Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2017, Article ID 4726050, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4726050
Research Article

Excited Neutrino Search Potential of the FCC-Based Electron-Hadron Colliders

Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Department of Physics Engineering, Gümüşhane University, 29100 Gümüşhane, Turkey

Correspondence should be addressed to A. Caliskan; rt.ude.enahsumug@naksilaca

Received 20 October 2017; Accepted 9 December 2017; Published 31 December 2017

Academic Editor: Anna Cimmino

Copyright © 2017 A. Caliskan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Abstract

The production potential of the excited neutrinos at the FCC-based electron-hadron colliders, namely, the with  TeV, the with  TeV, and the with  TeV, has been analyzed. The branching ratios of the excited neutrinos have been calculated for the different decay channels and shown that the dominant channel is . We have calculated the production cross sections with the process of and the decay widths of the excited neutrinos with the process of . The signals and corresponding backgrounds are studied in detail to obtain accessible mass limits. It is shown that the discovery limits obtained on the mass of the excited neutrino are  GeV for ,  GeV for ( GeV for ), and GeV for ( GeV for ), for the center-of-mass energies of , , and  TeV, respectively.

1. Introduction

The Standard Model (SM) of particle physics has so far been in agreement with the results of numerous experiments. The discovery of the Higgs boson [1] has also increased the reliability of the SM. However, there are some problems which have not been entirely solved by the SM, such as quark-lepton symmetry, family replication, number of families, fermion’s masses and mixing pattern, and hierarchy problems. Several theories beyond the SM (BSM), including extra dimensions, supersymmetry (SUSY), and compositeness, have been proposed to solve these problems. The best way to explain the inflation of fundamental particles in the SM is to assume that they have more fundamental matter constituents. Therefore, a natural explanation for the replication of the SM fermionic families is lepton and quark compositeness, in which both matter and antimatter elementary particles have a substructure called preon [2]. The composite models have been characterized by an energy scale, namely, compositeness scale, . A typical consequence of the compositeness is the appearance of excited leptons and quarks [3, 4]. Charged and neutral excited leptons are predicted by the composite models. The SM fermions are considered as ground states of a rich and heavier spectrum of the excited states. An excited spin-1/2 lepton is considered to be both the lowest radial and orbital excitation. Excited states with spin-3/2 are also expected to exist [5].

No evidence for excited lepton production has been found so far in searches based on data samples collected by the LEP [6], HERA [7], Tevatron [8], CMS [9], and ATLAS [10] experiments. For the excited electron [11, 12], muon [13], and neutrino [1417], there are some phenomenological studies at the future high-energy colliders.

Current experimental lower bounds on the masses of the excited neutrinos are  GeV [6] from LEP-L3 collaboration (pair production) assuming ,  GeV [18] at 95% CL from HERA-H1 collaboration (single production) assuming and  TeV [18], namely, the strongest limit, from LHC-ATLAS collaboration (pair production) assuming .

The Future Circular Collider (FCC) is a post-Large Hadron Collider (LHC) accelerator project [19], with  TeV, proposed at CERN and supported by European Union within the Horizon Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. Besides the option, FCC also includes collider option (TLEP) at the same tunnel [20]. Construction of the future and colliders tangential to the FCC will also provide several and collider options [21].

In this paper, we analyze the potential of the FCC-based colliders, namely, , , and , for the excited neutrino searches. The ERL60 denotes energy recovery linac proposed for the LHeC main option [22] and can also be used for the FCC-based colliders. The ILC and the PWFA-LC mean International Linear Collider [23] and Plasma Wake Field Accelerator Linear Collider [24], respectively. The FCC-based and colliders have been proposed in [25]. Energy of the electron beams, center-of-mass energy, and luminosity values of the FCC-based colliders are presented in Table 1 [25, 26].

Table 1: Main parameters of the FCC-based colliders.

We introduce the effective Lagrangian, the decay widths, and the branching ratios of the excited neutrinos in Section 2. In Section 3, we analyze the signal and backgrounds for the process , and finally we summarize our results in Section 4.

2. Production of the Excited Neutrinos

The interaction between a spin-1/2 excited lepton, a gauge boson , and the SM leptons is described by invariant Lagrangian [4, 27, 28] aswhere is the new physics scale responsible for the existence of the excited leptons, and are the field strength tensors, and are the gauge couplings, and are the scaling factors for the gauge couplings of and , where are the Dirac matrices, denotes the Pauli matrices, and is hypercharge.

For an excited neutrinos, three decay modes are possible: radiative decay , neutral weak decay , and charged weak decay . The branching ratios (BR) of the excited neutrino for the couplings and are given in Figure 1. One may note that the electromagnetic interaction between excited neutrino and ordinary neutrino, namely, -channel, vanishes for . As clearly visible from Figure 1, the -channel, whose branching ratio is ~60%, is dominant in the whole mass range for . In the case of , the branching ratio for the individual decay channels reaches the constant value of 60% for the -channel, 12% for the -channel, and 28% for the -channel at higher neutrino masses ( GeV). Since the charged weak decay () is dominant in both cases, we preferred this channel for investigating the excited neutrino in future linear collider experiments.

Figure 1: The branching ratios (%) depending on the mass of the excited neutrino for (a) and (b).

Neglecting the SM lepton mass, we find the decay width of excited leptons aswhere is the new electroweak coupling parameter corresponding to the gauge boson , where , , , and , , , where is the weak mixing angle and is the mass of the gauge boson. The total decay widths of the excited neutrino for the scale is given in Figure 2.

Figure 2: The total decay widths of the excited neutrino for the scale and the coupling .

3. Signal and Background Analysis

We analyze the potentials of the future collider machines to search for the excited neutrinos via the single production reaction with subsequent decay of the excited neutrino into an electron and a boson. Therefore, we consider the process and subprocesses . The signal and background analysis were done at the parton level by using the high-energy simulation program CALCHEP in the version 3.6.25 [29]. We used the CTEQ6L [30] parton distribution functions in our calculations.

For a comparison of different FCC-based colliders, the signal cross sections for excited neutrino production are presented in Figure 3, assuming the coupling parameter .

Figure 3: The total cross sections as a function of the excited neutrino mass at the colliders with various center-of-mass energies, assuming and .
3.1. Collider

The is a FCC-based future collider with the center-of-mass energy of  TeV. Keeping in mind that the lower bound on the mass of the excited neutrino is  TeV ( TeV), we have explored the mass limits for the discovery of the excited neutrinos in the range of and  TeV at the collider. To separate signal from backgrounds, final state particles (electron, boson and jets) with  GeV are required. The SM cross section after the application of these cuts is  pb. In order to define the kinematical cuts best suited for discovery, we have plotted the normalized transverse momentum and the normalized pseudorapidity distributions of the final state particles. Figure 4 shows the normalized distributions of the final state bosons (a), pseudorapidity () distributions of the final state electron (b), and the distributions of the final state (c), for signals corresponding to excited neutrino masses of and  GeV and the SM backgrounds. The distributions of the final state electrons are the same as those of the final state bosons. As can be seen from Figure 4, the kinematical cuts  GeV, and drastically reduce the background while keeping the signal almost unchanged. The invariant mass distributions of the system after the application of all kinematical cuts is reported in Figure 5. The separation of the signal from the background improved.

Figure 4: The normalized transverse momentum distributions of the final state bosons (a), the normalized pseudorapidity distributions of the final state electrons (b), and the normalized pseudorapidity distributions of the final state bosons (c) for and at the collider.
Figure 5: The invariant mass distributions of the excited neutrino signal and the corresponding background for and at the collider.

A natural way of extracting the excited neutrino signal, and the same time suppressing the SM background is to impose a cut on the invariant mass in addition to kinematical cuts. Therefore, we have selected events within the mass window .

We define statistical significance (SS) of the expected signal yield aswhere denotes the cross section due to the excited neutrino production and the SM backgrounds, denotes the SM cross section, and is the integrated luminosity of the collider. Assuming and , we have calculated the signal, the background cross sections, and SS in invariant mass bins since the signal is concentrated in a small region proportional to the invariant mass resolution. The results are summarized in Table 2. The collider can discover the excited neutrino in decay mode for the coupling up to the mass of  GeV taking into account the discovery criterion (% CL).

Table 2: The statistical significance (SS) values and the cross sections of the excited neutrino signal and relevant backgrounds at collider with  TeV and , assuming and .
3.2. Collider

The collider with the center-of-mass energy of  TeV can search for the excited neutrino in a wider mass range compared to the collider. We have explored the mass limits for discovery of the excited neutrinos in the mass range from to  TeV. In order to separate the excited neutrino signals from the background we have required  GeV, as for the collider. Subsequently, the SM background cross section for the collider is found to be  pb. The normalized distributions of the final state electrons, the distributions of the final state bosons, and the distributions of the final state electrons are presented in Figure 6. Also in this case, final state electrons and bosons have the same distribution. The kinematical cuts  GeV, , and are optimal for increasing the potential discovery. The invariant mass distributions of the system after the application of all kinematical cuts is reported in Figure 7.

Figure 6: The normalized transverse momentum distributions of the final state electrons (a), the normalized pseudorapidity distributions of the final state bosons (b), and the normalized pseudorapidity distributions of the final state electrons (c) for and at the collider.
Figure 7: The invariant mass distributions of the excited neutrino signal and the corresponding background for and at the collider.

Signal and background cross sections in invariant mass bins and the SS values calculated for and are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3: The statistical significance (SS) values and the cross sections of the excited neutrino signal and relevant background at the collider with  TeV assuming the coupling and the energy scale .

Assuming and , taking into account the calculated SS values for criterion, the collider can probe the excited neutrino up to the masses of and  GeV for the integrated luminosities of and , respectively.

3.3. Collider

If the excited neutrinos had not been observed at the and the colliders, they would have been explored up to the mass of  TeV at the collider that has the widest research potential. We have explored the mass limits for discovering the excited neutrinos in a broad mass spectrum from to  TeV. The SM background cross section is found to be  pb after the application of the same initial kinematical cuts. Figure 8 shows the distributions of the final state bosons, the distributions of the final state electrons, and the distributions of the boson for the excited neutrino masses of , , , and  GeV versus the backgrounds. As already discussed, the distributions of the bosons are the same for the final state electrons. By requiring  GeV , and , the background is suppressed, whereas the signal remains almost unchanged. The invariant mass distributions of the system obtained after application of all cuts is reported in Figure 9. We have also required the invariant masses to be in the range .

Figure 8: The normalized transverse momentum distributions of the final state bosons (a), the normalized pseudorapidity distributions of the final state electrons (b), and the normalized pseudorapidity distributions of the final state bosons (c) for and at the collider.
Figure 9: The invariant mass distributions of the excited neutrino signal and the corresponding background for and at the collider.

Assuming and , the signal and the background cross sections for collider, as well as the SS values, are summarized in Table 4 for two integrated luminosity values, namely, and . For the energy scale of , the collider can probe the excited neutrino up to the masses of and  GeV for the integrated luminosities of and , respectively.

Table 4: The statistical significance (SS) values and the cross sections of the excited neutrino signal and relevant background at the collider with  TeV assuming the coupling and the energy scale .

4. Conclusion

This work has shown that the FCC-based colliders have a great potential for the excited neutrino searches. We give a realistic estimate for the excited neutrino signal and the corresponding background at three different colliders, namely, the ( TeV), the ( TeV), and the ( TeV). The simulations have been performed assuming the energy scale and the coupling parameter . The mass limits for exclusion, observation, and discovery of the excited neutrinos at the three colliders are given in Table 5, for the different integrated luminosity values. As a result, these three FCC-based colliders offer the possibility of probing the excited neutrino over a very large mass range.

Table 5: The mass limits for the exclusion (), the observation (), and the discovery () of the excited neutrinos at the different colliders assuming the coupling and the energy scale .

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to A. Ozansoy and S. O. Kara for useful discussions and model file supports. This work has been supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under Grant no. 114F337.

References

  1. ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 716, no. 1, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  2. I. A. D’Souza and C. S. Kalman, PREONS: Models of Leptons, Quarks and Gauge Bosons as Composite Objects, World Scientific Publishing, 1992.
  3. J. H. Kühn, H. D. Tholl, and P. M. Zerwas, “Signals of excited quarks and leptons,” Physics Letters B, vol. 158, no. 3, pp. 270–275, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. U. Baur, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas, “Excited-quark and -lepton production at hadron colliders,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 815–824, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. Tosa and R. E. Marshak, “Exotic fermions,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 774–780, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L3 Collaboration, “Search for excited leptons at LEP,” Physics Letters B, vol. 568, no. 1, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  7. H1 Collaboration, “Search for excited electrons in ep collisions at HERA,” Physics Letters B, vol. 666, no. 2, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  8. D0 Collaboration, “Search for excited electrons in pp collision at s=1.96 TeV,” Physical Review D, vol. 77, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  9. CMS Collaboration, “Search for excited leptons in proton-proton collisions at s=8 TeV,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 125, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  10. ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for excited electrons and muons s=8 TeV proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 15, no. 093011, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  11. O. Cakir, A. Yilmaz, and S. Sultansoy, “Single production of excited electrons at future e-e+, ep and pp colliders,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, no. 075011, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  12. A. Ozansoy and A. A. Billur, “Search for excited electrons through γ scattering,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 86, no. 5, Article ID 055008, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. A. Caliskan, S. O. Kara, and A. Ozansoy, “Excited muon searches at the FCC-based muon-hadron colliders,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2017, Article ID 1540243, 9 pages, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. O. Cakir, I. T. Cakir, and Z. Kirca, “Single production of excited neutrinos at future e+e-, ep and pp colliders,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  15. O. Cakir and A. Ozansoy, “Single production of excited spin-3/2 neutrinos at linear colliders,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  16. M. Köksal, “Analysis of excited neutrinos at the CLIC,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 29, no. 24, Article ID 1450138, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. A. Ozansoy, V. Ari, and V. Cetinkaya, “Search for spin-3/2 neutrinos at LHeC,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2016, Article ID 1739027, 10 pages, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  18. C. Patrignani, K. Agashe, G. Aielli et al., “Review of particle physics,” Chinese Physics C, vol. 40, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  19. FCC Project Web Page: https://fcc.web.cern.ch.
  20. M. Bicer et al., “First look at the physics case of TLEP,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1401, p. 164, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  21. S. Sultansoy, A. Akay, Y. Acar, S. Beser, U. Kaya, and B. Oner, “FCC based lepton-hadron and photon-hadron colliders: luminosity and physics,” in Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the Future Collider Study (FCC Week '16), 2016.
  22. LHeC Project Web Page: http://lhec.web.cern.ch.
  23. C. Adolphsen, “The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 3,” in Proceedings of the The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 3, p. physics, arXiv:1308.0494.
  24. E. Adli, J. Delahaye, S. Gessner et al., “A Beam Driven Plasma-Wakefield Linear Collider: From Higgs Factory to Multi-TeV,” Tech. Rep. SLAC-PUB-15426, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. Y. C. Acar et al., Main parameters of LCxFCC based electron-proton colliders, arXiv:1602.03089 [hep-ph].
  26. Y. C. Acar et al., FCC based ep and μp colliders, arXiv:1510.08284 [hep-ph].
  27. K. Hagiwara, D. Zeppenfeld, and S. Komamiya, “Excited lepton production at LEP and HERA,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 115–122, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. F. Boudjema, A. Djouadi, and J. L. Kneur, “Excited fermions at e+e- and ep colliders,” Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 425–449, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Belyaev, N. D. Christensen, and A. Pukhov, “CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the standard model,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 184, no. 7, pp. 1729–1769, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. D. Stump, J. Huston, and J. Pumplin, “Inclusive jet production, parton distributions, and the search for new physics,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2003, no. 10, article 046, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar