Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2013, Article ID 875612, 24 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/875612
Review Article

Higgs-Yukawa Model in Chirally Invariant Lattice Field Theory

1CERN, Physics Department, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
2Institüt für Physik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 12489 Berlin, Germany
3NIC, DESY, Platanenallee 6, 15738 Zeuthen, Germany
4Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
5Institute of Physics, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
6Division of Physics, National Centre for Theoretical Sciences, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
7Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8602, Japan
8Department of Physics, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung Li 32023, Taiwan

Received 22 June 2012; Accepted 1 February 2013

Academic Editor: George Wei-Shu Hou

Copyright © 2013 John Bulava et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Dashen and H. Neuberger, “How to get an upper bound on the higgs mass,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 50, no. 24, pp. 1897–1900, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. T. Lee and G. Wick, “Vacuum stability and vacuum excitation in a spin-0 field theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 2291–2316, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. A. D. Linde, “Dynamical symmetry restoration and constraints on masses and coupling constants in gauge theories,” JETP Letters, vol. 23, pp. 64–67, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  4. S. Weinberg, “Mass of the Higgs Boson,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 294–296, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Sher, “Electroweak Higgs potential and vacuum stability,” Physics Reports, vol. 179, no. 5-6, pp. 273–418, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. The ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 716, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. The CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 716, no. 1, pp. 30–61, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. G. Degrassi, S. Vita, J. Elias-Miro et al., “Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the Standard Model at NNLO,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1208, p. 098, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  9. M. S. Carena, A. Megevand, M. Quiros, and C. E. Wagner, “Electroweak baryogenesis and new TeV fermions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 716, no. 1-2, pp. 319–351, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. B. Holdom, W. S. Hou, T. Hurth et al., “Four statements about the fourth generation,” PMC Physics A, vol. 3, p. 4, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. J. Smit, “Standard model and chiral gauge theories on the lattice,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 17, pp. 3–16, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. J. Shigemitsu, “Higgs-Yukawa-Chiral models 1,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 20, pp. 515–527, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. M. F. Golterman, “Lattice chiral gauge theories: results and problems,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 20, pp. 528–541, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. A. De and J. Jersak, “Yukawa model on the lattice,” Advanced Series on Directions in High Energy Physics, vol. 10, p. 732, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  15. I. Montvay and G. Münster, Quantum Fields on a Lattice Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997.
  16. M. F. Golterman, D. N. Petcher, and E. Rivas, “On the Eichten-Preskill proposal for lattice chiral gauge theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 29, no. 2-3, pp. 193–199, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. K. Jansen, “Domain wall fermions and chiral gauge theories,” Physics Reports, vol. 273, no. 1, p. 54, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. P. H. Ginsparg and K. G. Wilson, “A remnant of chiral symmetry on the lattice,” Physical Review, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2649–2657, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. M. Luscher, “Exact chiral symmetry on the lattice and the Ginsparg-Wilson relation,” Physics Letters B, vol. 428, pp. 342–345, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. T. Bhattacharya, M. R. Martin, and E. Poppitz, “Chiral lattice gauge theories from warped domain walls and Ginsparg-Wilson fermions,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 8, Article ID 085028, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. J. Giedt and E. Poppitz, “Chiral lattice gauge theories and the strong coupling dynamics of a Yukawa-Higgs model with Ginsparg-Wilson fermions,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 10, p. 076, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. E. Poppitz and Y. Shang, “Lattice chirality and the decoupling of mirror fermions,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 08, p. 081, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  23. P. Gerhold and K. Jansen, “The phase structure of a chirally invariant lattice Higgs-Yukawa model for small and for large values of the Yukawa coupling constant,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 09, p. 041, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. P. Gerhold and K. Jansen, “The phase structure of a chirally invariant lattice Higgs-Yukawa model-numerical simulations,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 10, p. 001, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, D. Nogradi, and C. Schroeder, “New Higgs physics from the lattice,” PoS LAT2007 056, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  26. P. Gerhold and K. Jansen, “Lower Higgs boson mass bounds from a chirally invariant lattice Higgs-Yukawa model with overlap fermions,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 07, p. 025, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. P. Gerhold, Upper and lower Higgs boson mass bounds from a chirally invariant lattice Higgs-Yukawa model [Ph.D. thesis], http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.2569.
  28. P. Gerhold and K. Jansen, “Upper Higgs boson mass bounds from a chirally invariant lattice Higgs-Yukawa model,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 04, p. 094, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. P. Gerhold, K. Jansen, and J. Kallarackal, “The Higgs boson resonance width from a chiral Higgs-Yukawa model on the lattice,” Physics Letters B, vol. 710, no. 4-5, pp. 697–702, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. P. Gerhold, K. Jansen, and J. Kallarackal, “Higgs boson mass bounds in the presence of a very heavy fourth quark generation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 01, p. 143, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. J. Bulava, P. Gerhold, G. W.-S. Hou et al., “Study of the Higgs-Yukawa theory in the strong-Yukawa coupling regime,” PoS LATTICE2011 075, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  32. ALPHA Collaboration and U. Wolff, “Monte Carlo errors with less errors,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 143–153, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. H. Neuberger, “Exactly massless quarks on the lattice,” Physics Letters B, vol. 417, no. 1-2, pp. 141–144, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  34. H. Neuberger, “More about exactly massless quarks on the lattice,” Physics Letters B, vol. 427, no. 3-4, pp. 353–355, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. P. Hernandez, K. Jansen, and M. Luscher, “Locality properties of Neuberger's lattice Dirac operator,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 552, no. 1-2, pp. 363–378, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  36. R. Frezzotti and K. Jansen, “A polynomial hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm,” Physics Letters B, vol. 402, no. 3-4, pp. 328–334, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. R. Frezzotti and K. Jansen, “The PHMC algorithm for simulations of dynamical fermions I. Description and properties,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 555, no. 1-2, pp. 395–431, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. R. Frezzotti and K. Jansen, “The PHMC algorithm for simulations of dynamical fermions II. Performance analysis,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 555, no. 1-2, pp. 432–453, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. P. Gerhold and K. Jansen, “Upper and lower Higgs boson mass bounds from a lattice Higgs-Yukawa model with dynamical overlap fermions,” PoS LAT2009 054, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  40. S. Hashimoto, “Physics results from dynamical overlap fermion simulations,” PoS LATTICE2008 011, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  41. A. Hasenfratz, K. Jansen, J. Jersák, C. B. Lang, H. Leutwyler, and T. Neuhaus, “Finite size effects and spontaneously broken symmetries: the case of the O4 model,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 257–261, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. A. Hasenfratz, K. Jansen, J. Jersák et al., “Goldstone bosons and finite size effects: a numerical study of the O4 model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 356, no. 1, pp. 332–163, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. M. Gockeler and H. Leutwyler, “Constraint correlation functions in the O(N) model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 361, no. 2, pp. 392–414, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. J. Kallarackal, The Higgs boson resonance from a chiral Higg-Yukawa model on the lattice [Ph.D. thesis], 2011.
  45. U. M. Heller, M. Klomfass, H. Neuberger, and P. M. Vranas, “Numerical analysis of the Higgs mass triviality bound,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 405, no. 2-3, pp. 555–573, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, A. Mück et al., “Higgs production and decay with a fourth Standard-Model-like fermion generation,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 72, p. 1992, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. M. S. Chanowitz, M. Furman, and I. Hinchliffe, “Weak interactions of ultra heavy fermions (II),” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 153, pp. 402–430, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. M. S. Chanowitz, M. Furman, and I. Hinchliffe, “Weak interactions of ultra heavy fermions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 78, no. 2-3, pp. 285–289, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. A. Hasenfratz, T. Neuhaus, K. Jansen, H. Yoneyama, and C. B. Lang, “The triviality bound of the four-component Φ4 model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 199, no. 4, pp. 531–535, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. Kuti, L. Lin, and Y. Shen, “Upper bound on the Higgs-Boson mass in the standard model,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 678–681, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. M. Luscher and P. Weisz, “Scaling laws and triviality bounds in the lattice ϕ4 theory (III). n-component model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 318, no. 3, pp. 705–741, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  52. A. Hasenfratz, K. Jansen, J. Jersa, C. B. Lang, T. Neuhaus, and H. Yoneyama, “Study of the 4-component ϕ4 model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 317, no. 1, pp. 81–96, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. M. Lüscher, “Two-particle states on a torus and their relation to the scattering matrix,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 354, no. 2-3, pp. 531–578, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  54. M. Luscher, “Signatures of unstable particles in finite volume,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 364, no. 1, pp. 237–251, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. K. Rummukainen and S. A. Gottlieb, “Resonance scattering phase shifts on a non-rest-frame lattice,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 450, no. 1-2, pp. 397–436, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. X. Feng, K. Jansen, and D. B. Renner, “Resonance parameters of the ρ meson from lattice QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 9, p. 094505, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. J. Bulava, P. Gerhold, K. Jansen, J. Kallarackal, and A. Nagy, “Higgs boson resonance parameters and the finite temperature phase transition in a chirally invariant Higgs-Yukawa model,” PoS LATTICE2011 301, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  58. A. Abada and R. Shrock, “Results from a strong-coupling expansion for a lattice Yukawa model with a real scalar field,” Physical Review D, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 304–307, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. A. Hasenfratz, P. Hasenfratz, K. Jansen, J. Kuti, and Y. Shen, “The equivalence of the top quark condensate and the elementary higgs field,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 365, no. 1, pp. 79–97, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. A. G. Cohen, D. Kaplan, and A. Nelson, “Progress in electroweak baryogenesis,” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, vol. 43, pp. 27–70, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. M. E. Fisher and M. N. Barber, “Scaling theory for finite-size effects in the critical region,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 28, no. 23, pp. 1516–1519, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. E. Brezin, “An investigation of finite size scaling,” Journal de Physique, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. E. Brezin and J. Zinn-Justin, “Finite size effects in phase transitions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 257, pp. 867–893, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. W. Bernreuther and M. Göckeler, “Renormalization group and finite size effects in scalar lattice field theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 295, no. 2, pp. 199–210, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  65. R. Kenna and C. Lang, “Renormalization group analysis of finite-size scaling in the ϕ44 model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 393, no. 3, pp. 461–479, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. R. Kenna, “Finite size scaling for O(N) ϕ4-theory at the upper critical dimension,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 691, no. 3, pp. 292–304, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. K. Binder, “Finite size scaling analysis of ising model block distribution functions,” Zeitschrift für Physik B, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 119–140, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. B. A. Freedman, J. Baker, and A. George, “A test of hyperscaling violation in three-dimensional Ising model,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 15, p. L715, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  69. V. Privman and M. E. Fisher, “Convergence of finite-size scaling renormalisation techniques,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. L295–L301, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  70. K. Binder, M. Nauenberg, V. Privman, and A. P. Young, “Finite-size tests of hyperscaling,” Physical Review B, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1498–1502, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. E. Focht, J. Jersak, and J. Paul, “Interplay of universality classes in a three-dimensional Yukawa model,” Physical Review D, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 4616–4627, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. O. Eberhardt, G. Herbert, H. Lacker et al., “Impact of a Higgs boson at a mass of 126 GeV on the standard model with three and four fermion generations,” Physical Review Letters In press, http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.1101.
  73. K. Jansen and P. Seuferling, “Finite-temperature symmetry restoration in the four-dimensional q4 model with four components,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 343, no. 2, pp. 507–521, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. S. M. Bhattacharjee and F. Seno, “A measure of data collapse for scaling,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 34, no. 33, p. 6375, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. M. Aizenman and R. Graham, “On the renormalized coupling constant and the susceptibility in ϕ44 field theory and the Ising model in four dimensions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 225, no. 2, pp. 261–288, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  76. J. Elias-Miro, J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, H. M. Lee, and A. Strumia, “Stabilization of the electroweak vacuum by a scalar threshold effect,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 06, p. 031, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar