Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2019, Article ID 2598953, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2598953
Research Article

Investigating Sterile Neutrino Flux in the Solar Neutrino Data

Department of Physics & Astronomical Science, School of Physical & Material Sciences, Central University of Himachal Pradesh (CUHP), Dharamshala, Kangra (HP) 176215, India

Correspondence should be addressed to B. C. Chauhan; ni.aacui.setaicossa@nahuahc

Received 1 January 2019; Revised 13 March 2019; Accepted 11 April 2019; Published 2 June 2019

Academic Editor: Burak Bilki

Copyright © 2019 Ankush et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Linked References

  1. R. Davis, D. S. Harmer, and K. C. Hoffman, “Search for neutrinos from the sun,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 20, no. 21, pp. 1205–1209, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. B. T. Cleveland, T. Daily, and R. Davis, “Measurement of the solar electron neutrino flux with the Homestake chlorine detector,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 496, no. 1, Article ID 505, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. K. Eguchi, S. Enomoto, and K. Furuno, “First results from KamLAND: evidence for reactor antineutrino disappearance,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 90, Article ID 021802, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. P. Aliani, V. Antonelli, R. Ferrari, M. Picariello, and E. Torrente-Lujan, “Analysis of Neutrino oscillation data with the recent KamLAND results,” https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0406182.
  5. A. B. Balantekin and H. Yuksel, “Constraints on neutrino parameters from neutral-current solar neutrino measurements,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 68, Article ID 033006, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. P. Aliani, V. Antonelli, M. Picariello, and E. Torrente-Lujan, “KamLAND potentiality on the determination of Neutrino mixing parameters in the post SNO-NC era,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 5, no. 2, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, M. A. Tórtola, and J. W. F. Valle, “Status of three-neutrino oscillations after the SNO-salt data,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 68, no. 11, Article ID 113010, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Choubey, S. Goswami, S. Petcov, and D. Roy, “Constraints on neutrino oscillation parameters from the SNO salt phase data,” Physics Letters B, vol. 583, no. 1-2, pp. 134–148, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. P. Aliani, V. Antonelli, M. Picariello, and E. Torrente-Lujan, “Neutrino mass parameters from Kamland, SNO, and other solar evidence,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 69, no. 1, Article ID 013005, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. P. C. de Holanda and Yu. A. Smirnov, “KamLAND data and the solution to the solar neutrino problem,” Astroparticle Physics, vol. 21, pp. 287–301, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. J. N. Bahcall, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, and C. Peña-Garay, “Solar Neutrinos Before and After KamLAND,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 0302, no. 009, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. B. C. Chauhan and J. Pulido, “LMA and sterile neutrinos: a case for resonant spin flavor precession,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2004, no. 06, article 008, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  13. A. Y. Smirnov, “Towards the solution of the solar neutrino problem,” Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements, vol. 235, no. 431, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  14. L. B. Auerbach, J. MacG. Dobbs, A. K. Mann et al., “Features of particle multiplicities and strangeness production in central heavy ion collisions between 1.7A and 158A GeV/c,” Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, vol. 64, Article ID 065501, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. K. Azizi, Y. Sarac, and H. Sundu, “Investigation of the TeX transition via QCD sum rules,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 73, Article ID 2638, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. P. C. de Holanda and A. Yu. Smirnov, “Minimal dynamical inverse seesaw mechanism,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 83, Article ID 113011, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. P. A. Sturrock, D. O. Caldwell, J. D. Scargle, G. Walther, and M. S. Wheatland, “Comment on "Search for periodic modulations of the solar neutrino flux in Super-Kamiokande" by J. Yoo et al,” High Energy Physics - Phenomenology, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  18. P. A. Sturrock, “Analysis of super-kamiokande 5 day measurements of the solar neutrino flux,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 605, pp. 568–572, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  19. D. O. Caldwell and P. A. Sturrock, “Evidence for solar neutrino flux variability and its implications,” Astroparticle Physics, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 543–556, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. P. A. Sturrock and M. A. Weber, “Comparative analysis of solar neutrino data and SXT X-ray data,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 565, Article ID 1366, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. V. Berezinsky, M. Narayan, and F. Vissani, “Mirror model for sterile neutrinos,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 658, no. 1-2, pp. 254–280, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. P. C. de Holanda and A. Y. Smirnov, “State of the art of neutrino physics, a tutorial for graduate students,” Physical Review D, vol. 69, Article ID 113002, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  23. K. Eguchi, S. Enomoto, K. Furuno et al., “Results and future prospects for muon (g – 2),” Physics Letters B, vol. 92, Article ID 071301, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. B. Aharmim, S. N. Ahmed, J. F. Amsbaugh et al., “The SNO+ experiment: status and overview,” Physical Review C, vol. 87, Article ID 015502, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. B. Abharmim et al., “Independent measurement of the total active 8B solar neutrino flux using an Array of 3He proportional counters at the sudbury neutrino observatory,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, Article ID 111301, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. K. Abe, C. Bronner, Y. Haga, Y. Hayato, M. Ikeda, K. Iyogi et al., “Atmospheric neutrino oscillation analysis with external constraints in Super-Kamiokande I-IV,” Physical Review D, vol. 94, Article ID 052010, pp. 345–352, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. M. Agostini, K. Altenmüller, S. Appel et al., “Improved measurement of 8B solar neutrinos with 1.5 kt·y of Borexino exposure,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.00756.
  28. G. Bellini, J. Benziger, S. Bonetti et al., “Precision measurement of the 7Be solar neutrino interaction rate in borexino,” Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 82, Article ID 033006, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. S. Abe, “A note on the q-deformation-theoretic aspect of the generalized entropies in nonextensive physics,” Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, vol. 84, Article ID 035804, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. V. D. Barger, D. Marfatia, and K. Whisnant, “Unknowns after the SNO charged-current measurement,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 509, no. 19, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. V. D. Barger, D. Marfatia, and K. Whisnant, “Unknowns after the SNO charged-current measurement,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 88, no. 1, Article ID 011302, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. V. Barger, D. Marfatia, K. Whisnant, and B. Wood, “Imprint of SNO neutral current data on the solar neutrino problem,” Physics Letters B, vol. 537, no. 3-4, pp. 179–186, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. A. B. Balantekin, V. Barger, D. Marfatia, S. Pakvasa, and H. Yuksel, “Neutrino physics from new SNO and KamLAND data and future prospects,” Physics Letters B, vol. 613, no. 1-2, pp. 61–66, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  34. A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Choubey, S. Goswami, and D. P. Royd, “Implications of the first neutral current data from SNO for solar neutrino oscillation,” Physics Letters B, vol. 540, no. 1-2, pp. 14–19, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  35. S. K. Kang and C. S. Kim, “Nonlinearly realized local scale invariance: gravity and matter,” Physics Letters B, vol. 584, no. 1-2, pp. 98–102, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. B. C. Chauhan and J. Pulido, “Quark-lepton complementarity, neutrino and standard model data predict,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 412, no. 3, Article ID 040, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. S. Dev, S. Kumar, and S. Verma, “Model independent constraints on non-electronic flavors in the solar boron neutrino flux,” Modern Physics Letters, vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 1761–1768, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. L. Singh, C. Bhag, R. Dutt, K. K. Sharma, and S. Dev, “Model independent constraints on solar neutrinos,” https://arxiv.org/pdf/1102.4917.pdf.
  39. V. Barger, D. Marfatia, and K. Whisnant, “Unknowns after the SNO charged-current measurement,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 88, no. 12, Article ID 011302, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. V. Barger, “Unknowns after the SNO charged-current measurement,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 537, Article ID 179, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  41. H. Nishino, K. Awai, Y. Hayato et al., “High-speed charge-to-time converter ASIC for the Super-Kamiokande detector,” Nuclear instruments and methods in physics research section a: accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment, vol. 610, p. 710, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  42. S. Yamada ; K. Awai ; Y. Hayato ; K. Kaneyuki ; Y. Kouzuma ; S. Nakayama ; H. Nishino ; K. Okumura, “Commissioning of the new electronics and online system for the super-kamiokande experiment,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 57, no. 428, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. A. Gando, Y. Gando, H. Hanakago et al., “7Be solar neutrino measurement with KamLAND,” Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, vol. 92, Article ID 055502, p. 055808, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. M. Agostini, K. Altenmuller, S. Appel et al., “First simultaneous precision spectroscopy of pp, 7Be, and pep solar neutrinos with borexino phase-II,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.09279.
  45. N. Vinyoles, A. M. Serenelli, and F. L. Villante, “A new generation of standard solar models,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 835, no. 2, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. E. Komatsu, K. M. Smith, J. Dunkley et al., “Seven-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: cosmological interpretation,” The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, vol. 192, no. 2, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  47. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo, B. C. Brown, L. Bugel et al., “Significant excess of electronlike events in the miniboone short-baseline neutrino experiment,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 121, Article ID 221801, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. P. Adamson, I. Anghel, A. Aurisano et al., “Search for sterile neutrinos in MINOS and MINOS+ using a two-detector fit,” http://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2017/pub/fermilab-pub-17-430-nd.pdf.
  49. G. Sharma, L. Singh, and B. C. Chauhan, “Model independent search for sterile component in the solar neutrino flux,” SESFC Conference Proceedings, vol. 46, 2016. View at Google Scholar