Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2014, Article ID 983861, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/983861
Research Article

Particle Production at CBM Energies in a Thermal Model Approach

Department of Physics, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India

Received 25 November 2013; Accepted 16 January 2014; Published 4 March 2014

Academic Editor: Terry Sloan

Copyright © 2014 A. Prakash et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. C. P. Singh, “Signals of quark-gluon plasma,” Physics Reports, vol. 236, no. 3, pp. 147–224, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. C. P. Singh, “Current status of properties and signals of quark—gluon plasma,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 7, no. 29, p. 7185, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. H. Satz, “quark matter and nuclear collisions: a brief history of strong interaction thermodynamics,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 21, Article ID 1230006, 23 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. B. Friman, C. Hohne, J. Knoll et al., Eds., The CBM Physics Book, vol. 814 of Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2011.
  5. A. Kumar, P. K. Srivastava, B. K. Singh, and C. P. Singh, “Charged hadron multiplicity distribution at relativistic heavy ion colliders,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, Article ID 352180, 27 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. A. Kumar, B. K. Singh, P. K. Srivastava, and C. P. Singh, “Wounded quarks and multiplicity at relativistic ion colliders,” The European Physical Journal Plus, vol. 128, p. 45, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. B. Mohanty, “STAR experiment results from the beam energy scan program at the RHIC,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 38, no. 12, Article ID 124023, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. L. Adamczyk, J. K. Adkins, G. Agakishiev et al., “Observation of an energy-dependent difference in elliptic flow between particles and anti-particles in relativistic heavy ion collisions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 110, no. 14, Article ID 142301, 7 pages, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  9. B. B. Back, M. D. Bakerb, M. Ballintijn et al., “The PHOBOS perspective on discoveries at RHIC,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 757, no. 1-2, pp. 28–101, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. A. Laszlo, PoS(CPOD07), 054, 2007.
  11. F. Antinori, P. A. Bacon, A. Badalà et al., “Strangeness enhancements at central rapidity in 40A GeV/c Pb-Pb collisions,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 37, no. 4, Article ID 045105, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. R. Singh, L. Kumar, P. K. Netrakanti, and B. Mohanty, “Selected experimental results from heavy-ion collisions at LHC,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, Article ID 761474, 22 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. P. Senger, “The compressed baryonic matter experiment at FAIR,” Central European Journal of Physics, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1289–1294, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. P. Senger, “Probing dense baryonic matter,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 375–380, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. S. Borsanyi, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor et al., “The QCD equation of state with dynamical quarks,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 11, article 77, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz et al., “Fluctuations of conserved charges at finite temperature from lattice QCD,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 1, article 138, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz et al., “Correlations and fluctuations from lattice QCD,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 38, no. 12, Article ID 124060, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, and J. Stachel, “Hadron production in central nucleus-nucleus collisions at chemical freeze-out,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 772, no. 3-4, pp. 167–199, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. J. Cleymans, H. Oeschler, and K. Redlich, “Statistical model description of K+ and K- production between 1–10 A·GeV,” Physics Letters B, vol. 485, pp. 27–31, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. F. Becattini, J. Cleymans, A. Keranen, E. Suhonen, and K. Redlich, “Features of particle multiplicities and strangeness production in central heavy ion collisions between 1.7A and 15A GeV/c,” Physical Review C, vol. 64, no. 2, Article ID 024901, 9 pages, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. W. Broniowski and W. Florkowski, “Description of strange particle production in Au+Au collisions of sNN=130 GeV in a single-freeze-out model,” Physical Review C, vol. 65, no. 6, Article ID 064905, 6 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. J. Y. Ollitrault, “Relativistic hydrodynamics for heavy-ion collisions,” European Journal of Physics, vol. 29, no. 2, p. 275, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. U. Heinz and R. Snellings, “Collective flow and viscosity in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, vol. 63, pp. 123–151, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. S. K. Tiwari, P. K. Srivastava, and C. P. Singh, “Description of hot and dense hadron-gas properties in a new excluded-volume model,” Physical Review C, vol. 85, no. 1, Article ID 014908, 15 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. P. K. Srivastava and C. P. Singh, “Hybrid model for QCD deconfining phase boundary,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 11, Article ID 114016, 10 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. P. K. Srivastava and C. P. Singh, “Strongly interacting matter at finite chemical potential: hybrid model approach,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 28, no. 14, Article ID 1350051, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. S. K. Tiwari and C. P. Singh, “Particle production in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions: a statistical-thermal model review,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, Article ID 805413, 27 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. S. K. Tiwari, P. K. Srivastava, and C. P. Singh, “The effect of flow on hadronic spectra in an excluded-volume model,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 40, no. 4, Article ID 045102, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. H. Weber, E. L. Bratkovskaya, W. Cassing, and H. Stocker, “Hadronic observables at relativistic energies: anything strange with strangeness?” Physical Review C, vol. 67, no. 1, Article ID 014904, 19 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. A. Andronic, D. Blaschke, P. Braun-Munzingera et al., “Hadron production in ultra-relativistic nuclear collisions: quarkyonic matter and a triple point in the phase diagram of QCD,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 837, no. 1-2, pp. 65–86, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. C. Alt, T. Anticic, B. Baatar et al., “Pion and kaon production in central Pb+Pb collisions at 20A and 30A GeV: evidence for the onset of deconfinement,” Physical Review C, vol. 77, no. 2, Article ID 024903, 10 pages, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  32. C. Alt, T. Anticic, B. Baatar et al., “Energy dependence of Λ and Ξ production in central Pb+Pb collisions at 20A, 30A, 40A, 80A, and 158A GeV measured at the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron,” Physical Review C, vol. 78, no. 3, Article ID 034918, 15 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. C. Blume, “Review of results from the NA49 Collaboration,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 31, pp. S685–S691, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. V. Afanasiev, T. Anticic, D. Barna et al., “Energy dependence of pion and kaon production in central Pb+Pb collisions,” Physical Review C, vol. 66, no. 5, Article ID 054902, 9 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. M. Gazdzicki, “Report from NA49,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 30, no. 8, p. S701, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. J. Randrup and J. Cleymans, “Maximum freeze-out baryon density in nuclear collisions,” Physical Review C, vol. 74, no. 4, Article ID 047901, 3 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. V. V. Begun, M. Gazdzicki, and M. I. Gorenstein, “Hadron-resonance gas at freeze-out: reminder on the importance of repulsive interactions,” Physical Review C, vol. 88, no. 2, Article ID 024092, 7 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. D. H. Rischke, M. I. Gorenstein, H. Stöcker, and W. Greiner, “Excluded volume effect for the nuclear matter equation of state,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 485–489, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Scherer, S. A. Bass, M. Bleicher et al., “Critical review of quark gluon signatures,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 42, pp. 279–293, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  40. M. Bleicher, E. Zabrodin, C. Spieles et al., “Relativistic hadron-hadron collisions in the ultra-relativistic quantum molecular dynamics model,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 25, no. 9, p. 1859, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. N. Bianchi, V. Muccifora, A. Deppman et al., “Absolute measurement of the total photoabsorption cross section for carbon in the nucleon resonance region,” Physics Letters B, vol. 309, no. 1-2, pp. 5–9, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. N. Bianchi, V. Muccifora, E. de Sanctis et al., “Absolute total photoabsorption cross sections on nuclei in the nucleon resonance region,” Physics Letters B, vol. 325, no. 3-4, pp. 333–336, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. N. Bianchi, V. Muccifora, E. de Sanctis et al., “Total hadronic photoabsorption cross section on nuclei in the nucleon resonance region,” Physical Review C, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1688–1699, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. M. Wagner, A. B. Larionov, and U. Mosel, “Kaon and pion production in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,” Physical Review C, vol. 71, no. 3, Article ID 034910, 19 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. J. Rafelski and B. Muller, “Strangeness production in the quark-gluon plasma,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 48, no. 16, pp. 1066–1069, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. J. Rafelski, “Strangeness production in the quark gluon plasma,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 418, pp. 215–235, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. C. P. Singh and S. Uddin, “Strangeness abundance as a signal for quark-gluon plasma,” Physical Review D, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 870–874, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. V. K. Tiwari and C. P. Singh, “Strangeness enhancement—a potential signature for QGP phase,” Physics Letters B, vol. 411, no. 1-2, pp. 225–229, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. C. P. Singh, “Comment on ‘φ-meson production as a probe of the quark-gluon plasma’,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 56, no. 16, p. 1750, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. T. S. Biro and J. Zimanyi, “Quarkochemistry in relativistic heavy-ion collisions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 113, pp. 6–10, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. T. S. Biro and J. Zimanyi, “Quark-gluon plasma formation in heavy ion collisions and quarkochemistry,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 395, pp. 525–538, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. S. Margetis, K. Safarik, and O. V. Baillie, “Strangeness production in heavy ion collisions,” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, vol. 50, pp. 299–342, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. S. Uddin and C. P. Singh, “Dependence of K/π ratio on temperature and chemical potential as a signature of quark-gluon plasma,” Physics Letters B, vol. 278, no. 3, pp. 357–362, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. V. Friese, PoS(CPOD09), 005, 2009.
  55. U. Heinz, P. R. Subramanian, and W. Greiner, “Antinuclei—a signature for the quark-gluon plasma,” Zeitschrift für Physik A, vol. 318, no. 2, pp. 247–248, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. P. Koch, B. Muller, H. Stocker, and W. Greiner, “Antibaryon-baryon ratios as a signal for quark gluon plasma for quark gluon plasma formation,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 3, no. 8, p. 737, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. J. Ellis, U. Heinz, and H. Kowalski, “Anti-baryon production in heavy-ion collisions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 233, no. 1-2, pp. 223–230, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. S. Gavin, M. Gyulassy, M. Plumer, and R. Venugopalan, “Antiproton production as a baryonometer in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 234, no. 1-2, pp. 175–179, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. H. Sorge, A. V. Keitz, R. Mattiello, H. Stocker, and W. Greiner, “String dynamics in hadronic matter,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 629–634, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. A. Tawfik, “Antiproton-to-proton ratios for ALICE heavy-ion collisions,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 859, no. 1, pp. 63–72, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. A. Tawfik, “Matter-antimatter asymmetry in heavy-ion collisions,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1396–1407, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH