Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 9897051, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9897051
Research Article

On the UV Dimensions of Loop Quantum Gravity

1Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza-Università di Roma, Piazzale A. Moro 2, 00185 Roma, Italy
2INFN, Sez. Roma1, Piazzale A. Moro 2, 00185 Roma, Italy

Received 1 May 2016; Accepted 22 June 2016

Academic Editor: Ahmed Farag Ali

Copyright © 2016 Michele Ronco. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. J. Ambjørn, J. Jurkiewicz, and R. Loll, “Reconstructing the universe,” Physical Review D, vol. 72, no. 6, Article ID 064014, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. P. Hořava, “Spectral dimension of the universe in quantum gravity at a Lifshitz point,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, no. 16, Article ID 161301, 4 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. S. Carlip, “Dimensional reduction in causal set gravity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 32, article 23, Article ID 232001, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Niedermaier and M. Reuter, “The asymptotic safety scenario in quantum gravity,” Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 9, p. 5, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  5. D. Benedetti, “Fractal properties of quantum spacetime,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, no. 11, Article ID 111303, 4 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. L. Modesto, “Fractal spacetime from the area spectrum,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 26, no. 24, Article ID 242002, 9 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. G. Calcagni, D. Oriti, and J. Thürigen, “Spectral dimension of quantum geometries,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 31, no. 13, Article ID 135014, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. G. Calcagni, D. Oriti, and J. Thrigen, “Dimensional flow in discrete quantum geometries,” Physical Review D, vol. 91, no. 8, Article ID 084047, 11 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski, “Background independent quantum gravity: a status report,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 21, no. 15, pp. R53–R152, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  10. C. Rovelli, “Loop quantum gravity,” Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 11, article 5, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. J. Ambjørn, A. Görlich, J. Jurkiewicz, and R. Loll, “Nonperturbative quantum gravity,” Physics Reports, vol. 519, no. 4-5, pp. 127–210, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. S. Carlip, “Spontaneous dimensional reduction in shortdistance quantum gravity?” in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1196, p. 72, Wroclaw, Poland, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J. Ambjorn, D. Coumbe, J. Gizbert-Studnicki, and J. Jurkiewicz, “Recent results in CDT quantum gravity,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.08788.
  14. O. Lauscher and M. Reuter, “Fractal spacetime structure in asymptotically safe gravity,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2005, no. 10, article 050, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. G. Calcagni, A. Eichhorn, and F. Saueressig, “Probing the quantum nature of spacetime by diffusion,” Physical Review D, vol. 87, no. 12, Article ID 124028, 14 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. D. Benedetti and J. Henson, “Spectral geometry as a probe of quantum spacetime,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 12, Article ID 13, 124036 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. S. Carlip, “Spontaneous dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,” Third award, 2016 Gravity Research Foundation Essay contest, https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.05694.
  18. R. Percacci and D. Perini, “On the ultraviolet behaviour of Newton's constant,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 5035–5041, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. T. Padmanabhan, S. Chakraborty, and D. Kothawala, “Spacetime with zero point length is two-dimensional at the Planck scale,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 48, article 55, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. G. Amelino-Camelia, F. Brighenti, G. Gubitosi, and G. Santos, “Thermal dimension of quantum spacetime,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.08020.
  21. G. Amelino-Camelia, M. Arzano, G. Gubitosi, and J. Magueijo, “Dimensional reduction in the sky,” Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 87, no. 12, Article ID 123532, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. G. Amelino-Camelia, M. Arzano, G. Gubitosi, and J. Magueijo, “Planck-scale dimensional reduction without a preferred frame,” Physics Letters. B, vol. 736, pp. 317–320, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  23. M. Bojowald, G. M. Hossain, M. Kagan, and S. Shankaranarayanan, “Anomaly freedom in perturbative loop quantum gravity,” Physical Review D. Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, vol. 78, no. 6, 063547, 31 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  24. T. Cailleteau, J. Mielczarek, A. Barrau, and J. Grain, “Anomaly-free scalar perturbations with holonomy corrections in loop quantum cosmology,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 29, no. 9, Article ID 095010, 17 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  25. A. Perez and D. Pranzetti, “On the regularization of the constraint algebra of quantum gravity in 2 + 1 dimensions with a nonvanishing cosmological constant,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 27, no. 14, Article ID 145009, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. C. Tomlin and M. Varadarajan, “Towards an anomaly-free quantum dynamics for a weak coupling limit of Euclidean gravity: diffeomorphism covariance,” Physical Review D, vol. 87, Article ID 044040, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. A. Barrau, M. Bojowald, G. Calcagni, J. Grain, and M. Kagan, “Anomaly-free cosmological perturbations in effective canonical quantum gravity,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2015, no. 5, article 051, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. M. Bojowald and G. M. Paily, “Deformed general relativity,” Physical Review D, vol. 87, Article ID 044044, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Testable scenario for relativity with minimum length,” Physics Letters B, vol. 510, no. 1–4, pp. 255–263, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Relativity in spacetimes with short-distance structure governed by an observer-independent (Planckian) length scale,” International Journal of Modern Physics. D. Gravitation, Astrophysics, Cosmology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 35–59, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  31. G. Amelino-Camelia, M. M. Da Silva, M. Ronco, L. Cesarini, and O. M. Lecian, “Spacetime-noncommutativity regime of Loop Quantum Gravity,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.00497.
  32. S. Majid and H. Ruegg, “Bicrossproduct structure of κ-Poincare group and non-commutative geometry,” Physics Letters B, vol. 334, no. 3-4, pp. 348–354, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. J. Lukierski, H. Ruegg, and W. J. Zakrzewski, “Classical and quantum mechanics of free κ-relativistic systems,” Annals of Physics, vol. 243, no. 1, pp. 90–116, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  34. D.-W. Chiou and L.-F. Li, “Loop quantum cosmology with higher order holonomy corrections,” Physical Review D. Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, vol. 80, no. 4, 043512, 19 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  35. A. Laddha and M. Varadarajan, “Hamiltonian constraint in polymer parametrized field theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, Article ID 025019, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. A. Corichi and P. Singh, “Is loop quantization in cosmology unique?” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, vol. 78, no. 2, Article ID 024034, 13 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  37. H. Nicolai, K. Peeters, and M. Zamaklar, “Loop quantum gravity: an outside view,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 19, pp. R193–R247, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  38. E. Wilson-Ewing, “Holonomy corrections in the effective equations for scalar mode perturbations in loop quantum cosmology,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 29, no. 8, 085005, 19 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  39. M. Bojowald and G. M. Paily, “Deformed general relativity and effective actions from loop quantum gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, Article ID 104018, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. A. Ashtekar and P. Singh, “Loop quantum cosmology: a status report,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 28, no. 21, 213001, 122 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  41. M. Bojowald, “Loop quantum cosmology,” Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 8, p. 11, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A. Ashtekar, “Symmetry reduced loop quantum gravity: a bird's eye view,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.02648.
  43. P. A. M. Dirac, “The theory of gravitation in hamiltonian form,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, vol. 246, no. 1246, 1958. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. R. L. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, “Republication of: the dynamics of general relativity,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1997–2027, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. T. Regge and C. Teitelboim, “Role of surface integrals in the Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity,” Annals of Physics, vol. 88, pp. 286–318, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  46. A. Ashtekar, J. Lewandowski, D. Marolf, J. Mourao, and T. Thiemann, “Quantization of diffeomorphism invariant theories of connections with local degrees of freedom,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 6456–6493, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  47. J. Lewandowski, A. Okolow, H. Sahlmann, and T. Thiemann, “Uniqueness of diffeomorphism invariant states on holonomy-flux algebras,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 267, no. 3, pp. 703–733, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  48. M. Bojowald and R. Swiderski, “Spherically symmetric quantum geometry: hamiltonian constraint,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 2129–2154, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  49. K. Banerjee and G. Date, “Discreteness corrections to the effective Hamiltonian of isotropic loop quantum cosmology,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 2017–2033, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  50. M. Bojowald, M. Kagan, H. H. Hernández, and A. Skirzewski, “Effective constraints of loop quantum gravity,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, vol. 75, no. 6, Article ID 064022, 25 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  51. S. Brahma, “Spherically symmetric canonical quantum gravity,” Physical Review D. Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, vol. 91, no. 12, 124003, 12 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  52. J. D. Brown and J. W. York Jr., “Quasilocal energy and conserved charges derived from the gravitational action,” Physical Review D, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1407–1419, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. G. Amelino-Camelia, “Quantum-spacetime phenomenology,” Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 16, p. 5, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. R. Gambini and J. Pullin, “Nonstandard optics from quantum space-time,” Physical Review D, vol. 59, no. 12, Article ID 124021, 4 pages, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  55. J. Alfaro, H. A. Morales-Técotl, and L. F. Urrutia, “Loop quantum gravity and light propagation,” Physical Review D, vol. 65, no. 10, Article ID 103509, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  56. L. Modesto, “Spectral dimension of a quantum universe,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, Article ID 104040, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. G. Calcagni, L. Modesto, and G. Nardelli, “Quantum spectral dimension in quantum field theory,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 25, no. 5, Article ID 1650058, 26 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  58. T. P. Sotiriou, M. Visser, and S. Weinfurtner, “From dispersion relations to spectral dimension—and back again,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, Article ID 104018, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. M. Arzano, G. Gubitosi, J. Magueijo, and G. Amelino-Camelia, “Anti-de Sitter momentum space,” Physical Review D, vol. 92, no. 2, Article ID 024028, 12 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  60. G. Calcagni, “Diffusion in multiscale spacetimes,” Physical Review E, vol. 87, no. 1, Article ID 012123, 20 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. M. Campiglia, R. Gambini, J. Olmedo, and J. Pullin, “Quantum self-gravitating collapsing matter in a quantum geometry,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05688.