Research Article  Open Access
A. Ozansoy, "Doubly Charged Lepton Search Potential of the FCCBased EnergyFrontier ElectronProton Colliders", Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2020, Article ID 9234130, 13 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9234130
Doubly Charged Lepton Search Potential of the FCCBased EnergyFrontier ElectronProton Colliders
Abstract
We search for the doubly charged leptons () predicted in composite models including extended weak isospin multiplets, namely, and , at the Future Circular Collider (FCC) based energyfrontier electronproton colliders with the centerofmass energies of TeV, TeV, and TeV, respectively. We deal with the process, calculate the production cross sections, and give the normalized transverse momentum and pseudorapidity distributions of finalstate electron to obtain the kinematical cuts for the discovery. We show the statistical significance (SS) of the expected signal yield as a function of doubly charged lepton mass ( plots) to attain the doubly charged lepton discovery mass limits for both the and . It is obtained that discovery mass limits on the mass of doubly charged lepton for () are TeV, TeV, and TeV for TeV, TeV, and TeV, respectively.
1. Introduction
The spectacular operation of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has so far confirmed the validity of the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics with great precision. Especially, Higgs boson discovery by ATLAS and CMS Collaborations at the LHC in 2012 was a great triumph of the SM [1, 2]. Nevertheless, there are some issues that the SM gives no explanation such as particle dark matter, neutrino masses, large number of fundamental particles, leptonquark symmetry, and fermionic family replication, and it is expected that these issues will be answered at the forthcoming decades by the future highenergy colliders. Currently, the spectrum of the SM matter particles has a pattern with three generations listed in a growing mass both for lepton and quark sectors. The second and third fermionic families are replicas of the first family in the context of charge, spin, weak isospin, and color charge but only differ in mass. The fundamental particle inflation in the SM and family replication are natural indicators for a further level of substructure. Compositeness is one of the beyond the SM (BSM) theories that predict a further level of matter constituents called preons as the ultimate building blocks and known fermions are composites of them [3–5]. A conspicuous consequence of lepton and quark substructure would be the existence of excited states [6–10]. Considering the known fermions as ground state, spin1/2 and weak isospin1/2 excited fermions are accepted as the lowest radial and orbital excitations by the composite models. Excited fermions with higher spins take part in composite models and are considered as higher excitations [11–15].
Mostly, excited fermions belonging to weak isospin singlets or doublets, i.e., and , are studied in detail at various colliders, so far. Phenomenological studies on spin1/2 excited leptons () can be found for the lepton and leptonhadron colliders in [16–24], and colliders in [25–29], and hadron colliders in [30–36]. The LHC sets the most stringent bounds on excited leptons and quarks with spin1/2. The mass limits were obtained from single production (, ) at TeV including contact interactions in the production and decay mechanism taking into account that the compositeness scale is equal to excited lepton mass () and , where and are the dimensionless couplings determined by the composite dynamics; the ATLAS Collaboration sets the mass limits as GeV, GeV, and GeV at the 95% confidence level (C.L.) [37]. Also, the obtained mass limits for the excited neutrinos from pair production processes () were set as GeV for all types of excited neutrinos [37] and for the excited quarks from single production processes (), the mass limit was set as GeV [38]. For the other mass limits and scale limits within the scope of lepton and quark compositeness searches, see [39]. Very recently, the first search for excited leptons at TeV is published by the CMS Collaboration [40]. Under the assumption , excited electrons and muons are excluded for masses below 3.9 and 3.8 TeV, respectively, at 95% C.L. Also, the best observed limit on the compositeness scale is obtained as TeV for both excited electrons and muons for TeV. Furthermore, it is shown in [41] that the effective models for excited fermions violate unitarity in a certain parameter region of the excited fermion mass and compositeness scale.
In this work, we consider another aspect of compositeness: weak isospin invariance. From this point of view, usual weak isospin singlets and doublets are extended to include triplets and quartets ( and ) [42]. Excited states with exotic charges with for the lepton sector and and for the quark sector are included in these exotic multiplets. Here, we only concentrate on doubly charged leptons appearing in and multiplets. If there is any signal for doubly charged leptons at future colliders, SM fermionic family structure and replication could be explained satisfactorily.
In the literature, doubly charged leptonic states appear in type II seesaw mechanisms [43–45], in models of strong electroweak symmetry breaking [46], in some extensions of supersymmetric models [47–51], in flavor models in warped extra dimensions and in more general models [52, 53], in string inspired models [54], and in models [55, 56]. Also, stable doubly charged leptons have been considered an acceptable candidate for cold dark matter [57].
Doubly charged lepton phenomenology is investigated so far at the LHC [58–68], at future linear colliders [69–72], and at the Large Hadronelectron Collider (LHeC) [73]. Doubly charged leptons related to the second lepton family are investigated at various possible future muonproton colliders in [74]. Also, the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations have performed the searches for longlived doubly charged states by DrellYanlike pair production processes. The ATLAS Collaboration has excluded longlived doubly charged lepton state masses up to 660 GeV based on the run at TeV with fb^{−1} [75], and the CMS Collaboration sets the lower mass limit up to 685 GeV based on the run at TeV with fb^{−1} [76].
LHC is the world’s largest particle physics laboratory, and it is necessary to extend its discovery potential and to plan for the colliders after it. Firstly, a major upgrade of the LHC is HighLuminosity phase (HLLHC) [77, 78] with an integrated luminosity of 3 ab^{−1} at TeV and, secondly, a possible further upgrade of the LHC is HighEnergy phase (HELHC) [79] with the 27 TeV centerofmass energy in 2020s.
The Future Circular Collider (FCC) project is an exciting and consistent postLHC highenergy collider project at CERN with a centerofmass energy of 100 TeV, and it is supported by the European Union within the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation [80, 81]. Besides the option (FCChh), FCC includes an electronpositron collider option (FCCee) known as TLEP [82, 83] in the same tunnel and also an collider option (FCCeh) providing the electron beam with an energy of 60 GeV by an energy recovery linac (ERL) [80]. The FCCeh would operate concurrently with the FCChh. The same ERL design has been studied in detail as the main option for the LHeC project [84, 85]. Concerning ERL that would be positioned inside the FCC tunnel, energy of the electron beam is limited ( GeV) due to the large synchrotron radiation. To achieve higher electron beam energies for the option of the FCC, linear colliders should be constructed tangential to the FCC [86]. Besides the main choice of FCCeh, namely, ERL60, other designs of FCCbased collider could be configured using the main parameters of International Linear Collider (ILC) [87] and Plasma Wake Field AcceleratorLinear Collider (PWFALC) [88]. A very detailed consideration on the multiTeV colliders based on FCC and linear colliders (LC) can be found in [86]. Another remarkable and important postLHC project is the Super protonproton Collider (SppC) project which is planned to be built in China with the centerofmass energy about 70 TeV [89]. Different options of FCCbased colliders are listed in Table 1.

In this work, in Section 2, we give the basics of extended weak isospin models and introduce the effective Lagrangians for the gauge interactions of doubly charged leptons. We consider the production of doubly charged leptons at future various highenergy colliders, show our analysis to obtain the best cuts for the discovery, and give the obtained mass limits in Section 3, and then, we conclude.
2. Extended Weak Isospin Multiplets
Long before the experimental verification of the existence of quarks and gluons, strong isospin symmetry allowed to designate the possible patterns of baryonic and mesonic states and to learn about the properties of these hadronic states. With the same point of view, using the weak isospin symmetry arguments, possible fermionic resonances could be revealed. Thus, without knowing about the dynamics of the fermionic integral parts (preons) exactly, we could obtain the quantum numbers of the excited fermionic spectrum. The weak isospin invariance is used to determine the allowed exotic states. SM fermions exist in singlets or doublets ( or ), and gauge bosons have (for photons) or (for weak bosons), so only states can be allowed. Therefore, usual weak isospin states can be extended to and states. The details of extended isospin models can be found in [42]. The form of these exotic and multiplets is and similar for the antiparticles. These multiplets can be arranged for all flavors of leptons. Also, exotic multiplets with and exist in the quark sector.
To attain the decay widths and production cross sections, we have to specify the doubly charged lepton couplings to SM leptons and gauge bosons. Due to the lack of knowledge about the explicit dynamics of preons, we use the effective Lagrangian method. Since all the gauge fields have weak hypercharge, a certain exotic multiplet couples through the gauge fields to a SM multiplet with the same . According to the wellknown GellMannNishijima formula (), exotic multiplet has and has , so from couples to SM righthanded leptons (singlets) and from couples to SM lefthanded leptons (doublets). To assure the current conservation, the couplings have to be of anomalous magnetic moment type. The only contribution that involves both and comes from the isovector current. Thus, doubly charged leptons can couple to SM leptons only via gauge bosons. Relevant gaugemediated interaction Lagrangians which are made of dimension five operators to describe the interactions between a doubly charged lepton, a SM lepton, and boson for the exotic multiples are given by
Here, is the SU(2) coupling and equal to , where , is a weak mixing angle, is the fine structure constant, is the antisymmetric tensor being , is the compositeness scale, and and are the couplings which are responsible for the effective interactions of and multiplets, respectively. denotes the doubly charhed lepton, and denotes the SM lepton. The vertex factors can be inferrred from Equations (2) and (3) as where and is the fourmomentum of the gauge field. In Equation (4), + is for and − is for . Due to the fact that the only contribution to the interaction Lagrangian comes from isovector current, has only one decay mode . Neglecting SM lepton mass, the analytical expression for the decay width of doubly charged lepton is and Equation (5) has the same form both for and as we set . In Figure 1, we plot the decay width of doubly charged lepton as a function of its mass for three different values of . Under the considerations and , Equation (5) suggests that doubly charged lepton decay width increases linearly with mass for a specific value of .
3. Doubly Charged Lepton Production at Future Colliders
Doubly charged leptons can be produced singly via the process . Feynman diagrams for the subprocesses are shown in Figure 2.
(a)
(b)
Neglecting SM lepton and quark masses, we find that the analytical expression of differential cross section for taking into account for the subprocess is and for the subprocess is
Changing , Equation (6) is valid for and Equation (7) is valid for for . We inserted doubly charged lepton interaction vertices given in Equation (4) into the wellknown highenergy physics simulation programme CalcHEP [90–92] and used it for our calculations.
Total production cross section for the process both for and as a function of doubly charged lepton mass is shown in Figure 3 for taking into account (a) and TeV (b). We use the CTEQ6L parton distribution function [93]. As seen from Figure 3, total cross sections for the doubly charged leptons for are slightly larger than the ones for . This result is due to the contribution of valence quarks in the initial state when is being produced.
(a)
(b)
Taking into account the decay of , we consider the kinematical distributions for the process . Respecting lepton number conservation, we only deal with the doubly charged leptons related to the first generation.
Since design studies are ongoing for an appropriate detector for the colliders considered in this work, our analysis is at the parton level.
We impose the basic cuts for the finalstate electron and quarks as
After applying basic cuts, SM cross sections are pb, pb, and pb for and 31.6 TeV, respectively. To reveal a clear signal, it is very important to determine the most appropriate cuts. After appliying the basic cuts, we plot the normalized transverse momentum (in Figures 4 and 5) and normalized pseudorapidity (in Figures 6 and 7) distributions of finalstate electron originated by the . These distributions exhibit the same characteristic for and .
From the normalized distributions, it is inferred that doubly charged leptons have high transverse momentum which shows a peak around in their distributions. From the normalized distributions of electron, it is seen that the electrons are in a backward direction; consequently, is produced in the backward direction. As the centerofmass energy of the collider increases, normalized distributions become more symmetric.
Examining normalized and distributions, we extract the discovery cuts for the finalstate electron. We choose the suitable regions where we eliminate most of the background while not losing most of the signal. Our results are summarized in Table 2.

To distinguish the signal and the background, we also imply an invariant mass cut on system for the mass intervals (we have selected the events within the mass intervals). where is the decay width of the doubly charged lepton for a given value of . By carrying out the invariant mass cut, the background cross sections are rather suppressed.
The finalstate signatures obtained from the decays of doubly charged lepton and boson are given in Table 3. We choose hadronic decay mode of boson,

After implying discovery cuts presented for the finalstate electron in Table 2, we plot the invariant mass distribution of system in Figures 8 and 9 for and , respectively.
As expected, these distributions show a peak around the chosen mass value of Since we try to specify doubly charged lepton signal from its decay products, we do not impose any further cuts on jets. We define the discovery sensitivity as
Here, is the cross section due to the presence of doubly charged lepton, is the SM background cross section, and is the integrated luminosity of the collider. In Figures 10 and 11, we plot the to determine the (exclusion), (observation), and (discovery) limits.
In Table 4, we give the doubly charged lepton mass limits at different FCCbased colliders for taking into account and concerning the criteria , , and which denote the exclusion, observation, and discovery mass limits, respectively.

4. Conclusion
A distinct and exclusive point of view of the compositeness is weak isospin invariance. It enables us to extend the weak isospin values to (triplet) and (quadruplet) multiplets. Doubly charged leptons that have an electrical charge of appear in these exotic multiplets. To find a clue about such new particles at future highenergy and highluminosity colliders that would indicate the internal structure of the known fermions, we have presented a phenomenological cutbased study for probing the doubly charged leptons coming from extended weak isospin multiplets at various FCCbased colliders. Taking into consideration the lepton flavor conservation, we have dealt with the decay of as and boson as after the single production of doubly charged lepton at colliders. We have provided the , ,and statistical significance (SS) exclusion curves in the parameter space. Taking into account the criteria that corresponds to discovery, we have obtained the mass limits for doubly charged lepton for the exotic multiplet (), 2.21 (2.73) TeV, 5.46 (8.47) TeV, and 12.9 (20.0) TeV at TeV, TeV, and TeV, respectively. Our study has showed that FCCbased colliders have quite well potential to attain the signals of doubly charged leptons considered in extended weak isospin models.
Data Availability
No data were used to support this study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
References
 The ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad, T. Abajyan et al., “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 716, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 The CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan, V. Khachatryan et al., “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 716, no. 1, pp. 30–61, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Terazawa, Y. Chikashige, and K. Akama, “Unified model of the NambuJonaLasinio type for all elementaryparticle forces,” Physical Review D, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 480–487, 1977. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Ne'eman, “Primitive particle model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 6970, 1979. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Terazawa, M. Yasue, K. Akama, and M. Hayashi, “Observable effects of the possible substructure of leptons and quarks,” Physics Letters B, vol. 112, no. 45, pp. 387–392, 1982. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. M. Renard, “Excited quarks and new hadronic states,” Il Nuovo Cimento A (19651970), vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 1983. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. J. Eichten, K. D. Lane, and M. E. Peskin, “New tests for quark and lepton substructure,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 811–814, 1983. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. de Rujula, L. Maiani, and R. Petronzio, “Search for excited quarks,” Physics Letters B, vol. 140, no. 34, pp. 253–258, 1984. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Cabibbo, L. Maiani, and Y. Srivastava, “Anomalous Z decays: excited leptons?” Physics Letters B, vol. 139, no. 56, pp. 459–463, 1984. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. H. Kuhn and P. M. Zerwas, “Excited quarks and leptons,” Physics Letters B, vol. 147, no. 13, pp. 189–196, 1984. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. L. Lopes, J. A. Martins Simoes, and D. Spehler, “Production and decay properties of possible spin 32 leptons,” Physics Letters B, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 367–372, 1980. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. L. Lopes, J. A. Martins Simoes, and D. Spehler, “Possible spin quarks and scaling violations in neutrino reactions,” Physical Review D, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 797–799, 1981. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. L. Lopes, D. Spehler, and J. A. Simoes, “Weak interactions involving spin leptons,” Physical Review D, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1854–1859, 1982. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Tosa and R. E. Marshak, “Exotic fermions,” Physical Review D, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 774–780, 1985. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. J. P. Eboli, E. M. Gregores, J. C. Montero, S. F. Novaes, and D. Spehler, “Excited fermionic states in polarized e^{}γ and e^{+}e^{} collisions,” Physical Review D, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 1253–1263, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Hagiwara, S. Komamiya, and D. Zeppenfeld, “Excited lepton production at LEP and HERA,” Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 115–122, 1985. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Boudjema, A. Djouadi, and J. L. Kneur, “Excited fermions at e^{+}e^{–} and eP colliders,” Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 425–449, 1993. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. Çakır, A. Yılmaz, and S. Sultansoy, “Single production of excited electrons at future e^{+}e^{–}, ep and pp colliders,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, no. 7, article 075011, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. Çakır, İ. T. Çakır, and Z. Kırca, “Single production of excited neutrinos at future e^{+}e^{–}, ep and pp colliders,” Physical Review D, vol. 70, no. 7, article 075017, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Caliskan, S. O. Kara, and A. Ozansoy, “Excited muon searches at the FCCbased muonhadron colliders,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2017, Article ID 1540243, 9 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Caliskan, “Excited neutrino search potential of the FCCbased electronhadron colliders,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2017, Article ID 4726050, 9 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Caliskan, “Search for excited muons at the future SPPCbased muonproton colliders,” Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 50, no. 8, p. 1409, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Caliskan, “Single production of composite electrons at the future SPPCbased leptonhadron colliders,” 2018, https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.07351. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Caliskan and S. O. Kara, “Single production of the excited electrons in the future FCCbased lepton–hadron colliders,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 33, no. 24, article 1850141, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 I. F. Ginzburg and D. Y. Ivanov, “Excited leptons and quarks at γγ/γe colliders,” Physics Letters B, vol. 276, no. 12, pp. 214–218, 1992. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Balyaev, E. Boos, and A. Pukhov, Physics Letters B, vol. 296, no. 34, pp. 452–457, 1992.
 M. Köksal, “Analysis of excited neutrinos at the CLIC,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 29, no. 24, article 1450138, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Ozansoy and A. A. Billur, “Search for excited electrons through γγ scattering,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 5, article 055008, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Kirca, O. Çakır, and Z. Z. Aydın, Acta Physica Polonica B, vol. 34, no. 8, article 4079, 2003.
 O. J. P. Éboli, S. M. Lietti, and P. Mathews, “Excited leptons at the CERN large hadron collider,” Physical Review D, vol. 65, no. 7, article 075003, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. C. Inan, “Exclusive excited leptons search in two lepton final states at the CERN LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 11, article 115002, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. Çakır, C. Leroy, R. Mehdiyev, and A. Belyaev, “Production and decay of excited electrons at the LHC,” The European Physical Journal C  Particles and Fields, vol. 32, no. S2, pp. s1–s17, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Belyaev, C. Leroy, and R. Mehdiyev, “Production of excited neutrinos at the LHC,” The European Physical Journal C  Particles and Fields, vol. 41, no. S2, pp. 1–10, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Boos, A. Vologdin, D. Toback, and J. Gaspard, “Prospects of searching for excited leptons during run II of the Fermilab Tevatron,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 1, article 013011, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. N. Akay, Y. O. Günaydin, M. Sahin, and S. Sultansoy, “Search for Excited u and d Quarks in Dijet Final States at Future pp Colliders,” Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2019, Article ID 9090785, 11 pages, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 U. Baur, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas, “Excitedquark and lepton production at hadron colliders,” Physical Review D, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 815–824, 1990. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 The ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Search for new phenomena in events with three or more charged leptons in pp collisions at TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, no. 138, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 The ATLAS Collaboration, M. Aaboud et al., “Search for new phenomena in dijet events using of pp collision data collected at TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Physical Review D, vol. 96, no. 5, article 052004, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Particle Data Group, M. Tanabashi et al., “Review of Particle Physics,” Physical Review D, vol. 98, no. 3, article 030001, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 The CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., “Search for excited leptons in llγ final states in protonproton collisions at TeV,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1904, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Biondini, R. Leonardi, O. Panella, and M. Presilla, “Perturbative unitarity bounds for effective composite models,” Physics Letters B, vol. 795, pp. 644–649, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Pancheri and Y. N. Srivastava, “Weak isospin spectroscopy of excited quarks and leptons,” Physics Letters B, vol. 146, no. 12, pp. 87–94, 1984. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. K. Chua and S. S. C. Law, “Phenomenological constraints on minimally coupled exotic lepton triplets,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 5, article 055010, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Foot, H. Lew, X. G. He, and G. C. Joshi, “Seesaw neutrino masses induced by a triplet of leptons,” Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, vol. 44, p. 441, 1989. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Kumericki, I. Picek, and B. Radovcic, “Exotic seesawmotivated heavy leptons at the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, no. 9, article 093002, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. del Aguila, A. Carmona, and J. Santiago, “Tau custodian searches at the LHC,” Physics Letters B, vol. 695, no. 5, pp. 449–453, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. A. Demir, M. Frank, K. Huitu, S. K. Rai, and I. Turan, “Signals of doublycharged Higgsinos at the CERN Large Hadron Collider,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 3, article 035013, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Franceschini and R. Mohapatra, “Radiatively induced type II seesaw models and vectorlike5/3charge quarks,” Physical Review D, vol. 89, no. 5, article 055013, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Dutta, R. N. Mohapatra, and D. J. Muller, “Signature at the Fermilab Tevatron for the light doubly charged Higgsino of the supersymmetric leftright model,” Physical Review D, vol. 60, no. 9, article 095005, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Chacko and R. N. Mohapatra, “Supersymmetric leftright models and light doubly charged Higgs bosons and Higgsinos,” Physical Review D, vol. 58, no. 1, article 015003, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Frank, “Doubly charged Higgsinomediated lepton flavor violating decays,” Physical Review D, vol. 62, no. 5, article 053004, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Cirelli, N. Fornengo, and A. Strumia, “Minimal dark matter,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 753, no. 12, pp. 178–194, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. del Aguila, J. de Blas, and M. PerezVictoria, “Effects of new leptons in electroweak precision data,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 1, article 013010, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Cvetic, J. Halverson, and P. Langacker, “Implications of string constraints for exotic matter and Z’s beyond the standard model,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2011, no. 11, article 58, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Pisano and V. Pleitez, “SU(3)⊗U(1) model for electroweak interactions,” Physical Review D, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 410–417, 1992. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. H. Frampton, “Chiral dilepton model and the flavor question,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 69, no. 20, pp. 2889–2891, 1992. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Fargion, M. Khlopov, and C. A. Stephan, “Dark matter with invisible light from heavy double charged leptons of almostcommutative geometry?” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 23, no. 24, pp. 7305–7354, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Delgado, C. Garcia Cely, T. Han, and Z. H. Wang, “Phenomenology of a lepton triplet,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, no. 7, article 073007, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Biondini, O. Panella, G. Pancheri, Y. N. Srivastava, and L. Fanò, “Phenomenology of excited doubly charged heavy leptons at the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 9, article 095018, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Alloul, M. Frank, B. Fuks, and M. R. de Traubenberg, “Doublycharged particles at the Large Hadron Collider,” Physical Review D, vol. 88, no. 7, article 075004, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Leonardi, O. Panella, and L. Fano, “Doubly charged heavy leptons at LHC via contact interactions,” Physical Review D, vol. 90, no. 3, article 035001, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Yu, C. X. Yue, and Y. Xia, “Pair production of the doubly charged leptons via electroweak vector boson fusion at the large hadron collider,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 31, no. 2, article 021201, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Ma, B. Zhang, and G. Cacciapaglia, “Triplet with a doublycharged lepton at the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 89, no. 1, article 015020, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Ma, B. Zhang, and G. Cacciapaglia, “Doubly charged lepton from an exotic doublet at the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 89, no. 9, article 093022, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Yu, C.X. Yue, and S. Yang, “Signatures of the quintuplet leptons at the LHC,” Physical Review D, vol. 91, no. 9, article 093003, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Okada and K. Yagyu, “Threeloop neutrino mass model with doubly charged particles from isodoublets,” Physical Review D, vol. 93, no. 1, article 013004, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. H. Chen and T. Nomura, “Bounds on LFV Higgs decays in a vectorlike lepton model and searching for doubly charged leptons at the LHC,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 76, no. 6, article 353, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Leonardi, L. Alunni, F. Romeo, L. Fanò, and O. Panella, “Hunting for heavy composite Majorana neutrinos at the LHC,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 76, no. 11, p. 593, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Q.G. Zeng, L. Ji, and S. Yang, “Pair production of the doubly charged leptons associated with a gauge boson γ or Z in e^{+}e^{−} and γγ collisions at future linear colliders,” Communications in Theoretical Physics, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 331–339, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Biondini and O. Panella, “Exotic leptons at future linear colliders,” Physical Review D, vol. 92, no. 1, article 015023, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y.C. Guo, C.X. Yue, and Z.C. Liu, “The signatures of doubly charged leptons in future linear colliders,” Journal of Physics. G, Nuclear and Particle Physics: An Institute of Physics Journal, vol. 44, no. 8, article 085004, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Q.G. Zeng, “Production of the doubly charged leptons at the ILC,” EPL (Europhysics Letters), vol. 111, no. 2, p. 21003, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Yu, Y.C Guo, Z.C. Liu, W.J. Fan, Y. Mei, and J. Zhang, “The signatures of doubly charged leptons at LHeC,” Journal of Physics. G, Nuclear and Particle Physics: An Institute of Physics Journal, vol. 45, no. 12, p. 125003, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Ozansoy, “Investigating doubly charged leptons at future energy frontier muonproton colliders,” Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2A3: Physical Sciences and Engineering, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 111–128, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 The ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Search for heavy longlived multicharged particles in pp collisions at TeV using the ATLAS detector,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 75, no. 8, p. 362, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 The CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., “Searches for longlived charged particles in pp collisions at and 8 TeV,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 122, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
 F. Zimmermann, HLLHC: Parameter Space, Constraints, and Possible Options, CERN Yellow Reports: Conference Proceedings, Chamonix 2011 Workshop on LHC Performance, Chamonix, France, 2011, EUCARDCON2011002.
 M. Lamont, “LHC, HLLHC and beyond,” in Proceedings of The European Physical Society Conference on High Energy Physics — PoS(EPSHEP 2013), p. 149, Stockholm, Sweden, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 The FCC Collaboration, A. Abada et al., “HELHC: the highenergy Large Hadron Collider. Future circular collider conceptual design report volume 4,” The European Physical Journal Special Topics, vol. 228, no. 5, pp. 1109–1382, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 The FCC Collaboration, A. Abada et al., “FCC Physics Opportunities: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 1,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 79, no. 6, p. 474, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
 The FCC Collaboration, A. Abada et al., “FCChh: the hadron Collider. Future circular collider conceptual design report volume 3,” The European Physical Journal Special Topics, vol. 228, no. 4, pp. 755–1107, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 The FCC Collaboration, A. Abada et al., “FCCee: the lepton collider : Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 2,” The European Physical Journal Special Topics, vol. 228, no. 2, pp. 261–623, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
 The TLEP Design Study Working Group, M. Bicer et al., “First look at the physics case of TLEP,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2014, no. 1, p. 164, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. L. A. Fernandez, C. Adolphsen, A. N. Akay et al., “A Large Hadron Electron Collider at CERN Report on the Physics and Design Concepts for Machine and Detector,” Journal of Physics G, vol. 39, no. 7, article 075001, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. Brüning and M. Klein, “The large hadron electron collider,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 28, no. 16, article 1330011, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. C. Acar, A. N. Akay, S. Beser et al., “Future circular collider based lepton–hadron and photon–hadron colliders: Luminosity and physics,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 871, pp. 47–53, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Adolphsen, M. Barone, B. Barish et al., “The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report  Volume 3. II: Accelerator Baseline Design,” 2013, https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.6328. View at: Google Scholar
 J. P. Delahaye, S. J. Gessner, E. Adli et al., “A beam driven plasmawakefiled linear collider from Higgs factory to multiTeV,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC'14), pp. 3791–3793, Dresden, Germany, June 2014. View at: Google Scholar
 F. Su, J. Gao, M. Xiao et al., “Method study of parameter choice for a circular proton–proton collider,” Chinese Physics C, vol. 40, no. 1, article 017001, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Belyaev, N. D. Christensen, and A. Pukhov, “CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the standard model,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 184, no. 7, pp. 1729–1769, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Pukhov, “CalcHEP 2.3: MSSM, structure functions, event generation, batchs, and generation of matrix elements for other packages,” 2004, https://arxiv.org/abs/hepph/0412191. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Pukhov, E. Boos, M. Dubinin et al., “CompHEP a package for evaluation of Feynman diagrams and integration over multiparticle phase space. User’ s manual for version 33,” 1999, https://arxiv.org/abs/hepph/9908288. View at: Google Scholar
 D. Stump, J. Huston, J. Pumplin et al., “Inclusive jet production, parton distributions, and the search for new physics,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 310, p. 46, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 A. Ozansoy. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP^{3}.