Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2016, Article ID 4303752, 17 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4303752
Review Article

Aspects of Moduli Stabilization in Type IIB String Theory

Center for Fundamental Physics, Zewail City of Science and Technology, Giza 12588, Egypt

Received 1 October 2015; Revised 28 December 2015; Accepted 30 December 2015

Academic Editor: Elias C. Vagenas

Copyright © 2016 Shaaban Khalil et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. A. D. Dolgov, “Long-range forces in the universe,” Physics Report, vol. 320, no. 1–6, pp. 1–15, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. Candelas, G. T. Horowitz, A. Strominger, and E. Witten, “Vacuum configurations for superstrings,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 258, no. 1, pp. 46–74, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. F. Denef, “Les Houches lectures on constructing string vacua,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.1194.
  4. A. Strominger and E. Witten, “New manifolds for superstring compactification,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 341–361, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  5. A. Strominger, “Superstrings with torsion,” Nuclear Physics. B, vol. 274, no. 2, pp. 253–284, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  6. E. Witten, “New issues in manifolds of SU(3) holonomy,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 268, no. 1, pp. 79–112, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and S. P. Trivedi, “de Sitter vacua in string theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 68, no. 4, Article ID 046005, 10 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. V. Balasubramanian, P. Berglund, J. P. Conlon, and F. Quevedo, “Systematics of moduli stabilisation in Calabi-Yau flux compactifications,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2005, no. 3, article 007, 22 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  9. V. Balasubramanian, P. Berglund, J. P. Conlon, and F. Quevedo, “Systematics of moduli stabilisation in Calabi-Yau flux compactifications,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2005, no. 3, article 007, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. J. P. Conlon, F. Quevedo, and K. Suruliz, “Large-volume flux compactifications: moduli spectrum and D3/D7 soft supersymmetry breaking,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2005, no. 8, article 007, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  11. R. Kallosh and A. D. Linde, “Landscape, the scale of SUSY breaking, and inflation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2004, no. 12, article 004, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. R. Kallosh and A. D. Linde, “Testing string theory with CMB,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2007, no. 4, article 017, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  13. O. Lebedev, H. P. Nilles, and M. Ratz, “de Sitter vacua from matter superpotentials,” Physics Letters B, vol. 636, no. 2, pp. 126–131, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. N. Seiberg, “Naturalness versus supersymmetric nonrenormalization theorems,” Physics Letters. B, vol. 318, no. 3, pp. 469–475, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. M. Dine and N. Seiberg, “Nonrenormalization theorems in superstring theory,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 57, no. 21, pp. 2625–2628, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. M. Dine, R. Rohm, N. Seiberg, and E. Witten, “Gluino condensation in superstring models,” Physics Letters B, vol. 156, no. 1-2, pp. 55–60, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. L. J. Dixon and J. A. Harvey, “String theories in ten dimensions without spacetime supersymmetry,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 274, no. 1, pp. 93–105, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  18. L. Alvarez-Gaume, P. H. Ginsparg, G. W. Moore, and C. Vafa, “An O(16)×O(16) heterotic string,” Physics Letters B, vol. 171, no. 2-3, pp. 155–162, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. V. P. Nair, A. Shapere, A. Strominger, and F. Wilczek, “Compactification of the twisted heterotic string,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 287, no. 3, pp. 402–418, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. J. Scherk and J. H. Schwarz, “How to get masses from extra dimensions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 153, no. 1-2, pp. 61–88, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. J. Polchinski, String Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998.
  22. S. B. Giddings, S. Kachru, and J. Polchinski, “Hierarchies from fluxes in string compactifications,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 10, Article ID 106006, 16 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  23. J. M. Maldacena and C. Nuñez, “Supergravity description of field theories on curved manifolds and a no go theorem,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 822–855, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. B. de Wit, D. J. Smit, and N. D. Hari Dass, “Residual supersymmetry of compactified D = 10 supergravity,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 283, pp. 165–191, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. R. Douglas and S. Kachru, “Flux compactification,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 733–796, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  26. M. Graña, “Flux compactifications in string theory: a comprehensive review,” Physics Reports, vol. 423, no. 3, pp. 91–158, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  27. F. Denef, M. R. Douglas, and S. Kachru, “Physics of string flux compactifications,” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, vol. 57, pp. 119–144, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. Blumenhagen, B. Kors, D. Lust, and S. Stieberger, “Four-dimensional string compactifications with D-branes, orientifolds and fluxes,” Physics Reports, vol. 445, no. 1–6, pp. 1–193, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  29. J. Wess and J. Bagger, Supersymmetry and Supergravity, Princeton Series in Physics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2nd edition, 1992. View at MathSciNet
  30. D. Bailin and A. Love, Supersymmetric Gauge Field Theory and String Theory, Graduate Student Series in Physics, IOP, Bristol, UK, 1994.
