Advances in High Energy Physics

Advances in High Energy Physics / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 707812 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/707812

Appearance of a Minimal Length in Annihilation

Academic Editor: Kadayam S. Viswanathan
Received28 Dec 2013
Accepted22 Jan 2014
Published16 Mar 2014

Abstract

Experimental data reveal with a 5 significance the existence of a characteristic minimal length  cm at the scale TeV in the annihilation reaction . Nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to gravity and satisfying the weak energy condition predicts, for an arbitrary gauge invariant Lagrangian, the existence of spinning charged electromagnetic soliton asymptotically Kerr-Newman for a distant observer with the gyromagnetic ratio . Its internal structure includes a rotating equatorial disk of de Sitter vacuum which has properties of a perfect conductor and ideal diamagnetic, displays superconducting behavior, supplies a particle with the finite positive electromagnetic mass related to breaking of space-time symmetry, and gives some idea about the physical origin of a minimal length in annihilation.

1. Introduction

The concept of a minimal length suggested by path-integral quantisation [1], string theory [2, 3], black hole physics [4], and quantum gravity [5, 6] has been introduced into quantum mechanics and quantum field theory through generalised uncertainty principle which restricts an accuracy in measuring a particle position by a certain finite minimal length scale related to maximal resolution [79] (for a review [10]). In gravity, the limiting quantum length is the Planck length  cm, the related energy scale  TeV. However gravitational effects have only be tested up to 1 TeV scale [11] which corresponds to  cm [12]; therefore, minimal length could be in principle found within the range between and [12]. In models with extra dimensions, the Planck length can be reduced to with  TeV, which results in modification of cross-sections of basic scattering processes , ([13] and references therein).

In this paper, we summarize the results on working out experimental data on the annihilation reaction motivated originally by looking for manifestations of the non-point-like behavior of fundamental particles.

The question of intrinsic structure of a charged spinning particle such as an electron has been discussed in the literature since its discovery by Thomson in 1897. In quantum field theory, a particle is assumed to point-like, and classical models of point-like spinning particles describe them by various generalizations of the classical lagrangian [1429]. Another type of point-like models [3040] goes back to the Schrödinger suggestion that the electron spin can be related to its Zittebewegung motion [41].

Second approach, which we apply in this paper, deals with extended particle models (for discussion and a review [42]).

To get evidence for an extended particle picture, we worked out available data of experiments performed to search for a non-point-like behavior, with focus on characteristic energy scale related to characteristic length scale of interaction region [4348]. Experimental limits on size of a lepton [4347] appear to be much less than its classical radius which suggests the existence of a relatively small characteristic length scale related to gravity [4347].

Study of the pure electromagnetic interaction using the data from VENUS, TOPAZ, ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, and OPAL puts the limit on maximal resolution at the scale  TeV by the characteristic length  cm with the 5 significance [48] (earlier, the 2.6 effect was reported for the data on reaction [49]. The increase of significance in our research is caused by the increase of statistics, since we used in our test the most extensive available data set.) To find a possible generic physical mechanism responsible for appearance of the minimal length in annihilation related to gravity without appealing to extra dimensions, we apply the results obtained in nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to gravity (NED-GR) for generic features of spinning electrically charged soliton asymptotically Kerr-Newman for a distant observer.

Early electron models based on the concept of an extended electron, proposed by Abraham more than a hundred years ago [50, 51], encountered the problem of preventing an electron from flying apart under the Coulomb repulsion. Theories based on geometrical assumptions about the “shape” or distribution of a charge density were compelled to introduce cohesive forces of nonelectromagnetic origin (the Poincaré stress) [52].

The Kerr-Newman solution to the Einstein-Maxwell equations [53] where is associated electromagnetic potential, and have inspired further search for an electromagnetic image of the electron since Carter [54] found that the parameter couples to the mass giving the angular momentum , and with the charge giving an asymptotic magnetic momentum , which results in exactly the same gyromagnetic ratio as predicted by the Dirac equation [54].

The Kerr-Newman solution belongs to the Kerr family solutions of the source-free Maxwell-Einstein equations with the only contribution to a stress-energy tensor coming from a source-free electromagnetic field [54]. It can represent the exterior fields of a spinning charged particle but cannot model a particle itself for the reason discovered by Carter: in the appropriate case, , when there are no Killing horizons and the manifold is geodesically complete, the whole space is a single vicious set, in which any point can be connected to any other point by both a future and a past directed timelike curve, which means complete and unavoidable breakdown of causality [54].

