Advances in High Energy Physics

Advances in High Energy Physics / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 5712084 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5712084

S. C. Ulhoa, E. P. Spaniol, R. Gomes, A. F. Santos, A. E. Santana, "On Regular Black Holes at Finite Temperature", Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2020, Article ID 5712084, 9 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5712084

On Regular Black Holes at Finite Temperature

Academic Editor: Torsten Asselmeyer-Maluga
Received11 Feb 2020
Revised12 May 2020
Accepted19 May 2020
Published10 Jun 2020

Abstract

The Thermo Field Dynamics (TFD) formalism is used to investigate the regular black holes at finite temperature. Using the Teleparalelism Equivalent to General Relativity (TEGR), the gravitational Stefan-Boltzmann law and the gravitational Casimir effect at zero and finite temperature are calculated. In addition, the first law of thermodynamics is considered. Then, the gravitational entropy and the temperature of the event horizon of a class of regular black holes are determined.

1. Introduction

The existence of singularities in the theory of general relativity has been problematic since its inception, especially those linked to black holes. The so-called fundamental singularities do not allow the application of the laws of physics, which are a type of difficult giving rise to some proposals to address the problem. One of them is the well-known cosmic censorship that was proposed by Penrose in the last century [1]. Another more particular proposal came with the solution of regular black holes whose first solution was obtained by Bardeen [2]. It is interesting to note that solutions describing regular black holes have an event horizon and therefore share many features with singular black holes. So, if black holes are real objects, there is a good chance that the regular ones are the objects that will be experimentally perceived. In this way, the theoretical study of such solutions becomes very relevant. Particularly the analysis of the thermodynamics of regular black holes can reveal substantial experimental implications. For this, it is necessary to define how the temperature is introduced and how from it the gravitational entropy is obtained. In addition, other effects can be predicted by means of this termalization, such as the gravitational Stefan-Boltzmann law and Casimir effect. In this sense, we will work with Thermo Field Dynamics (TFD) because it has proved to be a very powerful tool to deal with the termalization of a given field [3, 4]. This approach requires doubling the Fock space which allows both time and temperature to be system variables. This is an advantage over Matsubara’s approach [5]. Thermo Field Dynamics also requires the characterization of the field under analysis by means of the corresponding Green function. Regarding the gravitational field, we will use an alternative description that is known as Teleparalelism Equivalent to General Relativity (TEGR). When the gravitational field is described in this alternative way, some unique predictions are revealed.

Teleparalelism Equivalent to General Relativity is described in terms of tetrads which has many advantages over the metric formulation of gravitation as general relativity, since equivalence occurs only in relation to field equations. Among them, the most notorious is the existence of a gravitational energy that is obtained naturally through the Hamiltonian formulation of the TEGR [6]. Moreover, the propagator of graviton obtained in general relativity does not coincide with that predicted by the TEGR [7]. This opens up scope for the exploration of regular black holes via Thermo Field Dynamics. In this paper, we will use TFD to calculate the Stefan-Boltzmann law and the Casimir effect through the TEGR.

This article is organized as follows. In Section 2, Thermo Field Dynamics is introduced. In Section 3, the ideas of the Teleparallelism Equivalent to General Relativity are briefly recalled. In Section 4, the gravitational Stefan-Boltzmann and entropy are calculated for regular black holes. In addition, we also calculate for the same gravitational system, the Casimir effect, which is given at zero and finite temperature. Finally in the last section, we present our conclusions. In this article, we use the natural unities system, . We denote the Lorentz symmetry by Latin indices, , while diffeomorphisms are denoted by greek indices, .

2. Thermo Field Dynamics (TFD)

TFD is a thermal quantum field theory [3, 815]. This formalism is used when it is desirable to have explicit time dependence in addition to the temperature. TFD is based on two basic ingredients: (i) a doubling of the Hilbert space, , of the original field system, giving rise to , where is the tilde (dual) space. This doubling is defined by the tilde conjugation rules. (ii) The Bogoliubov transformation which introduces thermal effects through a rotation between tilde () and nontilde () operators. These ingredients allow to interpret the statistical average of an arbitrary operator , as the expectation value in a thermal vacuum. The thermal vacuum, , describes the thermal equilibrium of the system, where , is the temperature, and is the Boltzmann constant.

By taking an arbitrary operator and in the Hilbert space and in tilde space , respectively, the Bogoliubov transformation is where for bosons and for fermions. The Bogoliubov transformation, , is defined as with . Here, the parameter is the compactification parameter defined by . The temperature effect is described by the choice and , where with being the Boltzmann constant.

Any field in the TFD formalism can be written in terms of the -parameter. As an example, consider the scalar field. Using the Bogoliubov transformation, the scalar field dependent of -parameter becomes

Then, the propagator for the scalar field in terms of -parameter is written as where and represent the duplicate notation with and is the time ordering operator. Here

It is important to note that the physical quantities are given by the nontilde variables. Using the Bogoliubov transformation in equation (5), the Green function becomes with and being the generalized Bogoliubov transformation [16] which is given as where is the number of compactified dimensions, for fermions (bosons), denotes the set of all combinations with elements, and is the 4-momentum.

3. Teleparalellism Equivalent to General Relativity (TEGR)

General relativity which is the standard approach for gravitation is based on the Riemann geometry in which the field variables are the components of the metric tensor. Such a formulation does not lead to gravitational conserved quantities, partly because of the inclusion of the local Lorentz symmetry and partly due to the difficulty to formally establish a reference frame. Those problems are solved by TEGR which is formulated in terms of the tetrad field in a Weitzenböck manifold. In the 1930 decade, Einstein tried to establish a unified field theory using the concept of distant teleparallelism [17] which led to the formulation of a New General Relativity by Hyashi and Shirafuji [18]. Then a Hamiltonian formulation was successfully established which yielded conserved quantities such as the gravitational energy-momentum tensor and angular momentum [6].

Let us consider a Weitzenböck manifold endowed with the Cartan connection [19] then the associated torsion tensor is

The Cartan connection is curvature free. On the other hand, it is identically related to the Christoffel symbols , which exist in the realm of the Riemannian geometry, by where is the contortion tensor which is defined by with

In order to establish a Lagrangian density for TEGR, we firstly note that the scalar curvature constructed out of the Christoffel symbols is written in terms of the torsion tensor, due to the identity in equation (12), as

Then, getting rid of the total divergency which does not alters the field equations, we have where , is the Lagrangian density of matter fields, and is defined by with . If a derivative with respect to tetrad field is performed in the Lagrangian density, it yields where is the gravitational energy-momentum tensor [20]. The symmetry of leads to

This allows one to define the total energy-momentum vector. It reads which may be written in the following form

It is important to point out that the energy-momentum verctor respects the Lorentz symmetry, and it is invariant under coordinate transformation.

It is possible to use the Lagrangian density of TEGR above to establish a two-point Green function considering the tetrads as the observable fields on space-time. Thus, from and expression (14), the graviton propagator is [7]

Then, the Green function reads

Explicitly, it is with , where and are four vectors. With the weak field approximation, the gravitational energy-momentum tensor becomes

In order to avoid divergences, we adopt the usual procedure to write the energy-momentum tensor at different points in space-time and then taking the proper limit. Hence where . In this sense, it is possible to use the metric of a regular black hole to introduce thermal effects via TFD as explained in the last section. It worths to notice that in the weak field approximation, TEGR becomes a usual field which is very different from the metric formulation that cannot dissociate metric from space-time.

4. Gravitational Casimir Effect and Stefan-Boltzmann Law at Finite Temperature for Regular Black Holes

In this section, the framework of TFD is used to calculate the mean value of gravitational energy-momentum (26) which is obtained in the weak field approximation of TEGR. Thus, we have

If we use the Casimir prescription then where

It is possible to describe a class of regular black holes by the following line element [21] with where is the the mass of the regular black hole; in fact, it coincides with the ADM mass in the limit . The parameter can be seen as a fundamental length of the regular black hole. Such a line element reproduces known solutions for a suitable choice of the parameters and which has to be integers. For instance, the Bardeen solution is achieved for and , while the Hayward solution for . Thus, it should be noted that the metric in equation (31) represents a class of solutions. Such regular black holes arose in order to deal with an open problem in gravitation, the existence of singularities. In fact, the Bardeen solution was the first class of regular black holes which can be understood as a magnetic monopole coupled to the Einstein equation [22]. It is important to point out that although the metric in equation (31) has no singularity at , it does have an event horizon given by the solution of . On the other hand, the stability of such solutions need to be investigated.

4.1. Gravitational Stefan-Boltzmann Law

In order to analyze the gravitational Stefan-Boltzmann law, we have to choose in the TFD formalism. Then, the Bogoliubov transformation is

Hence, we have to use the following Green function: where . Thus, from (29), we can calculate the energy with which is the physical component in the matrix obtained in TFD. It reads

Once the Riemann zeta function is defined by , then the gravitational Stefan-Boltzmann energy is

Here, we have to notice that for the vanishing of the physical parameter of the regular black hole , the energy does not goes to zero. Therefore, we need to regularize such an expression by requiring . That leads to which is the regularized energy.

The first law of thermodynamics states

Then, if we use the regularized energy above, such first-order differential equation has the solution . This is very interesting to note that it is equal to the photon state equation. In terms of the temperature, the pressure is explicitly

In order to calculate the gravitational entropy, we recall the definition , where is the free energy and . Therefore, from , the entropy is which for the Bardeen and Hayward solutions may be represented graphically by Figure 1.

We choose to analyze the dependency with respect to for a constant , instead of the temperature whose dependence is quite simple. Thus, the role of black hole geometry is better understood. It is interesting to note that there is a discontinuity for the point around for the Hayward solution. Such a feature reflects a natural limit for the scale; after all, it is not expected that the geometric structure of the regular black hole coincides with the integration surface itself. The integration hyper-surface is a sphere of radius . Thus, the gravitational entropy exists on an arbitrary portion of space which is a different approach from the usual black hole thermodynamics. Usually, a black hole has a fixed entropy written in terms of its event horizon area. Here, the following principles are assumed: (i) the entropy is a function of macroscopic parameters. If the “no hair” theorems are valid [23], then the entropy is a function of mass, angular momentum, and charge. (ii) The Penrose process leads to an arbitrary manipulation of these parameters provided that the event horizon area remains unchanged. That holds for regular black holes [24]. It implies that the entropy has to be a function of area. It should be noted that the metric of the regular black hole tends to the Schwarzschild metric for a position far from the event horizon. Therefore, the entropy tends to be proportional to the event horizon area; hence, it is reasonable to admit that for a regular black hole, where , with being the solution of

Therefore, the temperature of the event horizon of a class of regular black holes defined by (31) is

Thus, for the Bardeen and Hayward solutions, the horizon temperature assumes the form as that in Figure 2.

It should be noted that the same discontinuity of entropy in Hayward solution also appears in the temperature. This discontinuity can also be interpreted as an improbability of the Hayward solution to be an experimental reality. On the other hand, the marked difference between the solutions for small indicates an immediate choice when an experiment to measure the temperature of the event horizon of a regular black hole can be performed. Such an expression is a unique prediction of TFD applied to TEGR.

4.2. Gravitational Casimir Effect

If the Casimir effect description is desired, then the choice has to be made which leads to the following Bogoliubov transformation

If the Green function is given by then where . Hence, the energy associated to the gravitational Casimir effect for regular black holes is which for the approximation becomes

It should be noted that the vacuum contribution is negative and has a dependency of . In order to take into account only the regular black hole contribution, a regularization procedure is necessary. Thus, subtracting the vacuum energy, we have where is the regularized Casimir energy. It is interesting to note that on the event horizon, it is exactly minus the vacuum energy.

Similarly, the Casimir pressure is

This yields which, after the limit is taken, reads

Again, in order to consider the nonvacuum contribution, a regularized pressure is necessary. Thus, the regularized gravitational Casimir pressure is

It should be noted that both the regularized Casimir energy and pressure are very small due to the weak field approximation. We would like to point out that in this formalism, the vacuum itself has some gravitational features which explain why a regularization is necessary.

4.3. Gravitational Casimir Effect at Finite Temperature

The choice is suitable to describe the Casimir effect at finite temperature. As a consequence, following the TFD prescription, the Bogoliubov transformation is given by where the first term takes into account temperature effects, the second term stands for the Casimir effect only, and the last term the interaction between both. The Green function is then

As before, the gravitational Casimir energy is obtained from expression (29) which reads where . It worths to obtain the regularized Casimir energy at finite temperature which is achieved by subtracting the vacuum energy from ; explicitly, it is where is the regularized expression. Similarly, the gravitational Casimir pressure, , at finite temperature is given by where . As the regularized energy, the regularized Casimir pressure is where The regularized expressions take into account only the contributions of the regular black holes. They are small corrections to the vacuum quantities which have the known limits for . It should be noted that the gravitational Casimir effect is a very controversial idea due to the energy problem in general relativity. As a matter of fact, the lack of a gravitational energy-momentum tensor in this approach prevents one from analyzing such effect. On the other hand in the framework of TEGR, the gravitational Casimir effect can be explored.

5. Conclusion

The regular black holes are studied at finite temperature. The temperature effects are introduced using the TFD formalism. TFD is a tool that allows to analyze temperature effects in addition to the time dependence. Using the Teleparalelism Equivalent to General Relativity, the gravitational thermodynamics to the regular black holes is investigated. This gravitational theory has a well defined energy-momentum tensor that allows to calculated the gravitational Stefan-Boltzmann law and Casimir effect associated to the regular black holes. A regularized gravitational Stefan-Boltzmann law for the regular black hole is obtained. Using the first law of thermodynamics, the gravitational pressure and the gravitational entropy are determined. The relation between gravitational energy and pressure is equal the relation that describes the photon. The gravitational entropy obtained here exists on an arbitrary portion of space. Then, it is a different approach from the usual black hole thermodynamics, since the usual black hole has a fixed entropy given in terms of its event horizon area. In addition, the temperature of the event horizon for regular black holes has been calculated. Furthermore, the gravitational Casimir energy and Casimir pressure at zero and finite temperature for this class of regular black holes are determined. It is interesting to note that such results can be experimentally verified; once confirmed, it suggests that the torsion tensor is the true quantity responsible by gravitation instead of curvature as the mainstream approach for the gravitational field.

Data Availability

No data were used to support this study. Our study is completely theoretical.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work by A. F. S. is supported by CNPq projects 308611/2017-9 and 430194/2018-8. A. E. S. also thanks CNPq (a federal Brazilian Government Agency) for partial financial support.

References

  1. R. Penrose, “The question of cosmic censorship,” Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, vol. 20, no. 3-4, pp. 233–248, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. M. Bardeen, “Non-singular general-relativistic gravitational collapse,” in Proceedings of International Conference GR5, p. 174, Tbilisi, 1968. View at: Google Scholar
  3. Y. Takahashi and H. Umezawa, “Thermo field dynamics,” International Journal of Modern Physics B, vol. 10, no. 13n14, pp. 1755–1805, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. P. A. Hennig, “Thermo field dynamics for quantum fields with continuous mass spectrum,” Physics Reports, vol. 253, no. 5-6, pp. 235–380, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. T. Matsubara, “A new approach to quantum-statistical mechanics,” Progress in Theoretical Physics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 351–378, 1955. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. W. Maluf and J. F. da Rocha-Neto, “Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity in the teleparallel geometry,” Physical Review D, vol. 64, no. 8, article 084014, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. C. Ulhoa, A. F. Santos, and F. C. Khanna, “Scattering of fermions by gravitons,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 49, no. 4, p. 54, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Y. Takahashi and H. Umezawa, “Higher order calculation in thermo field theory,” Collective Phenomena 2, vol. 2, p. 55, 1975. View at: Google Scholar
  9. Y. Takahashi, H. Umezawa, and H. Matsumoto, Thermofield Dynamics and Condensed States, North-Holland, Amsterdan, 1982.
  10. F. C. Khanna, A. P. C. Malbouisson, J. M. C. Malboiusson, and A. E. Santana, Themal Quantum Field Theory: Algebraic Aspects and Applications, World Scientific, Singapore, 2009.
  11. H. Umezawa, Advanced Field Theory: Micro, Macro and Thermal Physics, AIP, New York, NY, USA, 1993.
  12. A. E. Santana and F. C. Khanna, “Lie groups and thermal field theory,” Physics Letters A, vol. 203, no. 2-3, pp. 68–72, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. E. Santana, F. C. Khanna, H. Chu, and C. Chang, “Thermal lie groups, classical mechanics, and thermofield dynamics,” Annals of Physics, vol. 249, no. 2, pp. 481–498, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. E. Santana, A. M. Neto, J. D. M. Vianna, and F. C. Khanna, “Symmetry groups, density-matrix equations and covariant Wigner functions,” Physica A, vol. 280, no. 3-4, pp. 405–436, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. F. C. Khanna, A. P. C. Malbouisson, J. M. C. Malbouisson, and A. E. Santana, “Thermoalgebras and path integral,” Annals of Physics, vol. 324, no. 9, pp. 1931–1952, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. F. C. Khanna, A. P. C. Malbouisson, J. M. C. Malbouisson, and A. E. Santana, “Quantum fields in toroidal topology,” Annals of Physics, vol. 326, no. 10, pp. 2634–2657, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Einstein, “Auf die Riemann-Metrik und den Fern-Parallelismus gegründete einheitliche Feldtheorie,” Mathematische Annalen, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 685–697, 1930. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. K. Hayashi and T. Shirafuji, “New general relativity,” Physical Review D, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 3524–3553, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. E. Cartan, “Cosmology and gravitation,” in Advanced Study Institute on Cosmology and Gravitation - Spin, torsion, Rotation and Supergravity. International school of cosmology, COURSE. 6/1979-05-06/ERICE; USA/GBR, pp. 489–491, Plenum Press, New York; London, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  20. J. W. Maluf, “The teleparallel equivalent of general relativity,” Annalen der Physik, vol. 525, no. 5, pp. 339–357, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. C. S. Neves and A. Saa, “Regular rotating black holes and the weak energy condition,” Physics Letters B, vol. 734, pp. 44–48, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. E. Ayón-Beato and A. García, “The Bardeen model as a nonlinear magnetic monopole,” Physics Letters B, vol. 493, no. 1-2, pp. 149–152, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. B. Carter, “Axisymmetric black hole has only two degrees of dreedom,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 331–333, 1971. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. B. Toshmatov, A. Abdujabbarov, B. Ahmedov, and Z. Stuchlik, “Particle motion and Penrose processes around rotating regular black hole,” Astrophysics and Space Science, vol. 357, no. 1, p. 41, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 S. C. Ulhoa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

96 Views | 121 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.