Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 2398198, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2398198
Research Article

The Calculation of Single-Nucleon Energies of Nuclei by Considering Two-Body Effective Interaction, , and a Hartree-Fock Inspired Scheme

1Centro de Física Computacional, Department of Physics, University of Coimbra, 3004-516 Coimbra, Portugal
2Centro de Física do Porto, Departamento de Física e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 687, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal

Received 25 June 2016; Revised 2 September 2016; Accepted 20 September 2016

Academic Editor: Nasser Kalantar-Nayestanaki

Copyright © 2016 H. Mariji. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Abstract

The nucleon single-particle energies (SPEs) of the selected nuclei, that is, , , and , are obtained by using the diagonal matrix elements of two-body effective interaction, which generated through the lowest-order constrained variational (LOCV) calculations for the symmetric nuclear matter with the phenomenological nucleon-nucleon potential. The SPEs at the major levels of nuclei are calculated by employing a Hartree-Fock inspired scheme in the spherical harmonic oscillator basis. In the scheme, the correlation influences are taken into account by imposing the nucleon effective mass factor on the radial wave functions of the major levels. Replacing the density-dependent one-body momentum distribution functions of nucleons, , with the Heaviside functions, the role of in the nucleon SPEs at the major levels of the selected closed shell nuclei is investigated. The best fit of spin-orbit splitting is taken into account when correcting the major levels of the nuclei by using the parameterized Wood-Saxon potential and the density-dependent mean field potential which is constructed by the LOCV method. Considering the point-like protons in the spherical Coulomb potential well, the single-proton energies are corrected. The results show the importance of including , instead of the Heaviside functions, in the calculation of nucleon SPEs at the different levels, particularly the valence levels, of the closed shell nuclei.

1. Introduction

The study of shell structure and relevant properties, for example, single-particle energies (SPEs), of closed shell nuclei plays a crucial role in the description of various astrophysical scenarios. For many years, the impact of nuclear shell structure on the astrophysical nucleosynthesis processes has been recognized by observing the so-called equilibrium-, s-, and r-process peaks in the galactic abundance distribution curves [1]. SPEs have frequently been used in a few mass models where the total ground-state energies of finite nuclei are calculated as the sum of a microscopic term, determined by the calculated SPEs, and a macroscopic term, based on the finite range droplet model [2, 3]. Nowadays, the benchmark role of closed shell nuclei properties on a reliable description of astrophysical events becomes more obvious by daily progress in getting the observational data, for example, from the r-process sources such as binary compact stars (white dwarf and neutron star mergers) and explosive supernovae (Ia and II), or from the weak interaction processes in the stellar burning, whether via neutron/electron capture or via neutrino absorption on nucleons/nuclei (see, e.g., [4, 5] and the relevant references therein). Hence, investigating shell structure properties of closed shell nuclei such as SPEs is necessary for the state-of-the-art of the nuclear astrophysics calculations.

Recently, many works have been presented to describe the shell structure properties of exotic nuclei based on the closed shell nuclei properties. We can point, for instance, to the performing systematic microscopic calculations of medium-mass nuclei [6, 7], the calculations based on microscopic valence-space interactions [816], and the calculations by using Self-Consistent Green’s Function [17, 18] or In-Medium Similarity Renormalization Group [19, 20]. An important step to study nuclei far from stability is the use of nuclear interactions predicted by chiral effective field theory, which provides consistent two- and three-nucleon forces without any fit to the particular region in the nuclear chart [21, 22]. It is worth mentioning that shell evolutions of various neutron-rich isotopes have been studied by many authors recently, for example, for Si isotopes [23], for Sn isotopes with [24], for Ca isotopes [7], and for single-particle-like levels in Sb and Cu isotopes [25]. Lately, the authors of [26] studied the nuclear states with single-particle and collective characters in the framework of beyond mean field approaches and in the study of semimagic . The structure obtained is compatible with results from the state-of-the-art of shell-model calculations and experimental data [2729]. More recently, by applying the newly developed theory of effective nucleon-nucleon interactions on the study of exotic nuclei, the authors of [30] performed shell-model calculations with several major shells for the exotic neutron-rich Ne, Mg, and Si isotopes and predicted the drip lines and showed the effective single-particle energies by exhibiting the shell evolution. Thus, accounting for the shell structure of exotic nuclei, the nuclei far from stability, is essential to both nuclear physics and astrophysics.

