Research Article
Text Extraction from Historical Document Images by the Combination of Several Thresholding Techniques
Table 2
Average results obtained on the test dataset.
| | | Execution time (ms) | -measure (%) | PSNR | NRM (10−2) | MPM (10−3) | DRD |
| Global | Otsu [6] | 458,75 | 80,565 | 15,716 | 8.83 | 2.961 | 26.208 | Kapur et al. [8] | 520,828 | 81,921 | 15,692 | 8.109 | 2.059 | 23.104 | IGT | 309,543 | 76,556 | 14,307 | 10.11 | 2.778 | 28.73 |
| Local | Niblack [11] | 78504.1 | 66.88 | 7.78 | 11.47 | 18.239 | 43.42 | Sauvola and Pietikäinen [3] | 73914.2 | 85.68 | 18.62 | 7.95 | 1.254 | 6.13 | Nick | 72480.9 | 82.22 | 19.047 | 9.31 | 2.201 | 5.27 |
| Hybrid | Improved IGT | 487,943 | 78,039 | 14,728 | 12.05 | 3.72 | 22.78 | Gangamma and Srikanta [14] | 73999,157 | 69,187 | 13,469 | 21.71 | 15.43 | 38.81 | Background Subtraction thresholding | 1122,057 | 68,907 | 13,432 | 22.34 | 17.75 | 40.97 | Tabatabaei and Bohlool [16] | 75875 | 85.82 | 26.69 | 8.2 | 1.183 | 3.439 | Proposed Approche | 1417.86 | 87.44 | 27.97 | 6.74 | 1.025 | 3.161 |
|
|