Research Article  Open Access
Singlet Extensions of the MSSM with Symmetry
Abstract
We discuss singlet extensions of the MSSM with symmetry. We show that holomorphic zeros can avoid a potentially large coefficient of the term linear in the singlet. The emerging model has both an effective term and a supersymmetric mass term for the singlet which are controlled by the gravitino mass. The term turns out to be suppressed against by about one or two orders of magnitude. We argue that this class of models might provide us with a solution to the little hierarchy problem of the MSSM.
1. Purpose of This Paper
The symmetry [1, 2] provides us with compelling solutions of the and proton decay problems of the minimal supersymmetric extension of the standard model (MSSM). This symmetry appears anomalous, but the anomaly is cancelled by the (discrete) GreenSchwarz (GS) mechanism [3] in such a way that it does not spoil gauge coupling unification (see, e.g., [4] for a discussion). More precisely, if one extends the MSSM by a symmetry (continuous or discrete) that solves the problem and (i) demands anomaly freedom (while allowing GS anomaly cancellation), (ii) demands that the usual Yukawa couplings and the Weinberg operator be allowed, (iii) demands consistency with (10) grand unification, and (iv) demands precision gauge coupling unification, then this is the unique solution [2] (see also [5] for an alternative proof). By relaxing (iii) to consistency with (5), one obtains four additional symmetries [6]. Further, can be thought of as a discrete remnant of the Lorentz symmetry of compact extra dimensions; that is, it has a simple geometric interpretation and can arise in explicit stringderived models with the precise MSSM matter content [7]. The charge assignment is very simple: MSSM matter superfields have charge 1 while the Higgs superfields have 0, and the superpotential carries charge 2.
However, if one attempts to construct singlet extensions of the MSSM, one faces the problem that the presence of superpotential coupling of the singlet to the Higgs bilinear implies that also a linear term in the singlet is allowed by all symmetries. In more detail, since the Higgs bilinear has charge 0, the singlet needs to carry charge 2 in order to match the charge 2 of the superpotential. Then the desired term is allowed. However, in this case one might expect to have a problematic, unsuppressed linear term in in the (effective) superpotential, with of the order of the fundamental scale. In order to forbid this linear term, one may try to add a new symmetry. It is quite straightforward to see that an ordinary symmetry cannot forbid this linear term and be, at the same time, consistent with criteria (i)–(iv) above: in order to forbid the linear term, the singlet needs to carry a nontrivial charge under the new symmetry. But, as we want the term , this implies that also carries a nontrivial charge. Consequently, the new symmetry would yield a solution to the problem. However, this is not possible: as stated above, one can prove that (under our assumptions) the unique solution to the problem is , and this symmetry does not forbid the linear term.
In this paper, we take an alternative route and describe how one can get rid of the linear term (1) by employing holomorphic zeros [8] associated with an additional pseudoanomalous gauge symmetry.
2. Forbidding the Linear Term in the (G)NMSSM
2.1. Setup
Consider a singlet extension of the MSSM with a singlet and an additional symmetry. is pseudoanomalous symmetry, whose anomaly is cancelled by the GS mechanism. Such factors often arise in string compactifications and are accompanied by nontrivial FayetIliopoulos (FI) term [9] , which arises at 1loop [10]. The FI term of the is assumed to be cancelled by a nontrivial vacuum expectation value (VEV) of a “flavon” , which carries negative charge and charge 0. Without loss of generality, we can normalize such that has charge and . (Of course, in true stringderived models the situation is usually more complicated: in approximately 500 out of a total of 11940 MSSMlike models from [11] the FI term can be cancelled with one field only. In all other models, one would have to identify with an appropriate monomial of MSSM singlet fields (see Appendix A for details).) For the sake of definiteness, we assume thatwhere the Planck scale is identified with the “fundamental scale.” In this case, can be used as FroggattNielsen symmetry [12] to explain the flavor structure of quarks and leptons. However, this assumption is not crucial for the subsequent discussion, yet this is what one gets in explicit orbifold compactifications of the heterotic string which exhibit the exact MSSM spectrum at energies below the compactification scale.
Further, also the anomaly of is assumed to be cancelled by the GS mechanism with the GS axion being contained in the dilaton or another superfield, which we will denote by . Since the mixed and anomalies are universal, the GS mechanism does not interfere with the beautiful picture of MSSM gauge coupling unification (see, e.g., [4]). The “nonperturbative” term carries the same charge as the superpotential, namely, 2. It might be thought of as some nonperturbative hidden sector (see, e.g., [13]). Further, will also carry positive charge such that holomorphic zeros get lifted by “nonperturbative” terms. More details on the charge of can be found in Appendix B (see, e.g., [6, 14]). In more detail, we demand that be allowed, which is equivalent to the statement that carries charge (Note that may also be fractional even if the charges of all “fundamental” fields are integer, for instance, if one assumes that is given by the AffleckDineSeiberg superpotential [15]. Examples for such terms can be found, e.g., in [13].) may be thought of as gaugino condensate [16] or some other nonperturbative physics, such as the one discussed in [17], which is involved in spontaneous supersymmetry breaking. We discuss this in more detail in Appendix B. Inserting the VEV we obtain in Planck units. (Note that (3) is not the “full” hidden sector superpotential. One must, of course, make sure that does not attain an term VEV, and one needs to cancel the vacuum energy. A detailed discussion of these issues is, however, beyond the scope of the present paper.) This implies, in particular, that That is, symmetry breaking is controlled by the gravitino mass, as it should be, and due to the presence of we obtain a FroggattNielsenlike [12] modification of the terms. However, in contrast to the usual FroggattNielsen mechanism, it yields in our setup an enhancement rather than a suppression factor for the lifting of the holomorphic zeros by nonperturbative effects.
2.2. Charges and Allowed Terms in the Superpotential
We summarize the and charges in Table 1.

Below the breaking scale set by the VEV, we wish to have a nontrivial term at the nonperturbative level; that is,This implies We will then get effectively Next, we wish to couple the singlet to the Higgs bilinear. We hence demand thatsuch thatNow we wish to forbid the linear term in at the perturbative level. This can be achieved with holomorphic zeros [8], which amounts in our setup to demanding thatThis implies, in particular, that the cubic term in is also forbidden.
Of course, this all works only if we make sure that rather than cancels the FI term. This might be achieved by postulating that the soft mass squared of is positive while the one of is negative; that is,Full justification of such an assumption would require deriving the setting from some UV complete construction such as a string model. This is, however, beyond the scope of this paper.
We further obtain nonperturbative terms which are linear or quadratic in if or , respectively. Altogether we have where the coefficient of the cubic term is generically highly suppressed. Not all conditions on are independent; for example, if the quadratic term is allowed also, since , the linear term will be present.
There are many possible values that satisfy all the constraints; for instance, , which gives usThat is, the (holomorphic) term is roughly two orders of magnitude smaller than , which might be favorable in view of the socalled “little hierarchy problem.”
Note also that the effective superpotential admits two solutions to the  and term equations, the first one being (recall that ) Here one has electroweak symmetry breaking prior to supersymmetry breaking, and the Higgs VEV may be subject to cancellations since both and are of the order , for example, in our example. The second solution is with unbroken electroweak symmetry for unbroken supersymmetry.
2.3. Discussion
In summary, we find that the charge assignment of Table 1 yields an effective superpotential, with all the dimensionful parameters , , and of the order of the gravitino mass . This description is valid below the breaking scale, which is set by the flavon VEV . In particular, the linear term in the singlet is sufficiently suppressed. In contrast to the original (G)NMSSM [18], here, (i)there is (essentially) no cubic term in ; (ii)there is a suppressed linear term in . (Note that, unlike in [18], we cannot shift the singlet in order to eliminate the linear term because the point is special as it denotes the point of unbroken .)The scheme leads to certain predictions and expectations: (1)Forbidding the linear term by holomorphic zeros implies the absence of a perturbative cubic term in .(2)Further, we obtain the “little hierarchies” (recall that )
2.4. Further Applications
Clearly, this method of avoiding a linear term in a gauge singlet may find further applications. For instance, in model building one sometimes introduces socalled “driving fields” in order to “explain” a certain structure of flavon VEVs. Here, one may forbid too large tadpole terms in the same way as we have discussed above.
3. Discussion
We have discussed how to build singlet extensions of the MSSM with symmetry. We have shown that a potentially large linear term in the singlet can be avoided by using holomorphic zeros. The resulting model has a term, a supersymmetric mass of the order of the gravitino mass , as well as a coefficient of an effective linear term in the singlet of the order . is expected to be one or two orders of magnitude smaller than . This might be viewed as the first step towards a solution to the little hierarchy problem; that is, explain why the electroweak scale is at least one order of magnitude smaller than the soft supersymmetric terms. Obtaining a complete solution requires the derivation of our setting from a UV complete model, which allows us to compute various terms precisely. This, however, is beyond the scope of this paper.
Appendices
A. Cancellation of the FI Term
In this appendix, we discuss how the FI term gets cancelled by a single monomial . The generalization to the case of several monomials is straightforward. We consider a monomial of chiral superfields , which are assumed to be standard model singlets, with . is constructed to be gauge invariant with respect to all gauge symmetries except the “anomalous” . In a supersymmetric vacuum one then has where is determined from the requirement that the FI term in the term potential of the anomalous gets cancelled. That is, that is, On the other hand, the “anomalous” charge of the monomial is Hence, we obtain That is, if one compares the cases in which (i) the FI term is cancelled by a single field and (ii) the FI term is cancelled by a monomial, there are factors that enhance the flavon VEVs somewhat in case (ii).
B. Nonperturbative Terms in the Superpotential
In this appendix we discuss how to compute the charge of the nonperturbative term in the case that the anomaly of is cancelled via the universal GreenSchwarz mechanism. We follow the notation of Appendix in [6].
The Kähler potential of the dilaton reads Then, under gauge transformations with gauge parameter , the vector field and the dilaton shift according tosuch that is invariant. Furthermore, in order to cancel the cubic anomaly , the constant has to satisfy where the trace sums over the charges of all matter superfields. Consequently, one can define a charge for the nonperturbative term, with and the charge is given by Depending on the charge of can be positive or negative. On the other hand, in certain stringderived models, in which the GreenSchwarz mechanism is universal, one has the relationusing the fact that the generator of is normalized to . Then one obtains We have chosen such that the FI term is positive; that is, see Appendix A. Consequently, the charge of the nonperturbative term is positive as well; that is, For instance, in the case of a condensing group with fundamental and antifundamental “matter” fields, and , one has (see, e.g., [13, Equation ] of the published version) where denotes the renormalization group invariant scale and carries charge . and are the “anomalous” charges of and , respectively. Inserting the VEV of the mesons (see [13, Equation ]), one obtains a term of the form (3).
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank MuChun Chen and Graham Ross for useful discussions. Michael Ratz would like to thank the UC Irvine, where part of this work was done, for hospitality. This work was partially supported by the DFG cluster of excellence “Origin and Structure of the Universe” (http://www.universecluster.de) by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). The authors would like to thank the Aspen Center for Physics for hospitality and support. This research was done in the context of the ERC Advanced Grant Project “FLAVOUR” (267104).
References
 K. S. Babu, I. Gogoladze, and K. Wang, “Natural Rparity, μterm, and fermion mass hierarchy from discrete gauge symmetries,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 660, no. 12, pp. 322–342, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. M. Lee, S. Raby, M. Ratz et al., “A unique ${\mathbb{Z}}_{4}^{R}$ symmetry for the MSSM,” Physics Letters B, vol. 694, no. 45, pp. 491–495, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, “Anomaly cancellations in supersymmetric $D=10$ gauge theory and superstring theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 149, no. 1–3, pp. 117–122, 1984. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 M.C. Chen, M. Fallbacher, and M. Ratz, “Supersymmetric unification and $R$ symmetries,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 27, no. 40, Article ID 1230044, 15 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 M.C. Chen, M. Ratz, and V. Takhistov, “$R$ parity violation from discrete $R$ symmetries,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 891, pp. 322–345, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 H. M. Lee, S. Raby, M. Ratz et al., “Discrete R symmetries for the MSSM and its singlet extensions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 850, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Kappl, B. Petersen, S. Raby, M. Ratz, R. Schieren, and P. K. Vaudrevange, “Stringderived MSSM vacua with residual R symmetries,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 847, no. 2, pp. 325–349, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Leurer, Y. Nir, and N. Seiberg, “Mass matrix models,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 398, no. 2, pp. 319–342, 1993. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 P. Fayet and J. Iliopoulos, “Spontaneously broken supergauge symmetries and goldstone spinors,” Physics Letters B, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 461–464, 1974. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Fischler, H. P. Nilles, J. Polchinski, S. Raby, and L. Susskind, “Vanishing renormalization of the D term in supersymmetric U(1) theories,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 47, article 757, 1981. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. P. Nilles and P. K. S. Vaudrevange, “Geography of fields in extra dimensions: string theory lessons for particle physics,” in Perspectives on String Phenomenology, vol. 22 of Advanced Series on Directions in High Energy Physics, World Scientific, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
 C. D. Froggatt and H. B. Nielsen, “Hierarchy of quark masses, cabibbo angles and CP violation,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 147, no. 34, pp. 277–298, 1979. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Binetruy and E. Dudas, “Gaugino condensation and the anomalous U(1),” Physics Letters B, vol. 389, no. 3, pp. 503–509, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. ArkaniHamed, M. Dine, and S. P. Martin, “Dynamical supersymmetry breaking in models with a Green–Schwarz mechanism,” Physics Letters B, vol. 431, no. 34, pp. 329–338, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 I. Affleck, M. Dine, and N. Seiberg, “Dynamical supersymmetry breaking in supersymmetric QCD,” Nuclear Physics, Section B, vol. 241, no. 2, pp. 493–534, 1984. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. P. Nilles, “Dynamically broken supergravity and the hierarchy problem,” Physics Letters B, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 193–196, 1982. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Intriligator, N. Seiberg, and D. Shih, “Dynamical SUSY breaking in metastable vacua,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2006, article 21, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 M. Drees, “Supersymmetric models with extended Higgs sector,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 4, no. 14, pp. 3635–3651, 1989. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Michael Ratz and Patrick K. S. Vaudrevange. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP^{3}.