Rough Mirror as a Quantum State Selector: Analysis and Design

Table 4

The same as in Table 3 for generated 2D rough Gaussian surfaces with 𝑟=2 and 𝜂=1. The expected value of Φ₂≈2.58×10³. The table contains the extracted fitting parameters 𝜂^fit_𝐺,𝐸,PL and 𝑟^fit_𝐺,𝐸,PL, together with 𝜎_𝐺,𝐸,PL, and the recalculated values of Φ₂. The fourth row gives the results for the correlation function averaged over 10 independent runs.

#	𝜂𝐺,𝑟𝐺,𝜎×10^2	𝜂𝐸,𝑟𝐸,𝜎×10^2	𝜂PL,𝑟PL,𝜁^PL0,𝜎×10^2	(Φ^𝐺2,Φ^𝐸2,Φ^PL2)×10^−3
1	1.04, 1.97, 5.7	1.14, 2.04, 6.2	1.08, 2.45, 5.9	2.81, 5.51, 1.68
2	1.10, 1.80, 6.5	1.20, 1.76, 7.4	1.14, 2.15, 7.2	3.23, 6.56, 1.99
3	0.90, 1.84, 4.1	0.98, 2.05, 4.3	0.94, 2.40, 4.1	2.18, 4.06, 1.28
Av.	1.00, 1.98, 1.9	1.10, 2.11, 2.9	1.05, 2.49, 2.4	2.60, 5.05, 1.57