The question of matching the Kerr-Newman exterior fields to an interior material source has been addressed in a lot of papers. The source models can be roughly divided into disk-like [5557], shell-like [5860], bag-like [6167], and string-like ([68] and references therein) ones. Characteristic length in the equatorial plane is the Compton wavelength , and in bag-like models a characteristic thickness is of the order of the electron classical radius . The problem of matching does not have a unique solution, since one is free to choose arbitrarily the boundary between the exterior and the interior [55].

On the other hand, nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to gravity and satisfying the weak energy condition (nonnegative density as measured along any timelike curve) predicts, for an arbitrary gauge invariant lagrangian, the existence of a spinning charged soliton (a regular finite-energy solution of the nonlinear field equations, localized in the confined region and holding itself together by its own self-interaction) asymptotically Kerr-Newman for a distant observer with the gyromagnetic ratio [69].

In the spherically symmetric case and in the corotating frame in the axial symmetric case, a stress-energy tensor of any electromagnetic field has the algebraic structure such that

Spherically symmetric space-time with a source term specified by (3) has obligatory de Sitter center [70], in which field tension goes to zero, while the energy density of the electromagnetic vacuum achieves its maximal finite value which represents the de Sitter cut-off on the self-energy density [71].

A spherically symmetric electrically charged solution with de Sitter center [71] can be transformed by the Gürses-Gürsey algorithm based on the Newman-Trautman technique [72], into a spinning electromagnetic soliton with the Kerr-Newman behavior for a distant observer. Its internal structure includes the equatorial disk of a rotating de Sitter vacuum which has a perfect conductor and ideal diamagnetic properties, displays superconducting behavior [69], and supplies a particle with the finite positive electromagnetic mass related to interior de Sitter vacuum and breaking of space-time symmetry [69, 71, 73].

Nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to gravity provides actually an effective cohesive force related to negative pressure (unlike positive pressure which can, e.g., stop gravitational collapse if the mass of a collapsing body does not exceed a certain critical value). In the interior de Sitter region negative pressure generates repulsive geometry which prevents formation of a singularity [7476]. Interior de Sitter vacuum, as we will show, can be also responsible for the appearance of the minimal length in annihilation related to the distance of the closest approach of annihilating particles.

This paper is organised as follows. Experimental evidence is presented in Section 2. In Section 3, we outline basic features of electromagnetic soliton, and in Section 4, we apply them to find a possible physical origin of a minimal length in annihilation. In Section 5, we summarize and discuss the results.

2. Experimental Evidence

The purely electromagnetic interaction proceeds via the exchange of a virtual electron in the - and -channels (the -channel is forbidden) and is not interfered by the decay. Differential cross-sections were measured at energies from = 55 GeV to 207 GeV using the data collected with the VENUS, TOPAZ, ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, and OPAL from 1989 to 2003 [7785]. Comparison of the data with the QED predictions has been performed [86] to constrain models with an excited electron replacing the virtual electron in the QED process [8789] and with deviation from QED due to an effective interaction with nonstandard couplings and contact terms [9092]. The calculation of the differential cross-section QED- including radiative effects up to assumes a scattering center as a point. If the electron is an extended object, its structure would modify the QED cross-section if the test distances (corresponding to the CM-scattering energies) are smaller than its characteristic size.

A heavy excited electron of mass could couple to an electron and a photon via magnetic interaction with an effective lagrangian [8789] Here is the coupling constant, is the electromagnetic field, and are the wave function of the heavy electron and the electron, respectively, and and are the model parameters. The modified equation reads

If the center-of-mass energy satisfies the condition , then can be approximated as

In this approximation, the parameter is the QED cut-off parameter, . In the case of arbitrary , the full equation of [8789] was used to calculate . The angle is the scattering angle of two most energetic photons emitted with the angles and ,

The third order QED differential cross-section QED- is calculated numerically by generating a high number of Monte Carlo events [48, 93, 94]. The angular distribution was fitted with a high order polynomial function to get an analytical equation for the cross-section as function of .

An overall test was performed on the published differential cross-sections for energies between 55 GeV and 207 GeV. The result is  GeV−4. The overall fit shown in Figure 1 displays a minimum in .

The hypothesis used in (4) and (5) assumes that an excited electron would increase the total QED- cross-section and change the angular distribution of the QED cross-section. Contrary to these expectations, the fit displays a minimum with a negative fit parameter with a significance about .

Systematic errors arise from the luminosity evaluation, the selection efficiency, background evaluations, the choice of the QED- theoretical cross-section as the reference cross-section, and the choice of the fit procedure, of the fit parameter, and of the scattering angle in for comparison between data and theoretical calculation. The maximum estimated error for the value of the fit from the luminosity, selection efficiency, and background evaluations is approximately . The choice of the theoretical QED cross-section was studied with 1882 [] events from the L3 detector [93, 94]. In the worst case of scattering angles close to 90°, the would result in . The total systematic error is . For a small sample of events, the fit values were compared for , Maximum-Likelihood, Smirnov-Cramer von Misis, and Kolmogorov test, with and without binning [95, 96]. An approximate effect is estimated for the overall fit with the fit parameter .

An effective contact interaction with nonstandard coupling is described by the Lagrangian [9092] where is a cut-off parameter. This lagrangian involves an operator of dimension 6, the wave function of the electrons is , the QED covariant derivative is , the tilde on , and stands for the dual fields. The corresponding differential cross-section involves a deviation term

The fit for the hypothesis (4) was repeated for the hypothesis of the effective contact interaction (8) with using as the fit parameter with . An increase of the total QED- cross-section and a change of the angular distribution were expected. However, the best fit value of all data  GeV−4 appeared negative at the minimum in the test with the significance about . The results indicate decreasing cross-section of the process with respect to that predicted by pure QED.

It is remarkable that for both hypotheses, of the excited electron and effective contact interaction, the test leads to the best fit values for the complete data set with a significance. With the best value , one can estimate the energy scale  TeV corresponding to a length scale of the interaction region  cm which suggests the existence of a minimal length in annihilation.

3. Electromagnetic Soliton

In the nonlinear electrodynamics minimally coupled to gravity, the action is given by (in geometrical units ) where is the scalar curvature. The gauge-invariant electromagnetic Lagrangian is an arbitrary function of the field invariant which should have the Maxwell limit, , in the weak field regime.

The dynamic equations read where and an asterisk denotes the Hodge dual defined by

A stress-energy tensor of a spherically symmetric electromagnetic field where , has the algebraic structure such that The equation relating the tangential pressure with the density follows directly from (13) and reads

Electric field , is given by [71, 97] where is a constant of integration identified as an electric charge by the asymptotic Coulomb behavior for a distant observer in the weak field limit.

From (15) and (16), we get

Symmetry of a source term (14) leads to the metric [74] The metric function is given by

For the class of regular spherically symmetric solutions of the class (14), the weak energy condition leads inevitably to de Sitter asymptotic at [70, 74] where is the density in the regular center.

The field invariant , as well as the electric field , vanishes for and for (where they follow the Maxwell weak field limit); hence, the electric field achieves an extremal value somewhere in between [71].

The weak energy condition requires , which leads to , so that the energy density of the electromagnetic vacuum achieves as its maximal value which represents the de Sitter cutoff on the self-interaction divergent for a point charge [71].

For a distant observer, the metric is asymptotically Reissner-Nordström where is the Schwarzschild gravitational radius.

Spherically symmetric solutions specified by (14) belong to the Kerr-Schild class [67, 98]. By the Gürses-Gürsey algorithm [72], they can be transformed into regular solutions describing a spinning charged soliton. In the Boyer-Lindquist coordinates, the metric is [72] The function in (22) is given by For NED-GR solutions satisfying the weak energy condition, is everywhere positive function growing monotonically from as to as . The mass , appearing in a spinning solution, is the finite positive electromagnetic mass , generically related to interior de Sitter vacuum and to breaking of space-time symmetry [69, 73]. Let us note that the condition of the causality violation [54] is never satisfied for this class of solutions due to nonnegativity of the function [69].

For a distant observer, a spinning electromagnetic soliton is asymptotically Kerr-Newman, with .

In the geometry with the line element (22), the surfaces are the oblate ellipsoids [54] which degenerate, for , to the equatorial disk centered on the symmetry axis.

For , the function in (22) approaches de Sitter asymptotics The disk is totally intrinsically flat, but with nonzero vacuum density . Rotation transforms the de Sitter center into the disk (25). The equation of state on the disk reads in the corotating frame and represents the rotating de Sitter vacuum spread over the disk [69].

Field components compatible with the axial symmetry are . In terms of the field vectors defined as The dynamic equations (11) take the form of the Maxwell equations It follows that the electric induction is connected with the electric field intensity by where is the tensor of the dielectric permeability. The magnetic induction is related to the magnetic field intensity by where is the tensor of the magnetic permeability.

Symmetry of the oblate ellipsoid (24) gives two pairs independent nonzero eigenvalues In the de Sitter region, .

In the corotating frame, we have [69] which allows us to investigate the behavior of the fields on the disk where . The left hand side of (33) goes to zero by (27); hence, each component in the right hand side vanishes on the disk independently The field invariant and derivative on the disk are given by [69] The dielectric permeability goes to infinity, and the magnetic permeability vanishes. The rotating de Sitter vacuum disk displays a perfect conductor and ideal diamagnetic behavior [69].

The magnetic induction goes to zero on the disk independently on the magnetic permeability. Indeed, it follows from (34) and (28) that on the disk so that and must vanish faster than . On the intrinsically flat disk, we can apply the conventional definition of the surface current [99] where is the normal to the surface. The transition to a superconducting state corresponds formally to the limit and ; the right hand side of (37) then becomes indeterminate, and there is no condition which would restrict the possible values of the current [99]. The surface currents on the de Sitter disk can be any and amount to a nonzero total value [69].

4. Origin of a Minimal Length in Annihilation

In the asymptotically Kerr-Newman NED-GR models, there are two intrinsic length scales: the Compton wavelength  cm; the thickness of ellipsoid in a region of a maximal value of is of order of the classical electron radius  cm. Experimental data on the annihilation reaction reveal the existence of one more characteristic length scale,  cm. It corresponds to the minimum in the fit found with significance and represents the distance of the closest approach of annihilating particles which cannot be made smaller.

Generic features of electromagnetic soliton give some idea about the origin of the length given by experiments. The definite feature of annihilation process is that, at its certain stage, a region of interaction is neutral and spinless. We can roughly model it by a spherical lump with de Sitter vacuum interior asymptotically Schwarzschild as .

For all structures with the de Sitter interior, there exists the characteristic zero gravity surface at which the strong energy condition () is violated and beyond which the gravitational acceleration becomes repulsive [74, 75]. The related length scale appears naturally in a geometry with the de Sitter interior and the Schwarzschild exterior [76, 100].

The gravitational radius of a lump at the characteristic energy scale  TeV is  cm. Adopting for the interior de Sitter vacuum the experimental vacuum expectation value at the electroweak scale  GeV related to the electron mass [101], we get the de Sitter radius cm, where and . Characteristic radius of zero gravity surface is  cm, so that the scale  cm fits inside a region where gravity is repulsive. The minimal length scale can be thus understood as a distance at which electromagnetic attraction is stopped by the gravitational repulsion of the interior de Sitter vacuum.

Regular NED-GR solutions provide a characteristic de Sitter cut-off on electromagnetic self-energy whose numerical value depends on the choice of a density profile. Qualitatively it can be evaluated by [71] It gives, for the characteristic length scale at which electromagnetic attraction is balanced by de Sitter gravitational repulsion,  cm, sufficiently close to the minimal length for such a rough estimate.

5. Summary

In this paper, we analyze experimental data on the annihilation reaction . The global fit to the data is 5 standard deviations from the standard model expectation for the hypotheses of an excited electron and of contact interaction with nonstandard coupling. This corresponds to the energy scale  TeV and to related characteristic length scale  cm. We interpret this effect as the existence of a minimal length in annihilation as a distance of the closest approach of annihilating particles related to generic properties of a NED-GR electromagnetic soliton.

Nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to gravity and satisfying the weak energy condition admits the class of regular solutions describing spinning charged soliton asymptotically Kerr-Newman for a distant observer with a gyromagnetic ratio . Due to algebraic structure of a stress-energy tensor for an electromagnetic field, electromagnetic soliton has obligatory de Sitter vacuum interior which provides a cut-off on self-interaction. The internal structure includes an equatorial disk of rotating de Sitter vacuum which has properties of a perfect conductor and ideal diamagnetic and displays superconducting behavior [69].

This behavior, found for an arbitrary gauge invariant lagrangian, is generic and suggests that a spinning particle dominated by the electromagnetic interaction might have de Sitter interior arising naturally in the regular geometry asymptotically Kerr-Newman for a distant observer. De Sitter vacuum supplies a particle with the finite positive electromagnetic mass related to breaking of space-time symmetry and provides a characteristic length scale at which electromagnetic attraction is balanced by the gravitational repulsion that can explain the existence of the minimal length in annihilation.

NED theories appear as low-energy effective limits in certain models of string/M-theories [102104]. The above results apply to the cases when the relevant electromagnetic scale ( in our case) is much less than the Planck scale .

Let us note that the NED-GR connection of a lepton mass with de Sitter vacuum and space-time symmetry can be responsible for mass-squared differences for sub-eV particles [105]. The key point is that, in the interaction region where particles are created, gravitational effects of massive gauge bosons may become important and then the interaction vertex is gravity-electroweak. If the weak energy condition holds and density is finite, the space-time group around a gravity-electroweak vertex can be de Sitter. Then particles participating in the vertex are described by the eigenvalues of Casimir operators in the de Sitter geometry. As a result sub-eV particles acquire difference in mass squares . For de Sitter radius related to the gravity-electroweak unification scale , we get which can be read off from atmospheric and solar neutrino data which predict a TeV scale for unification and dominantly bimaximal mixing for neutrinos [73, 105], in agreement with the ideas of gravity-electroweak unification [106108].

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Polish National Science Center through the Grant 5828/B/H03/2011/40.

References

  1. T. Padmanabhan, “Planck length as the lower bound to all physical length scales,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 215–221, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  2. G. Veneziano, “A stringy nature needs just two constants,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 2, no. 3, article 199, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. D. J. Gross and P. F. Mende, “String theory beyond the Planck scale,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 303, no. 3, pp. 407–454, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  4. M. Maggiore, “A generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 304, no. 1-2, pp. 65–69, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. C. Rovelli and L. Smolin, “Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 442, no. 3, pp. 593–619, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  6. L. J. Garay, “Quantum gravity and minimum length,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 10, article 145, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. Kempf, G. Mangano, and R. B. Mann, “Hilbert space representation of the minimal length uncertainty relation,” Physical Review D, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 1108–1118, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  8. A. Kempf and G. Mangano, “Minimal length uncertainty relation and ultraviolet regularization,” Physical Review D, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 7909–7920, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. Kempf, “Mode generating mechanism in inflation with a cutoff,” Physical Review D, vol. 63, no. 8, Article ID 083514, 5 pages, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  10. S. Hossenfelder, “Minimal length scale scenarios for quantum gravity,” Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 16, p. 2, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  11. K. Nakamura and Particle Data Group, “Review of particle physics,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 37, no. 7, Article ID 075021, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Sprenger, P. Nicolini, and M. Bleicher, “Physics on the smallest scales: an introduction to minimal length phenomenology,” European Journal of Physics, vol. 33, no. 4, article 853, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Hossenfelder, M. Bleicher, S. Hofmann, J. Ruppert, S. Scherer, and H. Stöcker, “Signatures in the Planck regime,” Physics Letters B, vol. 575, no. 1-2, pp. 85–99, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Frenkel, “Die Elektrodynamik des rotierenden Elektrons,” Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 37, no. 4-5, pp. 243–262, 1926. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Mathisson, “Neue Mechanik materieller Systeme,” Acta Physica Polonica, vol. 6, pp. 163–200, 1937. View at: Google Scholar
  16. L. H. Kramers, Quantentheorie des Electron und der Strahlung, 1938.
  17. H. Hönl and A. Papapetrou, “Über die innere Bewegung des Elektrons. I.,” Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 112, no. 9-10, pp. 512–540, 1939. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. H. J. Bhabha and A. C. Corben, “General classical theory of spinning particles in a maxwell field,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 178, no. 974, pp. 273–314, 1941. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. V. Bargman, L. Michel, and V. L. Telegdxi, “Precession of the polarization of particles moving in a homogeneous electromagnetic field,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 2, pp. 435–436, 1959. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. P. L. Nash, “A Lagrangian theory of the classical spinning electron,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 2104–2108, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  21. K. Yee and M. Bander, “Equations of motion for spinning particles in external electromagnetic and gravitational fields,” Physical Review D, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 2797–2799, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  22. J. Bolte and S. Keppeler, “Semiclassical form factor for chaotic systems with spin 12,” Journal of Physics, vol. 32, no. 50, pp. 8863–8880, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  23. V. V. Nesterenko, “Singular Lagrangians with higher derivatives,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1673–1687, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  24. Y. A. Rylov, “Spin and wave function as attributes of ideal fluid,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 256–278, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  25. M. Rivas, Kinematical Theory of Spinning Particles, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2001.
  26. M. Rivas, “The dynamical equation of the spinning electron,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 36, no. 16, pp. 4703–4716, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  27. S. M. Kuzenko, S. L. Lyakhovich, and A. Y. Segal, “A geometric model of the arbitrary spin massive particle,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1529–1552, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  28. A. Staruszkiewicz, “Fundamental relativistic rotator,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 1, pp. 109–112, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  29. V. Kassandrov, N. Markova, G. Schaefer, and A. Wipf, “On the model of a classical relativistic particle of constant and universal mass and spin,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.3688. View at: Google Scholar
  30. J. Weyssenhoff and A. Raabe, “Relativistic dynamics of spin-fluids and spin-particles,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 9, pp. 7–18, 1947. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  31. M. H. L. Pryce, “The mass-centre in the restricted theory of relativity and its connexion with the quantum theory of elementary particles,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 195, pp. 62–81, 1948. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  32. C. N. Fleming, “Covariant position operators, spin, and locality,” Physical Review B, vol. 137, pp. 188–197, 1965. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Pavšič, “Classical motion of membranes, strings and point particles with extrinsic curvature,” Physics Letters B, vol. 205, no. 2-3, pp. 231–236, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  34. M. Pavsic, E. Recami, and W. A. Rodrigues Jr., “Spin and electron structure,” Physics Letters B, vol. 318, no. 3, pp. 481–488, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. D. Singh and N. Mobed, “Effects of space-time curvature on Spin-1/2 particle zitterbewegung,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 26, Article ID 185007, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. S. Plyushchay, “Canonical quantization and mass spectrum of relativistic particle analogue of relativistic string with rigidity,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 3, no. 13, p. 1299, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. M. S. Plyushchay, “Relativistic massive particle with higher curvatures as a model for the description of bosons and fermions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 235, no. 1-2, pp. 47–51, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  38. M. S. Plyushchay, “Relativistic Zitterbewegung: the model of spinning particles without Grassmann variables,” Physics Letters B, vol. 236, no. 3, pp. 291–297, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  39. M. S. Plyushchay, “Relativistic particle with arbitrary spin in a non-Grassmannian approach,” Physics Letters B, vol. 248, no. 3-4, pp. 299–304, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  40. A. O. Barut and N. Zanghì, “Classical model of the Dirac electron,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 52, no. 23, pp. 2009–2012, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  41. E. Schrödinger, “Über die kräftefreie Bewegung in der relativistischen Quantenmechanik,” Sonderausgabe aus den Sitzungsberichten der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, vol. 24, pp. 418–428, 1930. View at: Google Scholar
  42. A. Burinskii, “Gravity vs. quantum theory: is electron really pointlike?” Journal of Physics, vol. 343, Article ID 012019, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. I. Dymnikova, A. Hasan, J. Ulbricht, and J. Wu, “Testing the size of fundamental particles and self-gravitating objects,” Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 5, pp. 230–234, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  44. I. Dymnikova, A. Hasan, and J. Ulbricht, “Size of fundamental particles and selfgravitating particlelike structures with de Sitter core,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9903526. View at: Google Scholar
  45. I. Dymnikova, J. Ulbricht, and J. Zhao, “Limits on sizes of fundamental particles and on gravitational mass of a scalar,” in Quantum Electrodynamics and Physics of the Vacuum, G. Cantatore, Ed., p. 239, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. I. G. Dymnikova, A. Hasan, J. Ulbricht, and J. Zhao, “Limits on the sizes of fundamental particles and gravitational mass of the Higgs particle,” Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 7, pp. 122–130, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  47. I. Dymnikova, A. Sakharov, J. Ulbricht, and J. Zhao, “Putting non point-like behavior of fundamental particles to test,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0111302. View at: Google Scholar
  48. I. Dymnikova, A. Sakharov, and J. Ulbricht, “Minimal Length Scale in Annihilation,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.0629. View at: Google Scholar
  49. D. Bourilkov, “Hint for axial-vector contact interactions in the data on e+e-e+e- at center-of-mass energies 192–208 GeV,” Physical Review D, vol. 64, no. 7, Article ID R071701, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. M. Abraham, “Prinzipien der dynamik des electrons,” Annalen der Physik, vol. 10, pp. 105–179, 1903. View at: Google Scholar
  51. H. A. Lorentz, Theory of Electrons, Dover, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1952.
  52. P. A. M. Dirac, “An extensible model of the electron,” Proceedings of the Royal Society London A, vol. 268, pp. 57–67, 1962. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. E. T. Newman, E. Cough, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Prakash, and R. Torrence, “Metric of a rotating, charged mass,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 6, p. 918, 1965. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. B. Carter, “Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields,” Physical Review, vol. 174, no. 5, pp. 1559–1571, 1968. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. W. Israel, “Source of the Kerr metric,” Physical Review D, vol. 2, pp. 641–646, 1970. View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  56. A. Y. Burinskiĭ, “Microgeons with spin,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, vol. 66, no. 2, p. 193, 1974. View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  57. C. A. Lpez, “Material and electromagnetic sources of the Kerr-Newman geometry,” II Nuovo Cimento B, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 9–27, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. V. de la Cruz, J. E. Chase, and W. Israel, “Gravitational collapse with asymmetries,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 423–426, 1970. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. J. M. Cohen, “Note on the Kerr metric and rotating masses,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1477–1478, 1967. View at: Google Scholar
  60. C. A. Lopez, “Extended model of the electron in general relativity,” Physical Review D, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 313–316, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. R. H. Boyer, “Rotating fluid masses in general relativity,” Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 61, pp. 527–530, 1965. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. R. H. Boyer, “Rotating fluid masses in general relativity. II,” Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 495–501, 1966. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. M. Trümper, “Einsteinsche Feldgleichungen für das axialsymmetrische stationäre Gravitiationsfeld im Innern einer starr rotierenden idealen Flüssigkeit,” Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, vol. 22a, p. 1347, 1967. View at: Google Scholar
  64. J. Tiomno, “Electromagnetic field of rotating charged bodies,” Physical Review D, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 992–997, 1973. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. A. Y. Burinskiĭ, “The problem of the source of the Kerr-Newman metric: the volume Casimir effect and superdense pseudovacuum state,” Physics Letters B, vol. 216, no. 1-2, pp. 123–126, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  66. A. Y. Burinskii, “Supersymmetric superconducting bag as the core of a Kerr spinning particle,” Gravitation & Cosmology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 261–271, 2002. View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  67. A. Burinskii, E. Elizalde, S. R. Hildebrandt, and G. Magli, “Regular sources of the Kerr-Schild class for rotating and nonrotating black hole solutions,” Physical Review D, vol. 65, no. 6, Article ID 064039, 15 pages, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  68. A. Burinskii, “Wonderful consequences of the Kerr theorem: multiparticle Kerr-Schild solutions,” Gravitation & Cosmology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 301–304, 2005. View at: Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  69. I. Dymnikova, “Spinning superconducting electrovacuum soliton,” Physics Letters B, vol. 639, no. 3-4, pp. 368–372, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  70. I. Dymnikova, “The cosmological term as a source of mass,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 725–739, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  71. I. Dymnikova, “Regular electrically charged vacuum structures with de Sitter centre in nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to general relativity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 21, no. 18, pp. 4417–4428, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  72. M. Gürses and F. Gürsey, “Lorentz covariant treatment of the Kerr-Schild geometry,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 16, no. 12, p. 2385, 1975. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. I. Dymnikova, “Spacetime symmetry and mass of a lepton,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 41, no. 30, Article ID 304033, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. I. G. Dymnikova, “The algebraic structure of a cosmological term in spherically symmetric solutions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 472, no. 1-2, pp. 33–38, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  75. I. G. Dymnikova, “De Sitter-Schwarzschild black hole: its particlelike core and thermodynamical properties,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 529–540, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  76. I. Dymnikova, “Vacuum nonsingular black hole,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 235–242, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  77. The VENUS Collaboration, K. Abe, K. Amako et al., “Measurement of the differential cross sections of e+e- γγ and e+e- γγ at s=55, 56, 56.5 and 57 GeV and search for unstable photino pair production,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 175–191, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. The TOPAZ Collaboration, K. Shimozawa, J. Fujimoto et al., “e+e- γγ and γγγ reactions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 284, no. 1-2, pp. 144–150, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. The ALEPH Collaboration, “Searches for new particles in Z decays using the ALEPH detector,” Physics Reports, vol. 216, no. 5-6, pp. 253–340, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. The DELPHI Collaboration, P. Abreu, W. Adam et al., “Measurement of the e+e- γγ(γ),” Physics Letters B, vol. 327, no. 3-4, pp. 386–396, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. DELPHI Collaboration, “Measurement of the e+e- γγ(γ),” Physics Letters B, vol. 433, no. 3-4, pp. 429–444, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. DELPHI Collaboration, P. Abreu, W. Adam et al., “Determination of the e+e- γγ(γ) cross-section at centre-of-mass energies ranging from 189 GeV to 202 GeV,” Physics Letters B, vol. 491, no. 1-2, pp. 67–80, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. L3 Collaboration, P. Achard, O. Adriani et al., “Study of multiphoton final states and tests of QED in e+e- collisions at s up to 209 GeV,” Physics Letters B, vol. 531, no. 1-2, pp. 28–38, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. OPAL Collaboration, M. Z. Akrawy, G. Alexander et al., “Measurement of the cross sections of the reactions e+e- γγ and e+e- γγγ,” Physics Letters B, vol. 275, p. 531, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  85. The OPAL Collaboration, G. Abbiendi, C. Ainsley et al., “Multi-photon production in ee collisions at s = 181—209 GeV,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 331–344, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. U. Burch, C. H. Lin, A. Rubbia et al., “Test of non point-like behavior of Fermions,” in Proceeding of the AIP 7th Conference on Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum (QCHS7 '07), J. E. F. T. Ribeiro, Ed., vol. 892, pp. 468–471, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. A. M. Litke, [M.S. thesis], Harvard University, 1970.
  88. S. D. Drell, “Quantum electrodynamics at small distances,” Annals of Physics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 75–86, 1958. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. F. E. Low, “Heavy electrons and muons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 14, pp. 238–239, 1965. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  90. O. J. P. Eboli, “Bounds on effective interactions from the reaction e+e-γγ at LEP,” Physics Letters B, vol. 271, no. 1-2, pp. 274–276, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. P. Mery, M. Perrottet, and F. M. Renard, “Anomalous effects in e+e- annihilation into boson pairs II. e+e-ZZ, γZ,γγ,” Zeitschrift Für Physik C, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 579–591. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. J. Stanley Brodsky and S. D. Drell, “Anomalous magnetic moment and limits on fermion substructure,” Physical Review D, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 2236–2243, 1980. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. M. Maolinbay, No. 9479 Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule [M.S. thesis], ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland, 2001.
  94. F. A. Berends and R. Kleiss, “Distributions for electron-positron annihilation into two and three photons,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 186, no. 1, pp. 22–34, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
  95. E. Isiksal, No. 9479 Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule [M.S. thesis], ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland, 1991.
  96. W. T. Eadie, D. Drijard, F. E. James, M. Roos, and B. Sadoulet, Statistical Methods in Experimental Physics, North-Holland Physics Publishing, 1988.
  97. K. A. Bronnikov, “Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics,” Physical Review D, vol. 63, no. 4, Article ID 044005, 6 pages, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  98. E. Elizalde and S. R. Hildebrandt, “Family of regular interiors for nonrotating black holes with T00=T11,” Physical Review D, vol. 65, no. 12, Article ID 124024, 15 pages, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  99. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Electrodynamics of Continued Media, Pergamon Press, 1978.
  100. E. Poisson and W. Israel, “Structure of the black hole nucleus,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. L201–L205, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  101. L. B. Okun', Leptons and Quarks, North-Holland Physics Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1982.
  102. E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, “Nonlinear electrodynamics from quantized strings,” Physics Letters B, vol. 163, no. 1–4, pp. 123–130, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
  103. A. A. Tseytlin, “Vector field effective action in the open superstring theory,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 276, no. 2, pp. 391–428, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  104. N. Siberg and E. Witten, “String theory and noncommutative geometry,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1999, article 032, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. D. V. Ahluwalia and I. Dymnikova, “A theoretical case for negative mass-square for sub-ev particles,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 12, no. 9, article 1787, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. I. Antoniadis, “A possible new dimension at a few TeV,” Physics Letters B, vol. 246, no. 3-4, pp. 377–384, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  107. G. Dvali and A. Y. Smirnov, “Probing large extra dimensions with neutrinos,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 563, no. 1-2, pp. 63–81, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  108. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, and N. Kaloper, “Infinitely large new dimensions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 84, pp. 586–589, 2000. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Irina Dymnikova et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.


More related articles

761 Views | 448 Downloads | 10 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.