  31. L. E. Ibanez and A. M. Uranga, String Theory and Particle Physics: An Introduction to String Phenomenology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012.
  32. S. Gukov, C. Vafa, and E. Witten, “CFT's from Calabi-Yau four-folds,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 584, no. 1-2, pp. 69–108, 2000, Erratum in: Nuclear Physics B, vol. 608, no. 1-2, pp. 477–478, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. E. Cremmer, S. Ferrara, C. Kounnas, and D. V. Nanopoulos, “Naturally vanishing cosmological constant in N=1 supergravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 133, no. 1-2, pp. 61–66, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  34. J. R. Ellis, A. B. Lahanas, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. Tamvakis, “No-scale supersymmetric standard model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 134, no. 6, pp. 429–435, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. R. Barbieri, E. Cremmer, and S. Ferrara, “Flat and positive potentials in N = 1 supergravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 163, no. 1–4, pp. 143–147, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  36. A. Linde, Y. Mambrini, and K. A. Olive, “Supersymmetry breaking due to moduli stabilization in string theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 6, Article ID 066005, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. C. P. Burgess, R. Kallosh, and F. Quevedo, “De Sitter string vacua from supersymmetric D-terms,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 10, article 056, 14 pages, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  38. G. Villadoro and F. Zwirner, “de Sitter vacua via consistent D terms,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 95, no. 23, Article ID 231602, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  39. A. Achúcarro, B. de Carlos, J. A. Casas, and L. Doplicher, “de Sitter vacua from uplifting D-terms in effective supergravities from realistic strings,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2006, no. 6, article 014, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. K. Choi and K.-S. Jeong, “Supersymmetry breaking and moduli stabilization with anomalous U(1) gauge symmetry,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2006, no. 8, article 007, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. E. Dudas and Y. Mambrini, “Moduli stabilization with positive vacuum energy,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2006, no. 10, article 044, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  42. M. Haack, D. Krefl, D. Lüst, A. Van Proeyen, and M. Zagermann, “Gaugino condensates and D-terms from D7-branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 1, article 078, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. C. P. Burgess, J. M. Cline, K. Dasgupta, and H. Firouzjahi, “Uplifting and inflation with D3 branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 3, article 027, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  44. R. Kallosh and A. D. Linde, “O′KKLT,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 2, article 002, 13 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  45. A. Westphal, “De Sitter string vacua from Kähler uplifting,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 3, article 102, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. M. Rummel and A. Westphal, “A sufficient condition for de Sitter vacua in type IIB string theory,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 1, article 020, 44 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  47. J. Louis, M. Rummel, R. Valandro, and A. Westphal, “Building an explicit de Sitter,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 10, article 163, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  48. A. Awad, N. Chamoun, and S. Khalil, “On flux compactification and moduli stabilization,” Physics Letters B, vol. 635, no. 2-3, pp. 136–140, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  49. L. E. Ibáñez, C. Muñoz, and S. Rigolin, “Aspects of type I string phenomenology,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 553, no. 1-2, pp. 43–80, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  50. V. Balasubramanian and P. Berglund, “Stringy corrections to Kahler potentials, SUSY breaking, and the cosmological constant problem,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2004, no. 11, article 085, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  51. K. Becker, M. Becker, M. Haack, and J. Louis, “Supersymmetry breaking and alpha-prime corrections to flux induced potentials,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2002, no. 6, article 060, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  52. T. W. Grimm and J. Louis, “The effective action of N = 1 Calabi-Yau orientifolds,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 699, no. 1-2, pp. 387–426, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  53. A. Brignole, L. E. Ibáñez, and C. Muñoz, “Soft supersymmetry breaking terms from supergravity and superstring models,” in Perspectives on Supersymmetry II, vol. 21 of Advanced Series on Directions in High Energy Physics, pp. 244–268, World Scientific, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. D. G. Cerdeño and C. Muñoz, “An introduction to supergravity,” in Proceedings of the Corfu Summer Institute on Elementary Particle Physics (PoS CORFU '98), p. 11, Kerkyra, Greece, September 1998.
  55. K. Choi, A. Falkowski, H. P. Nilles, and M. Olechowski, “Soft supersymmetry breaking in KKLT flux compactification,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 718, no. 1-2, pp. 113–133, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  56. K. Choi, K.-S. Jeong, and K.-I. Okumura, “Phenomenology of mixed modulus-anomaly mediation in fluxed string compactifications and brane models,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2005, no. 9, article 039, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. M. Endo, M. Yamaguchi, and K. Yoshioka, “A bottom-up approach to moduli dynamics in heavy gravitino scenario: superpotential, soft terms and sparticle mass spectrum,” Physical Review D, vol. 72, no. 1, Article ID 015004, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. A. Falkowski, O. Lebedev, and Y. Mambrini, “SUSY phenomenology of KKLT flux compactifications,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2005, no. 11, article 034, 27 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  59. O. Lebedev, V. Löwen, H. P. Nilles, Y. Mambrini, and M. Ratz, “Metastable vacua in flux compactifications and their phenomenology,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 2, article 063, 23 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  60. B. C. Allanach, F. Quevedo, and K. Suruliz, “Low-energy supersymmetry breaking from string flux compactifications: benchmark scenarios,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2006, no. 4, article 040, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. J. P. Conlon and F. Quevedo, “Gaugino and scalar masses in the landscape,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2006, no. 6, article 029, 17 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  62. J. P. Conlon, S. S. Abdussalam, F. Quevedo, and K. Suruliz, “Soft SUSY breaking terms for chiral matter in IIB string compactifications,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 1, article 032, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  63. J. P. Conlon, D. Cremades, and F. Quevedo, “Kähler potentials of chiral matter fields for Calabi-Yau string compactifications,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, no. 1, article 022, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. S. Angus and J. P. Conlon, “Soft supersymmetry breaking in anisotropic LARGE volume compactifications,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 3, article 071, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  65. L. Aparicio, M. Cicoli, S. Krippendorf, A. Maharana, F. Muia, and F. Quevedo, “Sequestered de Sitter string scenarios: soft-terms,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 11, article 071, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. M. Chakraborti, U. Chattopadhyay, S. Rao, and D. P. Roy, “Higgsino dark matter in nonuniversal gaugino mass models,” Physical Review D, vol. 91, no. 3, Article ID 035022, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. W. Abdallah and S. Khalil, “MSSM dark matter in light of Higgs and LUX results,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2016, Article ID 5687463, 10 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. J. J. Blanco-Pillado, C. P. Burgess, J. M. Cline et al., “Racetrack inflation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2004, no. 11, article 063, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. J. J. Blanco-Pillado, C. P. Burgess, J. M. Cline et al., “Inflating in a better racetrack,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2006, no. 9, article 002, 22 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  70. C. P. Burgess, M. Cicoli, and F. Quevedo, “String inflation after Planck 2013,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2013, no. 11, article 003, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. J. P. Conlon and F. Quevedo, “Kähler moduli inflation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2006, no. 1, article 146, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. J. P. Conlon, R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and F. Quevedo, “Volume modulus inflation and the gravitino mass problem,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2008, no. 9, article 011, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. E. Silverstein, “Simple de sitter solutions,” Physical Review D, vol. 77, no. 10, Article ID 106006, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  74. E. Silverstein and A. Westphal, “Monodromy in the CMB: gravity waves and string inflation,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 10, Article ID 106003, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. W. Buchmuller, C. Wieck, and M. W. Winkler, “Supersymmetric moduli stabilization and high-scale inflation,” Physics Letters B, vol. 736, pp. 237–240, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  76. W. Buchmüller, E. Dudas, L. Heurtier, and C. Wieck, “Large-field inflation and supersymmetry breaking,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 9, article 053, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. A. Hebecker, P. Mangat, F. Rompineve, and L. T. Witkowski, “Tuning and backreaction in F-term axion monodromy inflation,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 894, pp. 456–495, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. W. Buchmüller, E. Dudas, L. Heurtier, A. Westphal, C. Wieck, and M. W. Winkler, “Challenges for large-field inflation and moduli stabilization,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, no. 4, article 058, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. E. Dudas and C. Wieck, “Moduli backreaction and supersymmetry breaking in string-inspired inflation models,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, no. 10, article 062, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. G. R. Dvali, Q. Shafi, and R. K. Schaefer, “Large scale structure and supersymmetric inflation without fine tuning,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 73, no. 14, pp. 1886–1889, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. M. Bastero-Gil, S. F. King, and Q. Shafi, “Supersymmetric hybrid inflation with non-minimal Kähler potential,” Physics Letters B, vol. 651, no. 5-6, pp. 345–351, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. M. Kawasaki, M. Yamaguchi, and T. Yanagida, “Natural chaotic inflation in supergravity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, no. 17, pp. 3572–3575, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama, “New inflation in supergravity with a chaotic initial condition,” Physical Review D, vol. 63, Article ID 043506, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  84. P. Brax and J. Martin, “Shift symmetry and inflation in supergravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 72, no. 2, Article ID 023518, 24 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  85. R. Kallosh and A. Linde, “New models of chaotic inflation in supergravity,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2010, no. 11, article 011, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and T. Rube, “General inflaton potentials in supergravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 4, Article ID 043507, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. E. Dudas, “Three-form multiplet and inflation,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 12, article 014, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  88. L. Aparicio, F. Quevedo, and R. Valandro, “Moduli stabilisation with nilpotent goldstino: vacuum structure and SUSY breaking,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.08105.