Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2017, Article ID 7374909, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7374909
Research Article

Mean Field Approximation for the Dense Charged Drop

Ariel University, Ariel, Israel

Correspondence should be addressed to S. Bondarenko; li.ca.leira@byegres

Received 22 October 2017; Revised 29 November 2017; Accepted 6 December 2017; Published 31 December 2017

Academic Editor: Edward Sarkisyan-Grinbaum

Copyright © 2017 S. Bondarenko and K. Komoshvili. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. E. Shuryak, “Four lectures on strongly coupled Quark Gluon Plasma,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 195, pp. 111–156, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. E. Shuryak, “Physics of strongly coupled quark–gluon plasma,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 48–101, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. E. V. Shuryak and I. Zahed, “Toward a theory of binary bound states in the quark-gluon plasma,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 70, Article ID 054507, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. B. Berdnikov and K. Rajagopal, “Slowing out of equilibrium near the QCD critical point,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 61, Article ID 105017, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. V. Koch, A. Majumder, and J. Randrup, “Baryon-strangeness correlations: a diagnostic of strongly interacting matter,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 95, Article ID 182301, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. J. Liao and E. V. Shuryak, “What do lattice baryonic susceptibilities tell us about quarks, diquarks, and baryons at ,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 73, Article ID 014509, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Nahrgang, C. Herold, and M. Bleicher, “Influence of an inhomogeneous and expanding medium on signals of the QCD phase transition,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 904-905, pp. 899c–902c, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Steinheimer and J. Randrup, “Spinodal Amplification of Density Fluctuations in Fluid-Dynamical Simulations of Relativistic Nuclear Collisions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, Article ID 212301, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. V. V. Skokov and D. N. Voskresensky, “Hydrodynamical description of first-order phase transitions: Analytical treatment and numerical modeling,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 828, no. 3-4, pp. 401–438, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. V. V. Skokov and D. N. Voskresensky, “Hydrodynamical description of a hadron-quark first-order phase transition,” JETP Letters, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 223–227, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Randrup, “Phase transition dynamics for baryon-dense matter,” Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, vol. 79, Article ID 054911, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. T. Ludlam and S. Aronson, “BRAHMS and STAR and PHOBOS and PHENIX collaborations,” Tech. Rep. BNL-73847-2005, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  13. K. Adcox, S. S. Adler, S. Afanasiev et al., “Formation of dense partonic matter in relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions at RHIC: experimental evaluation by the PHENIX collaboration,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 757, no. 1-2, pp. 184–283, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. J. Adams, M. M. Aggarwala, Z. Ahammed et al., “Experimental and theoretical challenges in the search for the quark–gluon plasma: the STAR Collaboration’s critical assessment of the evidence from RHIC collisions,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 757, no. 1-2, pp. 102–183, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. I. Arsene, I. G. Bearden, D. Beavis et al., “Quark-gluon plasma and color glass condensate at RHIC? The perspective from the BRAHMS experiment,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 757, no. 1-2, pp. 1–27, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. C. Jena, in Proceedings of the DAE Symposium on Nuclear Physics, vol. 56, pp. 1180-1181, 2011.
  17. A. Jipa, O. Ristea, C. Ristea et al., “New information on the dynamics of relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 381, Article ID 012042, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. P. Steinberg, “What have we learned about the quark–gluon plasma with the ATLAS detector at the LHC?” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 932, pp. 9–16, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. J. Velkovska, “What have hard probes taught us about the quark–gluon plasma as measured in CMS?” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 932, pp. 17–24, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. I. Arsene, “BRAHMS collaboration results for relativistic heavy ion collisions,” Physics of Particles and Nuclei, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1082–1086, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. M. Przybycien, “Recent results on soft probes of the Quark-Gluon Plasma from the ATLAS experiment at the LHC,” Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings, vol. 273–275, pp. 1539–1545, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. J. Adam, D. Adamová, M. M. Aggarwal et al., “Production of light nuclei and anti-nuclei in pp and Pb-Pb collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider,” Physical Review C, vol. 93, Article ID 024917, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. M. Chojnacki, “Soft probes of the Quark-Gluon Plasma measured by ALICE,” Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings, vol. 273–275, pp. 1553–1558, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. CMS Collaboration, “Pseudorapidity distributions of charged hadrons in proton-lead collisions at and 8.16 TeV,” Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-HIN-16-021, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  25. B. Wosiek, “Measurements of hard probes of the quark-gluon plasma with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC,” Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings, vol. 273–275, pp. 1546–1552, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. A. M. Sirunyan, W. Adam, F. Ambrogi, E. Asilar et al., “Pseudorapidity distributions of charged hadrons in proton-lead collisions at and 8.16 TeV,” 2017, https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.09355.
  27. A. Barbano, “Heavy flavours as a probe for the Quark-Gluon Plasma with ALICE at the LHC,” IL NUOVO CIMENTO C, vol. 40, no. 1, p. 27, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. B. Huang, “Overview of Recent Results from the STAR experiment,” Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings, vol. 289–290, pp. 19–24, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. P. F. Kolb, P. Huovinen, U. Heinz, and H. Heiselberg, “Elliptic flow at SPS and RHIC: from kinetic transport to hydrodynamics,” Physics Letters B, vol. 500, no. 3-4, pp. 232–240, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. D. Teaney, J. Lauret, and E. V. Shuryak, “Flow at the SPS and RHIC as a quark-gluon plasma signature,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 86, no. 21, pp. 4783–4786, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. U. W. Heinz and P. F. Kolb, “Early thermalization at RHIC,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 702, no. 1–4, pp. 269–280, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. A. Peshier and W. Cassing, “The hot nonperturbative gluon plasma is an almost ideal colored liquid,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 94, Article ID 172301, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke, “Viscosity information from relativistic nuclear collisions: how perfect is the fluid observed at RHIC?” Physical Review Letters, vol. 99, no. 17, Article ID 172301, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. B. Schenke, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, “Higher flow harmonics from,” Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, vol. 85, Article ID 024901, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. D. Teaney, “Effect of shear viscosity on spectra, elliptic flow, and Hanbury Brown-Twiss radii,” Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, vol. 68, Article ID 034913, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. S. Bondarenko and K. Komoshvili, “Gas–liquid transition in the model of particles interacting at high energy,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 73, article 2624, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. S. Bondarenko and K. Komoshvili, “Transverse transport properties of a charged drop in an electric field,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 24, no. 5, Article ID 1550034, 23 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. S. Bondarenko, K. Komoshvili, and A. Prygarin, “Transport properties of a charged fireball in an external electromagnetic field,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 950, pp. 129–162, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Bondarenko and K. Komoshvili, “Transverse kinetics of a charged drop in an external electric,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1701, Article ID 060007, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. Gyulassy, D. H. Rischke, and B. Zhang, “Hot spots and turbulent initial conditions of quark-gluon plasmas in nuclear collisions,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 613, no. 4, pp. 397–434, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. G. Torrieri, “Quark fluids in heavy ion collisions,” 2009, https://arxiv.org/abs/0911.5479.
  42. M. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, and E. Shuryak, “Event-by-event fluctuations in heavy ion collisions and the QCD critical point,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 60, Article ID 114028, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii, Statistical Physics, Part 1 (Course Theoretical Physics, Volume 5), Pergamon Press, 1980.
  44. M. H. Jeremy, “An Introduction to the dynamics of Van der Waals molecules,” Advances in Molecular Vibrations and Collision Dynamics 1A, vol. 1, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  45. D. Kharzeev, E. Levin, and K. Tuchin, “Multiparticle production and thermalization in high-energy QCD,” Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, vol. 75, Article ID 044903, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. E. K. G. Sarkisyan and A. S. Sakharov, “Relating multihadron production in hadronic and nuclear collisions,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 533–541, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. A. N. Mishra, R. Sahoo, E. K. G. Sarkisyan, and A. S. Sakharov, “Effective-energy budget in multiparticle production in nuclear collisions,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 74, article 3147, 2014, Erratum: [The European Physical Journal C 75, 70 (2015)]. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. E. K. G. Sarkisyan, A. N. Mishra, R. Sahoo, and A. S. Sakharov, “Multihadron production dynamics exploring the energy balance in hadronic and nuclear collisions,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 93, Article ID 079904, 2016, Addendum: [Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology 93, no. 7, 079904 (2016)]. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. E. K. G. Sarkisyan, A. N. Mishra, R. Sahoo, and A. S. Sakharov, “Centrality dependence of midrapidity density from GeV to TeV heavy-ion collisions in the effective-energy universality picture of hadroproduction,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 94, Article ID 011501(R), 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus