Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2017, Article ID 8185690, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8185690
Research Article

Bulk Local Operators, Conformal Descendants, and Radial Quantization

1Institute of Modern Physics, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, China
2Shaanxi Key Laboratory for Theoretical Physics Frontiers, Xi’an 710069, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Zhao-Long Wang; moc.liamg@4gnawlz

Received 5 July 2017; Accepted 13 August 2017; Published 2 October 2017

Academic Editor: Zhang-Yu Nie

Copyright © 2017 Zhao-Long Wang and Yi Yan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. J. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1113–1133, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  2. J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 231–252, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory,” Physics Letters. B. Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, vol. 428, no. 1-2, pp. 105–114, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  4. E. Witten, “Anti de Sitter space and holography,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 253–291, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. T. Banks, L. J. Dixon, D. Friedan, and E. Martinec, “Phenomenology and conformal field theory or can string theory predict the weak mixing angle?” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 299, no. 3, pp. 613–626, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. V. Balasubramanian, S. B. Giddings, and A. Lawrence, “What do CFTs tell us about Anti-de Sitter space-times?” The Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 9903, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. I. Bena, “On the construction of local fields in the bulk of AdS(5) and other spaces,” Physical Review. D. Third Series, vol. 62, Article ID 066007, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  8. A. Hamilton, D. Kabat, G. Lifschytz, and D. A. Lowe, “Holographic representation of local bulk operators,” Physical Review. D. Third Series, vol. 74, Article ID 066009, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  9. A. Hamilton, D. Kabat, G. Lifschytz, and D. A. Lowe, “Local bulk operators in AdS/CFT: A Holographic description of the black hole interior,” Physical Review D. Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, vol. 75, Article ID 106001, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. A. Hamilton, D. Kabat, G. Lifschytz, and D. A. Lowe, “Publisher’s Note: Local bulk operators in AdS/CFT correspondence: A holographic description of the black hole interior,” Physical Review D. Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, vol. 75, Article ID 129902, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  11. L. Susskind and E. Witten, “The Holographic bound in anti-de Sitter space,” High Energy Physics, Article ID 9805114, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  12. I. Heemskerk and J. Polchinski, “Holographic and Wilsonian renormalization groups,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1106, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  13. D. Sarkar, “(A)dS holography with a cutoff,” Physical Review D, vol. 90, no. 8, Article ID 086005, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. V. Balasubramanian, P. Kraus, and A. Lawrence, “Bulk versus boundary dynamics in anti-de Sitter spacetime,” Physical Review. D. Third Series, vol. 59, no. 4, 046003, 16 pages, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. D. Z. Freedman, S. D. Mathur, A. Matusis, and L. Rastelli, “Correlation functions in the CFT(d) / AdS(d+1) correspondence,” Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 546, no. 1-2, pp. 96–118, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. D. Pappadopulo, S. Rychkov, J. Espin, and R. Rattazzi, “Operator product expansion convergence in conformal field theory,” Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 86, no. 10, Article ID 105043, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Rychkov, “EPFL Lectures on Conformal Field Theory in D ≥ 3 Dimensions,” High Energy Physics, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. D. Kabat, G. Lifschytz, and D. A. Lowe, “Constructing local bulk observables in interacting AdS/CFT,” Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 83, no. 10, Article ID 106009, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Z.-L. Wang, “Talk preseneted on KIAS-YITP Joint Workshop 2015: geometry in gauge theories and string theory”. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Infinite conformal symmetry in two-dimensional quantum field theory,” Nuclear Physics. B. Theoretical, Phenomenological, and Experimental High Energy Physics. Quantum Field Theory and Statistical Systems, vol. 241, no. 2, pp. 333–380, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. E. S. Fradkin and M. Y. Palchik, Conformal Quantum Field Theory in D-dimensions, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.
  22. E. S. Fradkin and M. Y. Palchik, “New developments in D-dimensional conformal quantum field theory,” Physics Reports. A Review Section of Physics Letters, vol. 300, no. 1-2, 111 pages, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  23. A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully, “Black holes: Complementarity or firewalls?” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2013, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. L. Braunstein, S. Pirandola, and K. Zyczkowski, “Better late than never: Information retrieval from black holes,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 110, no. 10, Article ID 101301, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Y. Nakayama and H. Ooguri, “Bulk locality and boundary creating operators,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, no. 10, 4 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Miyaji, T. Numasawa, N. Shiba, T. Takayanagi, and K. Watanabe, “cMERA as Surface/State Correspondence in AdS/CFT,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 115, Article ID 171602, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  27. V. Balasubramanian, P. Kraus, A. Lawrence, and S. P. Trivedi, “Holographic probes of anti-de Sitter spacetimes,” Physical Review. D. Third Series, vol. 59, no. 10, Article ID 104021, 14 pages, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. K. Skenderis and B. C. van Rees, “Real-time gauge/gravity duality: prescription, renormalization and examples,” Journal of High Energy Physics. A SISSA Journal, vol. 0905, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  29. D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, “Minkowski space correlators in AdS / CFT correspondence: Recipe and applications,” Journal of High Energy Physics. A SISSA Journal, vol. 0209, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  30. D. Marolf, “States and boundary terms: Subtleties of Lorentzian AdS / CFT,” Journal of High Energy Physics. A SISSA Journal, vol. 0505, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  31. N. Iqbal and H. Liu, “Real-time response in AdS/CFT with application to spinors,” Fortschritte der Physik. Progress of Physics, vol. 57, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet