Journals
Publish with us
Publishing partnerships
About us
Blog
Advances in High Energy Physics
Journal overview
For authors
For reviewers
For editors
Table of Contents
Special Issues
Advances in High Energy Physics
/
2014
/
Article
/
Tab 2
/
Review Article
Challenges in Double Beta Decay
Table 2
Theoretically evaluated
matrix elements
according to different authors and methods. Where needed, values have been scaled to
= 1.2 fm and
= 1.25 (
=
(1.25/
)
2
) for a uniform comparison. Ranges refer to variation which arise due to model details.
Isotope
NSM [
42
]
GCM [
45
]
QRPA [
139
–
141
]
IBM [
44
]
PHFB [
49
]
Ca
0.85
2.37
2.00
Ge
2.81
4.60
4.20–7.24
4.64–5.47
Se
2.64
4.22
2.94–6.46
3.81–4.41
Zr
5.65
1.56–3.12
2.53
2.24
3.46
Mo
5.08
3.10–6.07
3.73–4.22
4.71
7.77
Pd
3.62
5.33
8.91
Cd
4.72
2.51–4.52
2.78
Sn
2.62
4.81
3.53
Te
4.11
3.50–6.16
4.52
Te
2.65
5.13
3.19–5.50
3.37–4.06
2.99
5.12
Xe
2.19
4.20
1.71–3.53
3.35
Nd
1.98
Nd
1.71
3.45
2.32–2.89
1.98
3.70
Sm
2.51
Gd
3.63
Pt
1.88