Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in High Energy Physics
Volume 2019, Article ID 8219567, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8219567
Research Article

Particle Transverse Momentum Distributions in p-p Collisions at TeV

1Department of Physics, Islamic University of Science and Technology, Kashmir 192122, India
2Department of Physics, Jamia Millia Islamia (Central University), New Delhi 110025, India
3Research Lab., Govt. Degree College (Boys) Anantnag, J&K, India

Correspondence should be addressed to Inam-ul Bashir; moc.liamg@pehmani

Received 6 February 2019; Accepted 27 March 2019; Published 8 April 2019

Academic Editor: Takao Sakaguchi

Copyright © 2019 Inam-ul Bashir et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Abstract

The midrapidity transverse momentum spectra of hadrons (p, K+, , , , and ) and the available rapidity distributions of the strange hadrons (, , ) produced in p-p collisions at LHC energy = 0.9 TeV have been studied using a Unified Statistical Thermal Freeze-out Model (USTFM). The calculated results are found to be in good agreement with the experimental data. The theoretical fits of the transverse momentum spectra using the model calculations provide the thermal freeze-out conditions in terms of the temperature and collective flow parameters for different hadronic species. The study reveals the presence of a significant collective flow and a well-defined temperature in the system thus indicating the formation of a thermally equilibrated hydrodynamic system in p-p collisions at LHC. Moreover, the fits to the available experimental rapidity distributions data of strange hadrons show the effect of almost complete transparency in p-p collisions at LHC. The model incorporates longitudinal as well as a transverse hydrodynamic flow. The contributions from heavier decay resonances have also been taken into account. We have also imposed the criteria of exact strangeness conservation in the system.

1. Introduction

Within the framework of the statistical hadronization model it is assumed that initially a fireball, i.e., a hot and dense matter of the partons (quarks and gluons), is formed over an extended region after the collision. The quarks and gluons in the fireball may be nearly free (deconfined) due to the ultra-violet freedom, i.e., in a quark gluon plasma (QGP) phase. This fireball undergoes a collective expansion accompanied by further particle production processes through the secondary collisions of quarks and gluons which consequently leads to a decrease in its temperature. Eventually the expansion reaches a point where quarks and gluons start interacting nonperturbatively leading to the confinement of quarks and gluons through the formation of hadrons, i.e., the so called hadronization process. In this hot matter which is in the form of a gas of hadronic resonances at high temperature and density, the hadrons continue to interact thereby producing more hadrons and the bulk matter expands further due to a collective hydrodynamic flow developed in the system. This consequently results in a further drop in the thermal temperature because a certain fraction of the available thermal energy is converted into directed (collective hydrodynamic) flow energy. As the mean free paths for different hadrons, due to expansion increases, the process of decoupling of the hadrons from the rest of the system takes place and the hadron spectra are frozen in time. The hadrons with smaller cross-sections stop interacting with the surrounding matter earlier and hence decouple earlier. Hence a so called sequential thermal/kinetic freeze-out of different hadronic species occurs. Following this, the hadrons freely stream out to the detectors. The freeze-out conditions of a given hadronic specie are thus directly reflected in its transverse momentum and rapidity spectra [1].

Within the framework of the statistical model, the system formed out of a heavy-ion collision is assumed to be in thermal and chemical equilibrium at the final freeze-out stage. The system at freeze-out can be described in terms of a nearly free gas of various hadronic resonances (HRG). The above assumptions are valid with or without the formation of a QGP at the initial stage. It is believed that the produced hadrons also carry information about the collision dynamics and the subsequent space-time evolution of the system. Hence precise measurements of the transverse momentum distributions of identified hadrons along with the rapidity spectra are essential for the understanding of the dynamics and properties of the created matter up to the final freeze-out [2]. The transverse momentum distributions are believed to be encoded with the information about the collective transverse and longitudinal expansions and the thermal temperature at freeze-out.

The particle production in p-p collisions is very important as these can serve as a baseline for understanding the particle production mechanism and extraction of the signals of QGP formation in heavy ion collisions [3]. The value of chemical potential is always lower in p-p collisions than in heavy ion collisions due to the lower stopping power in p-p collisions [4]. At lower energies like SPS and RHIC, the transparency effects are not much prominent and instead nuclear stopping takes place. As one goes to LHC energies, the stopping reduces much further giving rise to nearly zero net baryon density at midrapidity and thus the value of the chemical potential at midrapidity essentially reduces to zero. Thus at LHC, we believe the p-p collisions to be completely transparent.

The p-p collisions at lower energies (SPS and RHIC) were successfully described in the past by using statistical hadronization model [5, 6]. Naively, the p-p collisions are not expected to form QGP or a system with collective hydrodynamic effects. An absence of radial flow in p-p collisions at = 200 GeV and 540 GeV was found in a recent work [7]. However, there have been speculations [811] about the possibility of the formation of such a system but of smaller size in the p-p collisions. The occurrence of the high energy density events in high multiplicity p- collisions [12, 13] at CERN-SPS motivated searches for hadronic deconfinement in these collisions at = 0.54 TeV at SPS [8] and at = 1.8 TeV [9, 10] at the Tevatron, Fermilab. A common radial flow velocity for meson and antibaryon found from the analysis of the transverse momentum data of the Tevatron [9] had been attributed to as an evidence for collectivity due to the formation of QGP. [14]

Keeping in view the above facts, we in our present analysis will address the collective flow effect signatures in the p-p collisions at LHC, particularly in terms of transverse flow parameter while attempting to reproduce the transverse momentum distributions of various hadrons produced in p-p collisions at LHC. We will also address the effect of nuclear transparency by studying the rapidity distributions of the hadrons at LHC. We have employed the earlier proposed Unified Statistical Thermal Freeze-out Model (USTFM) which assumes the system at freeze-out to be in a state of local thermochemical equilibrium. We have incorporated the effects of transverse as well as longitudinal hydrodynamic flow in the produced system. A detailed description of our model is available in the references [2, 1520]. We have employed the strangeness conservation criteria such that the net strangeness in the system is zero.

2. Rapidity Spectra

In Figure 1, we have shown the rapidity distributions of some strange particles like , , and produced in p-p collisions at LHC energy = 0.9 TeV. The available data is taken from the CMS experiment at CERN LHC [21] and is shown by red colored filled shapes in Figure 1. The best fit of the model calculations with the experimental data is obtained by minimizing the distribution of given by [22]where is the measured value of the yield with its statistical uncertainty and is the value from the model calculations. In this analysis, we have taken only the statistical errors into consideration. for fitting the rapidity spectra are minimized with respect to the model variables a, b and whereas the values of T, n and are first obtained by fitting the corresponding distributions. The model parameter defines the chemical potential at midrapidity and the parameter gives the variation of the chemical potential along the rapidity axis in accordance with the equation [1517, 19, 20]Equation (2) is the outcome of the nuclear transparency effect where in is the baryon chemical potential and = cz is the rapidity of the expanding hadronic fluid element along the rapidity axis (z-axis), c being the constant of proportionality. The transverse velocity component of the hadronic fireball, , is assumed to vary with the transverse coordinate in accordance with the Blast Wave model aswhere is an index which determines the profile of and is the hadronic fluid surface transverse expansion velocity and is fixed in the model by using the following parameterization [1517, 19, 20]In the present model, the transverse radius of the fireball formed in the most central collisions is assumed to decrease monotonically along the rapidity axis and is therefore written aswhere the parameter fixes the transverse size of the expanding hadronic matter at the freeze-out and σ represents the width of the matter distribution.

Figure 1: Rapidity distribution of , , and at =0.9 TeV.

The distributions are not affected by the values of a, b and σ instead these parameters have significant effect on the rapidity distribution shapes. The fit parameters obtained from the rapidity distributions of the three experimental data set at = 0.9 TeV are given in Table 1. The uncertainties in the values of model parameters represent the uncertainties due to the fit.

Table 1: Values of a, b, and obtained from fitting the rapidity distributions of , and , respectively, at = 0.9 TeV.

It is evident from Table 1 that the value of the midrapidity baryonic chemical potential ( = ) is very small (almost negligible) in these experiments in the rapidity range of 0 ± 2 units.

At = 0.9 TeV a smaller value of and a larger value of indicates a higher degree of nuclear transparency in these collisions. However, on the overall basis it can be said that these LHC experiments involving p-p collisions give a clear indication of the existence of a nearly baryon free matter owing to a high degree of nuclear transparency effect. Another evidence for this nuclear transparency also comes from [23] where the measured midrapidity antibaryon to baryon ratio is found to be nearly equal to unity at various LHC energies. This fact is also supported by the nearly flat rapidity distributions obtained in Figure 1.

3. Transverse Momentum Spectra

The transverse momentum distributions of various hadrons produced in p-p collisions at = 0.9 TeV are fitted as shown in Figures 26. We have taken the value of the midrapidity chemical potential to be zero in accordance with the findings in Section 2 above. Thus we have plotted the -spectra of particles only because the antiparticles will exhibit the same spectral shapes. We find that the model calculations (shown by black solid curves) agree quite well with the experimental data (shown by red filled circles) taken from the ALICE Collaboration at = 0.9 TeV [24]. The values of the parameters T, n and at freeze-out are obtained through a best fit to a given hadron’s transverse momentum spectrum. These values are then used to fit the rapidity data and determine the values of a, b and from the available rapidity spectra of the hadrons. The flow velocity profile index varies from 1.0 to 1.20 for different cases. The value of c=1fm−1 is fixed for all the hadrons studied in this paper. The available error bars here represent the sum of statistical and systematic uncertainties. In Figure 2, we have shown the transverse momentum spectra of protons at = 0.9 TeV. The model curves cross virtually all data points within the error bars. The values of the freeze-out parameters of the hadrons obtained from their transverse momentum spectra, along with their minimum are shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Freeze-out parameters of various hadrons along with their corresponding , produced at = 0.9TeV.
Figure 2: Transverse momentum spectrum of protons p.
Figure 3: Transverse momentum spectrum of K+.
Figure 4: Transverse momentum spectra of and meson.
Figure 5: Transverse momentum spectrum of lambda .
Figure 6: The spectrum of .

The transverse momentum spectrum for K+ is shown in Figure 3. We observe a good agreement of our model calculations with the experimental data up to = 2.0 GeV. At larger values of , where hard processes are expected to contribute, the model predictions fall below the data for K+.

The transverse momentum spectra of and mesons are shown in Figure 4. We observe a very good agreement between the model calculations and the experimental data points for the case. Also the predicted spectrum of the ϕ mesons agrees well with the experimental data. The meson serves as a very good “thermometer” of the system. This is because its interaction with the hadronic environment is negligible. Moreover, it receives almost no contribution from resonance decays; hence its spectrum directly reflects the thermal and hydrodynamical conditions at freeze-out.

The transverse momentum spectrum of Λ is shown in Figure 5. The model curves are found to cross virtually all data points within the error bars. Also the transverse momentum distributions of is shown in Figure 6.

It is clear that the heavier particles have somewhat more flattened transverse momentum distribution as compared to lighter particles thereby exhibiting a larger apparent temperature. This is developed by their early thermochemical freeze-out in the system. The early decoupling of multistrange hyperons also results due to their lower interaction cross section with the surrounding hadronic matter of the fireball formed out of an ultra-relativistic proton-proton collision. Also it is evident from Table 2 that the heavier particles freeze-out a little earlier than the lighter particles. This phenomenon is called sequential freeze-out. However the little difference between the freeze-out temperatures of the lighter and heavier particles shows that the phenomena of sequential freeze-out is less prominent (or almost absent) in p-p collisions at = 0.9 TeV while as it is found to be more prominent in case of heavy ion collisions [1517]. Also a significant amount of collective flow is observed in these collisions at = 0.9 TeV, which is found to decrease towards heavier (multi-strange) particles. This is understood to be due to their early freeze-out from the system due to which these particles do not get enough time to develop collective effects. Also the value of the index parameter is found to decrease towards the heavier particles.

Further we have compared our theoretical results with the calculations from the PYTHIA event generator [25] using two different tunes indicated by colored curves in Figure 7, for the case of Λ and . It is seen that the PYTHIA curves underestimate the experimental data pattern in the case of Λ and and they fall below the data points especially at high . In the case of PHOJET calculations a similar behavior like PYTHIA is again exhibited. Similar deviations from the experimental data are observed for the case of ϕ meson and + ) [25] (not shown here). In comparison to PYTHIA and PHOJET calculations, our model successfully reproduces the spectra of these particles over the whole range.

Figure 7: Comparison of our model results with PHOJET and PYTHIA D6T (109) calculations.

4. Summary and Conclusion

The transverse momentum spectra of the hadrons (p, K+, , ϕ, Λ and ) and the rapidity distribution of the strange hadrons (, ) at    = 0.9 TeV are fitted quite well by using our Unified Statistical Thermal Freeze-out Model (USTFM). A very small observed value of the midrapidity chemical potential indicates the effects of almost complete nuclear transparency in p-p collisions at LHC. The LHC results show the existence of significant hydrodynamic flow present in the p-p system, which supports our assumption of a thermalized system in these collisions at LHC. The phenomena of sequential freeze-out are found to be almost absent in these collisions. Protons and Kaons are found to freeze-out almost simultaneously. The spectra are also compared with the predictions from PYTHIA and PHOJET event generators and it is found that a better fit is obtained by using our model.

Data Availability

The articles used to support the findings of this study are included within the article and are cited at relevant places within the text as references.

Disclosure

This manuscript has been presented in the 9th International Workshop on Multiple Partonic Interactions at LHC held in Shimla India and in 7th International Conference on Physics and Astrophysics of Quark Gluon Plasma held in VECC Kolkata India.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) for financial assistance. Riyaz Ahmed Bhat is grateful to the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), New Delhi, for providing financial support through the project Young Scientist Award.

References

  1. M. I. Gorenstein, M. S. Tsai, and S. N. Yang, “Freeze-out conditions and pion spectrum in heavy-ion collisions,” Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 1465–1472, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. S. Uddin, J. S. Ahmad, W. Bashir, and R. Ahmad Bhat, “A unified approach towards describing rapidity and transverse momentum distributions in a thermal freeze-out model,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 39, no. 1, Article ID 015012, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. F. Becattini and U. Heinz, “Thermal hadron production in pp and collisions,” Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, vol. 76, p. 269, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  4. J. Cleymans, S. Kabana, I. Kraus et al., “Particle production in p-p and heavy ion collisions at ultrarelativistic energies,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1107.0450.
  5. F. Becattini et al., “A comparative analysis of statistical hadron production,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 66, no. 3-4, pp. 377–386, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  6. I. Kraus, J. Cleymans, H. Oeschler, and K. Redlich, “Particle production in p−p collisions and predictions for √s=14 TeV at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC),” Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, vol. 79, no. 1, Article ID 014901, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. K. Jiang, Y. Zhu, W. Liu et al., “Onset of radial flow in p+p collisions,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.4230v1.
  8. L. Van Hove, “Multiplicity dependence of pt spectrum as a possible signal for a phase transition in hadronic collisions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 118, pp. 138–140, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  9. P. Lévai and B. Müller, “Transverse baryon flow as possible evidence for a quark-gluon-plasma phase,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 1519–1522, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. T. Alexopoulos, E. W. Anderson, A. Bujak, and D. D. Carmony, “Evidence for hadronic deconfinement in collisions at 1.8 TeV,” Physics Letters B, vol. 528, pp. 43–48, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. R. M. Weiner, “Surprises from the search for quark-gluon plasma? when was quark-gluon plasma seen?” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 37–70, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  12. K. Alpgard, R. E. Ansorge, B. Åsman et al., “First results on complete events from pp collisions at the cm energy of 540 GeV,” Physics Letters B, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 310–314, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  13. G. Arnison, A. Astbury, B. Aubert et al., “Some observations on the first events seen at the CERN proton-antiproton collider,” Physics Letters B, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 320–324, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  14. P. Ghosh, S. Muhuri, J. K. Nayak, and R. Varma, “Indication of transverse radial flow in high-multiplicity proton-proton collisions at the Large Hadron Collider,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 41, no. 3, Article ID 035106, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. S. Uddin, I. Bashir, and R. A. Bhat, “Transverse momentum distributions of hadrons produced in Pb-Pb collisions at LHC energy = 2.76 TeV,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, Article ID 154853, 7 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. S. Uddin, I. Bashir, R. A. Bhat, and W. Bashir, “Centrality dependence of thermal freeze-out conditions at LHC in Pb+Pb collisions at = 2.76 TeV,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 30, no. 33, Article ID 1550167, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Uddin, R. A. Bhat, I.-U. Bashir, W. Bashir, and J. S. Ahmad, “Systematic of particle thermal freeze-out in a hadronic fireball at RHIC,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 934, no. 1, pp. 121–132, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. A. Bhat, S. Uddin, and I. Bashir, “Unified thermal freeze-out model and its parameters at RHIC,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 935, pp. 43–51, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. I. Bashir, S. Uddin, R. A. Bhat, and W. Bashir, “Identified charged particle distributions in Au + Au collisions at = 9.2 GeV,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 30, no. 24, Article ID 1550139, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  20. I. Bashir, R. A. Bhat, and S. Uddin, “Transverse momentum distributions of strange hadrons produced in p–p collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 206–211, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  21. V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan, A. Tumasyan et al., “Strange particle production in pp collisions at s√=0.9 and 7 TeV,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 05, p. 064, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  22. A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, and J. Stachel, “Hadron production in central nucleus-nucleus collisions at chemical freeze-out,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 772, no. 3-4, pp. 167–199, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. E. Abbas, B. Abelev, J. Adam et al., “Mid-rapidity anti-baryon to baryon ratios in pp collisions at s√=0.9, 2.76 and 7 TeV measured by ALICE,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 73, p. 2496, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  24. K. Aamodt, N. Abel, U. Abeysekara et al., “Production of pions, kaons and protons in pp collisions at s√=900 GeV with ALICE at the LHC,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 71, p. 1655, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  25. A. Mischke, Identified Charged Hadrons And Strange Particle Production in 900 GeV Proton- Proton Collisions with the ALICE Experiment, 2010.