Review Article  Open Access
Andrea Giammanco, "Single Top as Window on Heavy Quarks and Other New Physics", Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, Article ID 848491, 8 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/848491
Single Top as Window on Heavy Quarks and Other New Physics
Abstract
This paper discusses what the study of the electroweak production of single top quarks can tell us about additional quark generations, and how to distinguish the new quarks hypothesis from other kinds of new physics. We also suggest some new studies that become possible for the first time thanks to the large statistics of single top quarks produced at the LHC.
1. Introduction
The top quark is the heaviest elementary particle discovered so far, and in many ways it is a very uncommon quark. The fact that its electroweak decay is faster than the hadronization timescale implies that the top quark exists only as a free quark, so that the effects from new physics could show up very clearly by comparing measurements with the precise Standard Model (SM) predictions. While the pairproduction process () has already entered several years ago the domain of “precision physics,” the study of single top production, started with the discovery at Tevatron in 2009 [1, 2], has been limited so far. The complexity of its final state demands a good control of the experimental apparatus, and other SM processes (including ) provide an overwhelming background.
The “rediscovery” of single top quark production at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) with the early 7 TeV data has been a major milestone for the ATLAS [3] and CMS [4] experiments, which are now working towards the ultimate precision and the full coverage of all production channels at 7 TeV and 8 TeV. Collisions at the Tevatron and at the LHC give access to different mixtures of electroweak single top processes: channel and channel production (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)) contribute less evenly at 7 TeV (65 pb and 4.6 pb, resp.) than at 1.96 TeV (2 pb and 1 pb), and associated production (, Figure 1(c)) which is virtually inaccessible at the Tevatron becomes the secondlargest contributor at the LHC (15 pb). A feature of SM single top production at LHC, absent at Tevatron, is the asymmetry between top and antitop production in channel (43 versus 23 pb at 7 TeV) and channel (3.1 versus 1.4 pb at 7 TeV). The first evidence of production has been reported by the ATLAS collaboration [5], followed by CMS [6], using 7 TeV data. Both measurements are systematicslimited, and reaching the level will require clever analysis improvements and more precise constraints of the leading systematics (related to modeling and, in the CMS case, to tagging efficiency).
(a)
(b)
(c)
ATLAS and CMS recorded more than 5 of pp collisions delivered by the LHC at 7 TeV during 2011, and the same amount has been reached within a few months of running at 8 TeV in 2012. Significant improvements of the channel crosssection measurement at 7 TeV [7, 8] and the first measurement of the channel crosssection at 8 TeV [9, 10] have been performed by both collaborations. The first cross sction measurement at 8 TeV is expected very soon. The signaltobackground ratio improves from 7 to 8 TeV for the production, whose crosssection is expected to increase by 40%, and for channel which increases by 35%, against a 20% increase for inclusive production and 25% for the process (with ). The channel crosssection, instead, increases by only 20%. A possibility not yet exploited by the LHC analyses is to take advantage of the different dependencies of these processes on energy, for example, by simultaneous fits to 7 and 8 TeV data with ratios constrained to SM expectations.
Table 1 shows the state of the art for theory predictions and experimental measurements of the crosssection of the three production mechanisms. Figure 2 shows the dependence of the crosssection for channel production on centreofmass energy. This is the only single top process whose crosssection has been measured at three centreofmass energies so far.
 
Quoted by [16]. 
The rest of this paper elaborates on what the study of the properties of singly produced top quarks can tell us about physics beyond the SM, with particular attention to what it can tell us about new heavy quarks. Section 2 discusses the most straightforward connection between single top studies and new sequential quark generations, which is the extraction of from the single top crosssection under some assumptions, which are critically discussed. Section 3 is devoted to single top polarization, a crucial feature of channel production in the SM which would hold true also with the inclusion of sequential quark generations in the model and can be a powerful discriminator with respect to other forms of new physics. Section 4 elaborates more generally on which kind of new physics can be suspected to be at play in case of different patterns of deviations from the SM expectations in the phase space sampled by single top analyses, with a bottomup approach. Finally, Section 5 mentions some single top signatures which are absent in the SM.
2. Single Top and
Typically, a single top crosssection measurement paper ends with the inference of the interval corresponding to the measured crosssection, under the simplifying assumption that, whatever the values, the relationships and hold true. Also implicit is the assumption of purely lefthanded coupling (i.e., lefthanded and righthanded helicity fractions ). Table 2 shows the intervals extracted by the Tevatron and LHC experiments under these assumptions, with and without the unitarity constraint . The most precise determination from single top [8] reached a comparable precision with the best one derived from the branching ratio , where [11], which is interpreted as under the same assumptions (and, therefore, can be used to infer directly only if the additional assumption is imposed).

Some papers [12–14] examined how single top crosssections are modified under the hypothesis of additional quarks mixing with the known uptype quarks, and therefore of a violation of unitarity for the components of the extended CKM matrix. While the sum and, a fortiori, the sum is bound to be ≤1 also in the extended matrix, the limits on and derived from precision physics under the SM assumption do not hold. Therefore, contrary to common intuition, additional quark generations could result in an enhancement, and not only necessarily a deficit, of the single top crosssection in channel and productions, due to the large parton densities of and quarks in the proton (much larger than the density), causing an amplification of the effect of any or value larger than the SM expectation, which can overcome the deficit due to a smaller .
References [13, 14] performed the exercise of deriving less modeldependent limits on all the three matrix elements by reexamining the measurements of single top crosssections and published at the time. This typically imposes several approximations and shortcuts, not having access to the raw data. A particularly tricky case for the reinterpretation are single top analyses based on multivariate techniques, because several of the input variables are related to the kinematics of a reconstructed top quark, and the choice itself of the jet that is assumed to come from the decay of the top quark is made under the assumption that it is a jet, and therefore . It is, therefore, important that the experimental collaborations carry out such an exercise themselves, with minimal model dependence at every stage of the analysis, possibly training the multivariate discriminators for different scenarios.
3. What Can Be Learned from Angular Observables
A crucial property of the top quark is its lifetime which is shorter than the QCD decoherence timescale ( s the former, two orders of magnitude more the latter), causing its decay products to retain memory of its helicity. This provides additional powerful tools in the search for new physics in single top studies: single top production in  and channel yields 100% polarized top quarks if only electroweak interactions are involved (which stays true if the only extension to the SM is a sequential new family of quarks), while different new physics models yield different polarizations. Relevant to this paper is the fact that, in case of hints of new physics in the single top sector, observing or not a SMlike (i.e., close to 100%) polarization of the top quark would discriminate between a trivial extension of the SM with additional quarks and other models.
The general form of the angular distribution () of decay product () in the top quark rest frame is where is the single top polarization (due to the production vertex) along a given direction chosen to quantise the top spin, and is a spinanalysing power specific of the decay particle (maximum for the charged lepton [20, 21], which is also preferred in this kind of studies because of the identification cleanness of electrons and muons). Both parameters can be affected by top quark anomalous couplings [20].
Single top polarization in the channel process is already manifest in the slope of the distribution (see Figure 3 for a selection of enriched in channel events, from [8]), where is defined as the angle between the charged lepton and the light jet () in the reconstructed top quark rest frame. The rationale for this definition is that the (light) quark recoiling against the single top quark tends to have a direction parallel to the spin direction of the top quark at the production vertex [21]. The SM expectation has even been builtin in the foundations of one of the earliest crosssection measurements at the LHC [22] which made use of the distribution to fit the SM signal (this is named the “2D analysis” in [22], being based on a likelihood fit to the bidimensional distribution in the () plane. In the same paper, this is combined with the result of a fit to a boosted decision trees where is one among many inputs) and it is part of the implicit assumptions of all the multivariate analyses at Tevatron and LHC. It is crucial to perform unbiased precision measurements of both the crosssection and to decouple the issue of measuring the SMlike component from the search for new physics. This is straightforward as a further step of a cutbased analysis or of the simple strategy of the “ analysis” [8, 10] ([8] makes use of three complementary analysis strategies, two of which are multivariate analyses), thanks to the small and calculable correlation between and , while more care has to be taken in multivariate analyses, where several input observables are correlated with the polarization. A promising way out in this case is the use of orthogonalization techniques, like “deboosting” [23], to ensure that the MVA discriminator used for event selection is uncorrelated with .
Other angular variables can be defined in single top events for the purpose of measuring top quark polarization in a modelindependent way (see, e.g., [27]). Several angular observables can be useful, alone or combined, thanks to their sensitivities to the helicity states of the from top decay, to constrain the parameters of the most general Lagrangian term that one can write for the coupling up to sixdimensional gauge invariant operators [28] (under the approximation ): where the SM predicts . The D0 collaboration has set constrains on these parameters by means of a neural network analysis combining several angular and kinematical inputs, with different networks trained for nonzero values of each of the anomalous parameters and [29]. Due to the higher centreofmass energy, given that the new physics effects would enter in the production vertex, LHC experiments are expected to be more sensitive to deviations to the SM. The simultaneous measurement of the crosssection and of the parameters of the generalized coupling would help to get rid of the simplifying assumption about implicit in (2).
4. Deficits and Excesses: A BottomUp Approach
Different beyondSM models predict different effects in the different production channels [12]. Here, we outline a few examples, reasoning in a bottomup approach, that is, starting from the possible observations of deficits or excesses to infer which model (including the SM itself) could provide the most natural explanation.(i)A deficit in all three channels would naturally lead to suspect (hence the existence of new quarks); this can be verified by precisely measuring in events; (ii)an excess in the channel, not confirmed in the other two, would induce to suspect a charged resonance (e.g., a righthanded , whose coupling to light fermions would be suppressed by helicity conservation and would, therefore, be visible in the final state and not in electronic or muonic decays), which would be confirmed by a peak or a peakdip structure in the spectrum; (iii)an excess in the channel, not confirmed in the other two, could be due to new interactions causing flavourchanging neutral currents (FCNCs): even with tiny and couplings, the very large upquark density at high in the proton would allow a visible signal to show up; important checks would be the differential measurements of and of the single top polarization; (iv)an excess in the channel and in the channel, with no deviation from the SM in the polarization of the top quark, and a deficit in the channel could be due to large or (nonunitarity of the CKM matrix, hence possible existence of new quarks), to be checked by measuring and .
Some of these new physics effects in channel and production might be mimicked by discrepancies in the gluon or quark PDFs at large and it is, therefore, necessary to be able to rule out this possibility by additional dedicated inputs. Precision measurements of all three production modes will have a deep impact on PDF constraints, with the three channels being complementary to each other and also to production. For example, channel and crosssections are sensitive to the quark PDF and anticorrelated with the crosssection, while the channel (essentially a DrellYan process) is insensitive to the quark PDF and can therefore act as a control process, and it is correlated with the crosssection, like the crosssection [30]. Moreover, the integrated or differential charge asymmetry in channel production will provide a very powerful input for constraining PDFs, similar to the production case, in a region of very relevant for several other searches. The first measurement of the integrated charge asymmetry () from the ATLAS collaboration [31] at 7 TeV has already disfavoured some PDF sets, as illustrated in Figure 4. Differential distributions of as a function of rapidity and transverse momentum of the top quark will provide significant additional discriminating power. Another useful input for constraining PDFs is the measurement of the ratio of single top crosssections between 7 and 8 TeV, as done by the CMS collaboration in the channel case by taking the ratio of results of the analysis at the two energies [10].
5. Exotic Single Top Signatures
While the “channel like” signature, as mentioned in Section 4, is sensitive to FCNC couplings of the kinds and , which can also be constrained by looking for the and decays in pairproduced top quark events (searches for the decay have been already performed by both LHC collaborations at 7 TeV [32, 33]), the exotic signature of a “very single top” (i.e., a partonic reaction producing a top quark, see Figure 5) is by far the most powerful handle to constrain the FCNC couplings of the kind , given the overwhelming SM background in the decays. The CDF and ATLAS collaborations performed a search in the verysingletop final state [34, 35], with the tightest bounds to date coming from ATLAS at 7 TeV: The D0 collaboration chose a different strategy, based on the SMlike signature of a single top quark in association with a light quark [36] (same signature as channel production in the SM). With a similar integrated luminosity as CDF (2.3 versus 2.2 for CDF), they obtained more stringent limits, demonstrating that the “top + jet” signature (mostly initiated by quarkquark collisions) is more sensitive than the “verysingletop” signature in the Tevatron conditions. Nevertheless, at the LHC energies the gluon flux is much more intense than at Tevatron in comparison to the quark flux; therefore, the balance is likely in favour of the “very single top” (A proper comparison, beyond the scope of this paper, would demand to take into account any effect susceptible to increase the jet multiplicity of the event, like initial state radiation and pileup).
New physics can produce a single top quark in association with invisible particles, hence large missing transverse energy (this signature is known in the literature as “monotops”) [37], or a single top in association with a boson, which in turn can give the monotop signature (when the boson decays into a neutrino pair) or a spectacular final state of three leptons, a b jet and large transverse missing energy. No experimental collaboration published a search for these final states yet. It can be remarked, in the context of this volume dedicated to new heavy quarks, that both signatures can be originated by the production of heavy vectorlike partners of the top quark, which would have the FCNC decay [38]. Given the very tight limits on a sequential fourth generation with SMlike couplings, the exploration of these alternative new quark scenarios becomes even more interesting, and single production is kinematically favoured over pair production, despite the larger QCD coupling, when the quark is very heavy.
6. Conclusions
The single top final states are an important place to look for indirect evidences of new heavy quarks, and the measurements of the properties of single top quarks are crucial to gain sensitivity to nonSM interactions and to get some insight into the kind of new physics at hand in case of deviations from the SM hypothesis.
Acknowledgments
The author wishes to thank Paris Sphicas and George Hou for their suggestions, and the Estonian Academy of Science for supporting this work with the Mobilitas Top Researcher Grant MTT59.
References
 T. Aaltonen, J. Adelman, T. Akimoto et al., “First observation of electroweak single top quark production,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 103, Article ID 092002, 9 pages, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. M. Abazov, B. Abbott, M. Abolins et al., “Observation of single topquark production,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 103, Article ID 092001, 7 pages, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 G. Aad, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah et al., “The ATLAS experiment at the CERN LHC,” Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 3, Article ID S08003, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Chatrchyan, G. Hmayakyan, V. Khachatryan et al., “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC,” Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 3, no. 8, Article ID S08004, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Aad, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah et al., “Evidence for the associated production of a W boson and a top quark in ATLAS at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV,” Physics Letters B, vol. 716, no. 1, pp. 142–159, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Chatrchyan, G. Hmayakyan, V. Khachatryan et al., “Evidence for associated production of a single top quark and W boson in pp collisions at 7 TeV,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 110, no. 2, Article ID 022003, 16 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Aad, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah et al., “Measurement of the tchannel single topquark production cross section in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Physics Letters B, vol. 717, no. 45, pp. 330–350, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Chatrchyan, G. Hmayakyan, V. Khachatryan et al., “Measurement of the singletopquark tchannel cross section in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1212, article 035, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 G. Cataldi, A. dos Anjos, W. Wiedenmann et al., “Measurement of tchannel single topquark production in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” ATLASCONF2012132. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Chatrchyan, G. Hmayakyan, V. Khachatryan et al., “Measurement of the singletop tchannel cross section in pp collisions at centreofmass energy of 8 TeV,” CMSTOP12011. View at: Google Scholar
 V. M. Abazov, B. Abbott, M. Abolins et al., “Precision measurement of the ratio $B(t\to Wb)/B(t\to Wq)$ and extraction of ${V}_{tb}$,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 107, Article ID 121802, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 T. M. P. Tait and C. P. Yuan, “Single top quark production as a window to physics beyond the standard model,” Physical Review D, vol. 63, no. 1, Article ID 014018, 5 pages, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Alwall, R. Frederix, J. M. Gérard et al., “Is ${V}_{tb}\approx 1$?” European Physical Journal C, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 791–801, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Lacker, A. Menzel, F. Spettel et al., “Modelindependent extraction of ${V}_{tq}$ matrix elements from topquark measurements at hadron colliders,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 72, article 2048. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Kidonakis, “Differential and total cross sections for top pair and single top production,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.3453v1. View at: Google Scholar
 T. Aaltonen, J. Adelman, T. Akimoto et al., “Measurement of single top quark production in 7. 5 ${\text{fb}}^{1}$ of CDF Data Using Neural Networks,” CDF conf. note 10793. View at: Google Scholar
 V. M. Abazov, B. Abbott, M. Abolins et al., “Modelindependent measurement of tchannel single top quark production in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV,” Physics Letters B, vol. 705, no. 4, pp. 313–319, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 Tevatron Electroweak Working Group, “Combination of CDF and D0 measurements of the single top production cross section,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.2171. View at: Google Scholar
 V. M. Abazov, B. Abbott, M. Abolins et al., “Measurements of single top quark production cross sections and ${V}_{tb}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, Article ID 112001, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Jezabek and J. H. Kühn, “VA tests through leptons from polarised top quarks,” Physics Letters B, vol. 329, no. 23, pp. 317–324, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
 G. Mahlon and S. Parke, “Single top quark production at the LHC: understanding spin,” Physics Letters B, vol. 476, no. 34, pp. 323–330, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Chatrchyan, G. Hmayakyan, V. Khachatryan et al., “Measurement of the tchannel single top quark production cross section in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 107, Article ID 091802, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 D. Martschei, M. Feindt, S. Honc, and J. WagnerKuhr, “Advanced event reweighting using multivariate analysis,” Journal of Physics, vol. 368, Article ID 012028, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. M. Campbell, R. Frederix, F. Maltoni, and F. Tramontano, “NLO predictions for tchannel production of single top and fourth generation quarks at hadron colliders,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2009, no. 10 article 042, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Kidonakis, “Nexttonexttoleadingorder collinear and soft gluon corrections for tchannel single top quark production,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 9, Article ID 091503, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. M. Campbell, J. W. Huston, and W. J. Stirling, “Hard interactions of quarks and gluons: a primer for LHC physics,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 70, no. 1, article 89, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. A. AguilarSaavedra and R. V. HerreroHahn, “Modelindependent measurement of the top quark polarisation,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.6006. View at: Google Scholar
 J. A. AguilarSaavedra, “A minimal set of top anomalous couplings,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 812, no. 12, pp. 181–204, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. M. Abazov, B. Abbott, M. Abolins et al., “Combination of searches for anomalous top quark couplings with 5.4 fb^{−1} of $p\overline{p}$ collisions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 713, pp. 165–171, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Guffanti and J. Rojo, “Top production at the LHC: the impact of PDF uncertainties and correlations,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.4671. View at: Google Scholar
 G. Cataldi, A. dos Anjos, W. Wiedenmann et al., “Measurement of the tchannel single topquark and topantiquark crosssections and their ratio in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV,” ATLASCONF2012056. View at: Google Scholar
 G. Cataldi, A. dos Anjos, W. Wiedenmann et al., “A search for flavour changing neutral currents in topquark decays in pp collision data collected with the ATLAS detector at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.0257. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Chatrchyan, G. Hmayakyan, V. Khachatryan et al., “Search for flavour changing neutral currents in top quark decays in pp collisions at 7 TeV,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0957. View at: Google Scholar
 T. Aaltonen, J. Adelman, T. Akimoto et al., “Search for topquark production via flavorchanging neutral currents in W +1 jet events at CDF,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, no. 15, Article ID 151801, 7 pages, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Cataldi, A. dos Anjos, W. Wiedenmann et al., “Search for FCNC single topquark production at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV with the ATLAS detector,” vol. 712, no. 45, pp. 351–369, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. M. Abazov, B. Abbott, M. Abolins et al., “Search for flavor changing neutral currents via quarkgluon couplings in single top quark production using 2.3 fb^{−1} of $p\overline{p}$ collisions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 693, no. 2, pp. 81–87, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Andrea, B. Fuks, and F. Maltoni, “Monotops at the LHC,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.6199. View at: Google Scholar
 G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, N. Gaur, D. Harada, Y. Okada, and L. Panizzi, “Heavy Vectorlike top partners at the LHC and avour constraints,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.6329. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Andrea Giammanco. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.