Noncommutative Effects on the Fluid Dynamics and Modifications of the Friedmann Equation

Ma, Kai

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6578204

Advances in High Energy Physics

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 | Article ID 6578204 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6578204

Noncommutative Effects on the Fluid Dynamics and Modifications of the Friedmann Equation

Kai Ma¹

Academic Editor: George Siopsis

Received05 Jul 2018

Accepted01 Oct 2018

Published21 Oct 2018

Abstract

We propose a new approach in Lagrangian formalism for studying the fluid dynamics on noncommutative space. Starting with the Poisson bracket for single particle, a map from canonical Lagrangian variables to Eulerian variables is constructed for taking into account the noncommutative effects. The advantage of this approach is that the kinematic and potential energies in the Lagrangian formalism continuously change in the infinite limit to the ones in Eulerian formalism and hence make sure that both the kinematical and potential energies are taken into account correctly. Furthermore, in our approach, the equations of motion of the mass density and current density are naturally expressed into conservative form. Based on this approach, the noncommutative Poisson bracket is introduced, and the noncommutative algebra among Eulerian variables and the noncommutative corrections on the equations of motion are obtained. We find that the noncommutative corrections generally depend on the derivatives of potential under consideration. Furthermore, we find that the noncommutative algebra does modify the usual Friedmann equation, and the noncommutative corrections measure the symmetry properties of the density function under rotation around the direction . This characterization results in vanishing corrections for spherically symmetric mass density distribution and potential.

1. Introduction

It is a general recognition in modern physics that nontrivial geometry of the background spacetime can affect the dynamics of particles living in it. Various nontrivial background spacetime has been proposed, and among them the noncommutative geometry plays a spacial role. Noncommutative spacetime modifies the fundamental commutator algebra in the ordinary quantum mechanics (QM) as with a totally antisymmetric constant tensor having dimension of length-squared, and hence evolution of the quantum system receives corrections. Noncommutative property not only appears in new physics models, for instance, string theory embedded in a background magnetic field [1] and quantum gravity [2–5], but also in real quantum system [6, 7]. Extensive studies have been devoted to investigate its physical consequences, for instance, breaking of rotational symmetry [8–10], distortion of energy levels of the atoms [11–16], contributions to the topological phase effects [17–23], corrections on the spin-orbital interactions [24–29], and speed of relativistic charged particles [30–33].

Most interestingly, it was pointed out that there is a connection between quantum Hall fluids and noncommutative field theory [34–41]. This relation was further investigated in a deeper perspective in various systems; for instance, the noncommutative property can appear naturally in the excitations of the lowest Landau level and becomes dominant when the magnetic field is strong enough [42–45]. In consideration of the correspondence between Poisson bracket and quantum commutator, noncommutative extended dynamics is also interesting even at the classical level [46–49], particularly in the fluid dynamics [50–53].

Two approaches have been proposed to study the noncommutative effects on the fluid dynamics. In the first one, the Eulerian description of the fluid dynamics is employed, and noncommutative corrections are taken into account by directly applying the Groenwald-Moyal -product [1, 8, 44, 51, 52, 54], which is defined asfor two arbitrary infinitely differentiable functions on the ordinary commutative space and . The alternative approach works in the Lagrangian description. The bracket algebra between the canonical Lagrangian variables is extended in noncommutative space, and then a map [55] from the Lagrangian variables to Eulerian variables is applied to obtain the noncommutative corrections in the fluid field theory.

Recently, a full noncommutative extended algebra among the Euler degrees of freedom, i.e., the density and velocity field variables, was proposed and some implications in cosmology physics were also briefly studied [50, 56]. However, because the noncommutative effects of the potential were not properly taken into account in [50], a conclusion of that to first order in noncommutative parameter, the Friedmann equation remains unmodified. In this paper, we propose an alternative approach for the map from the canonical Lagrangian variables to the Eulerian variables. Starting from the single particle picture, the noncommutative effects of the potential are carefully investigated, and the Euler equations are written in the conservative form. We find that the Friedmann equation does receive noncommutative corrections at the leading order of noncommutative parameter , and the noncommutative algebra modifies the cosmology physics in an anisotropy and inhomogeneity way.

The paper is organized as follows: in Section 2, based on the single particle picture, we introduce our map from Lagrangian variables to Eulerian variables and briefly discuss its relation to the approach in [50]; in Section 3, we show how the noncommutative algebra can be taken into account via the approach given in Section 2; particularly we focus on the noncommutative effects of the external potential; in Section 4, the cosmological implications of the noncommutative effects in our approach are discussed along the line in [50]; summary and our conclusions are given in the final section, Section 5.

2. Hamiltonian Framework of Fluid Dynamics

There are two sensible descriptions on the fluid dynamics, Eulerian and Lagrangian descriptions; both are aiming at formulating the equations for mass density, momentum, and energy in a fluid. While Eulerian description investigates the physics encoded in an observable at a fixed spatial position , position is not an independent variable but instead in the Lagrangian description. Both these two approaches have been used to investigate the noncommutative corrections on the ordinary fluid dynamics. However, the later one is more reliable since we can directly use the noncommutative algebra in (1). Nevertheless, the later one does not imply any simplification, because we need a map to transform the Lagrangian variables, position, and velocity, into Eulerian variables, mass density, current, etc. In [50], noncommutative fluid dynamics was investigated by using the map introduced in [55]. However, there were some ambiguities in that approach: the definition of the velocity field involves inverse of an integral of canonical variables, and hence the canonical brackets involving velocity field are hard to define; the Hamiltonian is not defined clearly, and hence the equations of motions look different in form from the ordinary approach. This also results in that the noncommutative effects of the potential were not considered properly in [50], which we have mentioned in the Introduction. In this section, we introduce a new approach for the map and show that how the potential can be taken into account correctly.

In order to employ the Poisson bracket to derive the fluid dynamics and furthermore to incorporate nontrivial bracket algebra, starting from the single particle picture is necessary to find the correct and convenient map from Lagrangian to Eulerian description. Our formalism for this map is based on the dynamics of single particle and always starts from a system with finite number of particles and then derives the relevant expressions and canonical algebras in the limit of infinite number of particles. To start, let us first define the canonical Lagrangian variables, the canonical position variable , and the canonical velocity variable (here we do not use for the velocity since it is one of the equations of motion), for single particle. The basic Poisson brackets among these variables are defined as follows (here and after we will suppress the explicit time dependence) where is the mass of the particle and is used here for normalization. The equations of motion of these variables can be obtained by using above algebra with following Hamiltonian: where is the external potential acting on the particle. According to the Hamiltonian mechanics one has The above equations are just the classical results from Newton’s law for single particle. It is straightforward to extend to the case having finite number of particles (without considering the interactions among these particles). In the limit of infinite number of particles, the algebra become continuous and described as follows: where for a system with total mass and volume and a set of new variables , which are fixed for grading the space of fluid, are introduced to account for the infinity of the system. The corresponding Hamiltonian is The equations of motion can be obtained in the similar way, Up to here, one can already investigate, in terms of the canonical variables and , the physical consequences of any extended algebra. However, in terms of the Eulerian variables, a map is necessary.

In [50], a map introduced in [55] was used; however, the definition of the velocity field involves inverse of an integral of canonical variables, and hence the canonical brackets involving velocity field are hard to define. In this paper, we will directly use the current field, instead of the velocity field, to define the map. Specifically, the mass and current densities are defined in terms of and and given as follows: By integrating over the variable , one can instantly see that above definitions are direct results of a system with finite number of particles, in the infinite limit. A straightforward but somewhat nontrivial computation leads to the Poisson algebra between the Euler variables and , These results are completely the same with those obtained in [50, 55]. To study the dynamics, we need to have the corresponding Hamiltonian. In [50], the kinematical part of the Hamiltonian is defined as . However, by integrating over the variable , one can see that it is not consistent with the infinite limit of the total kinematical energy of a system having finite number of particles. This is also true for the potential energy. Therefore, we will introduce another approach in this section. We introduce following momentum stress tensor: We further define the kinematic energy density as the trace of , i.e.,By integrating over the variable one can see that it is consistent with the total kinematical energy of a system having finite number of particles, For the potential energy density we define By integrating over the variable one obtain which is again consistent with the total kinematical energy of a system having finite number of particles (the constant factor is irrelevant; it appears since we use different normalization from the one in (12)). Therefore, here and after we will use following Hamiltonian for deriving the fluid dynamics in the Euclidian description: As a consequence, the equation of motion of the mass density is given as Furthermore, the equation of motion of the current density is This is the momentum equation of motion in conservative form, and clearly it has completely the same expression form with the ones in Lagrangian description. The first term in the right-hand side represents the change in the th component of momentum due to a mismatch in ‘-momentum’ carried through a cell in each of the three orthogonal directions, and the second term stands for the external force which is for gravity field.

3. Noncommutative Fluid Variables and Brackets

In last section we have introduced a new approach for deriving the dynamical equations of the fluid by using the Poisson bracket. In this section, based on this formalism, we extended the fluid dynamics onto noncommutative space which is represented by the algebra in (1) in noncommutative quantum mechanics. The noncommutative algebra among the canonical Lagrangian variables can be encoded by following extended brackets: where we have used and to denote the canonical Lagrangian variables in a noncommutative space.

Because the variables and are not directly measurable, to define an observable, for instance, the mass density , in terms of the noncommutative canonical variables, we need a representation of these noncommutative variables in terms of the ordinary ones. Such a representation is given as follows: For the Dirac function that frequently appears in the map introduced above, we define its representation as follows: The above definition ensure that the noncommutative correction on the Dirac function is consistent in physics after integrating over the space. For instance, the mass density Here in the second step, the correction disappears because it is a total derivative. This means that the number of particles does not change on the noncommutative space, which is consistent the physical requirements. Furthermore, the evolution equation for observable is defined as follows:

However, there is another approach which can avoid defining the representations of the noncommutative quantities. In this approach, the noncommutative effects are taken into account by using the Groenwald-Moyal -product [1, 8, 44, 51, 52, 54]; see (2). The corresponding noncommutative Poisson algebra is defined as The map introduced in last section is clearly preserved in this approach. The noncommutative properties of the Lagrangian variables are transported to the Euclidian variables via the maps defined in (15) and (16). As a consequences, the algebra between the Eulerian variables can be obtained directly, One can see that the noncommutativity of the space does not affect the commutator between current density variables. We have checked that the above two approaches give completely the same results (up to leading order of the noncommutative parameter ). The evolution of an observable is subjected to the following equation: By using this equation, we can easily obtain the equation of motion of the mass density, Comparing to the results in [50], there is an additional term due to the potential. This additional contribution disappear in [50] because (in their notation) is treated as a -independent function. For the equation of motion of the current density we have Again there is a contribution depending the derivatives of the potential.

4. Cosmological Implications

Several noncommutative extensions of the standard cosmological models have been proposed [57–60]; however, as commented in [50], these models are based on the modified uncertainty relation, and hence difficult to recognize the full physical effects of the noncommutative geometry in cosmology. While a new approach was introduced in [50], it is incomplete as we have explained and more serious investigations are in order. In this section, along the line in [50], based on our formalism we briefly discuss the cosmological implications of the noncommutative fluid dynamics. We will show that we arrive at completely different conclusions from the one in [50].

We will discuss the noncommutative corrections on the Friedmann equation in the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) framework of cosmology. In case of vanishing pressure and zero cosmological constant, the equations of motion of the density and current are where is the scale factor, is the Newton’s constant, and is the Hubble parameter. The Friedmann equation obtained by combining these two equations is where is the constant for initial condition.

Let us study the noncommutative corrections on (47). We will use the variable to denote the comoving coordinates, and as usual, the proper coordinate is defined as the product of the comoving coordinates and the scale factor , i.e., . Then in terms of the comoving velocity, the proper velocity is . However, our formalism is written in terms of current density; therefore we need to derive it from its definition, i.e., (16). A straightforward calculation shows where is the comoving current density. As usual, we assume that the comoving frame is stable, i.e., , and hence the comoving current vanishes. Therefore the proper current density is reduced to following form: Similarly one can obtain the momentum stress tensor in this case, Inserting these results into the right-hand side of the noncommutative corrected equations of motion of density and current (see (43) and (44)), respectively, one has where In the above derivations, we have assumed that the scale factor is spatial-independent. However, we will show that in general the noncommutative geometry introduces spatial-dependent corrections on the Friedmann equation. Therefore, all the results below should be understood in perturbative view of point. In spite of this, (51) and (52) are the master equations describing the noncommutative corrections in case of vanishing comoving current.

To obtain the explicit noncommutative deformations on the Friedmann equation (47), we need to transform the derivatives with respect to proper coordinates into derivatives with respect to comoving coordinates. This can be easily done by using following relations: After replacing the derivatives in (43) and (44), we obtain following results: where Applying the equation of motion of the mass density, i.e., (57), on (59), the equation of motion of the current density, i.e., (58), can be further simplified as follows: We can clearly see that the spatial variations of the potential play crucial role in the noncommutative corrections. Here we discuss the physical consequences of a dust potential restricted into following form: Inserting this potential into the modified equations of motion (see (57) and (63)), respectively, we have where where we have used the notation with the totally antisymmetric tensor. It is clear that if the inhomogeneity and anisotropy of the density are small, the two functions and are variations of under translation and rotation around the direction , respectively. This property is important for observing the noncommutative corrections. For instance, if the potential is spherically symmetric, which implies that the mass density is also spherically symmetric, then due to that its partial derivatives with respect to polar and azimuthal angles vanishes. In order to see the full results, let us assume that is not spherically symmetric for the moment. Then by combining (65) and (66) one has Then the original Friedmann equation receives noncommutative corrections, where , and Note that, comparing to the results in [50], there is an additional term in (71) which is -independent. This part is denoted by in the potential and was dropped. But here, because we can not judge if those contribution is smaller than the noncommutative corrections, therefore we keep all the terms. One can see clearly that the noncommutative space can generally introduce additional anisotropy and inhomogeneity represented by the functions and . These two functions measure nontrivial distributions of the density function in different directions: represents the inhomogeneity of the density distribution; characterizes the anisotropy under rotation around the direction . However, one should note that the nontrivial corrections depend essentially on the original density distribution function , as can be seen in (67) and (68). And for a spherically symmetric mass density there is no noncommutative correction. Nevertheless, in general case, because and measure the inherent inhomogeneity and anisotropy of the density distribution in different directions, respectively, the noncommutative corrections become important and can be clearly distinguished from the original one.

5. Summary and Conclusions

In summary we proposed a refined approach for studying the fluid dynamics on noncommutative space. We start from the single particle picture, and then the map from canonical Lagrangian variables to Eulerian variables is obtained in the infinite limit of a system with finite number of particles. This approach makes sure that both the kinematical and potential energies are taken into account correctly, and the equations of motion of the mass density and current density are naturally expressed into conservative form.

Based on this, we extended the usual Poisson bracket (for single particle) to the case with noncommutative algebra, and in the infinite limit the algebra among Eulerian variables is obtained. Furthermore, we find that the noncommutative corrections on the equations of motion generally depend on the derivatives of potential.

Most interestingly, applying our results for the Friedmann equation, we find that the noncommutative algebra does modify the usual Friedmann equation. This conclusion is completely different from the one in [50]. This is because we treat the potential in different ways, as we have explained in the text. It is worth while to note that that these two different interpretations of the potential can be tested by experimental observations. We briefly studied the influences of these equations on the ordinary Friedmann equation with potential given in (64). We find that noncommutative space can generally introduce additional anisotropy and inhomogeneity represented by the functions and . These two functions measure the symmetry properties of the density function under translation and rotation around the direction , respectively, and hence refers to the inhomogeneity and characterizes the anisotropy. However, as expected, the noncommutative corrections depend essentially on the derivatives of the density distribution function , as can be seen in (67) and (68). Furthermore, for spherically symmetric mass density and potential the noncommutative corrections vanish. This feature is consistent with the conclusion in [61]. Nevertheless, in general case, because and measure the inherent inhomogeneity and anisotropy of the density distribution in different directions, respectively, the noncommutative corrections become important and can be distinguished from the usual distribution.

Data Availability

No data were used to support this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

Kai Ma is supported by the Shaanxi Natural Science Foundation Project under Grant no. 2018JQ1018 and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant no. 11705113 and partially supported by the Shaanxi Natural Science Foundation Project under Grant no. 2017JM1032.

References

N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “String theory and noncommutative geometry,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 9, no. 32, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Freidel and R. Etera, “Effective 3-D quantum gravity and non-commutative quantum field theory,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Quantum Theory and Symmetries and 6th International Workshop on Lie Theory and Its Applications in Physics (QTS-4) (LT-6), Varna, Bulgaria, August 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
J. W. Moffat, “Noncommutative quantum gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 491, pp. 345–352, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Moffat, “Perturbative noncommutative quantum gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 493, no. 1-2, pp. 142–148, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Faizal, “Noncommutative quantum gravity,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 28, no. 10, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
J. Gamboa, M. Loewe, F. Mendez, and J. C. Rojas, “Noncommutative quantum mechanics,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 64, no. 6, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P.-M. Ho and H.-C. Kao, “Noncommutative quantum mechanics from noncommutative quantum field theory,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 88, no. 15, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
M. R. Douglas and N. A. Nekrasov, “Noncommutative field theory,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 977–1029, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
R. J. Szabo, “Quantum field theory on noncommutative spaces,” Physics Reports, vol. 378, pp. 207–299, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Ma, Y. Ren, and Y. Wang, “Probing noncommutativities of phase space by using persistent charged current and its asymmetry,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 97, no. 11, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Chaichian, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and A. Tureanu, “Hydrogen atom spectrum and the lamb shift in noncommutative QED,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 86, no. 13, pp. 2716–2719, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhang, “Testing spatial noncommutativity via rydberg atoms,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 93, no. 4, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P.-M. Zhang and P. A. Horvathy, “Kohn condition and exotic Newton-Hooke symmetry in the non-commutative Landau problem,” Physics Letters B, vol. 706, no. 4-5, pp. 442–446, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
P.-M. Zhang and P. A. Horvathy, “Chiral decomposition in the non-commutative Landau problem,” Annals of Physics, vol. 327, no. 6, pp. 1730–1743, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
K. Ma, “Constrains of charge-to-mass ratios on noncommutative phase space,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2017, Article ID 1945156, 6 pages, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. G. Ramírez and A. Deriglazov, “Relativistic effects due to gravimagnetic moment of a rotating body,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 96, no. 12, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Chaichian, P. Prešnajder, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and A. Tureanu, “Aharonov-Bohm effect in noncommutative spaces,” Physics Letters B, vol. 527, no. 1-2, pp. 149–154, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Chaichian, A. Demichev, P. Prešnajder, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and A. Tureanu, “Quantum theories on noncommutative spaces with nontrivial topology: Aharonov-Bohm and Casimir effects,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 611, no. 1–3, pp. 383–402, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Ma, J.-H. Wang, and H.-X. Yang, “Time-dependent AharonovBohm effect on the noncommutative space,” Physics Letters B, vol. 759, pp. 306–312, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Ma, J. H. Wang, and H. X. Yang, “Probing the noncommutative effects of phase space in the time-dependent Aharonov-Bohm effect,” Annals of Physics, vol. 383, pp. 120–129, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Ma, J. Wang, and H. Yang, “Seiberg–Witten map and quantum phase effects for neutral Dirac particle on noncommutative plane,” Physics Letters B, vol. 756, pp. 221–227, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Rodriguez, “Quantum effects of Aharonov-Bohm type and noncommutative quantum mechanics,” Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 97, no. 1, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
H. Fateme, K. Ma, and H. Hassan, “Motion of a nonrelativistic quantum particle in non-commutative phase space,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 32, no. 10, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Ma and S. Dulat, “Spin Hall effect on a noncommutative space,” Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 84, no. 1, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Basu, D. Chowdhury, and S. Ghosh, “Inertial spin Hall effect in non-commutative space,” Physics Letters A, vol. 377, no. 28-30, pp. 1661–1667, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
A. A. Deriglazov and A. M. Pupasov-Maksimov, “Relativistic corrections to the algebra of position variables and spin-orbital interaction,” Physics Letters B, vol. 761, pp. 207–212, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-H. Wang, K. Ma, and K. Li, “Influences of a topological defect on the spin Hall effect,” Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 87, no. 3, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wang, K. Ma, K. Li, and H. Fan, “Deformations of the spin currents by topological screw dislocation and cosmic dispiration,” Annals of Physics, vol. 362, pp. 327–335, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
Y.-J. Ren and K. Ma, “Influences of the coordinate dependent noncommutative space on charged and spin currents,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 33, no. 16, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
K. Wang, Y.-F. Zhang, Q. Wang, Z.-W. Long, and J. Jing, “Quantum speed limit for a relativistic electron in the noncommutative phase space,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 32, no. 23-24, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
K. Wang, Y.-F. Zhang, Q. Wang, Z.-W. Long, and J. Jing, “Quantum speed limit for relativistic spin-0 and spin-1 bosons on commutative and noncommutative planes,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2017, Article ID 4739596, 9 pages, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
A. A. Deriglazov and W. G. Ramírez, “Mathisson-Papapetrou-Tulczyjew-Dixon equations in ultra-relativistic regime and gravimagnetic moment,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 26, no. 6, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
A. A. Deriglazov and W. G. Ramírez, “Ultrarelativistic spinning particle and a rotating body in external fields,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2016, Article ID 1376016, 27 pages, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Bahcall and L. Susskind, “Fluid dynamics, Chern-Simons theory, and the quantum Hall effect,” International Journal of Modern Physics B, vol. 5, no. 16-17, pp. 2735–2749, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
L. Susskind, “The Quantum Hall fluid and noncommutative Chern-Simons theory,” 2001, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0101029.
View at: Google Scholar
A. El Rhalami, E. M. Sahraoui, and E. H. Saidi, “NC branes and hierarchies in quantum Hall fluids,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 5, no. 4, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
J. L. Barbon and A. Paredes, “Noncommutative field theory and the dynamics of quantum Hall fluids,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 17, no. 25, pp. 3589–3606, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
R. Jackiw, “Lochlainn O'Raifeartaigh, fluids, and noncommuting fields,” in Proceedings of the O'Raifeartaigh Memorial Symposium, Dublin, Ireland, September 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
J. L. Barbon and D. Gerber, “A note on the topological order of noncommutative Hall fluids,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 22, no. 29, pp. 5287–5300, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
K. Ma, J.-H. Wang, H.-X. Yang, and H.-W. Fan, “Hall conductivity in the cosmic defect and dislocation spacetime,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 33, no. 10, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kobakhidze, C. Lagger, and A. Manning, “Constraining noncommutative spacetime from GW150914,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 94, no. 6, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
R. Jackiw, “Physical instances of noncommuting coordinates,” Nuclear Physics B. Proceedings Supplement, vol. 108, pp. 30–36, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
X.-F. Diao, C.-Y. Long, B. Kong, and Z.-W. Long, “The noncommutative landau problem in podolsky's generalized electrodynamics,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 32, no. 4, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Gangopadhyay, A. Saha, and A. Halder, “On the Landau system in noncommutative phase-space,” Physics Letters A, vol. 379, pp. 2956–2961, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Jackiw, S.-Y. Pi, and A. P. Polychronakos, “Noncommuting gauge fields as a Lagrange fluid,” Annals of Physics, vol. 301, no. 2, pp. 157–173, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
S. Pramanik and S. Ghosh, “GUP-based and Snyder noncommutative algebras, relativistic particle models, deformed symmetries and interaction: a unified approach,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 28, no. 27, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
S. Pramanik, S. Ghosh, and P. Pal, “Electrodynamics of a generalized charged particle in doubly special relativity framework,” Annals of Physics, vol. 346, pp. 113–128, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
S. Ghosh, “A lagrangian for doubly special relativity particle and the role of noncommutativity,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 74, no. 8, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
A. A. Deriglazov and W. G. Ramirez, “Lagrangian formulation for Mathisson-Papapetrou-Tulczyjew-Dixon equations,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 92, no. 12, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Das and S. Ghosh, “Noncommutative geometry and fluid dynamics,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 76, no. 11, 2016, Erratum: The European Physical Journal C, vol. 77, no. 2, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Holender, M. A. Santos, M. T. Orlando, and I. V. Vancea, “Noncommutative fluid dynamics in the Kähler parametrization,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 84, no. 10, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Abdalla, L. Holender, M. A. Santos, and I. V. Vancea, “Noncommutative fluid dynamics in the Snyder space-time,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 86, no. 4, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Alavi, “General noncommuting curvilinear coordinates and fluid mechanics,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 2637–2639, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Banerjee, B. Chakraborty, S. Ghosh, P. Mukherjee, and S. Samanta, “Topics in noncommutative geometry inspired physics,” Foundations of Physics, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 1297–1345, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
R. Jackiw, V. P. Nair, and A. P. Polychronakos, “Perfect fluid theory and its extensions,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, vol. 37, no. 42, pp. R327–R432, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
R. Banerjee, S. Ghosh, and A. K. Mitra, “Hamiltonian analysis of interacting fluids,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 75, no. 5, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Marcolli and E. Pierpaoli, “Early universe models from noncommutative geometry,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1373–1432, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
A. H. Chamseddine, A. Connes, and V. Mukhanov, “Quanta of geometry: noncommutative aspects,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 114, no. 9, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
A. H. Chamseddine and A. Connes, “Quantum gravity boundary terms from spectral action,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 99, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
A. H. Chamseddine, A. Connes, and M. Marcolli, “Gravity and the standard model with neutrino mixing,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 991–1089, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
P. Mukherjee and A. Saha, “Note on the noncommutative correction to gravity,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 74, no. 2, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2018 Kai Ma. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP³.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

521

Downloads

566

Citations