Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2016, Article ID 3906746, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3906746
Review Article

Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics and Topology

Department of Physics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan

Received 11 November 2015; Revised 21 January 2016; Accepted 4 February 2016

Academic Editor: Elias C. Vagenas

Copyright © 2016 Muhammad Abdul Wasay. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. J. Wess and B. Zumino, “Supergauge transformations in four dimensions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 70, pp. 39–50, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  2. Y. A. Gel'fand and E. P. Likhtman, “Extension of the algebra of poincare group generators and violation of p invariance,” JETP Letters, vol. 13, pp. 323–326, 1971. View at Google Scholar
  3. P. Ramond, “Dual theory for free fermions,” Physical Review D, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 2415–2418, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. A. Neveu and J. H. Schwarz, “Factorizable dual model of pions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 86–112, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. V. Volkov and V. P. Akulov, “Is the neutrino a goldstone particle?” Physics Letters B, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 109–110, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. Greene, The Elegant Universe, W. W. Norton & Company, New York, NY, USA, 1999.
  7. S. Coleman and J. Mandula, “All possible symmetries of the S matrix,” Physical Review, vol. 159, no. 5, pp. 1251–1256, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Z. Freedman, P. van Nieuwenhuizen, and S. Ferrara, “Progress toward a theory of supergravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 13, article 3214, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. S. Deser and B. Zumino, “Consistent supergravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 335–337, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  10. E. Witten, “Dynamical breaking of supersymmetry,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 188, no. 3, pp. 513–554, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. F. Cooper and B. Freedman, “Aspects of supersymmetric quantum mechanics,” Annals of Physics, vol. 146, no. 2, pp. 262–288, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. E. Witten, “Constraints on supersymmetry breaking,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 202, no. 2, pp. 253–316, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. C. M. Bender, F. Cooper, and A. Das, “New test for spontaneous breakdown of supersymmetry,” Physical Review D, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1473–1480, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. Akhoury and A. Comtet, “Anomalous behaviour of the witten index: exactly soluble models,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 246, no. 2, pp. 253–278, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. A. Khare and J. Maharana, “Supersymmetry and nearest neighbour x-y model with random transverse magnetic field,” Physics Letters B, vol. 145, no. 1-2, pp. 77–80, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Cecotti and L. Girardello, “Stochastic and parastochastic aspects of supersymmetric functional measures: a new nonperturbative approach to supersymmetry,” Annals of Physics, vol. 145, no. 1, pp. 81–99, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. B. Freedman and F. Cooper, “A review of supersymmetric quantum mechanics,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 15, no. 1-2, pp. 138–146, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. A. Kihlberg, P. Salomonson, and B. S. Skagerstam, “Witten's index and supersymmetric quantum mechanics,” Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 203–209, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. Álvarez-Gaumé, “A note on the Atiyah-Singer index theorem,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, vol. 16, no. 18, pp. 4177–4182, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. L. Alvarez-Gaume and E. Witten, “Gravitational anomalies,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 234, no. 2, pp. 269–330, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. D. Friedan and P. Windey, “Supersymmetry and index theorems,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 15, no. 1-2, pp. 71–74, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. G. Parisi and N. Sourlas, “Supersymmetric field theories and stochastic differential equations,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 206, no. 2, pp. 321–332, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  23. P. Salomonson and J. W. van Holten, “Fermionic coordinates and supersymmetry in quantum mechanics,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 196, no. 3, pp. 509–531, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  24. L. F. Urrutia and E. Hemandez, “Long-range behavior of nuclear forces as a manifestation of supersymmetry in nature,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 755–758, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. A. Khare and J. Maharana, “Supersymmetric quantum mechanics in one, two and three dimensions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 244, no. 2, pp. 409–420, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  26. A. B. Balantekin, “Accidental degeneracies and supersymmetric quantum mechanics,” Annals of Physics, vol. 164, no. 2, pp. 277–287, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  27. V. A. Kostelecký and M. M. Nieto, “Evidence for a phenomenological supersymmetry in atomic physics,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 53, no. 24, pp. 2285–2288, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. A. R. P. Rau, “Comment on ‘Evidence for a phenomenological supersymmetry in atomic physics’,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 95–95, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. C. A. Blockley and G. E. Stedman, “Simple supersymmetry. I. Basic examples,” European Journal of Physics, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 218–224, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. P. Gauntlett, “Low-energy dynamics of N=2 supersymmetric monopoles,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 411, no. 2-3, pp. 443–460, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. T. J. Hollowood and T. Kingaby, “A comment on the χy genus and supersymmetric quantum mechanics,” Physics Letters B, vol. 566, no. 3-4, pp. 258–262, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. E. Witten, “Supersymmetry and Morse theory,” Journal of Differential Geometry, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 661–692, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  33. L. Álvarez-Gaumé, “Supersymmetry and the Atiyah-Singer index theorem,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 161–173, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  34. D. Friedan and P. Windey, “Supersymmetric derivation of the Atiyah-Singer index and the chiral anomaly,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 235, no. 3, pp. 395–416, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  35. E. Witten, “Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 351–399, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  36. E. Witten, “Topological quantum field theory,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 353–386, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  37. F. Benini, K. Hristov, and A. Zaffaroni, “Black hole microstates in AdS4 from supersymmetric localization,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.04085.
  38. A. Rogers, Supermanifolds: Theory and Applications, World Scientific Publishing, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  39. B. DeWitt, Supermanifolds, Cambridge University Press, 1984. View at MathSciNet
  40. K. Hori, S. Katz, A. Klemm et al., Mirror Symmetry, vol. 1 of Clay Mathematics Monographs, American Mathematical Society, 2003.
  41. M. Nakahara, Geometry Topology and Physics, IOP Publishing, Bristol, UK, 2nd edition, 2003.
  42. M. A. Wasay, Supersymmetric quantum mechanics [M.S. thesis], Uppsala University, 2010.
  43. P. Windey, “Supersymmetric quantum mechanics and the Atiyah-Singer index theorem,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 435–452, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  44. M. F. Atiyah and I. M. Singer, “The index of elliptic operators. I,” Annals of Mathematics Second Series, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 484–530, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  45. M. F. Atiyah and I. M. Singer, “The index of elliptic operators: III,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 546–604, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  46. M. F. Atiyah and I. M. Singer, “The index of elliptic operators. IV,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 119–138, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. M. F. Atiyah and I. M. Singer, “The index of elliptic operators: V,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 139–149, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  48. J. Bagger, “Supersymmetric sigma models,” in Proceedings of the Bonn-NATO Advanced Study Institute on Supersymmetry, pp. 213–257, Plenum Press, Bonn, Germany, August 1985.
  49. M. Campostrini and J. Wosiek, “Exact Witten index in D=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills quantum mechanics,” Physics Letters B, vol. 550, no. 1-2, pp. 121–127, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar