Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2016, Article ID 3279568, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3279568
Research Article

On the Compatibility of the Diboson Excess with a -Initiated Composite Sector

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK

Received 22 November 2015; Accepted 18 February 2016

Academic Editor: George Siopsis

Copyright © 2016 Verónica Sanz. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan, A. Tumasyan et al., “Search for massive resonances in dijet systems containing jets tagged as W or Z boson decays in pp collisions at 8=8 TeV,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, article 173, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. G. Aad, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah et al., “Search for high-mass diboson resonances with boson-tagged jets in proton-proton collisions at s=8 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, article 55, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. G. Aad, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah et al., “Search for production of WW/WZ resonances decaying to a lepton, neutrino and jets in pp collisions at s=8 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 75, article 209, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan, A. Tumasyan et al., “Search for massive resonances decaying into pairs of boosted bosons in semi-leptonic final states at s=8 TeV,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, article 174, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. G. Aad, B. Abbott, J. Abdallah et al., “Search for resonant diboson production in the llqq- final state in pp collisions at s=8 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 75, article 69, p. 69, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. C. W. Chiang, H. Fukuda, K. Harigaya, M. Ibe, and T. T. Yanagida, “Diboson resonance as a portal to hidden strong dynamics,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.02483.
  7. B. A. Dobrescu and Z. Liu, “Heavy Higgs bosons and the 2 TeV W boson,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, no. 10, article 118, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. A. Carmona, A. Delgado, M. Quiros, and J. Santiago, “Diboson resonant production in non-custodial composite Higgs models,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.01914.
  9. G. Cacciapaglia and M. T. Frandsen, “Unitarity implications of a diboson resonance in the TeV region for Higgs physics,” Physical Review D, vol. 92, no. 5, Article ID 055035, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. B. C. Allanach, B. Gripaios, and D. Sutherland, “Anatomy of the ATLAS diboson anomaly,” Physical Review D, vol. 92, no. 5, Article ID 055003, 9 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. Q.-H. Cao, B. Yan, and D.-M. Zhang, “Simple non-Abelian extensions of the standard model gauge group and the diboson excesses at the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 92, no. 9, Article ID 095025, 18 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. J. Brehmer, J. Hewett, J. Kopp, T. Rizzo, and J. Tattersall, “Symmetry restored in dibosons at the LHC?” http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.00013.
  13. A. Thamm, R. Torre, and A. Wulzer, “Composite heavy vector triplet in the ATLAS diboson excess,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 115, no. 22, Article ID 221802, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. Y. Gao, T. Ghosh, K. Sinha, and J. H. Yu, “SU2×SU2×U1 interpretations of the diboson and Wh excesses,” Physical Review D, vol. 92, no. 5, Article ID 055030, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. A. Alves, A. Berlin, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, “Dirac-fermionic dark matter in U1X models,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, article 76, pp. 1–33, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. T. Abe, R. Nagai, S. Okawa, and M. Tanabashi, “Unitarity sum rules, three-site moose model, and the ATLAS 2 TeV diboson anomalies,” Physical Review D, vol. 92, no. 5, Article ID 055016, 14 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. T. Abe, T. Kitahara, and M. M. Nojiri, “Prospects for spin-1 resonance search at 13 TeV LHC and the ATLAS diboson excess,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2016, article 84, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. D. B. Franzosi, M. T. Frandsen, and F. Sannino, “Diboson signals via Fermi scale spin-one states,” Physical Review D, vol. 92, no. 11, Article ID 115005, 5 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, “Triboson interpretations of the ATLAS diboson excess,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.06739.
  20. D. B. Franzosi, M. T. Frandsen, and F. Sannino, “Diboson signals via Fermi scale spin-one states,” Physical Review D, vol. 92, Article ID 115005, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. H. S. Fukano, M. Kurachi, S. Matsuzaki, K. Terashi, and K. Yamawaki, “2 TeV walking technirho at LHC?” Physics Letters B, vol. 750, pp. 259–265, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. M. J. Teper, “Glueball masses and other physical properties of SU(N) gauge theories in D=3+1: a review of lattice results for theorists,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9812187.
  23. C. J. Morningstar and M. J. Peardon, “Glueball spectrum from an anisotropic lattice study,” Physical Review D, vol. 60, no. 3, Article ID 034509, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. Y. Chen, A. Alexandru, S. J. Dong et al., “Glueball spectrum and matrix elements on anisotropic lattices,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 1, Article ID 014516, 21 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. E. Gregory, A. Irving, B. Lucini et al., “Towards the glueball spectrum from unquenched lattice QCD,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, article 170, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. B. Lucini, A. Rago, and E. Rinaldi, “Glueball masses in the large N limit,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 8, article 119, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, and Z. Ryzak, “Qualitative features of the glueball spectrum,” Annals of Physics, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 344–367, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. J. Kuti, “Exotica and the confining flux,” Nuclear Physics B: Proceedings Supplements, vol. 73, no. 1-3, pp. 72–85, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. F. J. Llanes-Estrada, P. Bicudo, and S. R. Cotanch, “J-- glueballs and a low odderon intercept,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 96, no. 8, Article ID 081601, 4 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. M. Fierz and W. Pauli, “On relativistic wave equations for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, vol. 173, no. 953, article 211, 1939. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. R. Fok, C. Guimarães, R. Lewis, and V. Sanz, “It is a graviton! or maybe not,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, article 62, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. C. Csaki, J. Hubisz, and S. J. Lee, “Radion phenomenology in realistic warped space models,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 12, Article ID 125015, 15 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. J. Fan, W. D. Goldberger, A. Ross, and W. Skiba, “Standard model couplings and collider signatures of a light scalar,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, no. 3, Article ID 035017, 11 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. M. Gouzevitch, A. Oliveira, J. Rojo, R. Rosenfeld, G. P. Salam, and V. Sanz, “Scale-invariant resonance tagging in multijet events and new physics in Higgs pair production,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 7, article 148, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. E. Kiritsis, “Product CFTs, gravitational cloning, massive gravitons and the space of gravitational duals,” Journal of High Energy Physics, no. 11, p. 49, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  36. E. D'Hoker and D. Z. Freedman, “Supersymmetric gauge theories and the AdS/CFT correspondence,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0201253.
  37. O. Aharony, A. B. Clark, and A. Karch, “CFT/AdS correspondence, massive gravitons, and a connectivity index conjecture,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 8, Article ID 086006, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  38. S. Narison, “Masses, decays and mixings of gluonia in QCD,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 509, no. 1-2, pp. 312–356, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. R. Contino, Y. Nomura, and A. Pomarol, “Higgs as a holographic pseudo-Goldstone boson,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 671, pp. 148–174, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. K. Agashe, R. Contino, and A. Pomarol, “The minimal composite Higgs model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 719, no. 1-2, pp. 165–187, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. G. F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol, and R. Rattazzi, “The strongly-interacting light Higgs,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 6, article 045, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. V. Sanz and J. Setford, “Composite Higgses with seesaw EWSB,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, article 154, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. D. B. Kaplan, “Flavor at SSC energies: a new mechanism for dynamically generated fermion masses,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 365, no. 2, pp. 259–278, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. T. Gherghetta and A. Pomarol, “Bulk fields and supersymmetry in a slice of AdS,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 586, no. 1-2, pp. 141–162, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  45. R. Contino, T. Kramer, M. Son, and R. Sundrum, “Warped/composite phenomenology simplified,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 5, article 074, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, “Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,” Physics Reports, vol. 323, no. 3-4, pp. 183–386, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Porrati, and L. Randall, “Holography and phenomenology,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2001, no. 8, article 017, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. J. Hirn and V. Sanz, “The fifth dimension as an analogue computer for strong interactions at the LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 3, article 100, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. J. Hirn and V. Sanz, “Negative S parameter from holographic technicolor,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 97, Article ID 121803, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. J. Hirn, A. Martin, and V. Sanz, “Benchmarks for new strong interactions at the LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 5, article 084, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. J. Hirn, N. Rius, and V. Sanz, “Geometric approach to condensates in holographic QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 8, Article ID 085005, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. L. Randall, V. Sanz, and M. D. Schwartz, “Entropy-area relations in field theory,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2002, no. 6, article 008, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. C. Csáki, Y. Shirman, and J. Terning, “Seiberg dual for the MSSM: partially composite W and Z,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, no. 9, Article ID 095011, 10 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. J. Erlich, E. Katz, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, “QCD and a holographic model of hadrons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 95, no. 26, Article ID 261602, 4 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, “Chiral symmetry breaking from five dimensional spaces,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 721, no. 1–3, pp. 79–97, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. E. Katz, A. Lewandowski, and M. D. Schwartz, “Tensor mesons in AdS/QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 8, Article ID 086004, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. H. M. Lee, M. Park, and V. Sanz, “Gravity-mediated (or composite) dark matter,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 74, article 2715, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. H. M. Lee, M. Park, and V. Sanz, “Gravity-mediated (or composite) Dark Matter confronts astrophysical data,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, article 63, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. C. Cs{\'a}ki, M. Graesser, L. Randall, and J. Terning, “Cosmology of brane models with radion stabilization,” Physical Review D, vol. 62, no. 4, Article ID 045015, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  60. W. D. Goldberger, B. Grinstein, and W. Skiba, “Distinguishing the Higgs boson from the dilaton at the Large Hadron Collider,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, no. 11, Article ID 111802, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, L. Randall, and L.-T. Wang, “Searching for the Kaluza-Klein graviton in bulk RS models,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 9, article 013, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. T. Gherghetta and A. Pomarol, “A warped supersymmetric standard model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 602, no. 1-2, pp. 3–22, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. Y. Grossman and M. Neubert, “Neutrino masses and mixings in non-factorizable geometry,” Physics Letters B, vol. 474, no. 3-4, pp. 361–371, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  64. H. Davoudiasl, J. L. Hewett, and T. G. Rizzo, “Bulk gauge fields in the Randall–Sundrum model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 473, no. 1-2, pp. 43–49, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  65. A. Pomarol, “Gauge bosons in a five-dimensional theory with localized gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 486, no. 1-2, pp. 153–157, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. S. Chang, J. Hisano, H. Nakano, N. Okada, and M. Yamaguchi, “Bulk standard model in the Randall-Sundrum background,” Physical Review D, vol. 62, no. 8, Article ID 084025, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  67. G. F. Giudice, R. Rattazzi, and J. D. Wells, “Graviscalars from higher-dimensional metrics and curvature-Higgs mixing,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 595, no. 1-2, pp. 250–276, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  68. H. Davoudiasl, J. L. Hewett, and T. G. Rizzo, “Experimental probes of localized gravity: on and off the wall,” Physical Review D, vol. 63, no. 7, Article ID 075004, 20 pages, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. K. Agashe, H. Davoudiasl, G. Perez, and A. Soni, “Warped gravitons at the CERN LHC and beyond,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 3, Article ID 036006, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. R. Bao, M. S. Carena, J. Lykken, M. Park, and J. Santiago, “Revamped braneworld gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 6, Article ID 064026, 25 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, “New constraint on a strongly interacting Higgs sector,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 964–967, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, “Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections,” Physical Review D, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 381–409, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. C. Csáki, M. L. Graesser, and G. D. Kribs, “Radion dynamics and electroweak physics,” Physical Review D, vol. 63, no. 6, Article ID 065002, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. A. Kobakhidze and J. Yue, “Excluding a generic spin-2 Higgs impostor,” Physics Letters B, vol. 727, no. 4-5, pp. 456–460, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. N. D. Christensen and C. Duhr, “FeynRules—Feynman rules made easy,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 180, no. 9, pp. 1614–1641, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, and T. Stelzer, “MadGraph 5: going beyond,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, no. 6, article 128, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer, and T. Reiter, “UFO—the universal FeynRules output,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 183, no. 6, pp. 1201–1214, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. J. Ellis, D. S. Hwang, V. Sanz, and T. You, “A fast track towards the ‘Higgs’ spin and parity,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, article 134, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. J. Ellis, R. Fok, D. S. Hwang, V. Sanz, and T. You, “Distinguishing ‘Higgs’ spin hypotheses using γγ and WW decays,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 73, article 2488, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. A. Djouadi, R. M. Godbole, B. Mellado, and K. Mohan, “Probing the spin-parity of the Higgs boson via jet kinematics in vector boson fusion,” Physics Letters B, vol. 723, no. 4-5, pp. 307–313, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. J. Ellis, V. Sanz, and T. You, “Prima facie evidence against spin-two Higgs impostors,” Physics Letters B, vol. 726, no. 1–3, pp. 244–250, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  82. J. Ellis, V. Sanz, and T. You, “Associated production evidence against Higgs impostors and anomalous couplings,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 73, article 2507, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. J. Brehmer, G. Brooijmans, G. Cacciapaglia et al., “The Diboson excess: experimental situation and classification of explanations; a Les Houches pre-proceeding,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.04357.