Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Multimedia
Volume 2008, Article ID 615186, 17 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/615186
Research Article

RICE: A Reliable and Efficient Remote Instrumentation Collaboration Environment

Cyberinfrastructure and Software Development Group, Ohio Supercomputer Center, 1224 Kinnear Road, Columbus, OH 43212, USA

Received 9 March 2008; Accepted 3 November 2008

Academic Editor: Ghassan Alregib

Copyright © 2008 Prasad Calyam et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. “Chemistry Research Instrumentation and Facilities: Departmental Multi-User Instrumentation (CRIF:MU),” Program Solicitation NSF 07-552, National Science Foundation, Arlington, Va, USA, 2007.
  2. T. Richardson, Q. Stafford-Fraser, K. R. Wood, and A. Hopper, “Virtual network computing,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 33–38, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. K. W. Hodapp, J. B. Jensen, E. M. Irwin et al., “The Gemini Near-Infrared Imager (NIRI),” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, vol. 115, no. 814, pp. 1388–1406, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. K. Jeffay, T. Hudson, and M. Parris, “Beyond audio and video: multimedia networking support for distributed, immersive virtual environments,” in Proceedings of the 27th Euromicro Conference (EUROMICRO '01), pp. 300–307, Warsaw, Poland, September 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. K. Furuya, M. Tanaka, K. Mitsuishi et al., “Public opened internet electron microscopy in education field,” in Proceedings of the Microscopy and Microanalysis Conference, vol. 10, pp. 1566–1567, Savannah, Ga, USA, August 2004.
  6. J. Kao, D. Troxel, and S. Kittipiyakul, “Internet remote microscope,” in Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies III, vol. 2901 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 90–100, Boston, Mass, USA, November 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. M. A. O'Keefe, B. Parvin, D. Owen et al., “Automation for on-line remote-control in-situ electron microscopy,” in Proceedings of the Pfefferkorn Conference on Electron Image and Signal Processing, Silver Bay, NY, USA, May 1996.
  8. M. Hadida, Y. Kadobayashi, S. Lamont et al., “Advanced networking for telemicroscopy,” in Proceedings of the of the 10th Annual Internet Society Conference on Advanced Networking for Telemicroscopy (INET '00), Yokohama, Japan, July 2000.
  9. T. E. Molina, G. Yang, A. W. Lin, S. T. Peltier, and M. H. Ellisman, “A generalized service-oriented architecture for remote control of scientific imaging instruments,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing, vol. 2005, pp. 550–556, Melbourne, Australia, December 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. Ultra VNC Open-source Remote Access Solution, http://www.uvnc.com/.
  11. Real VNC Open-source Remote Access Solution, http://www.realvnc.com/.
  12. Thinklogical KVMoIP Remote Access Solution, http://www.thinklogical.com/.
  13. Avocent KVMoIP Remote Access Solution, http://www.avocent.com/.
  14. Adder KVMoIP Remote Access Solution, http://www.adder.com/.
  15. M. C. Wright, C. R. Hubbard, R. Lenarduzzi, and J. Rome, “Internet-based remote collaboration at the neutron residual stress facility at HFIR,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on New Opportunities for Better User Group Software (NOBUGS '02), Gaithersburg, Md, USA, November 2002.
  16. R. H. Cockrum, D. L. Clark, and S. T. Kelly, “Remote internet instrumentation for monitoring ocean data,” in Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE Conference and Exhibition (OCEANS '01), vol. 2, pp. 1176–1182, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, November 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. The Ohio State University CAMM VIM Program, http://www.camm.ohio-state.edu/.
  18. S. Winkler, Digital Video Quality: Vision Models and Metrics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
  19. P. Calyam, D. Krymskiy, M. Sridharan, and P. Schopis, “TBI: end-to-end network performance measurement testbed for empirical bottleneck detection,” in Proceddings of the 1st International Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities (Tridentcom '05), pp. 290–298, Trento, Italy, February 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. S. Shalunov and B. Teitelbaum, “One-way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP) Requirements,” IETF RFC 3763, 2004.
  21. J. Mullin, L. Smallwood, A. Watson, and G. Wilson, “New techniques for assessing audio and video quality in real-time interactive communications,” ETNA Project Report, IHM-HCI, Lille, France, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  22. ITU-T Recommendation G.114, “One-Way Transmission Time,” 1996.
  23. P. Calyam, M. Sridharan, W. Mandrawa, and P. Schopis, “Performance measurement and analysis of H. 323 traffic,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Passive and Active Network Measurement (PAM '04), pp. 137–146, Antibes Juan-les-Pins, France, April 2004.
  24. Open H.323 Project, http://sourceforge.net/projects/openh323.
  25. A. Tirumala, L. Cottrell, and T. Dunigan, “Measuring end-to-end bandwidth with Iperf using Web100,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Passive and Active Network Measurement (PAM '03), La Jolla, Calif, USA, April 2003.
  26. A. B. Downey, “Using pathchar to estimate Internet link characteristics,” in Proceedings of the ACM SIGMETRICS International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems (SIGMETRICS '99), vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 222–223, Atlata, Ga, USA, May 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. A. McGregor and H.-W. Braoun, “Automated event detection for active measurement systems,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Passive and Active Measurements (PAM '01), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 2001.
  28. C. Logg, L. Cottrell, and J. Navratil, “Experiences in traceroute and available bandwidth change analysis,” in Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Network Troubleshooting: Research, Theory and Operations Practice Meet Malfunctioning Reality, pp. 247–252, Portland, Ore, USA, August-September 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. I. Atkinson, D. du Boulay, C. Chee et al., “Developing CIMA-based cyberinfrastructure for remote access to scientific instruments and collaborative e-research,” in Proceedings of the 5th Australasian Symposium on ACSW Frontiers, vol. 249 of ACM International Conference Series, pp. 3–10, Ballarat, Australia, January-February 2007.
  30. P. Calyam, N. Howes, A. Kalash, and M. Haffner, “User and network interplay in internet telemicroscopy,” in Proceedings of the 1st ICST/ACM International Conference on Immersive Telecommunications (IMMERSCOM '07), Verona, Italy, October 2007.