Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 9291213, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9291213
Research Article

The Quantum Description of BF Model in Superspace

Department of Physics, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India

Correspondence should be addressed to Manoj Kumar Dwivedi; moc.liamg@48ideviwdjonam

Received 29 May 2017; Revised 8 August 2017; Accepted 10 August 2017; Published 10 January 2018

Academic Editor: Elias C. Vagenas

Copyright © 2018 Manoj Kumar Dwivedi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. D. Birmingham, M. Blau, M. Rakowski, and G. Thompson, “Topological field theory,” Physics Reports, vol. 209, no. 4-5, pp. 129–340, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. Lucchesi, O. Piguet, and S. Sorella, “Renormalization and finiteness of topological theories,” Nuclear Physics. B. Theoretical, Phenomenological, and Experimental High Energy Physics. Quantum Field Theory and Statistical Systems, vol. 395, no. 1-2, pp. 325–353, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. V. I. Ogievetsky and I. V. Polubarinov, Yadernaya fizika, vol. 4, no. 68, p. 210.
  4. S. DESER, “Lagrangian Forms of the Dynamical Theory of Currents,” Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 187, no. 5, pp. 1931–1934, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. K. Hayashi, “The A1 and ρ mesons from the violation of local Lorentz invariance,” Physics Letters B, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 497–501, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Kalb and P. Ramond, “Classical direct interstring action,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 2273–2284, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Nambu, “III. Magnetic and electric confinement of quarks,” Physics Reports, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 250–253, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Z. Freedman and P. K. Townsend, “Antisymmetric tensor gauge theories and non-linear σ-models,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 282–296, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  9. E. Witten, “2 + 1 dimensional gravity as an exactly soluble system,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 311, no. 1, pp. 46–78, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  10. E. Guadagnini, M. Maggiore, and S. P. Sorella, “Supersymmetry of the three-dimensional Einstein-Hilbert gravity in the Landau gauge,” Physics Letters B, vol. 247, no. 4, pp. 543–548, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. N. Maggiore and S. P. Sorella, “Perturbation theory for antisymmetric tensor fields in four dimensions,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 929–945, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. G. T. Horowitz, “Exactly soluble diffeomorphism invariant theories,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 417–437, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. G. T. Horowitz and M. Srednicki, “A quantum field theoretic description of linking numbers and their generalization,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 83–94, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. M. Blau and G. Thompson, “Topological gauge theories of antisymmetric tensor fields,” Annals of Physics, vol. 205, no. 1, pp. 130–172, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. M. Blau and G. Thompson, “Do metric independent classical actions lead to topological field theories?” Physics Letters. B. Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, vol. 255, no. 4, pp. 535–542, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. N. Maggiore and S. P. Sorella, “Finiteness of the topological models in the Landau gauge,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 377, no. 1-2, pp. 236–251, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge Systems, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1992. View at MathSciNet
  18. S. Weinberg, The quantum theory of fields, Vol-II: Modern applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1996. View at MathSciNet
  19. I. A. Batalin and G. A. Vilkovisky, “Gauge algebra and quantization,” Physics Letters B, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 27–31, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. I. A. Batalin and G. A. Vilkovisky, “Quantization of gauge theories with linearly dependent generators,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2567–2582, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. J. Zinn-Justin, Renormalization of Gauge Theories, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1975.
  22. S. Upadhyay and P. K. Panigrahi, “Quantum gauge freedom in very special relativity,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 915, pp. 168–183, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Upadhyay, A. Reshetnyak, and B. P. Mandal, “Comments on interactions in the SUSY models,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 76, no. 7, article no. 391, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Upadhyay, M. Oksanen, and R. Bufalo, “BRST Quantization of Unimodular Gravity,” Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 350–365, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. S. Upadhyay, “Super-group field cosmology in Batalin-Vilkovisky formulation,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 4005–4015, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. S. Upadhyay, “N = 1 super-Chern-Simons theory in Batalin-Vilkovisky formulation,” EPL (Europhysics Letters), vol. 104, Article ID 61001, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  27. S. Upadhyay, “Finite field-dependent symmetries in perturbative quantum gravity,” Annals of Physics, vol. 340, pp. 110–118, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  28. S. Upadhyay, “Finite field dependent BRST transformations and its applications to gauge field theories,” 2013, https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.0982.
  29. M. Sharif and Z. Yousaf, “Stability of regular energy density in Palatini f(R) gravity,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 75, p. 58, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. S. Upadhyay and B. P. Mandal, “Generalized {BRST} symmetry for arbitrary spin conformal field theory,” Physics Letters. B. Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, vol. 744, pp. 231–236, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  31. S. Upadhyay and B. P. Mandal, “Field dependent nilpotent symmetry for gauge theories,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 72, no. 7, article 2065, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. S. Upadhyay and B. P. Mandal, “Relating Gribov-Zwanziger and Yang-Mills theories in Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1444, p. 213, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  33. S. Upadhyay and B. P. Mandal, “Generalized {BRST} transformation in Abelian rank-2 antisymmetric tensor field theory,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 25, no. 40, pp. 3347–3362, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  34. S. Upadhyay and D. Das, “ABJM theory in Batalin–Vilkovisky formulation,” Physics Letters B, vol. 733, pp. 63–68, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. S. Upadhyay, M. K. Dwivedi, and B. P. Mandal, “The noncovariant gauges in 3-form theories,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 28, no. 10, Article ID 1350033, 11 pages, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  36. S. Upadhyay and P. A. Ganai, “Finite field-dependent symmetry in the Thirring model,” Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, vol. 1, Article ID 063B04, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  37. C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, “Renormalization of the abelian Higgs-Kibble model,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 42, pp. 127–162, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  38. C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, “Renormalization of gauge theories,” Annals of Physics, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 287–321, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  39. P. Yu. Moshin, S. Upadhyay, and R. A. Castro, “Finite BRST mapping in higher-derivative models,” Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 411–418, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. S. Upadhyay, “Construction of a massive ABJM theory without Higgs superfields,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 117, p. 11001, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. S. Upadhyay, “A mass-deformed {BLG} theory in Gribov-Zwanziger framework,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 31, no. 26, Article ID 1650148, 11 pages, 2016. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  42. S. Upadhyay, “Ward and Nielsen identities for ABJM theory in N = 1 superspace,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 31, Article ID 1650112, 2016. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  43. S. Upadhyay, “Ward identities and gauge flow for M-theory in superspace,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 92, no. 6, Article ID 065027, 7 pages, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  44. L. R. Ribeiro, E. Passos, C. Furtado, and J. R. Nascimento, “Geometric phases modified by a Lorentz-symmetry violation background,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 30, no. 14, Article ID 1550072, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. S. Upadhyay, “Field-dependent symmetries in Friedmann-Robertson-Walker models,” Annals of Physics, vol. 356, pp. 299–305, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  46. S. Upadhyay, “The conformal gauge to the derivative gauge for worldsheet gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 740, pp. 341–344, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  47. S. Upadhyay, “Nilpotent symmetries in supergroup field cosmology,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 30, no. 18, p. 1550072, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. S. Upadhyay, “Generalised {BRST} symmetry and gaugeon formalism for perturbative quantum gravity: novel observation,” Annals of Physics, vol. 344, pp. 290–300, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  49. B. P. Mandal, S. K. Rai, and S. Upadhyay, “Finite nilpotent symmetry in Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism,” EPL (Europhysics Letters), vol. 105, Article ID 21001, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  50. S. Upadhyay, “Gaugeon formalism for perturbative quantum gravity,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 74, no. 2, article 2737, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. S. Upadhyay, “BRST symmetry and Darboux transformations in Abelian 2-form gauge theory,” EPL (Europhysics Letters), vol. 103, Article ID 61002, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  52. S. Upadhyay, “Aspects of finite field-dependent symmetry in SU (2) Cho–Faddeev–Niemi decomposition,” Physics Letters B, vol. 727, pp. 293–297, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. S. Upadhyay and B. Paul, “BRST symmetry for Regge–Teitelboim-based minisuperspacemodels,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 76, article 394, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  54. M. Faizal and S. Upadhyay, “Spontaneous breaking of the BRST symmetry in the ABJM theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 736, pp. 288–292, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. L. Bonora and M. Tonin, “Superfield formulation of extended BRS symmetry,” Physics Letters B, vol. 98, no. 1-2, pp. 48–50, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. J. Alfaro and P. H. Damgaard, “Schwinger-Dyson equations as supersymmetric ward identities,” Physics Letters B, vol. 222, no. 3-4, pp. 425–428, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. J. Alfaro, P. H. Damgaard, J. Latorre, and D. Montano, “On the BRST invariance of field deformations,” Physics Letters B, vol. 233, no. 1-2, pp. 153–157, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. J. Alfaro and P. H. Damgaard, “Origin of antifields in the Batalin-Vilkovisky Lagrangian formalism,” Nuclear Physics. B. Theoretical, Phenomenological, and Experimental High Energy Physics. Quantum Field Theory and Statistical Systems, vol. 404, no. 3, pp. 751–793, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  59. N. R. F. Braga and A. Das, “A superspace formulation of the BV action,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 442, no. 3, pp. 655–668, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. S. Upadhyay, M. B. Shah, and P. A. Ganai, “Lorentz violating p-form gauge theories in superspace,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 77, no. 3, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. S. Upadhyay, “A superspace description of Friedmann–Robertson–Walker models,” Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, vol. 2015, no. 9, Article ID 093B06, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  62. S. Upadhyay and B. P. Mandal, “BV formulation of higher form gauge theories in a superspace,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 72, no. 7, article 2059, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. S. Upadhyay, M. K. Dwivedi, and B. P. Mandal, “A superspace description of Chern-Simons theory in Batalin-Vilkovisky formulation,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 2076–2086, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  64. S. Upadhyay, “Perturbative quantum gravity in Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism,” Physics Letters. B. Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, vol. 723, no. 4-5, pp. 470–474, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  65. P. Brax and J. Martin, “Shift symmetry and inflation in supergravity,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 72, no. 2, Article ID 023518, 24 pages, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  66. A. Hebecker, A. K. Knochel, and T. Weigand, “A shift symmetry in the Higgs sector: experimental hints and stringy realizations,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 6, article 93, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar