Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2017, Article ID 1403937, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1403937
Research Article

A Specific Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanical Model: Supervariable Approach

Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Mohanpur 741246, India

Correspondence should be addressed to Aradhya Shukla; moc.liamg@830alkuhsa

Received 6 August 2016; Accepted 5 January 2017; Published 19 February 2017

Academic Editor: Shi-Hai Dong

Copyright © 2017 Aradhya Shukla. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, “The abelian Higgs Kibble model, unitarity of the S-operator,” Physics Letters B, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 344–346, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, “Renormalization of the abelian Higgs-Kibble model,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 42, pp. 127–162, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, “Renormalization of gauge theories,” Annals of Physics, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 287–321, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. I. V. Tyutin, “Gauge invariance in field theory and statistical physics in operator formalism,” Tech. Rep. FIAN-39, Lebedev Institute, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  5. J. Thierry-Mieg, “Geometrical reinterpretation of Faddeev–Popov ghost particles and BRS transformations,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 21, no. 12, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. J. Thierry-Mieg, “Explicit classical construction of the Faddeev-Popov ghost field,” Il Nuovo Cimento A, vol. 56, article 396, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Quirós, F. J. de Urries, J. Hoyos, M. L. Mazón, and E. Rodriguez, “Geometrical structure of Faddeev–Popov fields and invariance properties of gauge theories,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1767–1774, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  8. L. Bonora and M. Tonin, “Superfield formulation of extended BRS symmetry,” Physics Letters B, vol. 98, no. 1-2, pp. 48–50, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. Bonora, P. Pasti, and M. Tonin, “Geometric description of extended BRS symmetry in superfield formulation,” Il Nuovo Cimento. A. Serie 11, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 353–364, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  10. R. Delbourgo and P. D. Jarvis, “Extended BRS invariance and osp(4/2) supersymmetry,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, vol. 15, p. 611, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  11. R. Delbourgo, P. D. Jarvis, and G. Thompson, “Local OSp(4/2) supersymmetry and extended BRS transformations for gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 109, no. 1-2, pp. 25–27, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. D. S. Hwang and C. Lee, “Non-Abelian topological mass generation in four dimensions,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 38, no. 1, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. R. P. Malik, “Nilpotent symmetries for a spinning relativistic particlein augmented superfield formalism,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 513–524, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. R. Malik, “Unique nilpotent symmetry transformations for matter fields in QED: augmented superfield formalism,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 227–234, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. R. P. Malik, “A generalization of the horizontality condition in the superfield approach to nilpotent symmetries for QED with complex scalar fields,” Journal of Physics. A. Mathematical and Theoretical, vol. 40, no. 18, pp. 4877–4893, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. R. Malik, “An alternative to the horizontality condition in the superfield approach to BRST symmetries,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 169–177, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Krishna, A. Shukla, and R. P. Malik, “General N=2 supersymmetric quantum mechanical model: supervariable approach to its off-shell nilpotent symmetries,” Annals of Physics, vol. 351, pp. 558–570, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. S. Krishna, A. Shukla, and R. P. Malik, “Supervariable approach to nilpotent symmetries of a couple of N = 2 supersymmetric quantum mechanical models,” Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 1623–1631, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Krishna and R. P. Malik, “A free N=2 supersymmetric system: novel symmetries,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 109, no. 3, Article ID 31001, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. S. Krishna and R. P. Malik, “N=2 SUSY symmetries for a moving charged particle under influence of a magnetic field: supervariable approach,” Annals of Physics, vol. 355, pp. 204–216, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. D. Birmingham, M. Blau, M. Rakowski, and G. Thompson, “Topological field theory,” Physics Reports A, vol. 209, no. 4-5, pp. 129–340, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. R. Kumar and R. P. Malik, “Supersymmetric oscillator: novel symmetries,” EPL (Europhysics Letters), vol. 98, no. 1, Article ID 11002, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. R. Kumar and R. P. Malik, “Novel discrete symmetries in the general N = 2 supersymmetric quantum mechanical model,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 73, article 2514, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. R. P. Malik and A. Khare, “Novel symmetries in N = 2 supersymmetric quantum mechanical models,” Annals of Physics, vol. 334, pp. 142–156, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  25. N. Nakanishi and I. Ojima, Covariant Operator Formalism of Gauge Theory and Quantum Gravity, World Scientifc, Singapore, 1990.
  26. T. Eguchi, P. B. Gilkey, and A. J. Hanson, “Gravitation, gauge theories and differential geometry,” Physics Reports, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 213–393, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. S. Mukhi and N. Mukunda, Introduction to Topology, Differential Geometry and Group Theory for Physicists, Wiley Eastern Private Limited, New Delhi, India, 1990.
  28. K. Nishijima, “The Casimir operator in the representations of BRS algebra,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 897–904, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  29. S. Deser, A. Gomberoff, M. Henneaux, and C. Teitelboim, “Duality, self-duality, sources and charge quantization in abelian N-form theories,” Physics Letters B, vol. 400, no. 1-2, pp. 80–86, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet