Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2017, Article ID 2864784, 14 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2864784
Research Article

Dynamical System Analysis of Interacting Hessence Dark Energy in Gravity

Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, Howrah 711 103, India

Correspondence should be addressed to Ujjal Debnath; moc.oohay@htanbedlajju

Received 24 January 2017; Revised 31 March 2017; Accepted 15 May 2017; Published 25 July 2017

Academic Editor: George Siopsis

Copyright © 2017 Jyotirmay Das Mandal and Ujjal Debnath. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. A. G. Riess, L.-G. Strolger, and J. Tonry, “Type Ia supernova discoveries at z>1 from the Hubble Space Telescope: evidence for past deceleration and constraints on dark energy evolution,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 607, no. 2, pp. 665–687, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  2. R. A. Knop, G. Aldering, R. Amanullah et al., “New constraints on ΩM, ΩΛ, and w from an independent set of 11 high-redshift supernovae observed with the Hubble Space Telescope,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 598, no. 1, p. 102, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  3. P. Astier, J. Guy, N. Regnault et al., “The Supernova Legacy Survey: measurement of ΩM, ΩΛ and w from the first year data set,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 447, no. 1, Article ID 0510447, pp. 31–48, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  4. J. D. Neill, M. Sullivan, D. Balam et al., “The type Ia supernova rate at Z0.5 from the supernova legacy survey,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 132, no. 3, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  5. C. L. Bennett, M. Halpern, G. Hinshaw et al., “First-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (wmap) observations: preliminary maps and basic results,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 148, no. 1, Article ID 0302207, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  6. D. N. Spergell, L. Verde, H. V. Peiris et al., “First-year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (wmap) observations: determination of cosmological parameters,” The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 175–194, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. D. N. Spergell, R. Bean, O. Doré et al., “Three-year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (wmap) observations: implications for cosmology,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 170, no. 2, p. 377, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  8. L. Page, G. Hinshaw, E. Komatsu et al., “Three year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: polarization analysis,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 170, no. 2, p. 335, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  9. G. Hinshaw, M. R. Nolta, C. L. Bennett et al., “Three-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (wmap) observations: temperature analysis,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 170, no. 2, p. 288, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  10. N. Jarosik, C. Barnes, M. R. Greason et al., “Three-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: beam profiles, data processing, radiometer characterization, and systematic error limits,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 170, no. 2, p. 263, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  11. E. Komatsu, “[WMAP collaboration],” Astrophysics J. Suppl, vol. 192 18, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Tegmark et al., “Cosmological parameters from SDSS and WMAP,” Physical Review D, vol. 69, Article ID 103501, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  13. M. Tegmark, M. R. Blanton, M. A. Strauss, F. Hoyle, and D. Schlegel, “The three-dimensional power spectrum of galaxies from the sloan digital sky survey,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 606, no. 2, p. 702, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. U. Seljak, A. Makarov, P. McDonald et al., “Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS Lyα forest and galaxy bias: Constraints on the primordial spectrum of fluctuations, neutrino mass, and dark energy,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, Article ID 103515, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  15. J. K. Adelman-McCarthy, M. A. Agüeros, S. S. Allam et al., “The fourth data release of the sloan digital sky survey,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 162, no. 1, Article ID 0507711, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  16. M. Tegmark, M. R. Blanton, and M. l. A. Strauss, “The three-dimensional power spectrum of galaxies from the sloan digital sky survey,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 606, no. 2.
  17. M. Tegmark, D. Eisenstein, M. Strauss et al., “Cosmological constraints from the SDSS luminous red galaxies,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, Article ID 123507, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. S. W. Allen, R. W. Schmidt, H. Ebeling, A. C. Fabian, and L. Van Speybroeck, “Constraints on dark energy from Chandra observations of the largest relaxed galaxy clusters,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 353, p. 457, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. A. G. Riess, L.-G. Strolger, S. Casertano et al., “New hubble space telescope discoveries of type Ia supernovae at Z1 narrowing constraints on the early behavior of dark energy,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 1, 659. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, “Dynamics of dark energy,” International Journal of Modern Physics D: Gravitation, Astrophysics, Cosmology, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1753–1935, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. S. Weinberg, “The cosmological constant problem,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. P. J. Peebles and B. Ratra, “The cosmological constant and dark energy,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 559–606, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  23. T. Padmanabhan, “Dark energy: the cosmological challenge of the millennium,” Current Science, vol. 88, p. 1057, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  24. J. Martin and M. Yamaguchi, “DBI-essence,” Physical Review D, vol. 77, Article ID 123508, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  25. L. P. Chimento, R. Lazkoz, and I. Sendra, “DBI models for the unification of dark matter and dark energy,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1189–1209, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  26. P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan et al., “Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 571, no. A16, 66 pages, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  27. P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud et al., “Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 594, article A13, 63 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, “Cosmology for grand unified theories with radiatively induced symmetry breaking,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 48, p. 1220, 1982, A complete description of inflationary models can be found in the book by A. Linde, Particle Physicss and Inflationary Cosmology, Gordon and Breach, New York U.S.A. (1990). View at Google Scholar
  29. A. H. Guth, “Inflationary universe: a possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems,” Physical Review D, vol. 23, p. 347, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  30. A. Berera, I. J. Moss, and R. O. Ramos, Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 70, Article ID 026901, 2009.
  31. A. Berera and L.-Z. Fang, “Thermally induced density perturbations in the inflation era,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 1912–1915, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. Berera, Physical Review Letters, vol. 75, p. 3218, 1995, ; Physical Review D, vol. 55, p. 3346, 1997.
  33. P. Steinhardt, Critical Problems in Physics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1997.
  34. I. Zlatev, L. Wang, and P. J. Steinhardt, “Quintessence, cosmic coincidence, and the cosmological constant,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 896–899, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. M. Carrol, “Quintessence and the rest of the world: suppressing long-range interactions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 81, p. 3067, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. U. Alam, V. Sahni, T. D. Saini, and A. A. Starobinsky, “Is there supernova evidence for dark energy metamorphosis?” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 354, no. 1, pp. 275–291, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. R. Caldwell, “A phantom menace? Cosmological consequences of a dark energy component with super-negative equation of state,” Physics Letters B, vol. 545, no. 1-2, pp. 23–29, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. R. R. Caldwell, M. Kamionkowski, and N. N. Weinberg, “Phantom energy: dark energy with ω < −1 causes a cosmic doomsday,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, Article ID 071301, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  39. R. J. Scherrer, “Phantom dark energy, cosmic doomsday, and the coincidence problem,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, Article ID 063519, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  40. L. P. Chimento, M. I. Forte, R. Lazcoz, and M. G. Richarte, “Internal space structure generalization of the quintom cosmological scenario,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, Article ID 0435002, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  41. B. Feng, X. L. Wang, and X. M. Zhang, “Dark energy constraints from the cosmic age and supernova,” Physics Letters B, vol. 607, no. 35, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  42. L. A. Boyle, R. R. Caldwell, and M. Kamionkowski, “Spintessence! New models for dark matter and dark energy,” Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics, vol. 545, no. 1-2, pp. 17–22, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S. Kasuya, “Difficulty of a spinning complex scalar field to be dark energy,” Physics Letters B, vol. 515, no. 1-2, pp. 121–124, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. H. Wei, R.-G. Cai, and D.-F. Zeng, “Hessence: a new view of quintom dark energy,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 16, pp. 3189–3202, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  45. H. Wei and R-G. Cai, “Cosmological evolution of “hessence” dark energy and avoidance of the big rip,” Physical Review D, vol. 72, Article ID 123507, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  46. M. Alimohammadi and H. M. Sadjadi, “Attractor solutions for general hessence dark energy,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, Article ID 083527, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  47. H. Wei, N. Tang, and S. N. Zhang, “Reconstruction of hessence dark energy and the latest typeIa supernovae gold dataset,” Physical Review D, vol. 75, Article ID 043009, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  48. S. Capozziello and L. Z. Fang, “International Journal of Modern Physics D,” Curvature Quintessence, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 483–491, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  49. S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “Modified gravity with negative and positive powers of curvature: unification of inflation and cosmic acceleration,” Physical Review D, vol. 68, Article ID 123512, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  50. S. M. Carroll, V. Duvvuri, M. Trodden, and M. S. Turner, “Is cosmic speed-up due to new gravitational physics?” Physical Review D, vol. 70, Article ID 043528, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  51. A. Einstein, “Riemannian geometry with maintaining the notion of distant parallelism,” Preuss. Akad. Wiss., Phys.-Math. Ki, vol. 217, 1928. View at Google Scholar
