Advances in High Energy Physics

Advances in High Energy Physics / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 6660872 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6660872

Mahmoud Hanafy, Muhammad Maher, "An Approach of Statistical Corrections to Interactions in Hadron Resonance Gas", Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2021, Article ID 6660872, 10 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6660872

An Approach of Statistical Corrections to Interactions in Hadron Resonance Gas

Academic Editor: Ming Liu
Received15 Oct 2020
Accepted04 May 2021
Published27 May 2021

Abstract

We propose a new model for hadrons with quantum mechanical attractive and repulsive interactions sensitive to some spatial correlation length parameter inspired by the Beth-Uhlenbeck quantum mechanical nonideal gas model (Uhlenbeck and Beth, 1937). We confront the thermodynamics calculated using our model with a corresponding recent lattice data at four different values of the baryon chemical potential, over temperatures ranging from to and for five values for the correlation length ranging from to 0.2 fm. For equilibrium temperatures up to the vicinity of the chiral phase transition temperature ≃160 MeV, a decent fitting between the model and the lattice data is observed for different values of , especially at , where is in MeV and is in fm. For the vanishing chemical potential, the uncorrelated model , which corresponds to the ideal hadron resonance gas model, seems to offer the best fit. The quantum hadron correlations seem to be more probable at nonvanishing chemical potentials, especially within the range .

1. Introduction

One of the key goals of the ultrarelativistic nuclear collisions is to gain information on the hadron-parton phase diagram, which is characterized by different phases and different types of the phase transitions [1]. Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), the gauge field theory that describes the strong interactions of colored quarks and gluons and their colorless bound states, has two important intensive state parameters at equilibrium, namely, temperature and baryon chemical potential . A remarkable world-wide theoretical and experimental effort has been dedicated to the study of strongly interacting matter under extreme condition of temperature and baryon chemical potential. The lattice QCD simulations provide an a priori nonperturbative regularization of QCD that makes it compliant with analytic and computational methods with no model assumptions other than QCD itself being needed to formulate the theory. The temperature and density (chemical potential) dependence of the bulk thermodynamic quantities, commonly summarized as the equation of state (EoS), provides the most basic characterization of equilibrium properties of the strongly interacting matter. Its analysis within the framework of lattice QCD has been refined ever since the early calculations performed in pure gauge theories [2]. The EoS at vanishing chemical potentials does already provide important input into the modeling of the hydrodynamic evolution of hot and dense matter created in heavy-ion collisions [3, 4]. While this is appropriate for the thermal conditions met in these collisions at the LHC and the highest RHIC beam energies, knowledge of the EoS at nonvanishing baryon, strangeness, and electric charge chemical potentials is indispensable for the hydrodynamic models of the conditions met in the beam energy scan (BES) at RHIC [5] and in future experiments at facilities like FAIR at GSI and NICA at JINR [6, 7].

Bulk thermodynamic observables such as pressure, energy density, and entropy density as well as the second-order quantities such as the specific heat and velocity of sound have now been obtained at vanishing chemical potentials for the three lightest quark flavors [8]. By the analysis of the chiral transition temperature,  MeV [9], it has also been shown that the bulk thermodynamic observables change smoothly in the transition region probed. Due to the well-known sign problem encountered in the lattice QCD formulations at finite chemical potential, a direct calculation of the EoS at nonzero chemical potential is unfortunately not fully reliable. Lots of effort have been made to circumvent the divergences at the nonzero chemical potential, such as the Taylor expansion of the thermodynamic potential on course lattices besides other sophisticated computational techniques [1015] which made it possible to conduct calculations covering the range that is expected to be explored with the BES at RHIC by varying the beam energies in the range  GeV [16]. A promising approach in this quest is the investigation of hadron production. The hadron resonance gas (HRG) is customarily used in the lattice QCD calculations as a reference for the hadronic sector [17, 18]. At low temperatures, they are found to be in quite good agreement with the HRG model calculations [19], although some systematic deviations have been observed, which may be attributed to the existence of additional resonances which are not taken into account in HRG model calculations based on well-established resonances listed by the particle data group [20] and perhaps the need to extend the model to incorporate interactions.

In the HRG model, the thermodynamics of a strongly interacting system is conjectured to be approximated as an ideal gas composed of hadron resonances with [3, 19] that are treated as a free gas, exclusively in the hadronic phase, i.e., below . Therefore, the hadronic phase in the confined phase of QCD could be modeled as a noninteracting gas of the hadron resonances. It is reported in recent literature that the standard performance of the HRG model seems to be unable to describe all the available data that is predicted by recent lattice QCD simulations [21, 22]. The conjecture to incorporate various types of interactions has been worked out in various studies [4, 2325]. When comparing the thermodynamics calculated within the HRG framework with the corresponding data obtained using lattice QCD methods, one has to decide how to incorporate interactions among t/he hadrons.

Arguments based on the S-matrix approach [2628] suggest that the HRG model includes attractive interactions between hadrons which lead to the formation of resonances. More realistic hadronic models take into account the contribution of both attractive and repulsive interactions between the component hadrons. Repulsive interactions in the HRG model had previously been considered in the framework of the relativistic cluster and virial expansions [27], via repulsive mean fields [29, 30], and via excluded volume (EV) corrections [3136]. In particular, the effects of EV interactions between hadrons on HRG thermodynamics [3744] and on observables in heavy-ion collisions [4552] have extensively been studied in the literature. Recently, repulsive interactions have received renewed interest in the context of lattice QCD data on fluctuations of conserved charges. It was shown that large deviations of several fluctuation observables from the ideal HRG baseline could well be interpreted in terms of repulsive baryon-baryon interactions [23, 52, 53].

The present script is organized as follows: In Section 2, we review the detailed formalism of the conventional ideal (uncorrelated) HRG model, then we develop a nonideal (correlated) statistical correction to the ideal HRG model inspired by the Beth-Uhlenbeck (BU) quantum theory of nonideal gases. The calculations of the HRG thermodynamics based on the proposed correction are discussed in Section 3. Section 4 is devoted to the conclusions and outlook.

2. Model Description

In this study, we use the particle interaction probability term originally implemented in the expression for the second virial coefficient worked out in Ref. [54] in order to suggest a statistical correction to the uncorrelated HRG model. Uhlenbeck and Beth suggested a connection between the virial coefficients and the probabilities of finding pairs, triples, and so on, of particles near each other [55]. In the classical limit, which is usually designated by sufficiently high temperatures and/or low particle densities, it was shown that these probabilities (explicit expressions are to follow in the next section) can be expressed by Boltzmann factors so long as the de Broglie wavelength, which is a common measure of the significance of the quantum nonlocality, is small enough compared with the particle spacial extent measured by the particle “diameter” [55] as it was dubbed by Uhlenbeck and Beth themselves. Such a particle diameter can be considered as a measure of the spatial extent within which a particle can undergo hardcore (classical) interactions. Based on a comparison of their model with experimental results on helium molecules, the authors of [55] concluded that at sufficiently low temperatures for which the thermal de Broglie wavelength is comparable with the particle diameter, deviations from the classical excluded volume model due to quantum effects will be significant [55].

An extension has been made by the same authors to the quantum mechanical model of the particle interactions proposed in Ref. [55]. This extension considered the influence of Bose or Fermi statistics in addition to the effect of the inclusion of discrete quantum states for a general interaction potential that is not necessarily central [54]. The expression for the second virial expansion developed in Ref. [55] and extended in Ref. [54] was later generalized using the cluster integral to describe general particle interactions provided that such particles do not form bound states [26, 27, 56].

The extended BU quantum mechanical approach [54] was used quite recently to model the repulsive interactions between baryons in a hadron gas [25]. The second virial coefficient or the excluded volume parameter was calculated in [54] within the extended BU approach [54] and found to be temperature dependent and found also to differ dramatically from the classical excluded volume (EV) model result. Moreover, it was shown in [54] that at temperatures MeV, the widely used classical EV model [5759] underestimates the EV parameter for nucleons at a given value of the nucleon hard-core radius (assumed ≃0.3 fm) by large factors of 3-4. It was thus concluded in [25] that previous studies, which employed the hardcore radii of hadrons as an input into the classical EV model, have to be reevaluated using the appropriately rescaled quantum mechanical EV parameters.

In this section, we first introduce the basic formulation of the ideal HRG model. Then, we develop a statistical model inspired by the Beth-Uhlenbeck (BU) quantum theory of nonideal (correlated) gases [54] as a correction to the ideal (uncorrelated) HRG model. We thereby implement in our calculations a modified version of the partition function of a typical ideal hadron gas. In the framework of a bootstrap picture [60, 61], an equilibrium thermal model for an interaction free gas has a partition function from which the thermodynamics of such a system can be deduced by taking the proper derivatives.

2.1. Noncorrelated Ideal HRG

In a grand canonical ensemble, the partition function reads [3, 4, 19, 6264].where is the Hamiltonian combining all relevant degrees of freedom and is the number of constituents of the statistical ensemble. Equation (1) can be expressed as a sum over all hadron resonances taken from the recent particle data group (PDG) [20] with masses up to 2.5 GeV,where the pressure can be derived as and stands for fermions and bosons, respectively. is the dispersion relation and is the fugacity factor of the -th particle [19],where , , and are baryon, strangeness, and electric charge quantum numbers (their corresponding chemical potentials) of the -th hadron, respectively. From the phenomenological point of view, the baryon chemical potential —along the chemical freezeout boundary, where the production of particles is conjectured to cease—can be related to the nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy [65].where  GeV and . In addition to pressure, the number and energy density, respectively, and likewise the entropy density and other thermodynamics can straightforwardly be derived from the partition function by taking the proper derivatives

It should be noticed that both and are related to each other and to [19]. As an overall thermal equilibrium is assumed, is taken as a dependent variable to be estimated due to the strangeness conservation, i.e., at given and , the value assigned to is the one assuring . Only then, is combined with and in determining the thermodynamics, such as the particle number, energy, and entropy. The chemical potentials related to other quantum charges, such as the electric charge and the third-component isospin, can also be determined as functions of , , and and each of them must fulfill the corresponding conservation laws.

2.2. Quantum-Statistically Correlated HRG

In the beginning of Section 2, we qualitatively motivated a statistical correction scenario to the HRG model inspired by the generalized BU quantum mechanical particle interaction model. In the following, we are going to draw a quantitative picture of such a correction and how it can be smoothly blended with the ideal HRG model. For a quantum gas of fermions and bosons with mass and correlation (interaction) distance , at temperature and vanishing , a two-particle interaction probability of the formwas first introduced by Uhlenbeck and Beth [54] in an attempt to model the interactions of a quantum gas of particles assuming a general potential and neglecting the possibility for bound state formation. The Boltzmann-like term remains in effect even for an ideal gas, which is a typical approximation at sufficiently high temperatures. The sign expresses the apparent attraction (repulsion) between bosons (fermions) due to the change of statistics [54]. Inspired by such a correction, we introduce a correction for the probability term in the expression for the ideal hadron gas partition function given in Equation (1). We propose a new probability term of the form

This corrected probability function obviously incorporates interactions in the hadron resonance gas in the sense of Uhlenbeck and Beth quantum correlations [54] with being the correlation (interaction) length between any two hadrons at equilibrium temperature . Based on our proposed corrected probability function, we modify the noncorrelated HRG partition function to have the following form:which apparently sums over all hadron resonances following the same recipe described in motivating Equation (2) for the case of noncorrelated HRG. The thermodynamics of the correlated HRG can thus be calculated by taking the proper derivatives of as explicitly stated in the corresponding noncorrelated HRG case discussed above.

3. Calculation Results

We confront the data of the thermodynamics calculated using our statistically corrected HRG model based on Equation (9) with the corresponding lattice thermodynamics data from [66, 67] in the temperature range . These temperatures are rather typical for the phenomenological applications in the context of heavy-ion collisions and lattice QCD equation-of-state. In Refs. [66, 67], the authors calculated the QCD equation of state using Taylor expansions that include contributions from up to the sixth order in the baryon, strangeness, and electric charge chemical potentials. Calculations have been performed with a highly improved staggered quark action in the temperature range using up to four different sets of lattice cut-offs. The lattice data we are confronting with our model are taken from Ref. [66], the total pressure in the (2 + 1)-flavor QCD (left) and the total energy density in the (2 + 1)-flavor QCD (right) for several values of.

Figure 1 of this letter depicts the temperature dependence of the normalized pressure , normalized energy density , and trace anomaly (dashed curves) calculated using our statistically corrected HRG model based on Equation (9). Moreover, in Figure 1, our model data are confronted with the corresponding lattice data taken from Ref. [66] (symbols with error bars) at the vanishing baryon chemical potential . Comparison is made for four different values of the correlation length . Table 1 lists the /dof statistic for the normalized pressure , trace anomaly , and normalized energy density calculated in our statistically corrected hadron resonance gas (HRG) model and confronted with the corresponding lattice data from [66] for four values of the baryon chemical potential , and .


(MeV) (fm)/dof for /dof for /dof for

00
0.05
0.1
0.15

1700
0.05
0.1
0.15

3400
0.05
0.1
0.15

4250
0.05
0.1
0.15

At the vanishing chemical potential, the best fit to the lattice data occurs for the case of zero correlation length which, in this case, corresponds to the ideal HRG model. However, a slight exaggeration ( in the trace anomaly data) of our model’s thermodynamics is observed in the vicinity of the critical phase transition temperature . In the range , the discrepancy between our model thermodynamics and the corresponding lattice data is amplified. Generally, it is obvious that increasing the correlation length emphasizes the mismatch between our model and lattice data.

For the case and as it appears in Figure 2, the best fit generally occurs for and for . This good-fit temperature range extends from temperatures well below till . It is quite obvious here that the model fits the lattice data better compared to the corresponding vanishing chemical potential case(s). However, in the temperature range , the mismatch of our model with the lattice data becomes more pronounced compared to the corresponding range of the vanishing chemical potential case(s).

For the case of  MeV, see Figure 3, the only interesting observation is that for , the model data well below and in the vicinity of and up to significantly approaches the corresponding lattice data. The data mismatch then diverges for higher temperatures.

For the case of , Figure 4, the data mismatch is generally too large to suggest any plausible correlation at any of values of and for all temperatures of interest.

4. Conclusions

We confronted a novel statistical correction of the HRG model with recent lattice data [66, 67]. All our model calculations considered in this study do not seem to satisfactorily mimic the corresponding lattice data in the full temperature range under investigation, . However, the best matching occurs locally in the vicinity of in the range for the case of at zero and correlation radii, , respectively. Another remarkable matching between our model data with the corresponding lattice data occurs for the the case of , at 0.1 and 0.15 fm correlation radii for temperatures and up to . In the lower temperature range, , most of the cases investigated in this research show reasonable match with the corresponding lattice data for different correlation lengths except for the case in which where no good fitting is observed for any correlation length.

Data Availability

The [data type] data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors of this manuscript certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or nonfinancial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

References

  1. T. Banks and A. Ukawa, “Deconfining and chiral phase transitions in quantum chromodynamics at finite temperature,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 225, no. 1, pp. 145–155, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. Engels, F. Karsch, H. Satz, and I. Montvay, “High temperature SU(2) gluon matter of the lattice,” Physics Letters B, vol. 101, no. 1-2, pp. 89–94, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. F. Karsch, K. Redlich, and A. Tawfik, “Thermodynamics at non-zero baryon number density: a comparison of lattice and hadron resonance gas model calculations,” Physics Letters B, vol. 571, no. 1-2, pp. 67–74, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. Tawfik, “QCD phase diagram: a comparison of lattice and hadron resonance gas model calculations,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 5, article 054502, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Gyulassy and L. McLerran, “New forms of QCD matter discovered at RHIC,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 750, no. 1, pp. 30–63, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. N. Tawfik, “QCD phase-transition and chemical freezeout in nonzero magnetic field at NICA,” Indian Journal of Physics, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 93–99, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. N. Tawfik, “Analogy of QCD hadronization and Hawking-Unruh radiation at NICA,” The European Physical Journal A, vol. 52, no. 8, p. 254, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Tawfik, “Influence of strange quarks on the QCD phase diagram and chemical freeze-out,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. S1105–S1110, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. Bazavov, T. Bhattacharya, M. Cheng et al., “Chiral and deconfinement aspects of the QCD transition,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 5, article 054503, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. V. Gavai and S. Gupta, “Quark number susceptibilities, strangeness, and dynamical confinement,” Physical Review D, vol. 64, no. 7, article 074506, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. Allton, S. Ejiri, S. J. Hands et al., “QCD thermal phase transition in the presence of a small chemical potential,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 7, article 074507, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. Ejiri, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, and C. Schmidt, “Isentropic equation of state of 2-flavor QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 5, article 054506, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Borsányi, G. Endrődi, Z. Fodor et al., “QCD equation of state at nonzero chemical potential: continuum results with physical quark masses at order μ2,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2012, no. 8, p. 53, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Günther, R. Bellwied, S. Borsanyi et al., “The QCD equation of state at finite density from analytical continuation,” in EPJ Web of Conferences, vol. 137, p. 07008, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  15. M. D’Elia, G. Gagliardi, and F. Sanfilippo, “Higher order quark number fluctuations via imaginary chemical potentials in Nf = 2 + 1 QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 95, no. 9, article 094503, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Bzdak, S. I. Esumi, V. Koch, J. Liao, M. Stephanov, and N. Xu, “Mapping the phases of quantum chromodynamics with beam energy scan,” Physics Reports, vol. 853, pp. 1–87, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. P. Huovinen and P. Petreczky, “QCD equation of state and hadron resonance gas,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 837, no. 1-2, pp. 26–53, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling et al., “Is there still any Tc mystery in lattice QCD? Results with physical masses in the continuum limit III,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2010, no. 9, p. 73, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. N. Tawfik, “Equilibrium statistical–thermal models in high-energy physics,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 29, no. 17, article 1430021, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Tanabashi, K. Hagiwara, K. Hikasa et al., “Review of particle physics,” Physical Review D, vol. 98, no. 3, article 030001, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Samanta, S. Chatterjee, and B. Mohanty, “Exploring the hadron resonance gas phase on the QCD phase diagram,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 46, no. 6, article 065106, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. V. Vovchenko, A. Motornenko, P. Alba, M. I. Gorenstein, L. M. Satarov, and H. Stoecker, “Multicomponent van der Waals equation of state: applications in nuclear and hadronic physics,” Physical Review C, vol. 96, no. 4, article 045202, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. Huovinen and P. Petreczky, “Hadron resonance gas with repulsive interactions and fluctuations of conserved charges,” Physics Letters B, vol. 777, pp. 125–130, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. V. Vovchenko, A. Pasztor, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and H. Stoecker, “Repulsive baryonic interactions and lattice QCD observables at imaginary chemical potential,” Physics Letters B, vol. 775, pp. 71–78, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. V. Vovchenko, A. Motornenko, M. I. Gorenstein, and H. Stoecker, “Beth-Uhlenbeck approach for repulsive interactions between baryons in a hadron gas,” Physical Review C, vol. 97, no. 3, article 035202, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. R. Dashen, S.-k. Ma, and H. J. Bernstein, “S-matrix formulation of statistical mechanics,” Physical Review, vol. 187, no. 1, pp. 345–370, 1969. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. R. Venugopalan and M. Prakash, “Thermal properties of interacting hadrons,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 546, no. 4, pp. 718–760, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. P. M. Lo, “S-matrix formulation of thermodynamics with N-body scatterings,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 77, no. 8, p. 533, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. K. A. Olive, “The thermodynamics of the quark-hadron phase transition in the early universe,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 190, no. 3, pp. 483–503, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. K. A. Olive, “The quark-hadron transition in systems with net baryon number,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 198, no. 3, pp. 461–473, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. R. Hagedorn and J. Rafelski, “Hot hadronic matter and nuclear collisions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 136–142, 1980. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. I. Gorenstein, V. Petrov, and G. Zinovjev, “Phase transition in the hadron gas model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 327–330, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. R. Hagedorn, “The pressure ensemble as a tool for describing the hadron-quark phase transition,” Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 265–281, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. I. Kapusta and K. A. Olive, “Thermodynamics of hadrons: delimiting the temperature,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 408, p. 478, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  35. D. H. Rischke, M. I. Gorenstein, H. Stoecker, and W. Greiner, “Excluded volume effect for the nuclear matter equation of state,” Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 485–489, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. D. Anchishkin and E. Suhonen, “Generalization of mean-field models to account for effects of excluded volume,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 586, no. 4, pp. 734–754, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. L. Satarov, M. Dmitriev, and I. Mishustin, “Equation of state of hadron resonance gas and the phase diagram of strongly interacting matter,” Physics of Atomic Nuclei, vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 1390–1415, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel, and M. Winn, “Interacting hadron resonance gas meets lattice QCD,” Physics Letters B, vol. 718, no. 1, pp. 80–85, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. Bhattacharyya, S. Das, S. K. Ghosh, R. Ray, and S. Samanta, “Fluctuations and correlations of conserved charges in an excluded-volume hadron resonance gas model,” Physical Review C, vol. 90, no. 3, article 034909, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. Albright, J. Kapusta, and C. Young, “Matching excluded-volume hadron-resonance gas models and perturbative QCD to lattice calculations,” Physical Review C, vol. 90, no. 2, article 024915, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. V. Vovchenko, D. Anchishkin, and M. Gorenstein, “Hadron resonance gas equation of state from lattice QCD,” Physical Review C, vol. 91, no. 2, article 024905, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. Albright, J. Kapusta, and C. Young, “Baryon number fluctuations from a crossover equation of state compared to heavy-ion collision measurements in the beam energy ranges NN=7.7 to 200 GeV,” Physical Review C, vol. 92, no. 4, article 044904, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. K. Redlich and K. Zalewski, “Thermodynamics of the low-density excluded-volume hadron gas,” Physical Review C, vol. 93, no. 1, article 014910, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. P. Alba, W. M. Alberico, A. Nada, M. Panero, and H. Stöcker, “Excluded-volume effects for a hadron gas in Yang-Mills theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 95, no. 9, article 094511, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. P. Braun-Munzinger, I. Heppe, and J. Stachel, “Chemical equilibration in Pb+Pb collisions at the SPS,” Physics Letters B, vol. 465, no. 1-4, pp. 15–20, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. J. Cleymans, H. Oeschler, K. Redlich, and S. Wheaton, “Comparison of chemical freeze-out criteria in heavy-ion collisions,” Physical Review C, vol. 73, no. 3, article 034905, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. V. V. Begun, M. Gaździcki, and M. I. Gorenstein, “Hadron-resonance gas at freeze-out: Reminder on the importance of repulsive interactions,” Physical Review C, vol. 88, no. 2, article 024902, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. Fu, “Higher moments of net-proton multiplicity distributions in heavy ion collisions at chemical freeze-out,” Physics Letters B, vol. 722, no. 1-3, pp. 144–150, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. V. Vovchenko and H. Stoecker, “Examination of the sensitivity of the thermal fits to heavy-ion hadron yield data to the modeling of the eigenvolume interactions,” Physical Review C, vol. 95, no. 4, article 044904, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. P. Alba, V. Vovchenko, M. Gorenstein, and H. Stoecker, “Flavor-dependent eigenvolume interactions in a hadron resonance gas,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 974, pp. 22–34, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. L. Satarov, V. Vovchenko, P. Alba, M. Gorenstein, and H. Stoecker, “New scenarios for hard-core interactions in a hadron resonance gas,” Physical Review C, vol. 95, no. 2, article 024902, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. V. Vovchenko, M. I. Gorenstein, and H. Stoecker, “van der Waals interactions in hadron resonance gas: from nuclear matter to lattice QCD,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 118, no. 18, article 182301, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. V. Vovchenko, “Equations of state for real gases on the nuclear scale,” Physical Review C, vol. 96, no. 1, article 015206, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. G. Uhlenbeck and E. Beth, “The quantum theory of the non-ideal gas. II. Behaviour at low temperatures,” Physica, vol. 4, p. 915, 1937. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. G. E. Uhlenbeck and E. Beth, “The quantum theory of the non-ideal gas I. Deviations from the classical theory,” Physica, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 729–745, 1936. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. A. Kostyuk, M. Gorenstein, H. Stöcker, and W. Greiner, “Second cluster integral and excluded volume effects for the pion gas,” Physical Review C, vol. 63, no. 4, article 044901, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. K. Huang, New York, 1963.
  58. L. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics, vol. 5 of Course of Theoretical Physics, 1980.
  59. W. Greiner, L. Neise, and H. Stöcker, Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
  60. G. Fast, R. Hagedorn, and L. Jones, “A statistical interpretation of large-angle elastic scattering,” Il Nuovo Cimento, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 856–859, 1963. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. R. J. Eden, P. V. Landshoff, D. I. Olive, J. C. Polkinghorne, and P. Roman, “The analytic S-matrix,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 1101-1102, 1967. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. F. Karsch, K. Redlich, and A. Tawfik, “Hadron resonance mass spectrum and lattice QCD thermodynamics,” The European Physical Journal C-Particles and Fields, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 549–556, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. K. Redlich, F. Karsch, and A. Tawfik, “Heavy-ion collisions and lattice QCD at finite baryon density,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. S1271–S1274, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. A. Tawfik and D. Toublan, “Quark-antiquark condensates in the hadronic phase,” Physics Letters B, vol. 623, no. 1-2, pp. 48–54, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. A. Tawfik and E. Abbas, “Thermal description of particle production in Au-Au collisions at RHIC energies (STAR),” Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 521–531, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. A. Bazavov, H. T. Ding, P. Hegde et al., “QCD equation of state to O()from lattice QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 95, no. 5, article 054504, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. A. Bazavov, T. Bhattacharya, C. DeTar et al., “Equation of state in (2+1)-flavor QCD,” Physical Review D, vol. 90, no. 9, article 094503, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Mahmoud Hanafy and Muhammad Maher. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The publication of this article was funded by SCOAP3.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views196
Downloads359
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.