Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 923686, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/923686
Research Article

Minimal Length Schrödinger Equation with Harmonic Potential in the Presence of a Magnetic Field

1Department of Physics, Shahrood University, Shahrood, Iran
2Department of Basic Sciences, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran
3Theoretical Physics Group, Department of Physics, University of Uyo, Nigeria
4Department of Basic Sciences, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran

Received 18 August 2013; Revised 20 October 2013; Accepted 20 October 2013

Academic Editor: Elias C. Vagenas

Copyright © 2013 H. Hassanabadi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. Scardigli, “Generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity from micro-black hole gedanken experiment,” Physics Letters B, vol. 452, no. 1-2, pp. 39–44, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  2. S. Das and E. C. Vagenas, “Universality of quantum gravity corrections,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 22, pp. 221301–221305, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. S. Das and E. C. Vagenas, “Phenomenological implications of the generalized uncertainty principle,” Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 233–240, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. I. Dadić, L. Jonke, and S. Meljanac, “Harmonic oscillator with minimal length uncertainty relations and ladder operators,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 87701–87705, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. L. N. Chang, D. Minic, N. Okamura, and T. Takeuchi, “Exact solution of the harmonic oscillator in arbitrary dimensions with minimal length uncertainty relations,” Physical Review D, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 125027–125035, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. S. Benczik, L. N. Chang, D. Minic, N. Okamura, S. Rayyan, and T. Takeuchi, “Short distance versus long distance physics: the classical limit of the minimal length uncertainty relation,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 2, Article ID 026003, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. Konishi, G. Paffuti, and P. Provero, “Minimum physical length and the generalized uncertainty principle in string theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 234, no. 3, pp. 276–284, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  8. M. Maggiore, “A generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 304, no. 1-2, pp. 65–69, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. S. Das, E. C. Vagenas, and A. Farag Ali, “Discreteness of space from GUP II: relativistic wave equations,” Physics Letters B, vol. 690, no. 4, pp. 407–412, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. F. Ali, S. Das, and E. C. Vagenas, “Proposal for testing quantum gravity in the lab,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 44013–44023, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. M. Maggiore, “Quantum groups, gravity, and the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physical Review D, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 5182–5187, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. M. Maggiore, “The algebraic structure of the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physics Letters B, vol. 319, no. 1–3, pp. 83–86, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. A. Kempf, G. Mangano, and R. B. Mann, “Hilbert space representation of the minimal length uncertainty relation,” Physical Review D, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 1108–1118, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  14. J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, “String theories with deformed energy-momentum relations, and a possible nontachyonic bosonic string,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 2, Article ID 026010, 6 pages, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. J. L. Cortés and J. Gamboa, “Quantum uncertainty in doubly special relativity,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 6, p. 065015, 4, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. M. V. Battisti and G. Montani, “The big-bang singularity in the framework of a generalized uncertainty principle,” Physics Letters B, vol. 656, no. 1–3, pp. 96–101, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  17. A. F. Ali and A. Tawfik, “Modified Newton's law of gravitation due to minimal length in quantum gravity,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, Article ID 126528, 7 pages, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. H. Hassanabadi, S. Zarrinkamar, and E. Maghsoodi, “Scattering states of Woods-Saxon interaction in minimal length quantum mechanics,” Physics Letters B, vol. 718, no. 2, pp. 657–682, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  19. L. Menculini, O. Panella, and P. Roy, “Exact solutions of the (2+1) dimensional Dirac equation in a constant magnetic field in the presence of a minimal length,” Physical Review D, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 65017–65027. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. M. Maziashvili, “Implications of minimum-length deformed quantum mechanics for QFT/QG,” Fortschritte der Physik, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 685–700, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. L. J. Garay, “Quantum gravity and minimum length,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 145–165, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. W. C. Qiang and S. H. Dong, “Arbitrary l-state solutions of the rotating Morse potential through the exact quantization rule method,” Physics Letters A, vol. 363, no. 3, pp. 169–176, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  23. S. H. Dong, D. Morales, and J. Garcia-Ravelo, “Exact quantization rule and its applicatrions to physical potentials,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 189–198. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. A. F. Ali, S. Das, and E. C. Vagenas, “Proposal for testing quantum gravity in the lab,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 44013–44023, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. S.-H. Dong, “Exact solutions of the two-dimensional Schrödinger equation with certain central potentials,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1119–1128, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  26. K. J. Oyewumi, “Analytical solutions of the kratzer-fues potential in an arbitrary number of dimensions,” Foundations of Physics Letters, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. O. Bayrak, I. Boztosun, and H. Ciftci, “Exact analytical solutions to the kratzer potential by the asymptotic iteration method,” International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 540–544, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. R. Setare and E. Karimi, “Algebraic approach to the Kratzer potential,” Physica Scripta, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 90–93, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  29. S. Hossenfelder, “Minimal length scale scenarios for quantum gravity,” Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 16, no. 2, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. D. Bouaziz and M. Bawin, “Singular inverse square potential in arbitrary dimensions with a minimal length: application to the motion of a dipole in a cosmic string background,” Physical Review A, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 32110–32118, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. L. N. Chang, Z. Lewis, D. Minic, and T. Takeuchi, “On the minimal length uncertainty relation and the foundations of string theory,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, Article ID 493514, 30 pages, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  32. U. Harbach, S. Hossenfelder, M. Bleicher, and H. Stöcker, “Probing the minimal length scale by precision tests of the muon g-2,” Physics Letters B, vol. 584, no. 1-2, pp. 109–113, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. D. Kothawala, L. Sriramkumar, S. Shankaranarayanan, and T. Padmanabhan, “Path integral duality modified propagators in spacetimes with constant curvature,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 4, Article ID 044005, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. O. Panella, “Casimir-Polder intermolecular forces in minimal length theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 45012–45023, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. P. Pedram, K. Nozari, and S. H. Taheri, “The effects of minimal length and maximal momentum on the transition rate of ultra cold neutrons in gravitational field,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, article 93, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. A. F. Nikiforov and V. B. Uvarov, Special Functions of Mathematical Physics, Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, 1988, 1988. View at MathSciNet
  37. C. Tezcan and R. Sever, “A general approach for the exact solution of the Schrödinger equation,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 337–350, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet