Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 418342, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/418342
Research Article

Thomas-Fermi Model in the Presence of Natural Cutoffs

Department of Physics, Islamic Azad University, Sari Branch, Sari, Iran

Received 5 November 2013; Revised 26 January 2014; Accepted 29 January 2014; Published 28 April 2014

Academic Editor: Elias C. Vagenas

Copyright © 2014 Kourosh Nozari et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. G. Veneziano, “A stringy nature needs just two constants,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 2, no. 3, article 199, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  2. D. Amati, M. Cialfaloni, and G. Veneziano, “Superstring collisions at planckian energies,” Physics Letters B, vol. 197, no. 1-2, pp. 81–88, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  3. D. Amati, M. Cialfaloni, and G. Veneziano, “Can spacetime be probed below the string size?” Physics Letters B, vol. 216, no. 1-2, pp. 41–47, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  4. D. J. Gross and P. F. Mende, “The high-energy behavior of string scattering amplitudes,” Physics Letters B, vol. 197, no. 1-2, pp. 129–134, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. K. Konishi, G. Paffuti, and P. Provero, “Minimum physical length and the generalized uncertainty principle in string theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 234, no. 3, pp. 276–284, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. R. Guida, K. Konishi, and P. Provero, “On the short distance behavior of string theories,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 6, no. 16, pp. 1487–1504, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Kato, “Particle theories with minimum observable length and open string theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 245, no. 1, pp. 43–47, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  8. L. J. Garay, “Quantum gravity and minimal length,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 145–166, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  9. S. Capozziello, G. Lambiase, and G. Scarpetta, “Generalized uncertainty principle from quantum geometry,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  10. M. Maggiore, “A generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 304, no. 1-2, pp. 65–69, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  11. M. Maggiore, “The algebraic structure of the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physics Letters B, vol. 319, no. 1–3, pp. 83–86, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. M. Maggiore, “Quantum groups, gravity, and the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physical Review D, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 5182–5187, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. S. Hossenfelder, “Minimal length scale scenarios for quantum gravity,” Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 16, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Hossenfelder, “Can we measure structures to a precision better than the Planck length?” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 29, no. 11, Article ID 115011, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  15. F. Scardigli, “Generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity from micro-black hole gedanken experiment,” Physics Letters B, vol. 452, no. 1-2, pp. 39–44, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  16. A. Kempf, G. Mangano, and R. B. Mann, “Hilbert space representation of the minimal length uncertainty relation,” Physical Review D, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 1108–1118, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. H. Hinrichsen and A. Kempf, “Maximal localization in the presence of minimal uncertainties in positions and in momenta,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 2121–2137, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  18. A. Kempf, “On quantum field theory with nonzero minimal uncertainties in positions and momenta,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1347–1372, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  19. M. Bojowald and A. Kempf, “Generalized uncertainty principles and localization of a particle in discrete space,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 8, Article ID 085017, 15 pages, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  20. K. Nozari and A. Etemadi, “Minimal length, maximal momentum, and Hilbert space representation of quantum mechanics,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 10, Article ID 104029, 12 pages, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  21. R. J. Adler, “Six easy roads to the Planck scale,” The American Journal of Physics, vol. 78, article 925, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  22. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Relativity in spacetimes with short-distance structure governed by an observer-independent (Planckian) length scale,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 35–59, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  23. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Special treatment,” Nature, vol. 418, no. 6893, pp. 34–35, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Doubly-special relativity: first results and key open problems,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1643–1669, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  25. J. Kowalski-Glikman, “Introduction to doubly special relativity,” in Planck Scale Effects in Astrophysics and Cosmology, vol. 669 of Lecture Notes in Physics, pp. 131–159, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  26. G. Amelino-Camelia, G. Mandanici, A. Procaccini, and J. Kowalski-Glikman, “Phenomenology of doubly special relativity,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 20, no. 26, pp. 6007–6037, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  27. K. Imilkowska and J. Kowalski-Glikman, “Doubly special relativity as a limit of gravity,” in Special Relativity, vol. 702 of Lecture Notes in Physics, pp. 279–298, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  28. J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, “Lorentz invariance with an invariant energy scale,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 88, no. 19, Article ID 190403, 4 pages, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  29. J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, “Generalized Lorentz invariance with an invariant energy scale,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, no. 4, Article ID 044017, 12 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  30. J. Magueijo and L. Smolin, “String theories with deformed energy-momentum relations, and a possible nontachyonic bosonic string,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 2, Article ID 026010, p. 6, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  31. J. L. Cortés and J. Gamboa, “Quantum uncertainty in doubly special relativity,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 6, Article ID 065015, p. 4, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  32. A. F. Ali, S. Das, and E. C. Vagenas, “Discreteness of space from the generalized uncertainty principle,” Physics Letters B, vol. 678, no. 5, pp. 497–499, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  33. S. Das, E. C. Vagenas, and A. Farag Ali, “Discreteness of space from GUP II: relativistic wave equations,” Physics Letters B, vol. 690, pp. 407–412, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. P. Pedram, K. Nozari, and S. H. Taheri, “The effects of minimal length and maximal momentum on the transition rate of ultra cold neutrons in gravitational field,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, article 93, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. J. C. Inkson, Many-Body Theory of Solids, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1984.
  36. S. Das and E. C. Vagenas, “Universality of quantum gravity corrections,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, Article ID 221301, 4 pages, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  37. A. Farag Ali, S. Das, and E. C. Vagenas, “Proposal for testing quantum gravity in the lab,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, Article ID 044013, 2011. View at Google Scholar