Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2018, Article ID 4078657, 21 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4078657
Research Article

Neutrino Mass, Coupling Unification, Verifiable Proton Decay, Vacuum Stability, and WIMP Dark Matter in SU(5)

Centre of Excellence in Theoretical and Mathematical Sciences, Siksha ‘O’Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Khandagiri Square, Bhubaneswar 751030, Odisha, India

Correspondence should be addressed to M. K. Parida; ni.ca.aos@adirapanim

Received 5 April 2018; Accepted 24 May 2018; Published 6 August 2018

Academic Editor: Farinaldo Queiroz

Copyright © 2018 Biswonath Sahoo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. P. F. de Salas, D. V. Forero, C. A. Ternes, M. Tortola, and J. W. Valle, “Status of neutrino oscillations 2018: 3σ hint for normal mass ordering and improved CP sensitivity,” Physics Letters. B. Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, vol. 782, pp. 633–640, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  2. T. Schwetz, M. Tórtola, and J. W. Valle, “Global neutrino data and recent reactor fluxes: the status of three-flavour oscillation parameters,” New Journal of Physics , vol. 13, no. 6, p. 063004, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. D. Forero, M. Tortola, and J. Valle, “Neutrino oscillations refitted,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 90, no. 9, Article ID 093006, 10 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. G. L. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, D. Montanino, A. Palazzo, and A. M. Rotunno, “Global analysis of neutrino masses, mixings and phases: entering the era of leptonic CP violation searches,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 86, Article ID 013012, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. J. Bergström, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, and T. Schwetz, “Bayesian global analysis of neutrino oscillation data,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, no. 9, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. F. Zwicky, “Die rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen nebeln,” Helvetica Physica Acta, vol. 6, pp. 110–127, 1933. View at Google Scholar
  7. F. Zwicky, “Republication of: The redshift of extragalactic nebulae,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 41, pp. 207–224, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  8. WMAP Collaboration, D. N. Spergel et al., “Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe(WMAP) three year results: implications for cosmology,” The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, vol. 170, Article ID 0603449, p. 377, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  9. J. Einasto, “"Dark Matter”, Astronomy and Astrophysics 2010,” in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), O. Engvold, R. Stabell, B. Czerny, and J. Lattanzio, Eds., Eolss Publishers, Oxford,UK, 2010, Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO. View at Google Scholar
  10. G. R. Blumenthal, S. M. Faber, J. R. Primack, and M. J. Rees, “Formation of galaxies and large-scale structure with cold dark matter,” Nature, vol. 311, no. 5986, pp. 517–525, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Angle et al., “A search for light dark matter in XENON10 data,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 107, Article ID 051301, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. Angle et al., “Erratum: Search for light dark matter in XENON10 data,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 110, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  13. L. E. Strigari, “Galactic searches for dark matter,” Physics Reports, vol. 531, no. 1, pp. 1–88, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. V. C. Rubin and W. K. Ford, “Rotation of the andromeda nebula from a spectroscopic survey of emission regions,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 159, p. 379, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. D. Clowe, M. Bradač, A. H. Gonzalez et al., “A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 648, no. 2, pp. L109–L113, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. E. Aprile et al., “Dark Matter Results from 225 Live Days of XENON100 Data,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, Article ID 181301, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  17. D. S. Akerib et al., “First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 112, Article ID 091303, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  18. D. S. Akerib et al., “Results from a Search for Dark Matter in the Complete LUX Exposure,” Physical Review Letters B, vol. 118, no. 2, Article ID 021303, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  19. M. Ajello et al., “Fermi-LAT Observations of High Energy γ-ray Emission Toward the Galactic Center,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 819, no. 1, p. 44, 2016, arXiv:1511.02938. View at Google Scholar
  20. M. G. Aartsen, “Evidence for high-energy extraterrestrial neutrinos at the IceCube detector,” Science, vol. 342, no. 6161, Article ID 1242856, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. M. G. Artsen et al., “Observation of High-Energy Astrophysical Neutrinos in Three Years of IceCube Data,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 113, Article ID 101101, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  22. M. G. Artsen et al., “Lowering IceCube’s Energy Threshold for Point Source Searches in the Southern Sky,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 824, no. 2, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  23. IceCube, ANTARES Collaboration, S. Adrian-Martinez et al., “The First Combined Search for Neutrino-Point Sources in the Southern Hemisphere,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 823, no. 1, p. 65, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  24. CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., “Search for dark matter produced in association with heavy-flavor quarks in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s)=13 TeV,” High Energy Physics, 2017, CMS-EXO-16-005, CERN-EP-2017-087. View at Google Scholar
  25. A. M. Sirunyan et al., “Search for associated production of dark matter with a Higgs boson decaying to bb or γγ at s=13 TeV,” in JHEP, vol. 1710, 180 edition, 2017, arXiv:1703.05236. View at Google Scholar
  26. D. N. Spergel et al., “First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Determination of Cosmological Parameters,” The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, vol. 148, p. 175, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  27. WMAP Collaboration, E. Komatsu et al., “Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation,” The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, vol. 192, p. 18, 2011, arXiv:1001.4538. View at Google Scholar
  28. WMAP Collaboration, G. Hindshaw et al., “Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Data Processing, Sky Maps and Basic Results,” The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, vol. 180, p. 225, 2009, arXiv:0803.0732. View at Google Scholar
  29. Planck Collaboration, P. A. Ade et al., “Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameter,” Astron Astrophys, vol. 59, p. pp, 2015, arXiv:1502.01589. View at Google Scholar
  30. J. C. Pati and A. Salam, “Lepton number as the fourth ‘color’,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 275–289, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. C. Pati and A. Salam, “Erratum: Lepton number as the fourth 'color',” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 11, pp. 275–289, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, “Unity of all elementary-particle forces,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 438–441, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. H. Georgi, “The State of the Art—Gauge Theories,” in Particles and Fields, Williamsburg, Virginia (1974), AIP Conf. Proc. 23 (1975) 575.
  34. H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, “Unified interactions of leptons and hadrons,” Annals of Physics, vol. 93, no. 1-2, pp. 193–266, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  35. P. Langacker, “Grand unified theories and proton decay,” Physics Reports, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 185–385, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. Slansky, “Group theory for unified model building,” Physics Reports, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 1–128, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  37. P. Nath and P. Fileviez Perez, “Proton stability in grand unified theories, in strings and in branes,” Physics Reports, vol. 441, no. 5-6, pp. 191–317, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  38. G. Senjanovic, “Neutrino mass: from LHC to grand unification,” La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento, vol. 34, pp. 1–68, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  39. G. Senjanovic and V. Tello, “Origin of Neutrino Mass,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference From the Planck Scale to the Electroweak Scale, p. 141, Ioannina, Greece, May 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. G. Altarelli, “Neutrinos Today: An Introduction,” in Proceedings of the in Proceedings: 49th Recontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactons and Unified Theories, Thuile, Italy, 2014.
  41. A. Y. Smirnov, “Theories of Neutrino Masses and Mixings,” Il Nuovo Cimento C, vol. 37, no. 3, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  42. R. N. Mohapatra, “From old symmetries to new symmetries: Quarks, leptons and B - L,” 50 Years of Quarks, pp. 245–263, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. R. N. Mohapatra, “Neutrino mass as a signal of TeV scale physics,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 908, pp. 423–435, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  44. O. G. Miranda and J. W. Valle, “Neutrino oscillations and the seesaw origin of neutrino mass,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 908, pp. 436–455, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  45. M. K. Parida and B. P. Nayak, “Singlet Fermion Assisted Dominant Seesaw with Lepton Flavor and Number Violations and Leptogenesis,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2017, Article ID 4023493, 24 pages, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. P. Minkowski, “μ→eγ at a rate of one out of 109 muon decays?” Physics Letters B, vol. 67, pp. 421–428, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, Supergravity, P. van Nieuwenhuizen and D. Freedman, Eds., North-Holland, 1979.
  48. S.L. Glashow, in Quarks and Leptons, Cargèse, eds. M. Lévy et al., Plenum, 1980, New-York, p. 707.
  49. T. Yanagida, in Proceedings of the Workshop on the Unified Theory and the Baryon Number in the Universe, O. Sawada and A. Sugamoto, Eds., p. 95, Tsukuba, 1979, KEK Report No. 79-18.
  50. R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, “Neutrino mass and spontaneous parity nonconservation,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 44, p. 912, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, “Neutrino masses in SU(2) ⊗ U(1) theories,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 22, p. 2227, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, “Neutrino decay and spontaneous violation of lepton number,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 25, p. 774, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. T. Cheng and L.-F. Li, “Neutrino masses, mixings, and oscillations in SU(2) U(1) models of electroweak interactions,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 2860–2868, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. M. Magg, C. Wetterich, and B. Phys. Lett, “Neutrino mass problem and gauge hierarchy,” Physics Letters B, vol. 94, pp. 61–64, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. G. Lazarides, Q. Shafi, and C. Wetterich, “Proton lifetime and fermion masses in an SO(10) model,” Nuclear Physics Section B, vol. 181, no. 2, pp. 287–300, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović, “Neutrino masses and mixings in gauge models with spontaneous parity violation,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 23, article 165, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. E. Ma and U. Sarkar, “Neutrino masses and leptogenesis with heavy higgs triplets,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, no. 26, article 5716, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. R. Foot, H. Lew, X. G. He, and G. C. Joshi, “See-saw neutrino masses induced by a triplet of leptons,” Zeitschrift für Physik C: Particles and Fields, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 441–444, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. E. Ma, “Pathways to naturally small neutrino masses,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 81, p. 1171, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. B. Bajc and G. Senjanovic, “Seesaw at LHC,” Journal of High Energy Physics. A SISSA Journal, vol. 0708, no. 014, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  61. A. Arhrib, B. Bajc, D. K. Ghosh et al., “Collider signatures for the heavy lepton triplet in the type,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 82, no. 5, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. B. Bajc, M. Nemevsek, and G. Senjanovic, “Probing seesaw at LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, Article ID 055011, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  63. E. Akhmedova, M. Lindnerb, E. Schnapkab, and J. Vallec, “Left-right symmetry breaking in NJL approach,” Physics Letters B, vol. 368, no. 4, pp. 270–280, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. M. Malinsky, J. Romao, and J. Valle, “Supersymmetric SO(10) seesaw mechanism with low scale,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 95, Article ID 161801, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. R. N. Mohapatra and J. W. F. Valle, “Neutrino mass and baryon-number nonconservation in superstring models,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1642–1645, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. R. N. Mohapatra, “Mechanism for understanding small neutrino mass in superstring theories,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 561–563, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. C. H. Albright, “Search for a solution of the superstring neutrino mass problem without a high intermediate energy scale,” Physics Letters B, vol. 178, no. 2-3, pp. 219–225, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. E. Witten, “New issues in manifolds of SU(3) holonomy,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 268, no. 1, pp. 79–112, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  69. S. Nandi and U. Sarkar, “Solution to the neutrino-mass problem in superstring E6 theory,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 564–567, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. E. Ma, “Lepton-number nonconservation in E6 superstring models,” Physics Letters B, vol. 191, no. 3, pp. 287–289, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. D. Wyler and L. Wolfenstein, “Massless neutrinos in left-hand symmetric models,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 205–214, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. J. Bernabeu, A. Santamaria, and J. Vidal, “Lepton flavour non-conservation at high energies in a superstring inspired standard model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 187, pp. 303–308, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. J. W. F. Valle, “Gauge theories and physics of neutrino mass,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, pp. 91–171, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  74. M. K. Parida, R. L. Awasthi, and P. K. Sahu, “Proton decay and new contributions to 0ν2β decay in SO(10) with low-mass boson, observable oscillation, lepton flavor violation, and rare kaon decay,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, article 45, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. R. L. Awasthi and M. K. Parida, “Inverse seesaw mechanism in nonsupersymmetric SO(10), proton lifetime, nonunitarity effects, and a low-mass boson,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 86, no. 9, Article ID 093004, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. M. Reig, D. Restrepo, J. W. F. Valle, and O. Zapata, Bound-state dark matter and Dirac neutrino mass, arXiv:1803.08528.
  77. S. Centelles Chuliá, R. Srivastava, and J. W. Valle, “Seesaw roadmap to neutrino mass and dark matter,” Physics Letters. B. Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, vol. 781, pp. 122–128, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  78. S. Weinberg, Living in the Universe, or Multi Universe, B. J. Carr, Ed., Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  79. S. M. Barr, “New approach to flavor symmetry and an extended naturalness principle,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 82, no. 5, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. D. Chang, R. N. Mohapatra, and M. K. Parida, “Decoupling of parity- and SU(2)R-breaking scales: a new approach to left-right symmetric models,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 52, no. 13, pp. 1072–1075, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. D. Chang, R. N. Mohapatra, and M. K. Parida, “New approach to left-right-symmetry breaking in unified gauge theories,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 30, no. 5, article 1052, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  82. D. Chang, R. N. Mohapatra, J. M. Gipson, R. E. Marshak, and M. K. Parida, “Experimental tests of new SO(10) grand unification,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1718–1732, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. P. Langacker and N. Polonsky, “Uncertainties in coupling constant unification,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 4028–4045, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. E. Ma and D. Suematsu, “Fermion triplet dark matter and radiative neutrino mass,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 583–589, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. D. Meloni, T. Ohlsson, and S. Riad, “Renormalization Group Running of Fermion Observables in an Extended Non-Supersymmetric SO(10) Model,” in JHEP, vol. 3, p. 45, 2017, arXiv:1612.07973. View at Google Scholar
  86. C. Das and M. Parida, “New formulas and predictions for running fermion masses at higher scales in SM, 2HDM, and MSSM,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 121–137, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. M. K. Parida, P. K. Patra, and A. K. Mohanty, “Gravity-induced large grand-unification mass in SU(5) with higher-dimensional operators,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 316–322, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  88. J. Elias-Miró, J. R. Espinosa, G. F. Giudice, H. M. Lee, and A. Strumia, “Stabilization of the electroweak vacuum by a scalar threshold effect,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, article 31, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. O. Lebedev, “On stability of the electroweak vacuum and the Higgs portal,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 72, no. 7, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  90. S. Chigusa, T. Moroi, and Y. Shoji, “Decay rate of electroweak vacuum in the standard model and beyond,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 97, no. 11, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  91. E. Ma, “Efficacious additions to the Standard Model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 625, no. 1-2, pp. 76–78, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  92. I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, A. Greljo, J. Kamenik, and N. Košnik, “Physics of leptoquarks in precision experiments and at particle colliders,” Physics Reports, vol. 641, pp. 1–68, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  93. I. Doršner, “Scalar leptoquark in,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 86, no. 5, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, and I. Mustać, “Light vectorlike fermions in a minimal,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 89, no. 11, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  95. I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, and N. Košnik, “Leptoquark mechanism of neutrino masses within the grand unification framework,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 77, no. 6, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  96. I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, and N. Košnik, “Heavy and light scalar leptoquarks in proton decay,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 86, Article ID 015013, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  97. I. Doršner and P. F. Pérez, “Upper bound on the mass of the type III seesaw triplet in an SU(5) model,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2007, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  98. P. F. Pérez, “Supersymmetric adjoint SU(5),” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 76, no. 7, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  99. W.-Y. Keung and G. Senjanović, “Majorana neutrinos and the production of the right-handed charged gauge boson,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 50, no. 19, pp. 1427–1430, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. S. Weinberg, “Effective gauge theories,” Physics Letters B, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 51–55, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. L. J. Hall, “Grand unification of effective gauge theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 178, no. 1, pp. 75–124, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  102. B. A. Ovrut and H. J. Schnitzer, “Effective field theory in background field gauge,” Physics Letters B, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 139–142, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. M. K. Parida, “Heavy particle effects in grand unified theories with fine-structure constant matching,” Physics Letters B, vol. 196, no. 2, pp. 163–169, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. M. K. Parida and P. K. Patra, “Useful theorem on vanishing threshold contribution to,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 858–861, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  105. M. K. Parida and P. K. Patra, “Theorem on vanishing multiloop radiative corrections to,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 754–756, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  106. M. K. Parida and C. C. Hazra, “Superheavy-Higgs-scalar effects in effective gauge theories from SO(10) grand unification with low-mass right-handed gauge bosons,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 3074–3085, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. M. K. Parida and B. Sahoo, “Planck-scale induced left–right gauge theory at LHC and experimental tests,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 906, pp. 77–104, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  108. B. Sahoo and M. K. Parida, “Low mass right-handed gauge bosons from minimal grand unified theories,” Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings, vol. 273–275, pp. 2642–2644, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. Superkamiokande Collaboration, K. Abe, Y. Haga, Y. Hayato, M. Ikeda, K. Iyogi et al., “Search for Proton Decay via p→e+π0 and p→μ+π0 in 0.31 Megaton Years Exposoure of Water Cherenkov Detector,” Physical Review D, vol. 95, no. 1, Article ID 012004, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  110. M. K. Parida, B. P. Nayak, R. Satpathy, and R. L. Awasthi, “Standard Coupling Unification in SO(10), Hybrid Seesaw Neutrino Mass, Leptogenesis, Dark Matter, and Proton Lifetime Predictions,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1704, no. 75, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  111. Particle Data Group, J. Beringer et al., “Review of Particle Physics (RPP),” Physical Review D, vol. 86, Article ID 010001, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  112. M. L. Kynshi and M. K. Parida, “Higgs scalar in the grand desert with observable proton lifetime in SU(5) and small neutrino masses in SO(10),” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. R4830–R4834, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. K. Olive, K. Agashe, and C. Amsler, “Review of particle physics,” Chinese Physics C, vol. 38, no. 9, Article ID 090001, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  114. K. Olive, “Review of Particle Physics,” Chinese Physics C, vol. 40, no. 10, Article ID 100001, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  115. H. Georgi, H. R. Quinn, and S. Weinberg, “Hierarchy of interactions in unified gauge theories,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 451–454, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. D. R. Jones, “Two-loop,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 581-582, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  117. M. K. Parida, “Radiative Seesaw in SO(10) with Dark Matter,” Physics Letters B, vol. 704, pp. 206–210, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  118. R. N. Mohapatra and M. K. Parida, “Type-II seesaw dominance in nonsupersymmetric and split-supersymmetry SO(10) models and proton lifetime,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 84, no. 9, Article ID 095021, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  119. J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, “Neutrinoless double-β decay in su(2) x u(1) theories,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 25, no. 11, article 2951, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  120. B. P. Nayak and M. K. Parida, “New mechanism for Type-II seesaw dominance in SO(10) with low-mass Z,RH neutrinos, and verifiable LFV, LNV and proton decay,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 75, article no. 183, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. R. N. Mohapatra and M. K. Parida, “Threshold effects on the mass-scale predictions in SO(10) models and solar-neutrino puzzle,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 264–272, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  122. D.-G. Lee, R. N. Mohapatra, M. K. Parida, and M. Rani, “Predictions for the proton lifetime in minimal nonsupersymmetric SO(10) models: an update,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 229–235, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. M. Shiozawa, talk presented at TAUP, Asilomar, CA, U.S.A., 8-13 September, 2013.
  124. J. C. Pati, “Advantages of unity with SU(4)-color: Reflections through neutrino oscillations, baryogenesis and proton decay,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 32, no. 09, p. 1741013, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  125. Superkamiokande Collaboration, H. Nishino et al., “Search for Nucleon Decay into Charged Anti-lepton plus Meson in Super-Kamiokande I and II,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, Article ID 112001, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  126. J. L. Raaf, “Recent Nucleon Decay Results from Super-Kamiokande,” Nuclear Physics B—Proceedings Supplements, vol. 229-232, p. 559, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. K. S. Babu, J. C. Pati, and Z. Tavartkiladze, “Constraining proton lifetime in SO(10) with stabilized doublet-triplet splitting,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, article 84, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  128. B. Bajc, I. Dorsner, and M. Nemevsek, “Minimal SO(10) Splits Supersymmetry,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 811, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  129. A. Buras, J. Ellis, M. Gaillard, and D. Nanopoulos, “Aspects of the grand unification of strong, weak and electromagnetic interactions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 66–92, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  130. Y. Aoki, C. Dawson, J. Noaki, and A. Soni, “Proton decay matrix elements with domain-wall fermions,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 75, no. 1, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  131. Y. Aoki, E. Shintani, and A. Soni, “Proton Decay Matrix Elements on the Lattice,” Physical Review D, vol. 89, no. 1, Article ID 014505, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  132. C. Muñoz, “Enhancement factors for supersymmetric proton decay in SU(5) and SO(10) with superfield techniques,” Physics Letters B, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 55–59, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. G. Bertone and D. Hooper, “A History of Dark Matter,” Reviews of Modern Physics, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  134. R. Catena and P. Ullio, “A novel determination of the local dark matter density,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 1008, no. 004, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  135. B. W. Lee and S. Weinberg, “Cosmological lower bound on heavy-neutrino masses,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 165–168, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. K. Griest and M. Kamionkowski, “Unitarity limits on the mass and radius of dark-matter particles,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 615–618, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. G. Arcadi, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, M. Pierre, and F. S. Queiroz, “GUT models at current and future hadron colliders and implications to dark matter searches,” Physics Letters B, vol. 771, pp. 508–514, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  138. Y. Mambrini, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, “Dark matter and global symmetries,” Physics Letters. B. Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, vol. 760, pp. 807–815, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  139. P. V. Dong, D. T. Huong, F. S. Queiroz, J. W. Valle, and C. A. Vaquera-Araujo, “The dark side of flipped trinification,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 4, p. 143, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  140. J. M. Cline, K. Kainulainen, P. Scott, and C. Weniger, “Update on scalar singlet dark matter,” Physical Review D, vol. 88, Article ID 055025, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  141. J. M. Cline, K. Kainulainen, P. Scott, and C. Weniger, “Erratum: Update on scalar singlet dark matter,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 92, no. 3, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  142. Z. Ahmed et al., “Results from a Low-Energy Analysis of the CDMS II Germanium Data,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 106, Article ID 131302, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  143. R. Agnese et al., “Improved WIMP-search reach of the CDMS II germanium data,” Physical Review D, vol. 92, no. 7, Article ID 072003, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  144. R. Bernabei, P. Belli, F. Cappella et al., “First results from DAMA/LIBRA and the combined results with DAMA/NaI,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 333–355, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  145. R. Bernabei et al., “New results from DAMA/LIBRA,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 67, p. 39, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  146. M. W. Goodman and E. Witten, “Detectability of certain dark-matter candidates,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 3059–3063, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  147. L. Baudis, “Dark matter detection,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 43, no. 4, p. 044001, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  148. M. Schumann, L. Baudis, L. Bütikofer, A. Kish, and M. Selvi, “Dark matter sensitivity of multi-ton liquid xenon detectors,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 1510, no. 10, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  149. I. Garg, S. Goswami, K. Vishnudath, and N. Khan, “Electroweak vacuum stability in presence of singlet scalar dark matter in TeV scale seesaw models,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 96, no. 5, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  150. M. Aguilar et al., “First Result from the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station: Precision Measurement of the Positron Fraction in Primary Cosmic Rays of 0.5350 GeV,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 110, Article ID 141102, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  151. A. Abramowski et al., “Search for Photon-Linelike Signatures from Dark Matter Annihilations with H.E.S.S,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 110, Article ID 041301, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  152. J. Albert et al., “VHE Gamma-Ray Observation of the Crab Nebula and its Pulsar with the MAGIC telescope,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 674, p. 1037, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  153. J. Chang et al., “An excess of cosmic ray electrons at energies of 300-800 GeV,” Nature, vol. 456, p. 362, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  154. P. Athron, C. Balazs, A. Fowlie, and Y. Zhang, “Model-independent analysis of the DAMPE excess,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1802, no. 121, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  155. E. Bulbul, M. Markevitch, A. Foster, R. K. Smith, M. Loewenstein, and S. W. Randall, “Detection of an unidentified emission line in the stacked X-ray spectrum of galaxy clusters,” The Astrophysical Journal , vol. 789, article 13, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  156. A. Boyarsky, O. Ruchayskiy, D. Iakubovskyi, and J. Franse, “Unidentified line in X-ray spectra of the andromeda galaxy and perseus galaxy cluster,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 113, no. 25, Article ID 251301, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  157. T. Bringmann, X. Huang, A. Ibarra, S. Vogl, and C. Weniger, “Fermi LAT search for internal bremsstrahlung signatures from dark matter annihilation,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 1207, p. 054, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  158. C. Weniger, “A tentative gamma-ray line from Dark Matter annihilation at the Fermi Large Area Telescope,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 1208, no. 007, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  159. T. Daylan, D. P. Finkbeiner, D. Hooper et al., “The characterization of the gamma-ray signal from the central Milky Way: A case for annihilating dark matter,” Physics of the Dark Universe, vol. 12, pp. 1–23, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  160. T. Jeltema and S. Profumo, “Discovery of a 3.5 keV line in the Galactic Centre and a critical look at the origin of the line across astronomical targets,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 450, no. 2, pp. 2143–2152, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  161. J. Petrović, P. D. Serpico, and G. Zaharijaš, “Galactic Center gamma-ray "excess" from an active past of the Galactic Centre?” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 1410, no. 10, p. 052, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  162. M. Gonderinger, Y. Li, H. Patel, and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, “Vacuum stability, perturbativity, and scalar singlet dark matter,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1001, no. 53, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  163. C. Chen and Y. Tang, “Vacuum stability, neutrinos, and dark matter,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1204, no. 19, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  164. N. Khan and S. Rakshit, “Study of electroweak vacuum metastability with a singlet scalar dark matter,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 90, no. 11, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  165. P. Athron et al., “Status of the scalar singlet dark matter model,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 77, no. 8, p. 568, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  166. M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and M. Tamburini, “Cosmology and astrophysics of minimal dark matter,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 787, no. 1-2, pp. 152–175, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  167. A. Arhrib, R. Benbrik, M. Chabab et al., “Higgs potential in the type II seesaw model,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 84, no. 9, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  168. N. Haba, H. Ishida, N. Okada, and Y. Yamaguchi, “Vacuum stability and naturalness in type-II seesaw,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 76, no. 6, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  169. D. Chang, R. N. Mohapatra, and M. K. Parida, “New mechanism for baryon generation in SO(10) models with low mass WR-boson,” Physics Letters B, vol. 142, no. 1-2, pp. 55–58, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  170. R. Satpathy, M. Chakraborty, B. Sahoo, M. K. Parida, Work in progress.