Although most of the attempts, mentioned above, lead to results which are compatible with the relevant experimental data, they are not the end of the story in the study of the shell structure of nuclei because of the highly complicated nature of the strong nuclear force. During the past decade, many authors investigated [15, 31, 3345] how the presence of strong short-range repulsive force in finite nuclei leads to the presence of a high-momentum component in the ground-state wave function, as predicted by scattering experiments. Recently, the high-momentum transfer measurements have shown that nucleons in nuclear ground states can form short-range correlated pairs with large relative momentum [4550]. Furthermore, high-energy electron scattering shows that internucleon short-range repulsive force forms correlated high-momentum neutron-proton pairs and thus, in exotic nuclei, protons are more probable to have a momentum greater than the Fermi momentum in comparison to neutrons [51]. Nevertheless, the effect of the high-momentum component of nuclear force on the properties of nucleons such as nucleon momentum distribution, , and SPE is not well-accommodated in the shell-model theory since this model does not consider the nucleon-nucleon interaction at small distances with precision. For many years, some authors have theoretically predicted the experimental features of , such as the long-tail component in the high-momentum region and the gap at the Fermi surface compared to the fully occupied case of the noninteracting Fermi gas model [52, 53]. However, there are still differences, particularly in the high-momentum region, between experimental data and those on the basis of theoretical models whether they are microscopic or phenomenological. It is worth mentioning that in the framework of the lowest-order constrained variational (LOCV) method [54] and based on the Ristig-Clark formalism [55] the authors of [56] constructed one-body density- and momentum-dependent distribution functions . Their calculated have been in overall agreement with those of other methods. By applying on the calculation of single-nucleon properties, the authors obtained comparable results with other methods [57]. The model-dependent nature of , particularly in the high-momentum part, leads to disagreements between different methods in the calculation of single-nucleon properties. Hence, the investigation of the influence of high-momentum component on the shell structure properties of nuclei, for example, SPEs, is an open problem in nuclear physics.

In this work, we use the LOCV method to generate and two-body effective interaction matrix elements. LOCV is a fully self-consistent technique without any free parameter and with state-dependent correlation functions. The method uses the cluster expansion formalism with an adequate convergence up to two-body interactions. The insignificant effect of higher-order terms, for example, three-body, on the nuclear matter ground-state energy, and the convergence of the cluster expansion in the LOCV formalism have been discussed by the authors of [58] and the formalism has been validated. The method has been employed for asymmetric/symmetric nuclear matter (A/SNM) and neutron matter calculations at zero and nonzero temperatures, for different types of neutron stars [5967], and for finite nuclei calculations from which results have been compatible with experimental data [6875]. Lately, in order to reduce the effect of the high-momentum component of strong nuclear force on finite nuclei properties, a Fermi momentum cut-off has been imposed on both average effective interactions and density- and channel-dependent ones [76, 77]. More recently, we investigated the effect of the gap of at the Fermi surface on the binding energy of the selected medium-mass nuclei [78]. The results of our last work motivate us to investigate the effect of on the calculation of the nucleon SPEs of the closed shell nuclei.

There is a problem in the definition and the calculation of single-particle levels (SPLs) for atomic nuclei comprising strongly interacting nucleons. Many years ago, in order to describe experimental measurements, some authors (see, e.g., [79]) attempted to calculate the SPLs of nuclei by presenting a reasonable definition of SPLs. Furthermore, the presence of correlations between interacting nucleons has not been taken into account in the Hartree-Fock (HF) mean field levels [80]. In order to calculate the nucleon SPEs of nuclei, we present a formalized scheme, called here the HF inspired scheme, in which the two-body correlations are considered. We include in the calculation of density-dependent SPEs and impose a factor of nucleon effective mass, at the Fermi surface, on the radial parts of density functions when extracting SPLs. Thus, we control high-momentum components of two-nucleon interactions by , rather than using the usual Heaviside functions, and account for the presence of correlations in HF mean field by . Both and are generated by the LOCV calculations for SNM with phenomenological nucleon-nucleon potential [75]. In order to do this, we organize the paper as follows. In Section 2, we formalize a variational calculation of nucleon SPEs at the major levels of nuclei in the spherical harmonic oscillator (SHO) basis. During the calculation, we investigate the role of on the calculations at the minimum point of the total energy of a nucleus, denoted by ( is the SHO parameter). In Section 3, we correct the major levels of nuclei by applying the phenomenological parameterized Wood-Saxon (WS) potential and the mean field potential on the calculation of spin-orbit interaction at . In Section 4, by including the Coulomb interactions, we improve the single-proton energies. In Section 5, we shall show the effect of on the calculation of SPEs in the ground-state of selected closed shell nuclei, that is, , , and . Finally, in Section 6, we discuss the results.

2. Calculation of Nucleon SPEs at Major Levels

Although one can obtain the nucleon SPEs of a nucleus by solving the HF self-consistent equations, we calculate them by using a variational method and introducing the HF inspired scheme. In our point of view, applying a variational method for the present calculations is a more straightforward approach to show the effect of on SPEs. On the other hand, we believe that including a factor of with as the nucleon mass within the radial parts of SHO functions covers the correlation effects on the mean field calculations. Now, the general form of the Hamiltonian of a nucleus comprising A nucleons is given bywhere , the single-particle kinetic energy (SPKE) operator for ith nucleon, is given by and denotes the two-nucleon interaction potential. By denoting the occupied single-particle states by , the total energy of occupied states (the core energy), , in diagonal configuration, is given bywhere “” shows that the summation topped to occupied states. Now, we define the nucleon single-particle interaction energy (SPIE) as the energy which a specific nucleon obtains via the mean field interaction of all other nucleons in the core. By denoting configuration as the state of specific nucleon and SPIE as and rewriting interaction part of the Hamiltonian, the total energy of core gets the following form:Now, we can present an expression to calculate the SPE of a nucleon in the core as follows:The total energy of a closed shell nucleus with configuration plus one nucleon (one absent-nucleon, so-called, one hole) in the state above (below) the Fermi surface is as follows:By defining , we can rewrite the total energy as follows:The 1p-1h SPE (near the Fermi surface) readsIn this work, we set the SHO basis; that is, in which with , , and as the principle, the orbital angular momentum, and the projection of orbital angular momentum quantum numbers of the nucleon in the core, respectively. The SHO parameter, which plays the role of variation parameter, is given by in which is the oscillator energy to measure the size of the specific nucleus.

In order to calculate SPEs, our strategy is as follows: first, we obtain the density- and momentum-dependent diagonal matrix elements of the nucleon-nucleon effective interactions, , by using the LOCV calculations for SNM with potential. Then we employ the elements in order to construct SPIE. Next, while we keep the quantum numbers of one orbit, , we do summations over the relevant quantum numbers of other orbits in all over occupied states. In order to obtain the expectation values of SPKE and SPIE in configuration space, we use the correlated wave functions by imposing the nucleon effective mass on the radial SHO functions. Finally, we find the minimum value of the total energy of the nucleus, (3), via variation of and thus the ground-state energy of the nucleus is obtained as we did in our previous works [6978]. We assign the corresponding at the minimum point of total energy of the nucleus by and calculate the nucleon SPEs of the nucleus at . During the calculation of SPEs, we shall investigate how the one-body density-dependent momentum distribution functions are important in the evaluation of SPEs by replacing with Heaviside functions.

According to (3) and above explanations, the ground-state energy of the core readswhere 0020and stand for SPKE and SPIE, respectively. Thus, the SPE of nucleon in a specific single-particle state of a closed shell nucleus at is given byand the 1p-1h SPE is as follows:where In the SHO basis, one can obtain SPIE from (4) and (7) as follows:where means that we need a factor of only in the calculation of SPIE for (cf. (2)). Regarding the LOCV method, the two-body effective interaction has the following form [54]:where , the density- and channel-dependent two-body correlation functions, are operator type-like [73]. The operator for the potential has the following form [81]:where the forms of eighteen components of the two-body operator are as follows:In (14), all components are central functions of distance between two interacting nucleons without any dependency on quantum numbers.

Now, the matrix elements of two-body interactions are obtained by sandwiching (a) between and , two complete basis sets of plane waves together with spin and isospin parts, and (b) between and , two orthogonal bases in the configuration space, and (c) between and , two complete sets in which denotes , , , , and where , , , and are the relative orbital momentum, the total spin, isospin, and isospin projection of two interacting nucleons, respectively, and comes from . Thus, a straightforward calculation, by taking just diagonal matrix elements and considering orthogonality conditions, (12) is simplified bywhereIn (17), are the isospin Clebsch-Gordan coefficients and are the well-known spherical Bessel functions in which the relative momentum and distance of two interacting nucleons are obtained by the familiar relations and , respectively. In the above equations, we converted the summations over and to integrals by the well-known relation as follows:where are the one-body momentum distribution functions. In this work, , generated by using the LOCV calculations for SNM with potential based on the Ristig-Clark formalism [55], are density-dependent [78]. We suppose that the volume of box, , is obtained by where callsIn (16) and (17), we can replace by , since SPKE and SPIE depend only on the magnitude of the relevant single-particle momentum and also the interest of this work is to consider the closed shell nuclei. It should be noted that ’s are topped to the Fermi momentum, , with being degeneracy parameter of nucleons. Now, by use of (9), (10), (16), and (17), and recalling , we find SPE as follows:where we replaced with . In the above equation, readswhere is a normalization coefficient for each natural orbit and , the effective mass of nucleon, is calculated at the Fermi surface by the LOCV method with considering potential [78]. In this work, we calculate at a fixed energy, so-called k-mass definition, which is a measure of the nonlocality of single-particle potential, due to nonlocality in space. This definition is clearly different from the E-mass definition which shows the nonlocality of single-particle potential, due to nonlocality in time. By imposing this factor we mean the shape of density distribution function is altered by correlations in the HF inspired scheme. After varying and finding the minimum total energy of nucleus, we obtain the SPE of a specific single-particle state at . Table 1 shows for the single-nucleon major levels of , , and . In order to clarify the importance of including in calculations, the values of are considered in two different cases: (i) including the constructed and (ii) including the Heaviside function. In Table 1, the magnitudes of SPEs at the major levels, especially near the valence levels, indicate the importance of including , as discussed in Section 6.

Table 1: The single-nucleon major levels of energies (in MeV) of the sample nuclei at (in fm−1) by including two distribution functions: (i) and (ii) Heaviside (see text).

3. Spin-Orbit Interaction

In order to complete the calculations of SPLs and the evaluation of the effect on them, we include the spin-orbit effect in our calculations. There are many calculations of spin-orbit corrections, from the old calculations to new relativistic ones [8287]. Considering spin-orbit interaction, the spin orientation degeneracy is removed in the major SPLs and they will be split. Indeed, the SHO base kets, , are not appropriate in the presence of spin-orbit interaction. Including total angular momentum quantum number, , the appropriate base kets are , where and is the spin projection. Thus, SPEs at , corresponding to the minimum point of total energy of the nucleus, are given bywhereSandwiching the spin-orbit operator, , between two complete orthogonal sets of position base kets, imposing effective mass factor on the radial SHO functions, and performing straightforward mathematics, the spin-orbit correction is written asIn (13), the forms of constant factor and the WS type function are as follows [82]:where is a fit parameter, presents the total strength, is the reduced mass of the single particle and residual nucleus mass, is given by , and is the skin depth which shows diffuseness of the surface. In order to achieve the best agreement with the experimental spin-orbit splitting of nuclei the parameters take the following values at :

As another approach, we use our density-dependent single-particle potential, , as . In this way, we fit the spin-orbit correction with the experimental data only by one parameter, that is, , through . In order to obtain the best agreement with the experimental spin-orbit splitting of nuclei, the parameter takes the value at . Table 2 shows the results of spin-orbit interaction corrections on the major SPLs of , , and , calculated at , according to the best-fit values for the parameters of WS and potentials. We put the values of spin-orbit splitting corresponding to the mean field potential, (16), inside the parentheses. In order to characterize the accuracy of the best-adjustment data in the description of the calculated spin-orbit splitting, , the average theoretical error of predictions is given bywhere is the empirical spin-orbit splitting of each nucleus. Regarding the lack of empirical spin-orbit splitting data for some nuclei, as seen in Table 2, the value of is 14 in the above relation.

Table 2: Spin-orbit corrections (in MeV) on the single-neutron and -proton levels of 16O, 40Ca, and 56Ni at the corresponding (in ). The corrections have been obtained by employing WS and potentials, where the relevant values of latter potential have been put inside parentheses. The average error has been calculated by considering the empirical spin-orbit splitting [31, 32].

4. Coulomb Interaction

To impose the electromagnetic effects on the single-proton levels, one may suppose that each proton lies in the repulsive Coulomb potential well, made by the other protons. In fact, the potential is determined by a certain nuclear charge distribution, , as follows:where  C. In this work, the protons are assumed to be point-like particles and to have the uniform spherical charge distribution with the total value . Then the Coulomb potential is given byIn the above equation, , the spherical charge distribution radius is calculated by .

Comparing to nuclear interactions, there is no significant difference if one supposes that the protons are point-like or they have certain radii. In the latter case, it is sufficient to use in which  fm [88]. Table 3 shows the results of imposing Coulomb interaction corrections on the single-proton levels, , of the selected nuclei at the corresponding by including and the Heaviside functions, characterized with (i) and (ii), respectively.

Table 3: The Coulomb interaction corrections (in MeV) on the single-proton levels of 16O, 40Ca, and 56Ni at the corresponding (in fm−1) by including two functions: (i) and (ii) Heaviside.

5. The Effect of on SPEs

Including the spin-orbit corrections which have been calculated by potential, , and Coulomb corrections, , the nucleon SPEs, , readTable 4 shows the calculated SPLs of , , and at the corresponding , obtained by the HF inspired scheme and the LOCV calculations for SNM with by including and the Heaviside functions, identified by (i) and (ii), respectively, besides the experimental data. The letters p, n and the abbreviated word “exp specify the single-proton, single-neutron, and the experimental levels of each nucleus, respectively. As shown in Table 4, including leads to a reduction in the magnitude values of all SPEs with respect to the considering the Heaviside functions. This reduction is more significant for the valence levels. We discuss in Section 6 the results.

Table 4: The nucleon SPEs of 16O, 40Ca, and 56Ni by considering (i) and (ii) Heaviside functions.

6. Discussion and Conclusion

The momentum and energy distributions of nucleons are affected by the strong short-range correlations of nucleons in finite nuclei. This fact becomes more important when we calculate the nuclei properties, for example, nucleon SPEs, which play a main role in the description of some astrophysical processes (cf. Section 1). Thus, it would be useful if we measure how much can influence the prediction of nucleon SPEs of closed shell nuclei. In this work, we have investigated the issue for the selected closed shell nuclei, that is, , , and , by replacing , generated by the LOCV calculations for SNM with , with Heaviside functions. By constructing a density- and momentum-dependent mean field potential in the framework of LOCV method and by employing the HF inspired scheme in which the nucleon effective mass has been imposed on the natural orbits of nuclei, we have calculated the nucleon SPEs at the major levels of the selected nuclei and measured the effect of on the calculations. Table 1 illustrates the nucleon SPEs at major levels of the selected nuclei by considering and Heaviside functions. We see that there is an absolute increase around 70%, 30%, and 100% in the energy of valence levels of , , and , respectively, when we replace with the Heaviside functions. In order to obtain the correct values of the subshell energies, we have included the spin-orbit splitting corrections by using the parameterized WS potential and our density-dependent single-particle potential, , as the Thomas type mean field potential. The scheme incorporating this effect has been considered at , according to the best fit to the empirical spin-orbit splitting data, and the results have been presented in Table 2. In the case of WS best-fit, the calculated average deviation, , from empirical data is surprising with respect to the available data of empirical spin-orbit splitting for both neutron and proton levels of all selected nuclei. Although there is an advantage in the use of the mean field potential relative to the WS potential because of the existing only one adjustment parameter (), the spin-orbit splitting energies are not compatible with the experimental data for levels of the selected nuclei. In order to correct single-proton levels, we assumed that single point-like proton lies in a uniformly charged spherical potential well with a radius determined by the corresponding RMS radius, . As shown in Table 3, whereas these corrections do not lead to a significant change in the energy levels of the nuclei, there is a maximum about 20% and 30% decrease for the energy levels (all selected nuclei) and (), respectively, by replacing the Heaviside functions with . Table 4 compares the results of two cases of the SPEs calculations by considering two momentum distribution functions: (i) and (ii) Heaviside at the corresponding . Regarding the magnitude of SPEs, considering leads to a significant reduction with respect to the Heaviside case for the valence levels of the selected closed shell nuclei. The values of SPEs depend on the calculation scheme, which encompasses the way the interactions are regularized, and details of the many-body method. However, the results of the employed scheme in the present work show how the selection of momentum distribution function is important in the SPE calculations. As a result of the above discussions, by taking into account the depletion at the Fermi surface and the tail of the one-body density- dependent momentum distribution in the calculations, through using , we find a large difference in the nucleon SPEs at the valence levels and other levels of the selected closed shell nuclei.

In conclusion, has been employed to calculate the SPEs of closed shell nuclei, that is, , , and , by using the matrix elements of nucleon-nucleon effective interaction and from the LOCV calculations for SNM with and also employing an HF inspired scheme to consider the correlation effects through imposing the nucleon effective mass on the density distribution functions of nucleons. The surprising results show that the use of has a significant effect on the calculation of SPEs. The results of the present formalism might be improved by including all interaction matrix elements and constructing the diagonalized interaction matrix, by including three-body force effects, as well as the density-dependent Coulomb interactions. Although the calculations have been limited by the LOCV method (to generate the two-body effective interaction matrix elements), the Ristig-Clark formalism (to construct functions), and the HF inspired scheme (to include correlation effects), the results show how much the inclusion of can be important in the prediction of closed shell properties such as single-nucleon energies.

Competing Interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank the Laboratory for Advanced Computing at the University of Coimbra for providing high performance computing resources in order to calculate the two-body effective interactions matrix elements. The author would also like to thank Professor Constança Providência for her hospitality at the Centro de Física Computacional, Departamento de Física, Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal, Professor Orfeu Bertolami for his hospitality at the Departamento de Física e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Portugal, Professor I. Vidaña for their good discussions, and Dr. S. Chiacchiera for her useful help on the use of the cluster.

References

  1. E. M. Burbidge, G. R. Burbidge, W. A. Fowler, and F. Hoyle, “Synthesis of the elements in stars,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 547–650, 1957. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. von Groote, E. R. Hilf, and K. Takahashi, “A new semiempirical shell correction to the droplet model: gross theory of nuclear magics,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 17, no. 5-6, pp. 418–427, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. Möller, J. R. Nix, W. D. Myers, and W. J. Swiatecki, “Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations,” Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 185–381, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. Grawe, K. Langanke, and G. Martínez-Pinedo, “Nuclear structure and astrophysics,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 70, no. 9, article R02, pp. 1525–1582, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. Langanke, F.-K. Thielemann, and M. Wiescher, “Nuclear astrophysicsand nuclei far from stability,” in The Euroschool Lectures on Physics with Exotic Beams, Vol. I, J. Al-Khalili and E. Roeckl, Eds., vol. 651 of Lecture Notes in Physics, pp. 383–467, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. T. Otsuka, T. Suzuki, J. D. Holt, A. Schwenk, and Y. Akaishi, “Three-body forces and the limit of oxygen isotopes,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 105, no. 3, Article ID 032501, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. J. D. Holt, T. Otsuka, A. Schwenk, and T. Suzuki, “Three-body forces and shell structure in calcium isotopes,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 39, no. 8, Article ID 085111, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. A. T. Gallant, J. C. Bale, T. Brunner et al., “New precision mass measurements of neutron-rich calcium and potassium isotopes and three-nucleon forces,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, Article ID 032506, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. F. Wienholtz, D. Beck, K. Blaum et al., “Masses of exotic calcium isotopes pin down nuclear forces,” Nature, vol. 498, no. 7454, pp. 346–349, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. D. Holt, J. Menéndez, and A. Schwenk, “Chiral three-nucleon forces and bound excited states in neutron-rich oxygen isotopes,” The European Physical Journal A, vol. 49, article 39, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. C. Caesar, J. Simonis, T. Adachi et al., “Beyond the neutron drip line: the unbound oxygen isotopes 25O and 26O,” Physical Review C, vol. 88, no. 3, Article ID 034313, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. J. D. Holt, J. Menéndez, and A. Schwenk, “Three-body forces and proton-rich nuclei,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 110, no. 2, Article ID 022502, 5 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J. D. Holt, J. Menéndez, and A. Schwenk, “The role of three-nucleon forces and many-body processes in nuclear pairing,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 40, no. 7, Article ID 075105, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. J. D. Holt, J. Menéndez, J. Simonis, and A. Schwenk, “Three-nucleon forces and spectroscopy of neutron-rich calcium isotopes,” Physical Review C, vol. 90, no. 2, Article ID 024312, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. G. Hagen, M. Hjorth-Jensen, G. R. Jansen, R. MacHleidt, and T. Papenbrock, “Evolution of shell structure in neutron-rich calcium isotopes,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, no. 3, Article ID 032502, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. Roth, S. Binder, K. Vobig, A. Calci, J. Langhammer, and P. Navrátil, “Medium-mass nuclei with normal-ordered chiral NN+3N interactions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, no. 5, Article ID 052501, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. V. Somà, C. Barbieri, and T. Duguet, “Ab initio Gorkov-Green's function calculations of open-shell nuclei,” Physical Review C, vol. 87, no. 1, Article ID 011303, 5 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. V. Somà, A. Cipollone, C. Barbieri, P. Navrátil, and T. Duguet, “Chiral two-and three-nucleon forces along medium-mass isotope chains,” Physical Review C, vol. 89, no. 6, Article ID 061301, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. K. Tsukiyama, S. K. Bogner, and A. Schwenk, “In-medium similarity renormalization group for nuclei,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 106, no. 22, Article ID 222502, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. H. Hergert, S. K. Bogner, S. Binder et al., “In-medium similarity renormalization group with chiral two-plus three-nucleon interactions,” Physical Review C, vol. 87, no. 3, Article ID 034307, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. E. Epelbaum, H.-W. Hammer, and U.-G. Meißner, “Modern theory of nuclear forces,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 1773–1825, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H.-W. Hammer, A. Nogga, and A. Schwenk, “Colloquium: three-body forces: from cold atoms to nuclei,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 85, no. 1, p. 197, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. S. R. Stroberg, A. Gade, J. A. Tostevin et al., “Neutron single-particle strength in silicon isotopes: constraining the driving forces of shell evolution,” Physical Review C, vol. 91, no. 4, Article ID 041302, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. E. Dikmen, O. Öztürk, and Y. Cengiz, “Fitting single particle energies in sdgh major shell,” Communications in Theoretical Physics, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 222–228, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Y. Utsuno, T. Otsuka, Y. Tsunoda et al., “Recent advances in shell evolution with shell-model calculations,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan-JPS Conference Proceedings, vol. 6, Article ID 010007, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  26. J. L. Egido, M. Borrajo, and T. Rodŕiguez, “Collective and single-particle motion in beyond mean field approaches,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 116, Article ID 052502, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. D. Santiago-Gonzalez, I. Wiedenhöver, V. Abramkina et al., “Triple configuration coexistence in 44S,” Physical Review C, vol. 83, Article ID 061305, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. Y. Utsuno, N. Shimizu, T. Otsuka, T. Yoshida, and Y. Tsunoda, “Nature of isomerism in exotic sulfur isotopes,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 114, no. 3, Article ID 032501, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. F. Nowacki and A. Poves, “New effective interaction for 0ω shell-model calculations in the sd-pf valence space,” Physical Review C, vol. 79, no. 1, Article ID 014310, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. N. Tsunoda, T. Otsuka, N. Shimizu, M. Hjorth-Jensen, K. Takayanagi, and T. Suzuki, “Exotic neutron-rich medium-mass nuclei with realistic nuclear forces,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.06442.
  31. L. Coraggio, N. Itaco, A. Covello, A. Gargano, and T. T. S. Kuo, “Ground-state properties of closed-shell nuclei with low-momentum realistic interactions,” Physical Review C, vol. 68, no. 3, Article ID 034320, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. N. V. Gnezdilov, I. N. Borzov, E. E. Saperstein, and S. V. Tolokonnikov, “Self-consistent description of single-particle levels of magic nuclei,” Physical Review C—Nuclear Physics, vol. 89, no. 3, Article ID 034304, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. P. Navrátil, J. P. Vary, and B. R. Barrett, “Properties of 12C in the Ab initio nuclear shell model,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 84, no. 25, pp. 5728–5731, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. F. Arias de Saavedra, G. Có, and A. Fabrocini, “Correlated model for Λ hypernuclei,” Physical Review C, vol. 63, no. 6, Article ID 064308, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. S. C. Pieper, R. B. Wiringa, and J. Carlson, “Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of excited states in A=6–8 nuclei,” Physical Review C, vol. 70, no. 5, Article ID 054325, 11 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. D. J. Dean and M. Hjorth-Jensen, “Coupled-cluster approach to nuclear physics,” Physical Review C—Nuclear Physics, vol. 69, no. 5, Article ID 054320, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. E. Caurier, G. Martínez-Pinedo, F. Nowacki, A. Poves, and P. A. Zuker, “The shell model as a unified view of nuclear structure,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 427–488, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. E. Epelbaum, “Few-nucleon forces and systems in chiral effective field theory,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 654–741, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, D. J. Dean, and M. Hjorth-Jensen, “Medium-mass nuclei from chiral nucleon-nucleon interactions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 9, Article ID 092502, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. Fujii, R. Okamoto, and K. Suzuki, “Publisher's note: ground-state and single-particle energies of nuclei around 16O, 40Ca, and 56Ni from realistic nucleon-nucleon forces [Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 182501 (2009)],” Physical Review Letters, vol. 103, no. 19, Article ID 182501, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. T. Otsuka, T. Suzuki, J. D. Holt, A. Schwenk, and Y. Akaishi, “Three-body forces and the limit of oxygen isotopes,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 105, no. 3, Article ID 032501, 4 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. H. Hergert, S. Binder, A. Calci, J. Langhammer, and R. Roth, “Ab Initio calculations of even oxygen isotopes with chiral two-plus-three-nucleon interactions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 110, no. 24, Article ID 242501, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, T. A. Lähde, D. Lee, G. Meißner, and G. Rupak, “Ab Initio calculation of the spectrum and structure of 16O,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 112, no. 10, Article ID 102501, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. A. Cipollone, C. Barbieri, and P. Navrátil, “Chiral three-nucleon forces and the evolution of correlations along the oxygen isotopic chain,” Physical Review C, vol. 92, no. 1, Article ID 014306, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. J. J. Kelly, “Nucleon knockout by intermediate energy electrons,” in Advances in Nuclear Physics, J. W. Negele and E. Vogt, Eds., vol. 23, pp. 75–294, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  46. W. H. Dickhoff and C. Barbieri, “Self-consistent Green's function method for nuclei and nuclear matter,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 377–496, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. F. Benmokhtar et al., “Measurement of the 3Hee,ep´pn reaction at high missing energies and momenta,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 94, no. 8, Article ID 082305, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. K. S. Egiyan, N. B. Dashyan, M. M. Sargsian et al., “Measurement of two- and three-nucleon short-range correlation probabilities in nuclei,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 96, no. 8, Article ID 082501, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. E. Piasetzky, M. Sargsian, L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman, and J. W. Watson, “Evidence for strong dominance of proton-neutron correlations in nuclei,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 97, no. 16, Article ID 162504, 4 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. R. Shneor, P. Monaghan, R. Subedi et al., “Investigation of proton-proton short-range correlations via the 12Ce,e´pppn,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 99, no. 7, Article ID 072501, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. O. Hen, M. Sargsian, L. B. Weinstein et al., “Momentum sharing in imbalanced Fermi systems,” Science, vol. 346, no. 6209, pp. 614–617, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. A. N. Antonov, P. E. Hodgson, and I. Zh. Petkov, Nucleon Momentum and Density Distributions in Nuclei, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1988.
  53. V. R. Pandharipande, I. Sick, and P. K. A. DeWitt Huberts, “Independent particle motion and correlations in fermion systems,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 981–992, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. R. F. Bishop, C. Howes, J. M. Irvine, and M. Modarres, “Constrained variational calculations for finite nuclei,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear Physics, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1709–1723, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. L. Risting and J. W. Clark, “Density matrix of quantum fluids,” Physical Review B, vol. 14, pp. 2875–2887, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. M. Modarres, A. Rajabi, and H. R. Moshfegh, “The one-body momentum distribution of nuclear matter at finite temperature,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 808, no. 1–4, pp. 60–72, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. M. Modarres and A. Rajabi, “The single-particle potential of nuclear matter in the LOCV framework,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 867, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. M. Modarres, A. Rajabi, and H. R. Moshfegh, “State-dependent calculation of three-body cluster energy for nuclear matter and the validity of the lowest order constrained variational formalism,” Physical Review C, vol. 76, no. 6, Article ID 064311, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. M. Modarres and J. M. Irvine, “LOCV calculations with a self-consistent treatment of isobars,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear Physics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 511–526, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. H. R. Moshfegh and M. Modarres, “The properties of hot nuclear matter in LOCV formalism,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 749, no. 1–4, pp. 130–133, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. M. Modarres and G. H. Bordbar, “Incompressibility of hot asymmetrical nuclear matter: lowest order constrained variational approach,” Physical Review C, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 2781–2786, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. M. Modarres, “Lowest-order constrained variational calculation for hot asymmetric nuclear matter,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 923–937, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. M. Modarres and H. R. Moshfegh, “Lowest order constrained variational calculation for nuclear and neutron matter with a new charge-dependent reid potential,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 21–36, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. H. R. Moshfegh and M. Modarres, “The effect of three-body cluster energy on LOCV calculation for hot nuclear and neutron matter,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 821–829, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. S. Goudarzi and H. R. Moshfegh, “Effects of three-body forces on the maximum mass of neutron stars in the lowest-order constrained variational formalism,” Physical Review C, vol. 91, no. 5, Article ID 054320, 10 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. G. H. Bordbar, M. Bigdeli, and T. Yazdizadeh, “Structure of neutron star with a quark core,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 21, no. 28-29, pp. 5991–6001, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. G. H. Bordbar, S. M. Zebarjad, and R. Zahedinia, “Lowest order constrained variational calculation of structure properties of protoneutron star,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 61–70, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. M. Modarres, “Local density approximation for alpha-particle binding energy,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear Physics, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. L251–L255, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. M. Modarres, H. R. Moshfegh, and H. Mariji, “Lowest order constrained variational and local density approximation approach to the hot alpha particle,” Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 80, no. 8, pp. 911–923, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. M. Modarres and N. Rasekhinejad, “Ground state of heavy closed shell nuclei: an effective interaction and local density approximation approach,” Physical Review C, vol. 72, no. 6, Article ID 014301, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. M. Modarres and N. Rasekhinejad, “Ground state of heavy closed shell nuclei: an effective interaction and local density approximation approach,” Physical Review C, vol. 72, no. 6, Article ID 064306, 10 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. M. Modarres, H. Mariji, and N. Rasekhinejad, “The ground state binding energy of the closed shell nuclei with the density dependent Av18 effective interaction in LOCV method,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 312, no. 9, Article ID 092043, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. M. Modarres, N. Rasekhinejad, and H. Mariji, “The density-dependent Av18 effective interaction and ground state of closed shell nuclei,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 679–703, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. M. Modarres, H. Mariji, and N. Rasekhinejad, “The effect of density dependent Av18 effective interaction on the ground state properties of heavy closed shell nuclei,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 859, no. 1, pp. 16–28, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. M. Modarres and H. Mariji, “Effect of nondiagonal lowest order constrained variational effective two-body matrix elements on the binding energy of closed shell nuclei,” Physical Review C, vol. 86, no. 5, Article ID 054324, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. H. Mariji, “Imposing Fermi momentum cut-off on the channel- and density-dependent effective interaction and the ground-state properties of closed shell nuclei,” The European Physical Journal A, vol. 50, no. 3, article 56, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. H. Mariji and M. Modarres, “The effect of Fermi momentum cutoff on the binding energy of closed shell nuclei in the LOCV framework,” Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 245–251, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. H. Mariji, “The effect of gap in n(k,ρ) on the single-particle properties of nucleons and the ground-state binding energy of closed-shell nuclei,” The European Physical Journal A, vol. 52, no. 4, article 109, pp. 1–10, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. C. Mahaux and R. Sartor, Advances in Nuclear Physics: Single Particle Motion in Nuclei, Edited by J. W. Negele and E. Vogt, Springer US; Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1991.
  80. P. B. Frois, “Nucleon distributions and the nuclear many-body problem,” in Modern Topics in Electron Scattering, P. B. Frois and I. Sick, Eds., World Scientific, London, UK, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  81. R. B. Wiringa, V. G. J. Stoks, and R. Schiavilla, “Accurate nucleon-nucleon potential with charge-independence breaking,” Physical Review C, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 38–51, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. N. Bohr and Mottelson, Nuclear Structure: Single Particle Motion, vol. 1, 1969.
  83. N. Schwierz, I. Wiedenhöver, and A. Volya, “Parameterization of the woods-saxon potential for shell-model calculations,” https://arxiv.org/abs/0709.3525.
  84. W. Koepf and P. Ring, “The spin-orbit field in superdeformed nuclei: a relativistic investigation,” Zeitschrift für Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei, vol. 339, no. 1, pp. 81–90, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. G. Mairle and P. Grabmayr, “A phenomenological spin-orbit and nuclear potential for 208Pb,” The European Physical Journal A—Hadrons and Nuclei, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 313–326, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. H. Grawe, A. Blazhev, M. Górska, R. Grzywacz, H. Mach, and I. Mukha, “Nuclear structure far off stability—implications for nuclear astrophysics,” European Physical Journal A, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 257–267, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. S. C. Pieper and V. R. Pandharipande, “Origins of spin-orbit splitting in 15N,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 70, no. 17, p. 2541, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  88. I. J. Thompson and F. M. Nunes, Nuclear Reactions for Astrophysics: Principles, Calculation and Applications of Low-Energy Reactions, Cambridge University Press, London, UK, 2009.