Research Article  Open Access
Analyzing the Anomalous Dipole Moment Type Couplings of Heavy Quarks with FCNC Interactions at the CLIC
Abstract
We examine both anomalous magnetic and dipole moment type couplings of a heavy quark via its single production with subsequent dominant standard model decay modes at the compact linear collider (CLIC). The signal and background cross sections are analyzed for heavy quark masses 600 and 700 GeV. We make the analysis to delimitate these couplings as well as to find the attainable integrated luminosities for observation limit.
1. Introduction
Discovery of new particles performs a crucial role for physics beyond the standard model (SM) and may play a milestone role in the discovery of some open questions like the electroweak symmetry breaking [1–5], fermion mass spectrum hierarchies and mixing angle in quark/lepton sectors [6–10], CP violation, and flavor structure of standard theory [11–17]. The precise determination of heavy quark properties may present the existence of new physics. A heavy downtype quark () with mass less than 645 GeV and an uptype quark () with mass less than 585 GeV [18] are excluded at 95% confidence level from protonproton collisions at TeV ATLAS detector at the CERN large hadron collider.
Searching for new sources of CP violation beyond the SM is an attractive subject in particle physics, since it explains the asymmetry between matter and antimatter. CP violating anomalous flavor changing neutral current (FCNC) couplings have been considered in the literature before at hadron [19] and [20, 21] colliders. This type of FCNC interactions offer an ideal place to search for new physics. Due to the large mass values, heavy quarks have crucial advantage to new interactions originating at a higher scale as in top quark physics. Recently, anomalous FCNC quark couplings, such as (), were experimentally restricted by some collaborations. For instance, the upper limits observed from vertices by ATLAS collaboration are and assuming only one coupling is kept nonzero [22], while D0 set limits are [23] and CDF set limits are [24]. Recent observed upper limits on the coupling strengths from CMS collaboration, which analyzed both and vertices probed simultaneously, are , and [25].
Serious contributions can be expected for the production of the heavy fermions, due to the anomalous magnetic moment type interactions. Phenomenological studies with these anomalous effects of these quarks have been performed on hadron colliders [26–31], on electron proton colliders [32, 33], and on linear colliders [34]. In this work, we study the production of single heavy quark at compact linear collider (CLIC) [35] via both anomalous magnetic and dipole moment type interactions. CLIC, a most popular proposed linear collider on TeV scale, would complete the LHC results by performing precision measurements to provide necessary information about some parameters of heavy quarks. The aim of this study is to delimitate the anomalous magnetic and dipole moment type couplings of quark from a detailed signal and background analysis including Monte Carlo simulation with the effects of initial state radiation (ISR) and beamstrahlung (BS) in the collisions.
2. Single Production and Decay of Quark
The interaction Lagrangian for quark within the SM is given by where , and are the vector fields for photon, gluon, boson, and boson, respectively. is the electroweak coupling constant and is the strong coupling constant. are the GellMann matrices; is the electric charge of heavy quark and are the vector and axialvector type couplings of the neutral weak current with quark; is the weak mixing angle, and . denotes the elements of extended 4 ×4 CKM mixing matrix which are constrained by flavor physics.
The anomalous magnetic and dipole moment type interactions among heavy quark , ordinary quarks , and the neutral gauge bosons can be described by an effective Lagrangian which contains the anomalous magnetic and dipole moment type couplings given by where , and are the field strength tensors of the gauge bosons; is the electric charge of the quark (). and are the anomalous magnetic (dipole) moment type couplings with photon, boson, and gluon, respectively. Note that ’s are CP violating and is the cutoff scale of new interactions and we assume and .
CP violating flavor changing neutral current processes within the SM with the and quarks are analyzed by constructing and employing global unique fit of the unitary CKM mass mixing matrix at = 600 and 700 GeV separately, in [36]. In our calculations we use this parameterization for values of the CKM matrix elements and we assume with a mass splitting of GeV. We implement the related interaction vertices, given in the effective Lagrangian, into the tree level event generator CompHEP package [37] for numerical calculations. In Figure 1, branching ratios (BR) dependence on for SM decay channels () and anomalous decay channels () of quark which are calculated by using Lagrangians (1) and (2) are given for GeV and . As seen from this figure, SM decay channel, , is dominant for less than 0.2 changing around 27–63 BR. Total decay widths of quark dependence on are given in Figure 2 for and 700 GeV with and 0.1 .
The contributing tree level Feynman Diagram for the anomalous single production of quark in collision is shown in Figure 3. In Figure 4, the total cross sections for single production of quark are plotted at collision center of mass energy of 3 TeV with respect to for and 700 GeV with and 0.1 . Initial state radiation (ISR) and beamstrahlung (BS) are specific features of the linear colliders. We take the beam parameters for the CLIC given in Table 1, when calculating the ISR and BS effects. Hereafter, in all our numerical calculations we take into account ISR + BS effects.
 
Here, is the number of particles in bunch; and are beam sizes; and is the bunch length. 
3. Signal and Background Analysis
The signal process of single production of quark including the dominant SM decay mode over anomalous decay is , where . The dominant source of SM background process is for the corresponding signal processes.
In the transverse momentum, rapidity, and invariant mass distributions analysis, we assume . In Figure 5, the transverse momentum () distributions of the final state quark for signal and background are shown for CLIC energy. We applied a cut of GeV to reduce the background, comparing the signal distribution of quark with that of the corresponding background.
In Figure 6, we plot the rapidity distributions of final state quark in signal and background processes. According to these figures, the cut can be applied to suppress the background while the signal remains almost unchanged.
In Figure 7, the invariant mass distributions for the system in the final state are plotted. From these figures, we can see that the signal has a peak around mass of quark over the background.
In Table 2, we calculate cross sections of the signal and background and the statistical significance () to discuss the observability of 600 and 700 GeV quark for and 0.01 by taking at CLIC. The of the signal is obtained by using the following formula: where is the signal and is the background cross sections for the process, respectively, and . We take into account finite energy resolution of the detectors for realistic analysis. In our numerical calculations we use the mass bin width to count signal and background events with the mass resolution . The mentioned and cuts are applied assuming the integrated luminosity given in Table 1.

After this point, we will focus on limiting the anomalous magnetic and dipole moment type couplings. Firstly, in Figure 8, we present the contour plot for plane at TeV with GeV. According to these figures, the lower limits of and are about 0.033 at the CLIC energy.
To analyze the case of , the contour plots for the anomalous couplings in the plane are presented in Figure 9 at TeV with (a) GeV and (b) GeV by taking into account different values of . According to these figures the lower limits of and are about 0.038 for GeV and 0.019 for GeV with . In Figures 8 and 9, allowed parameter space area of quark is above the lines.
(a)
(b)
We plot the lowest necessary luminosities with observation limits for (a) GeV and (b) GeV at TeV depending on anomalous couplings in Figure 10. In the case of , it is seen that from these figures, quarks with masses 600 and 700 GeV can be observed at observation limit with lowest integrated luminosity at the order of at CLIC.
(a)
(b)
4. Conclusion
The anomalous FCNC interactions of heavy quarks could be important for some parameter regions due to the expected large masses. The sensitivity to the anomalous couplings (, ) and (, ) can be obtained for GeV about (0.033, 0.033) and (0.035, 0.038) for , and for GeV (, ) values can be obtained about (0.019, 0.0195) for with TeV. We also find the lowest necessary luminosity limit values at the order of for CLIC.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
This research has been partially supported by Kastamonu University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Department under the Grant no. KUBAP03/201201.
References
 B. Holdom, “Heavy quarks and electroweak symmetry breaking,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 57, no. 20, pp. 2496–2499, 1986. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Holdom, “Erratum to “Heavy quarks and electroweak symmetry breaking”,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 58, no. 2, p. 177, 1987. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. T. Hill, M. A. Luty, and E. A. Paschos, “Electroweak symmetry breaking by fourthgeneration condensates and the neutrino spectrum,” Physical Review D, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 3011–3025, 1991. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Elliott and S. F. King, “Heavy quark condensates from dynamically broken flavour symmetry,” Physics Letters B, vol. 283, no. 34, pp. 371–378, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
 P. Q. Hung and C. Xiong, “Dynamical electroweak symmetry breaking with a heavy fourth generation,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 848, no. 2, pp. 288–302, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Holdom, “The discovery of the fourth family at the LHC: wat if?” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2006, no. 8, article 076, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Q. Hung and M. Sher, “Experimental constraints on fourth generation quark masses,” Physical Review D, vol. 77, no. 3, Article ID 037302, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Q. Hung and C. Xiong, “Implication of a quasi fixed point with a heavy fourth generation: the emergence of a TeVscale physical cutoff,” Physics Letters B, vol. 694, no. 45, pp. 430–434, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Q. Hung and C. Xiong, “Renormalization group fixed point with a fourth generation: Higgsinduced bound states and condensates,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 847, no. 1, pp. 160–178, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. Cakir, A. Senol, and A. T. Tasci, “Single production of fourthfamily t′ quarks at the CERN large hadron electron collider,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 88, no. 1, Article ID 11002, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W.S. Hou and C.Y. Ma, “Flavor and CP violation with fourth generations revisited,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, Article ID 036002, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. BarShalom, D. Oaknin, and A. Soni, “Extended FriedbergLee hidden symmetries, quark masses, and CP violation with four generations,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 1, Article ID 015011, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. J. Buras, B. Duling, T. Feldmann, T. Heidsieck, C. Promberger, and S. Recksiegel, “Patterns of flavour violation in the presence of a fourth generation of quarks and leptons,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 9, article 106, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Soni, A. K. Alok, A. Giri, R. Mohanta, and S. Nandi, “The fourth family: a simple explanation for the observed pattern of anomalies in BCP asymmetries,” Physics Letters B, vol. 683, no. 45, pp. 302–305, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. Eberhardt, A. Lenz, and J. Rohrwild, “Less space for a new family of fermions,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 9, Article ID 095006, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Soni, A. K. Alok, A. Giri, R. Mohanta, and S. Nandi, “Standard model with four generations: selected implications for rare B and K decays,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 3, Article ID 033009, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. K. Alok, A. Dighe, and D. London, “Constraints on the fourgeneration quark mixing matrix from a fit to flavorphysics data,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 7, Article ID 073008, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 The ATLAS collaboration, ATLASCONF2013056.
 T. Han, K. Whisnant, B.L. Young, and X. Zhang, “Topquark decay via the anomalous coupling t̄c γ at hadron colliders,” Physical Review D, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 7241–7248, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 T. Han and J. L. Hewett, “Topcharm associated production in high energy e^{+}e^{−} collisions,” Physical Review D, vol. 60, Article ID 074015, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. T. Alan, A. Senol, and A. T. Tasci, “CP violating asymmetries in the flavour changing single top quark production,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 279–284, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Aad, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah et al., “Search for FCNC single topquark production at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Physics Letters B, vol. 712, no. 45, p. 351, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. M. Abazov, B. Abbott, M. Abolins et al., “Search for flavor changing neutral currents via quarkgluon couplings in single top quark production using 2.3 fb^{−1} of $p\stackrel{\u0305}{p}$ collisions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 693, p. 81, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Aaltonen, J. Adelman, T. Akimoto et al., “Search for topquark production via flavorchanging neutral currents in W + 1 jet events at CDF,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, Article ID 151801, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 E. Yazgan, “Flavor changing neutral currents in top quark production and decay,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.5435. View at: Google Scholar
 E. Arik, O. Çakir, and S. Sultansoy, “Anomalous single production of the fourthSMfamily quarks decaying into a light scalar boson at the Tevatron,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 332–335, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Arik, O. Cakir, and S. Sultansoy, “Anomalous single production of the fourth SM family quarks at the Fermilab Tevatron,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, no. 3, Article ID 035002, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 İ. T. Çakır, H. Duran Yıldız, O. Çakır, and G. Ünel, “Anomalous resonant production of the fourthfamily uptype quarks at the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, Article ID 095009, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Çiftçi , “Anomalous single production of the fourth generation quarks at the CERN LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, Article ID 075018, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Sahin, S. Sultansoy, and S. Turkoz, “Searching for the fourth family quarks through anomalous decays,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 5, Article ID 051503, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. Cakir, I. T. Cakir, A. Senol, and A. T. Tasci, “Anomalous single production of fourth family uptype quark associated with neutral gauge bosons at the LHC,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 39, Article ID 055005, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. T. Alan, A. Senol, and O. Çakir, “Anomalous production of fourthfamily upquarks at future lepton hadron colliders,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 657–660, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Çiftçi and A. K. Ciftci, “A comperative study of the anomalous single production of the fourth generation quarks at ep and gammap colliders,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.4489. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Senol, A. T. Tasci, and F. Ustabas, “Anomalous single production of fourth generation t' quarks at ILC and CLIC,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 851, no. 2, pp. 289–297, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Linssen, A. Miyamoto, M. Stanitzki, and H. Weerts, “Physics and detectors at CLIC: CLIC conceptual design report,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.5940. View at: Google Scholar
 G. Eilam, B. Melic, and J. Trampetic, “CP violation and the fourth generation,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, Article ID 116003, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Pukhov, E. Boos, M. Dubinin et al., “CompHEP—a package for evaluation of Feynman diagrams and integration over multiparticle phase space. User's manual for version 33,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hepph/9908288. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 A. T. Tasci et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP^{3}.