  52. A. Einstein, “A unified field theory based on the riemannian metric and distant parallelism,” Mathematische Annalen, vol. 102, p. 685, 1930. View at Google Scholar
  53. K. Hayashi and T. Shirafuji, “New general relativity,” Physical Review D: Particles and Fields, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 3524–3553, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  54. R. Aldrovandi and J. G. Pereira, Teleparallel Gravity: An Introduction, vol. 173, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  55. M. P. Gaugh, “Beyond LCDM: a viable alternative?” https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.00330.
  56. A. Behboodi, S. Akshabi, and K. Nozari, “Matter stability in modified teleparallel gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 718, no. 1, pp. 30–33, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. E. Dil and E. Kolay, “Dynamics of mixed dark energy domination in teleparallel gravity and phase-space analysis,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, Article ID 608252, 20 pages, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  58. R. Lazcoz, G. Leon, and I. Quiros, “Quintom cosmologies with arbitrary potentials”. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. H. Wei and S. N. Zhang, “Dynamics of quintom and hessence energies in loop quantum cosmology,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 6, Article ID 063005, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. S. K. Biswas and S. Chakraborty, “Interacting dark energy in f(T) cosmology: a dynamical system analysis,” International Journal of Modern Physics. D. Gravitation, Astrophysics, Cosmology, vol. 24, no. 7, 1550046, 20 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  61. E. E. Flanagan and E. Rosenthal, “Can gravity probe B usefully constrain torsion gravity theories?” Physical Review D, vol. 75, Article ID 124016, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  62. J. Garecki, “Teleparallel equivalent of general relativity: a critical review,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1010.2654.
  63. G. R. Bengochea and R. Ferraro, “Dark torsion as the cosmic speed-up,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, Article ID 124019, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  64. E. V. Linder, “Einstein′s other gravity and the acceleration of the universe,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, Article ID 127301, 2010, [Erratum-ibidD82, 109902 (2010)]. View at Google Scholar
  65. P. Wu and H. Yu, “Observational constraints on fT theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 693, no. 4, pp. 415–420, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. P. Wu and H. Yu, “fT models with phantom divide line crossing,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 71, p. 1552, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  67. M. R. Setare and M. J. S. Houndjo, “Finite-time future singularities models in f(T) gravity and the effects of viscosity,” Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 260–267, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. M. H. Daouda, M. E. Rodrigues, and M. J. S. Houndjo, “Reconstruction of f(T) gravity according to holographic dark energy,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 72, article 1893, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. V. F. Cardone, N. Radicella, and S. Camera, “Accelerating fT gravity models constrained by recent cosmological data,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, Article ID 124007, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  70. S. Camera, V. F. Cardone, and N. Radicella, “Detectability of torsion gravity via galaxy clustering and cosmic shear measurements,” Physical Review D, vol. 89, Article ID 083520, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  71. K. Bamba, M. Jamil, D. Momeni, and R. Myrzakulov, “Generalized second law of thermodynamics in f(T) gravity with entropy corrections,” Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 344, no. 1, pp. 259–267, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. G. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, and M. Porrati, “4D gravity on a brane in 5D MInkowski space,” Physics Letters. B. Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, vol. 485, no. 1-3, pp. 208–214, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  73. C. Deffayet, G. Dvali, and G. Gabadadze, “Accelerated universe from gravity leaking to extra dimensions,” Physical Review. D. Third Series, vol. 65, no. 4, Article ID 044023, 9 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  74. K. Nozari and N. Behrouz, “An interacting dark energy model with nonminimal derivative coupling,” Physics of the Dark Universe, vol. 13, no. 92, 2016. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. N. Mahata and S. Chakraborty, “A Dynamical System Analysis of Three Fluid cosmological Model,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.07017.
  76. J. Wainwright and G. F. R. Ellis, Dynamical Systems in Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  77. B. Aulbach, Continuous and Discrete Dynamics Near Manifolds of Equilibria, vol. 1058 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet