Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 980687, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/980687
Research Article

The Higgs Sector of the Minimal SUSY Model

1Universitè de Strasbourg, IPHC, 23 rue du Loess, 67037 Strasbourg, France
2CNRS, UMR7178, 67037 Strasbourg, France

Received 23 April 2015; Revised 17 June 2015; Accepted 25 June 2015

Academic Editor: Kai Schmidt-Hoberg

Copyright © 2015 Lorenzo Basso. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. J. Ellis, F. Luo, K. A. Olive, and P. Sandick, “The Higgs mass beyond the CMSSM,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 73, article 2403, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie, and A. M. Teixeira, “The next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model,” Physics Reports, vol. 496, no. 1-2, pp. 1–77, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. W. Buchmüller, K. Hamaguchi, O. Lebedev, and M. Ratz, “Supersymmetric Standard Model from the heterotic string (II),” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 785, no. 1-2, pp. 149–209, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  4. M. Ambroso and B. A. Ovrut, “THE B-L/electroweak hierarchy in smooth heterotic compactifications,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 25, no. 13, p. 2631, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Ambroso and B. A. Ovrut, “The mass spectra, hierarchy and cosmology of B-L MSSM heterotic compactifications,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1569–1627, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. S. Khalil and A. Masiero, “Radiative B-L symmetry breaking in supersymmetric models,” Physics Letters B, vol. 665, no. 5, pp. 374–377, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. P. Fileviez Perez and S. Spinner, “Fate of R parity,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 3, Article ID 035004, 7 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. V. Barger, P. Fileviez Perez, and S. Spinner, “Minimal gauged U(1)B-L model with spontaneous R parity violation,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, Article ID 181802, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. J. Pelto, I. Vilja, and H. Virtanen, “Leptogenesis B-L in gauged supersymmetry with MSSM Higgs sector,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, Article ID 055001, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. K. S. Babu, Y. Meng, and Z. Tavartkiladze, “New ways to leptogenesis with gauged B−L symmetry,” Physics Letters B, vol. 681, no. 1, pp. 37–43, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. B. Holdom, “Two U(1)'s and ϵ charge shifts,” Physics Letters B, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 196–198, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. S. Babu, C. Kolda, and J. March-Russell, “Implications of generalized Z-Z′ mixing,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 6788–6792, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. del Aguila, G. D. Coughlan, and M. Quirós, “Gauge coupling renormalisation with several U(1) factors,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 307, no. 3, pp. 633–648, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. F. del Aguila, J. Gonzalez, and M. Quiros, “Renormalization group analysis of extended electroweak models from the heterotic string,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 307, no. 3, pp. 571–632, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. B. O'Leary, W. Porod, and F. Staub, “Mass spectrum of the minimal SUSY B-L model,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 5, article 042, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  16. L. Basso, B. O'Leary, W. Porod, and F. Staub, “Dark matter scenarios in the minimal SUSY B-L model,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 9, article 54, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan, A. Tumasyan et al., “Precise determination of the mass of the Higgs boson and tests of compatibility of its couplings with the standard model predictions using proton collisions at 7 and 8 TeV,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 7, article 212, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. J. Adam, X. Bai, A. M. Baldini et al., “New constraint on the existence of the μ+e+γ decay,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 110, Article ID 201801, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. U. Bellgardt, G. Otter, R. Eichler et al., “Search for the decay μ→ e+e+e,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 299, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. CMS Collaboration, “Search for the standard model Higgs boson in the H to WW to lnujj decay channel in pp collisions at the LHC,” Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-13-027, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  21. S. Chatrchyan, V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan et al., “Search for a standard-model-like Higgs boson with a mass in the range 145 to 1000 GeV at the LHC,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 73, article 2469, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. W. Porod, “SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production at e+e- colliders,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 153, no. 2, pp. 275–315, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. W. Porod and F. Staub, “SPheno 3.1: extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 183, no. 11, pp. 2458–2469, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. F. Staub, “Sarah,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.0538.
  25. F. Staub, “From superpotential to model files for FeynArts and CalcHep/CompHep,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 181, no. 6, pp. 1077–1086, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. F. Staub, “Automatic calculation of supersymmetric renormalization group equations and loop corrections,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 182, no. 3, pp. 808–833, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  27. F. Staub, “SARAH 3.2: dirac gauginos, UFO output, and more,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 184, no. 7, pp. 1792–1809, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. F. Staub, “SARAH 4 : a tool for (not only SUSY) model builders,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 185, no. 6, pp. 1773–1790, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. L. Basso, A. Belyaev, D. Chowdhury et al., “Proposal for generalised supersymmetry les Houches Accord for see-saw models and PDG numbering scheme,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 184, no. 3, pp. 698–719, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  30. F. Staub, “Exploring new models in all detail with SARAH,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.04200.
  31. F. Staub, T. Ohl, W. Porod, and C. Speckner, “A tool box for implementing supersymmetric models,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 183, no. 10, pp. 2165–2206, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. W. Porod, F. Staub, and A. Vicente, “A flavor kit for BSM models,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 74, article 2992, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein, and K. E. Williams, “HiggsBounds: confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with exclusion bounds from LEP and the Tevatron,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 138–167, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein, and K. E. Williams, “HiggsBounds 2.0.0: confronting neutral and charged Higgs sector predictions with exclusion bounds from LEP and the Tevatron,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 182, no. 12, pp. 2605–2631, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer et al., “Recent developments in HiggsBounds and a preview of HiggsSignals,” PoS CHARGED, http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.2345.
  36. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer et al., “HiggsBounds-4 : improved tests of extended Higgs sectors against exclusion bounds from LEP, the Tevatron and the LHC,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 74, article 2693, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. R. M. Fonseca, M. Malinsky, W. Porod, and F. Staub, “Running soft parameters in SUSY models with multiple U(1) gauge factors,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 854, no. 1, pp. 28–53, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. P. H. Chankowski, S. Pokorski, and J. Wagner, “Z′ and the Appelquist-Carrazzone decoupling,” The European Physical Journal C—Particles and Fields, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 187–205, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. W. Abdallah, S. Khalil, and S. Moretti, “Double Higgs peak in the minimal SUSY B-L model,” Physical Review D, vol. 91, no. 1, Article ID 014001, 6 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. G. Aad, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah et al., “Search for high-mass dilepton resonances in pp collisions at s=8 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Physical Review D, vol. 90, Article ID 052005, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan, A. Tumasyan et al., “Search for physics beyond the standard model in dilepton mass spectra in proton-proton collisions at s-=8 TeV,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, no. 4, article 025, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. G. Cacciapaglia, C. Csáki, G. Marandella, and A. Strumia, “The minimal set of electroweak precision parameters,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 3, Article ID 033011, 12 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. L. Basso, K. Mimasu, and S. Moretti, “Non-exotic Z' signals in l+l-, bb and tt- final states at the LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 11, article 060, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. M. Hirsch, H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, and S. G. Kovalenko, “B-L-violating masses in softly broken supersymmetry,” Physics Letters B, vol. 398, no. 3-4, pp. 311–314, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. Y. Grossman and H. E. Haber, “Sneutrino mixing phenomena,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 78, no. 18, pp. 3438–3441, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. L. Basso and F. Staub, “Enhancing hγγ with staus in supersymmetric models with an extended gauge sector,” Physical Review D, vol. 87, no. 1, Article ID 015011, 6 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. A. Hammad, S. Khalil, and S. Moretti, “Higgs boson decays into γγ and Zγ in the MSSM and BLSSM,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.05408.
  48. J. E. Camargo-Molina, B. O'Leary, W. Porod, and F. Staub, “Stability of R parity in supersymmetric models extended by U(1)B-L,” Physical Review D, vol. 88, Article ID 015033, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. A. Abada, M. E. Krauss, W. Porod, F. Staub, A. Vicente, and C. Weiland, “Lepton flavor violation in low-scale seesaw models: SUSY and non-SUSY contributions,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 11, article 048, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. A. Vicente, “Lepton flavor violation beyond the MSSM,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.08622.
  51. L. Basso, S. Moretti, and G. M. Pruna, “Phenomenology of the minimal B-L extension of the standard model: the Higgs sector,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, Article ID 055014, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. CMS Collaboration, “Search for invisible decays of Higgs bosons in the vector boson fusion production mode,” Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIG-14-038, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 2015, http://cds.cern.ch/record/2007270. View at Google Scholar
  53. L. Basso, A. Belyaev, S. Moretti, and C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous, “Phenomenology of the minimal B-L extension of the standard model: Z and neutrinos,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 5, Article ID 055030, 14 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. L. Basso, A. Belyaev, J. Fiaschi, S. Moretti, I. Tomalin, and M. Thomas, In preparation.
  55. A. Djouadi, “The anatomy of electroweak symmetry breaking: tome I: the Higgs boson in the Standard Model,” Physics Reports, vol. 457, no. 1–4, pp. 1–216, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. M. Carena, S. Gori, N. R. Shah, and C. E. M. Wagner, “A 125 GeV SM-like Higgs in the MSSM and the γγ rate,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 3, article 014, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. U. Ellwanger, “A Higgs boson near 125 GeV with enhanced di-photon signal in the NMSSM,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 3, article 044, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  58. R. Benbrik, M. Gomez Bock, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stål, G. Weiglein, and L. Zeune, “Confronting the MSSM and the NMSSM with the discovery of a signal in the two photon channel at the LHC,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 72, article 2171, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. K. Schmidt-Hoberg and F. Staub, “Enhanced hγγ rate in MSSM singlet extensions,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 10, article 195, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. A. Delgado, G. Nardini, and M. Quiros, “Large diphoton Higgs rates from supersymmetric triplets,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 11, Article ID 115010, 7 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. ALEPH Collaboration, DELPHI Collaboration, L3 Collaboration, OPAL Collaboration, and The LEP Working Group for Higgs Boson Searches, “Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson at LEP,” Physics Letters B, vol. 565, Article ID 0306033, pp. 61–75, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. G. Bélanger, U. Ellwanger, J. F. Gunion, Y. Jiang, S. Kraml, and J. H. Schwarz, “Higgs bosons at 98 and 125 GeV at LEP and the LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 1, article 069, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. M. Drees, “Supersymmetric explanation of the excess of Higgs-like events at the LHC and at LEP,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, Article ID 115018, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal, T. Stefaniak, and G. Weiglein, “HiggsSignals: confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with measurements at the Tevatron and the LHC,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 74, article 2711, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar