Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 379642, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/379642
Review Article

Prospects for Studies of the Free Fall and Gravitational Quantum States of Antimatter

1Laboratoire Kastler-Brossel, CNRS, ENS, Collège de France, UPMC, Campus Jussieu, 75252 Paris, France
2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
3ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
4Institut de Recherche sur les lois Fondamentales de l’Univers, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
5Institut Max von Laue-Paul Langevin, 6 rue Jules Horowitz, 38042 Grenoble, France
6P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute, 53 Leninsky Prospekt, 117924 Moscow, Russia

Received 29 July 2014; Accepted 1 October 2014

Academic Editor: Ignatios Antoniadis

Copyright © 2015 G. Dufour et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. The ALPHA Collaboration and A. E. Charman, “Description and first application of a new technique to measure the gravitational mass of antihydrogen,” Nature Communications, vol. 4, article 1785, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. AEGIS Collaboration and M. G. Giammarchi, “AEGIS at CERN: measuring antihydrogen fall,” Few-Body Systems, vol. 54, no. 5-6, pp. 779–782, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. Pérez and Y. Sacquin, “The GBAR experiment: gravitational behaviour of antihydrogen at rest,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 29, no. 18, Article ID 184008, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. Kirch and K. S. Khaw, “Testing antimatter gravity with muonium,” International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series, vol. 30, Article ID 1460258, 8 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. D. B. Cassidy and S. D. Hogan, “Atom control and gravity measurements using Rydberg positronium,” International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series, vol. 30, Article ID 1460259, 9 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. M. M. Nieto and T. Goldman, “The arguments against “antigravity” and the gravitational acceleration of antimatter,” Physics Report, vol. 205, no. 5, pp. 221–281, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Scherk, “Antigravity: a crazy idea?” Physics Letters: B, vol. 88, no. 3-4, pp. 265–267, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. G. Chardin and J.-M. Rax, “CP violation. A matter of (anti)gravity?” Physics Letters B, vol. 282, no. 1-2, pp. 256–262, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. Chardin, “CP violation and antigravity (revisited),” Nuclear Physics, Section A, vol. 558, pp. 477–495, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Chardin, “Motivations for antigravity in general relativity,” Hyperfine Interactions, vol. 109, no. 1–4, pp. 83–94, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. V. A. Kostelecky and J. D. Tasson, “Matter-gravity couplings and Lorentz violation,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 1, Article ID 016013, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. L. Good, “K20 and the equivalence principle,” Physical Review, vol. 121, pp. 311–313, 1961. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. S. Pakvasa, W. A. Simmons, and T. J. Weiler, “Test of equivalence principle for neutrinos and antineutrinos,” Physical Review D, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1761–1763, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Apostolakis, E. Aslanides, G. Backenstoss et al., “Tests of the equivalence principle with neutral kaons,” Physics Letters B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics, vol. 452, no. 3-4, pp. 425–433, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. Gabrielse, A. Khabbaz, D. S. Hall, C. Heimann, H. Kalinowsky, and W. Jhe, “Precision mass spectroscopy of the antiproton and proton using simultaneously trapped particles,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 82, no. 16, pp. 3198–3201, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. F. C. Witteborn and W. M. Fairbank, “Experimental comparison of the gravitational force on freely falling electrons and metallic electrons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 19, no. 18, pp. 1049–1052, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. H. Holzscheiter, “Constraints on gravitational properties of antimatter from cyclotron-frequency measurements,” International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series, vol. 30, Article ID 1460260, 9 pages, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  18. Antimatter and Gravity, International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series, 2014.
  19. M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, Wiley, New York, ny, usa, 1972.
  20. L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, J. B. Sykes, and J. S. Bell, Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory, Royaume-Uni, Oxford, UK, 1965.
  21. V. V. Nesvizhevsky, H. G. Börner, A. K. Petukhov et al., “Quantum states of neutrons in the Earth's gravitational field,” Nature, vol. 415, no. 6869, pp. 297–299, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. G. Chardin, P. Grandemange, D. Lunney et al., “Proposal to measure the gravitational behaviour of antihydrogen at rest,” Tech. Rep. CERN-SPSC-2011-029. SPSC-P-342, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  23. J. Walz and T. W. Hänsch, “A proposal to measure antimatter gravity using ultracold antihydrogen atoms,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 561–570, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  24. J. P. Merrison, H. Bluhme, J. Chevallier et al., “Hydrogen formation by proton impact on positronium,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 78, no. 14, pp. 2728–2731, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. H. R. J. Walters and C. Starrett, “Positron and positronium scattering,” Physica Status Solidi (C), vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 3429–3436, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. P. Comini and P.-A. Hervieux, “H-+ ion production from collisions between antiprotons and excited positronium: cross sections calculations in the framework of the GBAR experiment,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 15, no. 9, Article ID 095022, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. Liszkay, C. Corbel, P. Pérez et al., “Positronium reemission yield from mesostructured silica films,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, no. 6, Article ID 063114, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. B. Cassidy, T. H. Hisakado, H. W. K. Tom, and A. P. Mills, “Photoemission of positronium from Si,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 107, no. 3, Article ID 033401, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. N. Oshima, T. M. Kojima, M. Niigaki, A. Mohri, K. Komaki, and Y. Yamazaki, “New scheme for positron accumulation in ultrahigh vacuum,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 93, no. 19, Article ID 195001, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. P. Grandemange, Piegeage et accumulation de positons issus d'un faisceau pulse produit par un accelerateur pour I'etude de I'interaction gravitationnelle de I'antimatiere [Ph.D. thesis], Universite Paris Sud, Paris, France, 2013.
  31. L. Hilico, J.-P. Karr, A. Douillet, P. Indelicato, S. Wolf, and F. S. Kaler, “Preparing single ultra-cold antihydrogen atoms for free-fall in GBAR,” International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series, vol. 30, Article ID 1460269, 11 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. H. B. G. Casimir and D. Polder, “Influence of retardation on the London-van der Waals forces,” Nature, vol. 158, no. 4022, pp. 787–788, 1946. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. H. B. G. Casimir, “On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates,” Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, vol. 51, p. 793, 1948. View at Google Scholar
  34. H. Friedrich, G. Jacoby, and C. G. Meister, “Quantum reflection by Casimir-van der Waals potentials tails,” Physical Review A, vol. 65, no. 3 B, Article ID 032902, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. Lambrecht, P. A. Maia Neto, and S. Reynaud, “The Casimir effect within scattering theory,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 8, article no. 243, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. Messina, D. A. R. Dalvit, P. A. M. Neto, A. Lambrecht, and S. Reynaud, “Dispersive interactions between atoms and nonplanar surfaces,” Physical Review A, vol. 80, no. 2, Article ID 022119, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. G. Dufour, A. Gerardin, R. Guérout et al., “Quantum reflection of antihydrogen from the Casimir potential above matter slabs,” Physical Review A, vol. 87, no. 1, Article ID 012901, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. M. V. Berry and K. E. Mount, “Semiclassical approximations in wave mechanics,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 35, no. 1, article no. 306, pp. 315–397, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. Y. Voronin, P. Froelich, and B. Zygelman, “Interaction of ultracold antihydrogen with a conducting wall,” Physical Review A, vol. 72, no. 6, Article ID 062903, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. G. Dufour, R. Guerout, A. Lambrecht, V. V. Nesvizhevsky, S. Reynaud, and A. Y. Voronin, “Quantum reflection of antihydrogen from nanoporous media,” Physical Review A, vol. 87, no. 2, Article ID 022506, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. G. Dufour, P. Debu, A. Lambrecht, V. V. Nesvizhevsky, S. Reynaud, and A. Y. Voronin, “Shaping the distribution of vertical velocities of antihydrogen in GBAR,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 74, no. 1, article 2731, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. V. V. Nesvizhevsky, H. Börner, A. M. Gagarski et al., “Search for quantum states of the neutron in a gravitational field: gravitational levels,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 440, no. 3, pp. 754–759, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. V. V. Nesvizhevsky, H. G. Börner, A. M. Gagarski et al., “Measurement of quantum states of neutrons in the Earth's gravitational field,” Physical Review D, vol. 68, no. 10, Article ID 102002, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. V. V. Nesvizhevsky, A. K. Petukhov, H. G. Börner et al., “Study of the neutron quantum states in the gravity field,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 479–491, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. Y. Voronin, H. Abele, S. Baeßler et al., “Quantum motion of a neutron in a waveguide in the gravitational field,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 4, Article ID 044029, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. A. Y. Voronin, P. Froelich, and V. V. Nesvizhevsky, “Gravitational quantum states of Antihydrogen,” Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, vol. 83, no. 3, Article ID 032903, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. W. E. Lamb, “Fine structure of the hydrogen atom. III,” Physical Review, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 259–276, 1952. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. L. P. Gor’kov and I. E. Dzyaloshinskii, “Contribution to the theory of the Mott exciton in a strong magnetic field,” Soviet Physics—JETP, vol. 26, pp. 449–453, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  49. Y. E. Lozovik and S. Y. Volkov, “Hydrogen atom moving across a magnetic field,” Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, vol. 70, no. 2, Article ID 023410, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. A. Y. Voronin and P. Froelich, “Quantum reflection of ultracold antihydrogen from a solid surface,” Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 38, no. 18, pp. L301–L308, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. M. Kreuz, V. V. Nesvizhevsky, P. Schmidt-Wellenburg et al., “A method to measure the resonance transitions between the gravitationally bound quantum states of neutrons in the GRANIT spectrometer,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 611, no. 2-3, pp. 326–330, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. A. P. Mills Jr., “Positron moderation and remoderation techniques for producing cold positron and positronium sources,” Hyperfine Interactions, vol. 44, no. 1–4, pp. 105–123, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter, Quantum. Mechanics of One- And Two-Electron Atoms, Dover, New York, NY, USA, 1957. View at MathSciNet
  54. T. F. Gallagher, Rydberg Atoms, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1994.
  55. A. P. Mills Jr. and M. Leventhal, “Can we measure the gravitational free fall of cold Rydberg state positronium?” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 192, no. 1-2, pp. 102–106, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. C. Seiler, S. D. Hogan, H. Schmutz, J. A. Agner, and F. Merkt, “Collisional and radiative processes in adiabatic deceleration, deflection, and off-axis trapping of a Rydberg atom beam,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 106, no. 7, Article ID 073003, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. A. C. L. Jones, T. H. Hisakado, H. J. Goldman, H. W. K. Tom, A. P. Mills Jr., and D. B. Cassidy, “Doppler-corrected Balmer spectroscopy of Rydberg positronium,” Physical Review A, vol. 90, no. 1, Article ID 012503, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. T. E. Wall, D. B. Cassidy, and S. D. Hogan, This has not yet been demonstrated for positronium; the feasibility of doing so is considered, to be published.
  59. T. F. Gallagher, “Rydberg atoms,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 143–188, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. E. Vliegen and F. Merkt, “Normal-incidence electrostatic rydberg atom mirror,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 97, no. 3, Article ID 033002, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. S. D. Hogan and F. Merkt, “Demonstration of three-dimensional electrostatic trapping of state-selected rydberg atoms,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, no. 4, Article ID 043001, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. T. J. Phillips, “Antimatter gravity studies with interferometry,” Hyperfine Interactions, vol. 109, no. 1–4, pp. 357–365, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. M. K. Oberthaler, “Anti-matter wave interferometry with positronium,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 192, no. 1-2, pp. 129–134, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. P. Crivelli, V. V. Nesvizhevsky, and A. Y. Voronin, “Can we observe the gravitational quantum states of Positronium?” Advances in High Energy Physics. In press.
  65. S. D. Hogan, C. Seiler, and F. Merkt, “Rydberg-state-enabled deceleration and trapping of cold molecules,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 103, no. 12, Article ID 123001, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. D. B. Cassidy, P. Crivelli, T. H. Hisakado et al., “Positronium cooling in porous silica measured via Doppler spectroscopy,” Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, vol. 81, no. 1, Article ID 012715, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. P. Crivelli, U. Gendotti, A. Rubbia, L. Liszkay, P. Pérez, and C. Corbel, “Measurement of the orthopositronium confinement energy in mesoporous thin films,” Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, vol. 81, no. 5, Article ID 052703, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. C. Hugenschmidt, B. Löwe, J. Mayer et al., “Unprecedented intensity of a low-energy positron beam,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 593, no. 3, pp. 616–618, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. A. Kellerbauer, M. Amoretti, A. S. Belov et al., “Proposed antimatter gravity measurement with an antihydrogen beam,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 266, no. 3, pp. 351–356, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. D. P. van der Werf, “The GBAR experiment,” International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series, vol. 30, Article ID 1460263, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  71. A. I. Zhmoginov, A. E. Charman, R. Shalloo, J. Fajans, and J. S. Wurtele, “Nonlinear dynamics of anti-hydrogen in magnetostatic traps: implications for gravitational measurements,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 30, no. 20, Article ID 205014, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. I. Antoniadis, S. Baessler, M. Büchner et al., “Short-range fundamental forces,” Comptes Rendus Physique, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 755–778, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus