F. W. Hehl, “Four lectures on Poincare gauge field theory,” in Proceedings of the 6th School of Cosmology and Gravitation on Spin, Torsion, Rotation and Supergravity, Erice, 1979, P. G. Bergmann and V. de Sabbata, Eds., Plenum, New York, NY, USA, 1980.
  51. F. W. Hehl, J. D. McCrea, E. W. Mielke, and Y. Neeman, “Metric-affine gauge theory of gravity: field equations, Noether identities, world spinors, and breaking of dilation invariance,” Physics Reports, vol. 258, pp. 1–171, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  52. K. Hayashi, “The gauge theory of the translation group and underlying geometry,” Physics Letters B, vol. 69, Article ID 104014, pp. 441–444, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  53. K. Hayashi and T. Shirafuji, “New general relativity,” Physical Review D, vol. 19, Article ID 104014, pp. 3524–3553, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  54. K. Hayashi and T. Shirafuji, “Addendum to ‘new general relativity’,” Physical Review D, vol. 24, Article ID 104014, pp. 3312–3314, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  55. M. Blagojević and M. Vasilić, “Asymptotic symmetry and conserved quantities in the Poincare gauge theory of gravity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 5, Article ID 104014, p. 1241, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  56. T. Kawai, “Energy-momentum and angular momentum densities in gauge theories of gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 62, Article ID 104014, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  57. T. Kawai, K. Shibata, and I. Tanaka, “Generalized equivalence principle in extended new general relativity,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 104, pp. 505–530, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  58. Y. M. Cho, “Einstein Lagrangian as the translational Yang-Mills Lagrangian,” Physical Review D, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 2521–2525, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  59. F. Gronwald, “Metric-affine Gauge theory of gravity: I. Fundamental structure and field equations,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 6, pp. 263–303, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  60. U. Muench, Uber teleparallele gravitationstheorien [M.S. thesis], University of Cologne, 1997.
  61. V. C. de Andrade and J. G. Pereira, “Gravitational Lorentz force and the description of the gravitational interaction,” Physical Review D, vol. 56, pp. 4689–4695, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  62. R. Tresguerres, “Translations and dynamics,” International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 905–946, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  63. Yu. N. Obukhov and J. G. Pereira, “Metric-affine approach to teleparallel gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, no. 4, Article ID 044016, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. Y. N. Obukhov and J. G. Pereira, “Lessons of spin and torsion: reply to ‘consistent coupling to Dirac fields in teleparallelism’,” Physical Review D, vol. 69, Article ID 128502, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  65. D. Puetzfeld, “An exact-plane fronted wave solution in metric-affine gravity,” in Exact Solutions and Scalar Field in Gravity: Recent Developments, A. Macias, J. Cervantes-Cota, and C. Lämmerzahl, Eds., pp. 141–151, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  66. A. García, A. Macías, D. Puetzfeld, and J. Socorro, “Plane-fronted waves in metric-affine gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 62, no. 4, Article ID 044021, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. A. D. King and D. Vassiliev, “Torsion waves in metric-affine field theory,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 2317–2329, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  68. V. Pasic and D. Vassiliev, “pp-waves with torsion and metric-affine gravity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 19, pp. 3961–3975, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  69. D. Vassiliev, “Pseudoinstantons in metric-affine field theory,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1239–1265, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  70. D. Vassiliev, “Quadratic metric-affine gravity,” Annalen der Physik, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 231–252, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  71. Y. N. Obukhov, “Plane waves in metric-affine gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 2, Article ID 024025, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. T. G. Lucas, Y. N. Obukhov, and J. G. Pereira, “Regularizing role of teleparallelism,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, Article ID 064043, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  73. H. T. Nieh, “A torsional topological invariant,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 22, no. 29, pp. 5237–5244, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  74. R. Jackiw and S.-Y. Pi, “Chern-Simons modification of general relativity,” Physical Review D, vol. 68, Article ID 104012, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. M. B. Cantche, “Einstein-Cartan formulation of Chern-Simons Lorentz-violating gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, Article ID 025002, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. E. W. Mielke, “Einsteinian gravity from a topological action,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1311–1325, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. E. W. Mielke, “Topologically modified teleparallelism, passing through the Nieh-Yan functional,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, Article ID 067502, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. F. W. Hehl, J. D. McCrea, E. W. Mielke, and Y. Ne'eman, “Metric-affine gauge theory of gravity: field equations, Noether identities, world spinors, and breaking of dilation invariance,” Physics Reports, vol. 258, no. 1-2, pp. 1–171, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. R. Aldrovandi, T. G. Lucas, and J. G. Pereira, “Gravitational energy-momentum conservation in teleparallel gravity,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.0034.
  80. Y. N. Obukhov, J. G. Pereira, and G. F. Rubilar, “On the energy transported by exact plane gravitational-wave solutions,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 26, Article ID 215014, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  81. P. Baekler and F. W. Hehl, “Rotating black holes in metric-affine gravity,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 635–668, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  82. J. M. Nester, F. H. Ho, and C. M. Chen, “Quasilocal center-of-mass for teleparallel gravity,” in Proceedings of the 10th Marcel Grossman Meeting, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2003.
  83. J. M. Nester, “Positive energy via the teleparallel hamiltonian,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 4, no. 07, pp. 1755–1772, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  84. J. M. Nester, “A positive gravitational energy proof,” Physics Letters A, vol. 139, no. 3-4, pp. 112–114, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  85. M. Blagojević, “Hamiltonian structure and gauge symmetries of Poincaré gauge theory,” Annalen der Physik, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 367–391, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  86. E. W. Mielke and R. P. Wallner, “Mass and spin of double dual solutions in Poincaré gauge theory,” Il Nuovo Cimento B, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 607–624, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. T. Kawai and N. Toma, “An extended new general relativity as a reduction of Poincaré¯ gauge theory of gravity. Generators of internal and coordinate transformations,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 901–926, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  88. J. W. Maluf, “Localization of energy in general relativity,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 4242–4247, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  89. V. C. de Andrade, L. C. T. Guillen, and J. G. Pereira, “Gravitational energy-momentum density in teleparallel gravity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 84, no. 20, pp. 4533–4536, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar