Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Multimedia
Volume 2008, Article ID 825671, 10 pages
Research Article

An Effective Multimedia Item Shell Design for Individualized Education: The Crome Project

1Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Canada T6B 2E8
2Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, PA 16802, USA

Received 10 August 2007; Revised 15 January 2008; Accepted 12 February 2008

Academic Editor: S. Takamura

Copyright © 2008 Irene Cheng and Anup Basu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Agarwal, S. R. Bhattacharyya, D. Ghose, and R. Allen, “The Web: interactive and multimedia education,” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, vol. 30, no. 16, pp. 1717–1727, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  2. R. Gonzalez, G. Cranitch, and J. H. Jo, “Academic directions of multimedia education,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 89–95, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. K. Ivers and A. Barron, Multimedia Projects in Education: Designing, Producing and Assessing, Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, Colo, USA, 2nd edition, 2002.
  4. E. Orhun, “Web-based educational resources for learning and online teaching in higher education: the MERLOT project,” in Proceedings of the 24th International Association of Technological University Liberies (IATUL '03), vol. 13, Ankara,Turkey, June 2003.
  5. C. G. Parshall, T. Davey, and P. J. Pashley, “Innovative item types for computerized testing,” in Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice, W. van der Linden and C. Glas, Eds., pp. 129–148, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  6. O. Parlangeli, E. Marchigiani, and S. Bagnara, “Multimedia systems in distance education: effects of usability on learning,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 37–49, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. S. Rabinowitz and T. Brandt, “Computer-based assessment: can it deliver on its promise?” 2001,
  8. J. E. Tuovinen, “Multimedia distance education interactions,” Education Media International, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 16–24, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. T. Volery and D. Lord, “Critical success factors in online education,” International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 216–223, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. J. Yau and M. Joy, “Adaptive learning and testing with learning objects,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE '04), pp. 1861–1865, Melbourne, Australia, December 2004.
  11. A. L. Zenisky and S. G. Sireci, “Technological innovations in large-scale assessment,” Applied Measurement in Education, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 337–362, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. R. K. Hambleton, H. Swaminathan, and H. J. Rogers, Fundamentals of Item Response Theory, Sage, Newbury Park, Calif, USA, 1991.
  13. W. van der Linden and R. Hambleton, Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory, Springer, London, UK, 1997.
  14. A. Birnbaum, “Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability,” in Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores, F. M. Lord and M. R. Novick, Eds., pp. 395–479, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, USA, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  15. S. D. Craig, A. G. Graesser, J. Sullins, and B. Gholson, “Affect and learning: an exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with auto tutor,” Journal of Educational Media, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 241–250, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  16. M. Gierl, “Personal communication,” July 2006, Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta. View at Google Scholar
  17. I. Cheng and A. Basu, “Improving multimedia innovative item types for computer based testing,” in Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM '06), pp. 557–566, San Diego, Calif, USA, December 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar