Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2017, Article ID 6369505, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6369505
Research Article

Dreibein as Prepotential for Three-Dimensional Yang-Mills Theory

1Department of Physics, University of Calcutta, 92 APC Road, Kolkata 700009, India
2Centre for Promotion of Research, 7 Shaktinagar Main Road, Porur, Chennai 600116, India

Correspondence should be addressed to Indrajit Mitra; moc.liamg@yroeht.ardni

Received 6 April 2017; Revised 15 June 2017; Accepted 9 July 2017; Published 22 August 2017

Academic Editor: Edward Sarkisyan-Grinbaum

Copyright © 2017 Indrajit Mitra and H. S. Sharatchandra. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. P. E. Haagensen and K. Johnson, “Yang-Mills fields and Riemannian geometry,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 439, no. 3, pp. 597–616, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. D. Z. Freedman, P. E. Haagensen, K. Johnson, and J. I. Latorre, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9309045.
  3. M. Bauer, D. Z. Freedman, and P. E. Haagensen, “Spatial geometry of the electric field representation of non-abelian gauge theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 428, no. 1–2, pp. 147–168, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. F. A. Lunev, “Three dimensional yang-mills theory in gauge invariant variables,” Physics Letters B, vol. 295, no. 1-2, pp. 99–103, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  5. R. Anishetty, P. Majumdar, and H. S. Sharatchandra, “Dual gluons and monopoles in 2+1 dimensional Yang–Mills theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 478, pp. 373–378, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. P. Majumdar and H. S. Sharatchandra, “(3+1)-dimensional Yang–Mills theory as a local theory of evolution of metrics on 3-manifolds,” Physics Letters B, vol. 491, no. 1–2, pp. 199–202, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. D. Diakonov and V. Petrov, “Gauge-invariant formulation of the d=3 Yang–Mills theory,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 493, no. 1–2, pp. 169–174, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “Entropy bounds and Cardy–Verlinde formula in Yang–Mills theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 540, no. 3–4, pp. 167–172, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. P. E. Haagensen, K. Johnson, and C. S. Lam, “Gauge invariant geometric variables for Yang-Mills theory,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 477, no. 1, pp. 273–292, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. E. Harikumar, I. Mitra, and H. S. Sharatchandra, “Topological field patterns of the Yang–Mills theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 557, no. 3–4, pp. 297–302, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. Y. M. Cho, “Restricted gauge theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 21, p. 1080, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. L. Faddeev and A. J. Niemi, “Partially Dual Variables in SU(2) Yang-Mills Theory,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 82, p. 1624, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. L. D. Faddeev and A. J. Niemi, “Decomposing the Yang-Mills field,” Physics Letters B, vol. 464, no. 1–2, pp. 90–93, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. L. D. Faddeev and A. J. Niemi, “Aspects of electric and magnetic variables in SU(2) Yang–Mills theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 525, no. 1–2, pp. 195–200, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. A. J. Niemi, “Three-dimensional gravity from SU(2) Yang-Mills theory in two dimensions,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. L. D. Faddeev and A. J. Niemi, “Spin-charge separation, conformal covariance and the SU(2) Yang–Mills theory,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 776, no. 1–2, pp. 38–65, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. E. Witten, “2 + 1 dimensional gravity as an exactly soluble system,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 311, no. 1, pp. 46–78, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  18. A. Ashtekar, “New variables for classical and quantum gravity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 57, no. 18, pp. 2244–2247, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  19. K. Krasnov, “A gauge-theoretic approach to gravity,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Phisical and Engineering Sciences, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. Z.-Q. Guo, “Reformulations of Yang-Mills theories with space-time tensor fields,” Annals of Physics, vol. 364, pp. 283–316, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. G. ’t Hooft, “A chiral alternative to the vierbein field in general relativity,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 357, no. 1, pp. 211–221, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. P. Majumdar and H. S. Sharatchandra, “Gauge field copies,” Physical Review D, vol. 63, p. 067701, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. S. Mandelstam, “II. Vortices and quark confinement in non-Abelian gauge theories,” Physics Reports, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 245–249, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. A. M. Polyakov, “Quark confinement and topology of gauge theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 429–458, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  25. E. Harikumar, I. Mitra, and H. S. Sharatchandra, “Half-monopoles and half-vortices in the Yang–Mills theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 557, no. 3–4, pp. 303–308, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. G. ’t Hooft, “Topology of the gauge condition and new confinement phases in non-abelian gauge theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 190, no. 3, pp. 455–478, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang, Properties of Matter Under Unusual Conditions, vol. 23, Interscience, New York, NY, USA, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. D. Karabali and V. P. Nair, “A gauge-invariant Hamiltonian analysis for non-Abelian gauge theoreiesin (2+1) dimensions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 464, 135, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. D. Karabali and V. P. Nair, “On the origin of the mass gap for non-Abelian gauge theories in (2+1) dimensions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 379, no. 1–4, pp. 141–147, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. D. Karabali, C. Kim, and V. P. Nair, “Planar yang-mills theory: hamiltonian, regulators and mass gap,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 524, no. 3, pp. 661–694, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. V. P. Nair, The Hamiltonian Approach to Yang-Mills (2+1): An Update and Corrections to String Tension, Proceedings of Science, 2009.