Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2018, Article ID 8271280, 10 pages
Research Article

Feasibility Study of the Time Reversal Symmetry Tests in Decay of Metastable Positronium Atoms with the J-PET Detector

1Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, 30-348 Cracow, Poland
2INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, 00044 Frascati, Italy
3Department of Nuclear Methods, Institute of Physics, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, 20-031 Lublin, Poland
4Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
5Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science of Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow, Poland
6Świerk Department of Complex Systems, National Centre for Nuclear Research, 05-400 Otwock-Świerk, Poland
7High Energy Department, National Centre for Nuclear Research, 05-400 Otwock-Świerk, Poland
8Department of Physics, College of Education for Pure Sciences, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq

Correspondence should be addressed to A. Gajos; lp.ude.ju@sojag.rednaskela

Received 20 April 2018; Accepted 29 July 2018; Published 12 December 2018

Academic Editor: Krzysztof Urbanowski

Copyright © 2018 A. Gajos et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.


This article reports on the feasibility of testing of the symmetry under reversal in time in a purely leptonic system constituted by positronium atoms using the J-PET detector. The present state of symmetry tests is discussed with an emphasis on the scarcely explored sector of leptonic systems. Two possible strategies of searching for manifestations of violation in nonvanishing angular correlations of final state observables in the decay of metastable triplet states of positronium available with J-PET are proposed and discussed. Results of a pilot measurement with J-PET and assessment of its performance in reconstruction of three-photon decays are shown along with an analysis of its impact on the sensitivity of the detector for the determination of -violation sensitive observables.

1. Introduction

The concept of symmetry of Nature under discrete transformations has been exposed to numerous experimental tests ever since its introduction by E. Wigner in 1931 [1]. The first evidence of violation of the supposed symmetries under spatial () and charge () parity transformations in the weak interactions has been found already in 1956 and 1958, respectively [2, 3]. However, observation of noninvariance of a physical system under reversal in time required over 50 years more and was finally performed in the system of entangled neutral B mesons in 2012 [4]. Although many experiments proved violation of the combined symmetry, leading to violation expected on the ground of the theorem, experimental evidence for noninvariance under time reversal remains scarce to date.

The Jagiellonian PET (J-PET) experiment aims at performing a test of the symmetry under reversal in time in a purely leptonic system constituted by orthopositronium (o-Ps) with a precision unprecedented in this sector. The increased sensitivity of J-PET with respect to previous discrete symmetry tests with o-Ps→3 is achieved by a large geometrical acceptance and angular resolution of the detector as well as by improved control of the positronium atoms polarization. In this work, we report on the results of feasibility studies for the planned violation searches by determination of angular correlations in the o-Ps→3 decay based on a test run of the J-PET detector.

This article is structured as follows: next section briefly discusses the properties of time and time reversal in quantum systems. Subsequently, Section 3 provides an overview of the present status and available techniques of testing of the symmetry under reversal in time and points out the goals of the J-PET experiment in this field. A brief description of the detector and details of the setup used for a test measurement are given in Section 4. Section 5 discusses possible strategies to test the time reversal symmetry with J-PET. Results of the feasibility studies are presented in Section 6 and their impact on the perspectives for a test with J-PET is discussed in Section 7.

2. Time and Reversal of Physical Systems in Time

Although the advent of special relativity made it common equate time with spatial coordinates, time remains a distinct concept. Its treatment as an external parameter used in classical mechanics still cannot be consistently avoided in today’s quantum theories [5]. As opposed to position and momentum, time lacks a corresponding operator in standard quantum mechanics and thus, countering the intuition, cannot be an observable. Moreover, a careful insight into the time evolution of unstable quantum systems reveals a number of surprising phenomena such as deviations from exponential decay law [6, 7] or emission of electromagnetic radiation at late times [8]. The decay process, inevitably involved in measurements of unstable systems is also a factor restricting possible studies of the symmetry under time reversal [9].

While efforts are taken to define a time operator, observation of violation in the decaying meson systems disproves certain approaches [10]. Alternatively, concepts of time intervals not defined through an external parameter may be considered using tunneling and dwell times [11, 12]. However, also in this case invariance under time reversal is an important factor [13].

It is important to stress that all considerations made herein are only valid if gravitational effects are not considered. In the framework of general relativity with a generic curved spacetime, the concept of inversion of time (as well as the transformation) loses its interpretation specific only to the linear affine structure of spacetime [14].

The peculiar properties of time extend as well to the operation of reversing physical systems in time (the T operator), which results in grave experimental challenges limiting the possibilities of violation measurements. In contrast to the unitary P and C operators, T can be shown to be antiunitary. As a consequence, no conserved quantities may be attributed to the T operation [15] excluding symmetry tests by means of, e.g., testing selection rules.

Feasibility of tests based on a comparison between time evolution of a physical system in two directions, i.e., and , is also limited as most of the processes which could be used involve a decaying state making it impractical to obtain a reverse process with the same conditions in an experiment. The only exception exploited to date is constituted by transitions of neutral mesons between their flavour-definite states and CP eigenstates [16, 17]. A comparison of such reversible transitions in a neutral B meson system with quantum entanglement of pairs produced in a decay of yielded the only direct experimental evidence of violation of the symmetry under reversal in time obtained to date [4]. While a similar concept of violation searches is currently pursued with the neutral kaon system [1719], no direct tests of this symmetry have been proposed outside the systems of neutral mesons.

In the absence of conserved quantities and with the difficulties of comparing mutually reverse time evolution processes in decaying systems, manifestations of violation may still be sought in nonvanishing expectation values of certain operators odd under the T transformation [20]. It follows from the antiunitarity of the T operator that for any operator where the subscript denotes states and operators transformed by the operator of reversal in time. Therefore, an operator odd with respect to the T transformation (i.e., ) must satisfyFor stationary states or in systems where conditions on interaction dynamics such as absence of significant final state interactions are satisfied [21], the mean value of a T-odd and Hermitian operator must therefore vanish in case of invariance:and violation of the symmetry may thus be manifested as a nonzero expectation value of such an operator.

3. Status and Strategies of Symmetry Testing

A number of experiments based on the property of T operator demonstrated in (1)-(3) have been conducted to date. The electric dipole moment of elementary systems, constituting a convenient T-odd operator, has been sought for neutrons and electrons in experiments reaching a precision of and , respectively [22, 23]. However, none of such experiments has observed violation to date despite their excellent sensitivity. In another class of experiments, a T-odd operator is constructed out of final state observables in a decay process, such as the weak decay studied by the KEK-E246 experiment [24] in which the muon polarization transverse to the decay plane () was determined as an observable whose nonzero mean value would manifest violation. However, neither this measurement nor similar studies using decay of polarized nuclei [25] and of free neutrons [26] have observed significant mean values of T-odd final state observables.

Notably, although the property of reversal in time shown in (1)-(3) is not limited to any particular system nor interaction, it has been mostly exploited to test the symmetry in weak interactions. Whereas the latter is the most promising candidate due to well proven violation, evidence for noninvariance may be sought in other physical systems and phenomena using the same scheme of a symmetry test. Systems constituted by purely leptonic matter are an example of a sector where experimental results related to the time reversal symmetry—and to discrete symmetries in general—remain rare. Several measurements of neutrino oscillations are being conducted by the NOA and T2K experiments searching for violation in the and channels [27, 28], which may provide indirect information on the symmetry. Another notable test of discrete symmetries in the leptonic sector is the search for the violation of Lorentz and invariance based on the Standard Model Extension framework [29] and anti-CPT theorem [30] which has also been performed by T2K [31, 32]. Other possible tests of these symmetries with the positronium system include spectroscopy of the 1S-2S transition [33] and measuring the free fall acceleration of positronium [34]. However, the question of the , , and symmetries in the leptonic systems remains open as the aforementioned experiments have not observed a significant signal of a violation.

Few systems exist which allow for discrete symmetry tests in a purely leptonic sector. However, a candidate competitive with respect to neutrino oscillations is constituted by the electromagnetic decay of positronium atoms, exotic bound states of an electron and a positron. With a reduced mass only twice smaller than that of a hydrogen atom, positronium is characterized by a similar energy level structure. At the same time, it is a metastable state with a lifetime strongly dependent on the spin configuration. The singlet state referred to as parapositronium, may only decay into an even number of photons due to charge parity conservation, and has a lifetime (in vacuum) of ns. The triplet state (orthopositronium, o-Ps) is limited to decay into an odd number of photons and lives in vacuum over three orders of magnitude longer than the singlet state (ns) [3537].

Being an eigenstate of the parity operator alike atoms, positronium is also characterized by symmetry under charge conjugation typical for particle-antiparticle systems. Positronium atoms are thus a useful system for discrete symmetry studies. Moreover, they may be copiously produced in laboratory conditions using typical sources of radiation [38], giving positronium-based experiments a technical advantage over those using, e.g., aforementioned neutrino oscillations. However, few results on the discrete symmetries in the positronium system have been reported to date. The most precise measurements studied the angular correlation operators in the decay of orthopositronium states into three photons and determined mean values of final state operators odd under the and conjugations, finding no violation signal at the sensitivity level of [39, 40]. Although the aforementioned studies sought for violation of and , it should be emphasized that the operators used therein were odd under the T operation as well, leading to an implicit probe also for the symmetry under reversal in time.

The results obtained to date, showing no sign of violation, were limited in precision by technical factors such as detector geometrical acceptance and resolution, uncertainty of positronium polarization, and data sample size. In terms of physical restrictions, sensitivity of such discrete symmetry tests with orthopositronium decay is only limited by possible false asymmetries arising from photon-photon final state interactions at the precision level of [41, 42]. The J-PET experiment thus sets its goal to explore the -violating observables at precision beyond the presently established level [43].

4. The J-PET Detector

The J-PET (Jagiellonian Positron Emission Tomograph) is a photon detector constructed entirely with plastic scintillators. Along with constituting the first prototype of plastic scintillator-based cost-effective PET scanner with a large field of view [44, 45], it may be used to detect photons in the sub-MeV range such as products of annihilation of positronium atoms, thus allowing for a range of studies related to discrete symmetries and quantum entanglement [43].

J-PET consists of three concentric cylindrical layers of axially arranged detection modules based on strips of EJ-230 plastic scintillator as shown schematically in Figure 1. Each scintillator strip is 50 cm long with a rectangular cross-section of 7 × 19 mm2. Within a detection module, both ends of a scintillator strip are optically coupled to photomultiplier tubes. Due to low atomic number of the elements constituting plastic scintillators, quanta interact mostly through Compton scattering in the strips, depositing a part of their energy dependent on the scattering angle. The lack of exact photon energy determination in J-PET is compensated by fast decay time of plastic scintillators resulting in high time resolution and allowing for use of radioactive sources with activity as high as 10 MBq. The energy deposited by photons scattered in a scintillator is converted to optical photons which travel to both ends of a strip undergoing multiple internal reflections. Consequently, the position of interaction along a detection module is determined using the difference between effective light propagation times to the two photomultiplier tubes attached to a scintillator strip [46]. In the transverse plane of the detector, interactions are localized up to the position of a single module, resulting in an azimuthal angle resolution of about .

Figure 1: Schematic view of the J-PET detector consisting of 192 plastic scintillator strips arranged in three concentric layers with radii ranging from 42.5 cm to 57.5 cm. The strips are oriented along the Z axis of the detector barrel.

Although the J-PET detection modules do not allow for a direct measurement of total photon energy, recording interactions of all photons from a annihilation allows for an indirect reconstruction of photons’ momenta based on event geometry and 4-momentum conservation [47].

As J-PET is intended for a broad range of studies from medical imaging [48] through quantum entanglement [49, 50] to tests of discrete symmetries [43], its data acquisition is operating in a triggerless mode [51] in order to avoid any bias in the recorded sample of events. Electric signals produced by the photomultipliers are sampled in the time domain at four predefined voltage thresholds allowing for an estimation of the deposited energy using the time over threshold technique [52]. Further reconstruction of photon interactions as well as data preselection and handling is performed with dedicated software [53, 54]. Several extensions of the detector are presently in preparation such as improvements of the J-PET geometrical acceptance by inclusion of additional detector layers [47] as well as enhanced scintillator readout with silicon photomultipliers [55] and new front-end electronics [52].

5. Discrete Symmetry Tests with the J-PET Detector

5.1. Measurements Involving Orthopositronium Spin

The symmetry under reversal in time can be put to test in the o-Ps→3 decay by using the properties of T conjugation demonstrated by (1)-(3). Spin of the decaying orthopositronium atom and momenta of the three photons produced in the decay (ordered according to their descending magnitude, i.e., ) allow for construction of an angular correlation operator odd under reversal in time:which corresponds to an angular correlation between the positronium spin direction and the decay plane as illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Vectors describing the final state of an o-Ps→3 annihilation in the o-Ps frame of reference. denotes orthopositronium spin and are the momentum vectors of the annihilation photons, lying in a single plane. The operator defined in (4) is a measure of angular correlation between the positronium spin and the decay plane normal vector.

Such an approach which requires estimation of the spin direction of decaying positronia was used by both previous discrete symmetry tests conducted with orthopositronium decay [39, 40]. These two experiments, however, adopted different techniques to control the o-Ps spin polarization. In the violation search, positronium atoms were produced in strong external magnetic field resulting in their polarization along a thus imposed direction [39]. A setup required to provide the magnetic field, however, was associated with a limitation of the geometrical acceptance of the detectors used. The second measurement, testing the symmetry using the Gammasphere detector which covered almost a full solid angle, did not therefore rely on external magnetic field. Instead, positronium polarization was evaluated statistically by allowing for o-Ps atoms formation only in a single hemisphere around a point-like positron source, resulting in estimation of the polarization along a fixed quantization axis with an accuracy limited by a geometrical factor of 0.5 [40]. Neither of the previous experiments attempted to reconstruct the position of o-Ps→3 decay, instead limiting the volume of o-Ps creation and assuming the same origin point for all annihilations.

The J-PET experiment attempts to improve on the latter approach which does not require the use of external magnetic field. The statistical knowledge of spin polarization of the positrons forming o-Ps atoms can be significantly increased with a positronium production setup depicted in Figure 3, where polarization is estimated on an event-by-event basis instead of assuming a fixed quantization axis throughout the measurement. A trilateration-based technique of reconstructing the position of o-Ps→3 decay created for J-PET allows for estimation of the direction of positron propagation in a single event with a vector spanned by a point-like source location and the reconstructed orthopositronium annihilation point [56].

Figure 3: Scheme of the positronium production setup devised for positron polarization determination in J-PET experiment. Positrons are produced in a source mounted in the center of a cylindrical vacuum chamber coaxial with the detector. Positronium atoms are formed by the interaction of positrons in a porous medium covering the chamber walls. Determination of an o-Ps→3 annihilation position in the cylinder provides an estimate of positron momentum direction.

The dependence of average spin polarization of positrons (largely preserved during formation of orthopositronium [57]) on the angular accuracy of the polarization axis determination is given by where is the opening angle of a cone representing the uncertainty of polarization axis direction [58]. This uncertainty in J-PET results predominantly from the resolution of determination of the annihilation point as depicted in Figure 4 and amounts to about [56], resulting in a polarization decrease smaller than 2%. By contrast, in the previous measurement with Gammasphere [40] where the polarization axis was fixed, the same geometrical factor accounted for a 50% polarization loss.

Figure 4: Determination of positron polarization axis using its momentum direction (black arrow) estimated using the source position and reconstructed origin of the annihilation of orthopositronium in the chamber wall (dark gray band). The shaded region represents the angular uncertainty of positron flight direction resulting from achievable resolution of the annihilation point.
5.2. Measurements Using Polarization of Photons

The scheme of measurement without external magnetic field for positronium polarization may be further simplified with modified choice of the measured T-odd operator. This novel approach of testing the symmetry may be pursued by J-PET with a spin-independent operator constructed for the o-Ps→3 annihilations if the polarization vector of one of the final state photons is included [43]: where denotes the electric polarization vector of the most energetic quantum and is the momentum of the second most energetic one. Such angular correlation operators involving photon electric polarization have never been studied in the decay of orthopositronium. Geometry of the J-PET detector enables a measurement of thanks to the ability to record secondary interactions of once scattered photons from the o-Ps→3 annihilation as depicted in Figure 5.

Figure 5: Scheme of estimation of polarization vector for a photon produced in o-Ps→3 at J-PET. Photon of momentum is scattered in one of the detection modules and a secondary interaction of the scattering product is recorded in a different scintillator strip. The most probable angle between the polarization vector and the scattering plane spanned by and amounts to .

6. Test Measurement with the J-PET Detector

The setup presented in Figure 3 was constructed and fully commissioned in 2017 [59]. One of the first test measurements was dedicated to evaluation of the feasibility of identification and reconstruction of three-photon events. A    source was mounted inside a cylindrical vacuum chamber of 14 cm radius. The positronium formation-enhancing medium, presently under elaboration, was not included in the measurement. Therefore, the test of event reconstruction was based on direct annihilation of positrons with electrons of the aluminium chamber walls, with a yield smaller by more than an order of magnitude than the rate of o-Ps→3 annihilations expected in the final measurements with a porous medium for positronium production.

The capabilities of J-PET to select events and discriminate background arising from two-photon annihilations as well as from accidental coincidences are based primarily on two factors:(i)a measure of energy deposited by a photon in Compton scattering, provided by the time over threshold (TOT) values determined by the J-PET front-end electronics,(ii)angular dependencies between relative azimuthal angles of recorded interaction points, specific to topology of the event [60].

Distributions of the TOT values, after equalization of responses of each detection module, are presented in Figure 6. Separate study of TOT distributions for quanta observed in groups of 1, 2 and more recorded hits in scintillators within a short time window reveals the different composition of photons from 3 annihilations with respect to those originating from background processes such as deexcitation of the decay products from a Na source (1270 keV) and cosmic radiation. Two Compton edges corresponding to keV and keV photons are clearly discernible in TOT distributions, allowing identifying candidates for interactions of 3 annihilation products by TOT values located below the keV Compton edge as marked with dashed lines in Figure 6.

Figure 6: Distributions of time over threshold (TOT) values, for interactions observed in groups of 1, 2 and more within a coincidence time window of 2.5 ns. In the samples with increasing number of coincident photons, the contribution of quanta from annihilations increases with respect to other processes. Gray lines and arrow denote the region used to identify annihilation photon candidates.

The second event selection criterion is based on the correlations between relative azimuthal angles of photon interactions recorded in the detector in cases of three interactions observed in close time coincidence. The tests performed with Monte Carlo simulations have shown that annihilations into two and three photons can be well separated using such correlations [60]. An exemplary relative distribution of values constructed using these correlations, obtained with the test measurement, is presented in Figure 7(a). For a comparison, the same distribution obtained with a point-like annihilation medium used in another test measurement of J-PET is presented in Figure 7(b).

Figure 7: Relations between the sum and difference of two smallest relative azimuthal angles ( and , respectively) between interaction points in events with three recorded interactions. (a) Distribution obtained in the test measurement with the aluminium chamber presented in Figure 3. For reference, the same spectrum obtained with a point-like annihilation medium located in the detector center [59] is displayed in (b). The vertical band around arises from two-photon annihilations and is broadened in the first case due to extensive dimensions of the annihilation chamber used. annihilation events are expected in the region located at the right side of the band [60].

A sharp vertical band at seen in Figure 7(b) originates from events corresponding to annihilations into two back-to-back photons. Broadening of this band in case of the extensive chamber is a result of the increased discrepancy between relative azimuthal angles of detection module locations used for the calculation and the actual relative angles in events originating in the walls of the cylindrical chamber as depicted schematically in Figure 8.

Figure 8: Explanation of the broadening of the 2 annihilation band present in Figures 7(a) and 7(b) at . Left: when annihilations originate in a small region in the detector center, the calculated relative azimuthal angles of detection modules which registered the photons correspond closely to actual relative angles between photons’ momenta. Right: with annihilations taking place in the walls of an extensive-size annihilation chamber (gray band), the broadening of the band at is caused by a discrepancy between the calculated and actual relative angles. The detector scheme and proportions are not preserved for clarity.

The distributions presented in Figure 7 are in good agreement with the simulation-based expectations [60]. Selection of events with values of significantly larger than allows for identification of three-photon annihilations.

The aforementioned event selection techniques allowed to extract 1164 event candidates from the two-day test measurement with a source activity of about 10 MBq placed in the center of the aluminium cylinder as depicted in Figure 3. Therefore, a quantitative estimation of the achievable resolution of three-photon event origin points and its impact on the positronium polarization control capabilities requires a measurement including a medium enhancing the positronium production.

Resolution of the detector and its field of view was validated with a benchmark analysis of the test data performed using the abundant annihilation events. Figure 9 presents the images of the annihilation chamber obtained using 2 events whose selection and reconstruction was performed with the same techniques as applied to medical imaging tests performed with J-PET [48]. Although a large part of recorded annihilations originate already in the setup holding the source, a considerable fraction of positrons reach the chamber walls. The effective longitudinal field of view of J-PET for 2 events which can be directly extended to annihilations due to similar geometrical constraints spans the range of approximately cm.

Figure 9: Tomographic images of the cylindrical chamber used in the test run of J-PET, obtained using reconstructed annihilation events. (a) Transverse view of the chamber (the central longitudinal region of cm was excluded where the image is dominated by annihilation events originating in the setup of the source.). (b) Longitudinal view of the imaged chamber. In the central region, a strong image of the positron source and its mounting setup is visible.

7. Summary and Perspectives

The J-PET group attempts to perform the first search for signs of violation of the symmetry under reversal in time in the decay of positronium atoms. One of the available techniques is based on evaluation of mean values of final state observables constructed from photons’ momenta and positronium spin in an o-Ps→3 annihilation with a precision enhanced with respect to the previous realization of similar measurements by determination of positronium spin distinctly for each recorded event. Moreover, the J-PET detector enables a novel test by determination of a T-odd observable constructed using the momenta and polarization of photons from annihilation.

The pilot measurement conducted with the J-PET detector demonstrated the possibility of identifying candidates of annihilation photons interactions in the plastic scintillator strips by means of the time over threshold measure of deposited energy and angular dependencies between relative azimuthal angles of interaction points specific to event spatial topology. A preliminary selection of three-photon annihilation events yielded 1164 event candidates from a two-day test measurement with a yield reduced by more than an order of magnitude with respect to the planned experiments with a porous positronium production target and a centrally located 10 MBq source. The annihilation reconstruction resolution and performance of the setup proposed for positron spin determination was validated with a benchmark reconstruction of two-photon annihilations. Results obtained from the test measurement confirm the feasibility of a test of symmetry under reversal in time by measurement of the angular correlation operator defined in (4) without external magnetic field once a positronium production medium is used.

Data Availability

As this article covers a feasibility study of time reversal symmetry tests with the J-PET detector in the view of the future measurements, the data with a physical relevance will only be collected in the future and the presently used data of a test measurement are mostly of technical importance only.


The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors acknowledge technical and administrative support of A. Heczko, M. Kajetanowicz, and W. Migdał. This work was supported by the Polish National Center for Research and Development through Grant INNOTECH-K1/IN1/64/159174/NCBR/12, the Foundation for Polish Science through the MPD and TEAM/2017-4/39 programmes and Grants nos. 2016/21/B/ST2/01222 and 2017/25/N/NZ1/00861, the Ministry for Science and Higher Education through Grants nos. 6673/IA/SP/2016, 7150/E-338/SPUB/2017/1, and 7150/E-338/M/2017, and the EU and MSHE Grant no. POIG.02.03.00-161 00013/09. B. C. Hiesmayr acknowledges support by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF-P26783). C. Curceanu acknowledges a grant from the John Templeton Foundation (ID 58158).


  1. E. P. Wigner, Group theory and its application to the quantum mechanics of atomic spectra, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1959. View at MathSciNet
  2. C. S. Wu, E. Ambler, R. W. Hayward, D. D. Hoppes, and R. P. Hudson, “Experimental test of parity conservation in beta decay,” Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 1413–1415, 1957. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. C. Macq, K. M. Crowe, and R. P. Haddock, “Helicity of the electron and positron in muon decay,” Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 2061–2071, 1958. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. P. Lees, V. Poireau, V. Tisserand et al., “Observation of Time Reversal Violation in the B0 Meson System,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, p. 211801, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  5. J. G. Muga, R. Sala Mayato, and I. L. Egusquiza, Time in Quantum Mechanics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2nd edition, 2008. View at MathSciNet
  6. K. Urbanowski, “Decay law of relativistic particles: quantum theory meets special relativity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 737, pp. 346–351, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. F. Giacosa, “Time evolution of an unstable quantum system,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1831–1836, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. Urbanowski and K. Raczyńska, “Possible emission of cosmic X- and γ-rays by unstable particles at late times,” Physics Letters B, vol. 731, pp. 236–241, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Bernabeu and F. Martinez-Vidal, “Colloquium: Time-reversal violation with quantum-entangled B mesons,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 165–182, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. T. Durt, A. Di Domenico, and B. Hiesmayr, Falsification of a Time Operator Model based on Charge-Conjugation-Parity violation of neutral K-mesons, 2015.
  11. N. G. Kelkar, “Electron tunneling times,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1825–1830, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. N. G. Kelkar, “Quantum Reflection and Dwell Times of Metastable States,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 99, no. 21, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. N. G. Kelkar and M. Nowakowski, “Analysis of averaged multichannel delay times,” Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 78, no. 1, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. L. M. Sokołowski, “Discrete Lorentz symmetries in gravitational fields,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1947–1953, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. G. Sachs, The physics of time reversal, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA, 1987. View at MathSciNet
  16. J. Bernabéu, F. Martínez-Vidal, and P. Villanueva-Pérez, “Time Reversal Violation from the entangled B0-B0 system,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 8, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. J. Bernabeu, A. Di Domenico, and P. Villanueva-Perez, “Direct test of time reversal symmetry in the entangled neutral kaon system at a ϕ-factory,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 868, no. 1, pp. 102–119, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. A. Gajos, “A direct test of T symmetry in the neutral K meson system at KLOE-2,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 631, p. 012018, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. A. Gajos, “Tests of discrete symmetries and quantum coherence with neutral kaons at the KLOE-2 experiment,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1975–1981, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. L. Wolfenstein, “The search for direct evidence for time reversal violation,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 501–511, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. E. Conzett, “Tests of time-reversal invariance in nuclear and particle physics,” Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 1041–1046, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. M. Pendlebury, S. Afach, N. J. Ayres et al., “Revised experimental upper limit on the electric dipole moment of the neutron,” Physical Review D, vol. 92, p. 092003, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  23. J. Baron, W. C. Campbell, and D. DeMille, “Order of magnitude smaller limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron,” Science, vol. 343, no. 6168, pp. 269–272, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. M. Abe, M. Aoki, I. Ara et al., “Search for T-violating transverse muon polarization in the K+→π0μ+ν decay,” Physical Review Letters, vol. D73, p. 072005, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  25. R. Huber, J. Lang, S. Navert et al., “Search for time-reversal violation in the β decay of polarized 8Li nuclei,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 90, no. 20, p. 202301/4, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Kozela, G. Ban, A. Białek et al., “Measurement of the transverse polarization of electrons emitted in free neutron decay,” Physical Review C nuclear physics, vol. 85, no. 4, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Bian, “The NOvA Experiment: Overview and Status,” in Proceedings of the Meeting of the APS Division of Particles and Fields (DPF 2013), Santa Cruz, Calif, USA,
  28. K. Abe, J. Amey, C. Andreopoulos et al., “T2K, Combined Analysis of Neutrino and Antineutrino Oscillations at T2K,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 11, p. 151801, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  29. V. A. Kostelecký, “Formalism for CPT, T, and Lorentz violation in neutral meson oscillations,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 64, no. 7, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. O. W. Greenberg, “CPT violation implies violation of Lorentz invariance,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 89, no. 23, p. 231602/4, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. Abe, J. Amey, C. Andreopoulos et al., “Search for Lorentz and CPT violation using sidereal time dependence of neutrino flavor transitions over a short baseline,” Physical Review D, vol. 95, p. 111101, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  32. V. A. Kostelecký and N. Russell, “Data tables for Lorentz and CPT violation,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 83, p. 11, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. K. Pachucki and S. G. Karshenboim, “Higher-order recoil corrections to energy levels of two-body systems,” Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 2792–2798, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. V. A. Kostelecký and A. J. Vargas, “Lorentz and CPT tests with hydrogen, antihydrogen, and related systems,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 92, no. 5, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. A. H. Al-Ramadhan and D. W. Gidley, “New precision measurement of the decay rate of singlet positronium,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 1632–1635, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. S. Vallery, P. W. Zitzewitz, and D. W. Gidley, “Resolution of the orthopositronium-lifetime puzzle,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 90, no. 20, p. 203402/4, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. O. Jinnouchi, S. Asai, and T. Kobayashi, “Precision measurement of orthopositronium decay rate using SiO2 powder,” Physics Letters B, vol. 572, no. 3-4, pp. 117–126, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. B. Jasińska, M. Gorgol, and M. Wiertel, “Determination of the 3γ fraction from positron annihilation in mesoporous materials for symmetry violation experiment with J-PET scanner,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 47, p. 453, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  39. T. Yamazaki, T. Namba, S. Asai, and T. Kobayashi, “Search for cp violation in positronium decay,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 104, p. 083401, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  40. P. A. Vetter and S. J. Freedman, “Search for cpt-odd decays of positronium,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, no. 26, p. 263401, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. B. K. Arbic, S. Hatamian, M. Skalsey, J. Van House, and W. Zheng, “Angular-correlation test of CPT in polarized positronium,” Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 3189–3194, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. W. Bernreuther, U. Low, J. P. Ma, and O. Nachtmann, “How to Test CP, T and CPT Invariance in the Three Photon Decay of Polarized s Wave Triplet Positronium,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 41, p. 143, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. P. Moskal, D. Alfs, T. Bednarski et al., “Potential of the J-PET detector for studies of discrete symmetries in decays of positronium atom - A purely leptonic system,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 509–535, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. P. Moskal, Strip device and the method for the determination of the place and response time of the gamma quanta and the application of the device for the positron emission thomography, Patent number US2012112079, EP2454612, JP2012533734, 2010.
  45. S. Niedźwiecki, P. Białas, C. Curceanu et al., “J-PET: a new technology for the whole-body PET imaging,” Acta Physica Polonica A, vol. 48, p. 1567, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. P. Moskal, S. Niedźwiecki, T. Bednarski et al., “Test of a single module of the J-PET scanner based on plastic scintillators,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 764, pp. 317–321, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. D. Kamińska, A. Gajos, E. Czerwiński et al., “A feasibility study of ortho-positronium decays measurement with the J-PET scanner based on plastic scintillators,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 76, p. 445, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  48. M. Pawlik-Niedźwiecka, S. Niedźwiecki, D. Alfs et al., “Preliminary Studies of J-PET Detector Spatial Resolution,” Acta Physica Polonica A, vol. 132, no. 5, pp. 1645–1649, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. B. C. Hiesmayr and P. Moskal, “Genuine Multipartite Entanglement in the 3-Photon Decay of Positronium,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, 2017. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. Nowakowski and D. B. Fierro, “Three-photon entanglement from ortho-positronium revisited,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1955–1960, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. G. Korcyl, D. Alfs, T. Bednarski et al., “Sampling FEE and Trigger-less DAQ for the J-PET Scanner,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 47, no. 2, p. 491, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. M. Pałka, P. Strzempek, G. Korcyl et al., “Multichannel FPGA based MVT system for high precision time (20 ps RMS) and charge measurement,” Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 12, no. 08, pp. P08001–P08001, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. W. Krzemień, A. Gajos, A. Gruntowski et al., “Analysis Framework for the J-PET Scanner,” Acta Physica Polonica A, vol. 127, no. 5, pp. 1491–1494, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. W. Krzemień, D. Alfs, P. Białas et al., “Overview of the Software Architecture and Data Flow for the J-PET Tomography Device,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 47, no. 2, p. 561, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. P. Moskal, O. Rundel, D. Alfs et al., “Time resolution of the plastic scintillator strips with matrix photomultiplier readout for J-PET tomograph,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 2025–2047, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. A. Gajos, D. Kamińska, E. Czerwiński et al., “Trilateration-based reconstruction of ortho -positronium decays into three photons with the J-PET detector,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 819, pp. 54–59, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. P. W. Zitzewitz, J. C. Van House, A. Rich, and D. W. Gidley, “Spin Polarization of Low-Energy Positron Beams,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 43, no. 18, pp. 1281–1284, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. P. Coleman, Positron Beams and Their Applications, World Scientific, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. E. Czerwiński, K. Dulski, P. Białas et al., “Commissioning of the J-PET Detector for Studies of Decays of Positronium Atoms,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 48, no. 10, p. 1961, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. P. Kowalski, W. Wiślicki, L. Raczyński et al., “Scatter Fraction of the J-PET Tomography Scanner,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 47, no. 2, p. 549, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar