Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2016, Article ID 3740957, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3740957
Research Article

Spinor Quintom Cosmology with Intrinsic Spin

Department of Physics, Sinop University, Korucuk, 57000 Sinop, Turkey

Received 5 October 2016; Revised 5 November 2016; Accepted 7 November 2016

Academic Editor: Dandala R. K. Reddy

Copyright © 2016 Emre Dil. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. S. Perlmutter, G. Aldering, G. Goldhaber et al., “Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 high-redshift supernovae,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 517, no. 2, p. 565, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. A. G. Riess, A. V. Filippenko, P. Challis et al., “Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 1009–1038, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. U. Seljak, A. Makarov, P. McDonald et al., “Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS Lyα forest and galaxy bias: constraints on the primordial spectrum of fluctuations, neutrino mass, and dark energy,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, Article ID 103515, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Tegmark, M. Strauss, M. Blanton et al., “Cosmological parameters from SDSS and WMAP,” Physical Review D, vol. 69, no. 10, Article ID 103501, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. D. J. Eisenstein, I. Zehavi, D. W. Hogg et al., “Detection of the baryon acoustic peak in the large-scale correlation function of SDSS luminous red galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 633, no. 2, p. 560, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. D. N. Spergel, L. Verde, H. V. Peiris et al., “First-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: determination of cosmological parameters,” Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 175–194, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Larson, J. Dunkley, G. Hinshaw et al., “Seven-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP*) observations: power spectra and WMAP-derived parameters,” The Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series, vol. 192, no. 2, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Hinshaw, D. Larson, E. Komatsu et al., “Nine-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: cosmological parameter results,” Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series, vol. 208, no. 2, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. Bamba, S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, “Dark energy cosmology: the equivalent description via different theoretical models and cosmography tests,” Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 342, no. 1, pp. 155–228, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. S. Weinberg, “The cosmological constant problem,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. S. M. Carroll, W. H. Press, and E. L. Turner, “The cosmological constant,” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 499–542, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. L. M. Krauss and M. S. Turner, “The cosmological constant is back,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1137–1144, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. Huey, L. M. Wang, R. Dave, R. R. Caldwell, and P. J. Steinhardt, “Resolving the cosmological missing energy problem,” Physical Review D, vol. 59, Article ID 063005, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. B. Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles, “Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field,” Physical Review D, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 3406–3427, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Wetterich, “Cosmology and the fate of dilatation symmetry,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 302, no. 4, pp. 668–696, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. R. Caldwell, M. Kamionkowski, and N. N. Weinberg, “Phantom energy: dark energy with w <−1 causes a cosmic doomsday,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, no. 7, Article ID 071301, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  17. R. R. Caldwell, “A phantom menace? Cosmological consequences of a dark energy component with super-negative equation of state,” Physics Letters B, vol. 545, no. 1-2, pp. 23–29, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. S. M. Carroll, M. Hoffman, and M. Trodden, “Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w be less than −1?” Physical Review D, vol. 68, no. 2, Article ID 023509, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. R. R. Caldwell, M. Kamionkowski, and N. N. Weinberg, “Phantom energy: dark energy with ω<-1 causes a cosmic doomsday,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, Article ID 071301, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. Y.-F. Cai, E. N. Saridakis, M. R. Setare, and J.-Q. Xia, “Quintom cosmology: theoretical implications and observations,” Physics Reports, vol. 493, no. 1, pp. 1–60, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. D. Huterer and A. Cooray, “Uncorrelated estimates of dark energy evolution,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 2, Article ID 023506, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. B. Feng, X. L. Wang, and X. M. Zhang, “Dark energy constraints from the cosmic age and supernova,” Physics Letters B, vol. 607, no. 1-2, pp. 35–41, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. E. Komatsu, J. Dunkley, M. R. Nolta et al., “FIVE-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe∗ observations: cosmological interpretation,” The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, vol. 180, no. 2, pp. 330–376, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, “Late-time cosmology in a (phantom) scalar-tensor theory: dark energy and the cosmic speed-up,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, no. 4, Article ID 043539, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. H. Li, J. Liua, J. Q. Xiac, and L. Sund, “Constraining cosmological parameters with observational data including weak lensing effects,” Physics Letters B, vol. 675, no. 2, pp. 164–169, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. J.-Q. Xia, Y.-F. Cai, T.-T. Qiu, G.-B. Zhao, and X. Zhang, “Constraints on the sound speed of dynamical dark energy,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1229–1243, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Vikman, “Can dark energy evolve to the phantom?” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 2, Article ID 023515, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. W. Hu, “Crossing the phantom divide: dark energy internal degrees of freedom,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 4, Article ID 047301, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. R. R. Caldwell and M. Doran, “Dark-energy evolution across the cosmological-constant boundary,” Physical Review D, vol. 72, no. 4, Article ID 043527, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  30. G. B. Zhao, J. Q. Xia, M. Li, B. Feng, and X. Zhang, “Perturbations of the quintom models of dark energy and the effects on observations,” Physical Review D, vol. 72, Article ID 123515, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  31. M. Kunz and D. Sapone, “Crossing the phantom divide,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 12, Article ID 123503, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and M. Sami, “Dark energy cosmology from higher-order, string-inspired gravity, and its reconstruction,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, Article ID 046004, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. M.-Z. Li, B. Feng, and X.-M. Zhang, “A single scalar field model of dark energy with equation of state crossing −1,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2005, no. 12, p. 2, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. L. Perivolaropoulos, “Crossing the phantom divide barrier with scalar tensor theories,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2005, no. 10, p. 1, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  35. J. Sadeghi, M. R. Setare, A. Banijamali, and F. Milani, “Crossing of the phantom divide using tachyon-Gauss-Bonnet gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, no. 12, Article ID 123003, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. V. K. Onemli and R. P. Woodard, “Super-acceleration from massless, minimally coupled 4,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 19, no. 17, pp. 4607–4626, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  37. V. K. Onemli and R. P. Woodard, “Quantum effects can render w < −1 on cosmological scales,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, no. 10, Article ID 107301, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. T. Brunier, V. K. Onemli, and R. P. Woodard, “Two-loop scalar self-mass during inflation,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 59–84, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  39. E. O. Kahya and V. K. Onemli, “Quantum stability of a w<-1 phase of cosmic acceleration,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 4, Article ID 043512, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. E. O. Kahya, V. K. Onemli, and R. P. Woodard, “A Completely Regular Quantum Stress Tensor with ω<-1,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 2, Article ID 023508, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  41. A. H. Taub, “Quantum equations in cosmological spaces,” Physical Review, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 512–525, 1937. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. D. R. Brill and J. A. Wheeler, “Interaction of neutrinos and gravitational fields,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 29, pp. 465–479, 1957. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  43. L. Parker, “Quantized fields and particle creation in expanding universes. II,” Physical Review D, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 346, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. L. Parker, “Quantized fields and particle creation in expanding universes. II,” Physical Review D, vol. 3, no. 10, p. 2546, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. Y. N. Obukhov, “Spin-driven inflation,” Physics Letters A, vol. 182, no. 2-3, pp. 214–216, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. C. Armendáriz-Picón and P. B. Greene, “Spinors, inflation, and non-singular cyclic cosmologies,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1637–1658, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  47. S. Kasuya, “Difficulty of a spinning complex scalar field to be dark energy,” Physics Letters B, vol. 515, no. 1-2, pp. 121–124, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. B. Saha, “Dirac spinor in Bianchi-I universe with time-dependent gravitational and cosmological constants,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 16, no. 20, pp. 1287–1296, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  49. M. O. Ribas, F. P. Devecchi, and G. M. Kremer, “Fermions as sources of accelerated regimes in cosmology,” Physical Review D, vol. 72, no. 12, Article ID 123502, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. L. P. Chimento, F. P. Devecchi, M. Forte, and G. M. Kremer, “Phantom cosmologies and fermions,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 25, no. 8, Article ID 085007, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  51. Y.-F. Cai and J. Wang, “Dark energy model with spinor matter and its quintom scenario,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 25, no. 16, Article ID 165014, 12 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  52. E. A. Lord, Tensors, Relativity and Cosmology, McGraw-Hill, 1976.
  53. T. W. B. Kibble, “Lorentz invariance and the gravitational field,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 2, pp. 212–221, 1961. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  54. D. W. Sciama, Recent Developments in General Relativity, Pergamon, 1962.
  55. V. de Sabbata and C. Sivaram, Spin and Torsion in Gravitation, World Scientific, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. R. Utiyama, “Invariant theoretical interpretation of interaction,” APS Journals Archive, vol. 101, no. 5, p. 1597, 1956. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, “f(R) theories of gravity,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 451–497, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  58. S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis, “Extended theories of gravity,” Physics Reports, vol. 509, no. 4-5, pp. 167–321, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. N. J. Popławski, “Nonsingular dirac particles in spacetime with torsion,” Physics Letters. B, vol. 690, no. 1, pp. 73–77, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  60. I. L. Shapiro, “Physical aspects of the space–time torsion,” Physics Reports. A Review Section of Physics Letters, vol. 357, no. 2, pp. 113–213, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  61. F. W. Hehl and B. K. Datta, “Nonlinear spinor equation and asymmetric connection in general relativity,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 12, pp. 1334–1339, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  62. N. Poplawski, “Intrinsic spin requires gravity with torsion and curvature,” (https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.0047).
  63. M. Forger and H. Römer, “Currents and the energy-momentum tensor in classical field theory: a fresh look at an old problem,” Annals of Physics, vol. 309, no. 2, pp. 306–389, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  64. S. Carroll, Spacetime and geometry: an introduction to general relativity, Addison Wesley, San Francisco, California, USA, 2004. View at MathSciNet