Advances in Medicine

Advances in Medicine / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 531074 |

Meseret Birhanie, Belay Tessema, Getachew Ferede, Mengistu Endris, Bamlaku Enawgaw, "Malaria, Typhoid Fever, and Their Coinfection among Febrile Patients at a Rural Health Center in Northwest Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study", Advances in Medicine, vol. 2014, Article ID 531074, 8 pages, 2014.

Malaria, Typhoid Fever, and Their Coinfection among Febrile Patients at a Rural Health Center in Northwest Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Academic Editor: Spilios Manolakopoulos
Received03 Jul 2014
Accepted17 Sep 2014
Published01 Oct 2014


Background. Malaria and typhoid fever are major public health problems in tropical and subtropical countries. People in endemic areas are at risk of contracting both infections concurrently. Objectives. The study was aimed at determining the prevalence and associated risk factors of malaria, typhoid, and their coinfection among febrile patients. Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 200 febrile patients suspected for malaria and/or typhoid fever from April to May, 2013, at Ayinba Health Center, Northwest Ethiopia. Blood samples were collected for blood culture, Widal test, and blood film preparation. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 statistical software. Results. The prevalence of malaria was 36.5% (). Among these 32 (43.8%), 30 (41.1%) and 11 (15.1%) were positive for P. falciparum, P. vivax, and mixed infections, respectively. The seroprevalence of typhoid fever was 38 (19%), but 1 (0.5%) with blood culture. Malaria typhoid fever coinfection was 13 (6.5%). 2–5-year-old children and poor hand washing habit were significantly associated with malaria and typhoid infection, respectively (). Conclusions. The prevalence of malaria and typhoid fever was found high. Further studies should be done on the other determinants of malaria and typhoid fever coinfection in different seasons and different study areas.

1. Introduction

Malaria is one of the febrile illnesses and the most common fatal disease in the world caused by one or more species of plasmodium. These are Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium ovale, Plasmodium malariae, and Plasmodium knowlesi. Approximately half of the world population is at risk of malaria. Most of malaria cases and deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa. According to the World malaria report 2011, there were about 216 million cases of malaria and an estimated 655,000 deaths in 2010 [1].

Malaria is the most communicable disease in Ethiopia and it accounts for about 30% of the overall disability adjusted life years lost. Approximately 68% (54.2 million) of the total population of 78 million lives in malaria risk areas. P. falciparum and P. vivax are the dominant species of malaria in Ethiopia, with 60% and 40% relative frequencies, respectively. Plasmodium falciparum is a predominant species in endemic areas and causes complicated disease and death in the country [2].

Typhoid fever (enteric fever) is a systemic prolonged febrile illness caused by certain Salmonella serotypes. Salmonella enterica serotype typhi (S. typhi) and Salmonella enterica serotype paratyphi (S. paratyphi A, S. paratyphi B, and S. paratyphi C) are species that cause typhoid fever. S. typhi is the most common serotype of salmonella that causes typhoid fever [36]. The estimated total number of world typhoid fever episode in 2010 was 13.5 million [5]. Poor disposal of human excreta, poorly equipped latrine with water facility, poor hand washing habit, and untreated water usage are the main cause of transmission of typhoid fever in developing countries [4, 5].

Malaria and typhoid fever are a major public health problem in tropical and subtropical countries caused by very different organisms, protozoa and Gram negative bacilli, respectively, and transmitted via different mechanisms [58]. People in endemic areas are at a risk of contracting both infections concurrently [9, 10]. There is a considerable overlap of signs and symptoms of malaria and typhoid fever [2, 1114]. Thus the similarity of clinical features of both diseases leads to misdiagnosis and mistreatment of the febrile patients [11, 15]. So, reliable diagnostic method is important for effective management of cases to reduce misuse and wastage of drugs [11, 1416]. So far, the prevalence of malaria, typhoid fever, their coinfection, and associated risk factorswere not well studied in Ethiopia. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of malaria, typhoid fever, and their coinfection among febrile patients.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Area, Population, and Design

The study was conducted from April 2013 to May 2013 at Ayinba Health Center, Dembia district, Northwest Ethiopia. The altitude of the district ranges between 1,750 and 2,100 m above sea level. It has a population of more than 300,000 and the majority of its population depends on subsistence agriculture. The district is malarious (mainly P. vivax and P. falciparum) and covers an area of 1,270 Km2. It is 27 km away from ancient city Gondar. All febrile patients (age ranged 2–80 years) suspected for malaria and/or typhoid fever who had not taken antimalarial drug and/or antibiotics within 2 weeks were included. Patients with underlying diseases were excluded from the study.

2.2. Specimen Collection and Processing

Data on the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants were collected using a pretested structured questionnaire by interview. After interview, 10 mL blood sample was collected from adult patients by experienced laboratory technologist. Then, 7 mL blood was inoculated immediately to 45 mL Brain Heart Infusion broth. Similarly, 3-4 mL blood was collected from children and 1.5–2 mL blood was inoculated to 9 mL broth to isolate S. typhi and S. paratyphi. Both thick and thin blood films were prepared for malaria diagnosis and slide agglutination test was done for typhoid fever screening using somatic (O) and flagellar (H) antigens kits of S. typhi (TYDAL, Lab Care Diagnostics (India)). Antibody titration was performed for slide reactive samples. Antibody titer of ≥1 : 80 against O and H antigen of S. typhi was taken as a cut of value based on the manufacturer instruction. The blood smear was read at the health center by laboratory technicians and the result was reported. All blood films were reread by experienced microscopist at the University of Gondar Hospital laboratory who was blinded to initial results. Discrepancies occurred in the result by the two readers were solved by using the third experienced microscopist.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The data was cleaned, edited, checked for completeness, entered to Epi Info version 3.5.3, and exported to SPSS version 20 for analysis. Chi-square and odds ratio (OR) by logistic regression were calculated to determine associated factors. value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

2.4. Ethical Consideration

Ethical clearance was obtained from University of Gondar, School of Biomedical and Laboratory Sciences research and ethical committee. Permission was obtained from Dembia Woreda Health Office and Ayinba Health Center. Written informed consent was obtained from each of the volunteer study subjects or guardian of children. Positive results were given for nurses working in the health center for treatment according to the national treatment guideline.

3. Results

Sociodemographic Data. A total of 200 febrile patients suspected for malaria and/or typhoid fever were included in this study. About 60% of the study participants were males. The mean age was 24.24 ± 13.4 years and majority of the patients (41.5%) were within the age range of 12–25 years, and most of the patients were farmers (71.5%), rural residents (89%), and illiterate (61.5%) (Table 1).


 Female 8040.0
Age in years
 2–5 126.0
 6–11 2512.5
 12–25 8341.5
 26–45 6633.0
 ≥46 147.0
 Urban 22 11.0
 Illiterate 12361.5
 Read and write 2010.0
 Primary school 4022.0
 Secondary school 7 3.5
 College/university 6 3.0
 Merchant 7 3.5
 Civil servant 3 1.5
 Housewife 2 1.0
 Daily laborers 4 2.0
 Students 3216.0

Prevalence of Malaria. Malaria was the most prevalent disease in the study area. From the total 200 febrile patients 73 (36.5%) were malaria positive. Of them, 32 (43.8%) were positive for P. falciparum, 30 (41.1%) were positive for P. vivax, and the remaining 11 (15.1%) were positive for both P. falciparum and P. vivax. The positivity rates of P. falciparum and P. vivax were 51.2% and 48.8%, respectively (Figure 1).

Prevalence of Typhoid Fever. Of the total study subjects, 38 (64.4%) patients had antibody titers of ≥1 : 80 for both O and H antigens; of them, 7 (18.4%) had ≥ 1 : 320 titers. Different gram negative organisms were grown on the blood culture but there was only one growth of S. typhi (Table 2).

Widal titer FrequencyPercentage

No agglutination 5 8.5
1 : 20 610.2
1 : 401016.9
1 : 801423.7
1 : 1601728.8
≥1 : 320 711.9

Total 59100.0

≥1 : 80 titer taken as positive titer.
3.1. Prevalence of Malaria and Typhoid Fever Coinfection

The titration result showed that the prevalence of coinfection was 13 (6.5%). Of them 8 (61.5%) were coinfected with P. falciparum, 3 (23.1%) were with P. vivax, and 2 (15.4%) were with mixed infection. The prevalence of coinfection using blood culture was 1 (0.5%).

3.2. Risk Factors Associated with Malaria, Typhoid Fever, and Their Coinfection

The age group 2–5 years old were significantly associated with malaria . The chi square analyses showed that this age group was significantly associated with malaria . There was no significant association of malaria and typhoid fever with sex, residence, occupation, and educational background (Table 3). Clinical features were not significantly associated with malaria and typhoid fever (Table 4).

Variables   Malaria   Typhoid fever   Coinfection
Positive (%)Negative (%) valueReactive (%)Nonreactive (%) valuePositive (%)Negative (%) value

 Male47 (39.2)73 (60.8)0.920.33720 (16.7)100 (83.3)1.060.309 (7.5)111 (92.5)0.490.482
 Female26 (32.5)54 (67.5)18 (22.5)62 (77.5)4 (5.0)6 (95.0)
 2–58 (66.7)4 (33.3)10.20.043 (25.0)9 (75.0)0.910.923 (25.0)9 (75.0)8.260.08
 6–118 (32.0)17 (68.0)6 (24.0)19 (76.0)2 (8.0)23 (92.0)
 12–2535 (42.2)48 (57.8)15 (18.1)68 (81.9)5 (6.0)78 (94.0)
 26–4520 (30.3)46 (69.7)13 (19.7)53 (80.3)3 (4.5)63 (95.5)
 ≥462 (14.3)11 (85.7)2 (14.3)12 (85.7)0 (0.0)14 (100)
 Rural68 (38.2)110 (61.8)0.020.15534 (19.1)144 (80.9)0.010.9112 (6.7)166 (93.3)0.160.69
 Urban5 (22.7)17 (77.3)4 (18.2)18 (81.8)1 (4.5)21 (95.5)
 Illiterate44 (35.8)79 (64.2)1.360.85124 (19.5)99 (80.5)0.180.998 (6.5)115 (93.5)1.190.879
 Read and write8 (40.0)12 (60.0)4 (20.8)16 (80.0)1 (5.0)19 (95.0)
 Primary school17 (38.6)27 (61.4)8 (18.2)36 (81.8)3 (6.8)41 (93.2)
 Secondary school3 (42.9)4 (57.1)1 (14.3)6 (85.7)1 (14.3)6 (85.7)
 College1 (16.7)5 (83.3)1 (16.7)5 (83.3)0 (0.0)6 (100)
 Farmer52 (35.4)95 (64.6)8.540.2029 (19.7)118 (80.3)2.900.829 (6.1)138 (93.8)2.140.906
 Merchant2 (28.6)5 (71.4)2 (28.6)5 (71.4)1 (14.3)6 (85.7)
 Civil servant1 (33.3)2 (66.7)0 (0.0)3 (100.0)0 (0.0)3 (100)
 Housewife0 (0.0)2 (100.0)0 (0.0)2 (100.0)0 (0.0)4 (100)
 Daily laborers0 (0.0)4 (100.0)1 (25.0)3 (75.0)0 (0.0)2 (100)
 Student14 (43.8)18 (56.2)6 (18.8)26 (81.2)3 (9.4)29 (90.6)

: number; : Chi square.

Clinical features  Malaria   Typhoid fever   Coinfection
Positive (%)Negative (%) value Reactive (%)Nonreactive (%) valuePositive (%)Negative (%) value

 Continuous27 (34.2)52 (65.8)0.300.5815 (19)64 (81)0.000.994 (5.1)75 (94.9)0.440.5
 Intermittent46 (38.0)75 (62.0)23 (19)98 (81)9 (7.4)112 (92.6
 Yes66 (36.1)117 (63.9)0.180.6834 (18.6)149 (81.4)0.240.6210 (5.4)174 (94.6)4.290.06
 No7 (41.2)10 (58.8)4 (23.5)13 (76.5)3 (16.7)13 (83.3)
Joint pain
 Yes55 (36.2)97 (63.8)0.030.8728 (18.4)124 (81.6)0.140.718 (5.3)144 (94.5)1.590.44
 No18 (37.5)30 (65.5)10 (20.8)38 (79.2)5 (10.4)43 (89.6)
 Yes33 (38.8)52 (61.2)0.340.5613 (15.3)72 (84.7)1.320.254 (4.7)81 (95.3)0.780.38
 No40 (34.8)75 (65.2)25 (21.7)90 (78.3)9 (7.8)106 (92.2)
 Yes63 (38.0)103 (62.0)0.890.3529 (17.5)137 (82.5)1.480.2210 (6.0)156 (94.0)0.360.55
 No10 (29.4)24 (70.6) 9 (26.5)25 (73.5)3 (8.8)31 (91.2)
 Yes70 (38.5)112 (61.5)3.360.0733 (18.1)149 (81.9)0.990.3212 (6.6)170 (93.4)0.030.86
 No3 (16.7)15 (83.3)5 (27.8)13 (72.2)1 (5.6)17 (94.4)
 Yes49 (36.6)85 (63.4)0.000.9829 (21.6)105 (78.4)1.840.189 (6.7)125 (93.3)0.030.86
 No24 (36.4)42 (63.6)9 (13.6)57 (86.4)4 (6.1)62 (93.9)
 Yes27 (37.0)46 (63.0)0.010.9119 (25.7)55 (74.3)3.400.066 (8.2)67 (91.8)0.560.45
 No46 (36.2)81 (63.8)19 (15.1)107 (84.9)7 (5.5)120 (94.5)
 Yes14 (40)21 (60)0.050.836 (17.1)29 (82.9)0.490.824 (11.8)30 (88.2)1.870.17
 No59 (35.8)106 (64.2)32 (19.4)133 (80.6)9 (5.4)157 (94.6)

: number; : Chi square.

By using logistic regression analysis, bed net usage, impregnation of the bed net with chemicals, and history of travel to malaria endemic areas were not significantly associated risk factors of malaria (Table 5). But hand washing habit was significantly associated with typhoid fever infection (, OR = 2.893, 95% CI = 1.245–6.72) (Table 6).

VariablesPositive (%) Negative (%) value COR 95% CI

History of travel
 Yes10 (37.0)17 (63.0)0.950.9740.420–2.256
 No63 (36.4)110 (63.6)1
Bed net usage
 Yes56 (38.9)88 (61.1)1
 No17 (30.4)39 (69.9)0.261.6850.354–1.326
Impregnation of bed net
 Yes 3 (18.8)13 (81.2)1
 No53 (41.4)75 (58.6)0.3661.8890.476–7.497

: number; COR: crude odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

VariablesTyphoid fever
Reactive (%)Nonreactive (%) valueCOR95% CI

Water source
 Tap water13 (23.2)43 (76.8)1
 River6 (27.2)16 (72.7)0.771.240.403–3.820
 Spring17 (16.0)89 (84.0)0.260.6320.281–1.418
 Well2 (12.5)14 (87.5)0.360.4730.095–2.235
Uncooked food feeding
 Yes14 (21.2)52 (78.8)0.57 1.2340.590–2.57
 No24 (17.9)110 (82.1)1
Toilet usage
 Yes34 (19.1)144 (80.9)1
 No4 (18.2)18 (81.8)0.910.9410.299–2.961
Hand washing habit
 Poor11 (35.5)20 (64.5)0.012.8931.245–6.720
 Good27 (16.0)142 (84.0)1

: number; COR: crude odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

4. Discussion

The result of this study is comparable with the reports from Akoko State, Nigeria, 37.6% [17] and Imo State, Nigeria, 39% [18]. But it is less than the reports from Sierra Leone 62.3% [8] West Gojam, Ethiopia, 62% [19] and Ibadan, Nigeria, 44.3% [20] and higher than the reports in Ebony, Nigeria, 13.2% [21], Enugu, Nigeria, 22.2% [22], Kaduna State, Nigeria, 27% [7], Sokoto, Nigeria, 17% [23], and Benin 5% [24]. The discrepancy of the results between the studies might be due to seasonal variation and difference in geographical locations.

The positivity rates of P. falciparum and P. vivax were almost similar (51.2% and 48.8%, resp.). But according to the Federal Ministry of Health report the relative frequency of P. falciparum and P. vivax was 60% and 40%, respectively [2]. There is a great difference in frequencies of two plasmodium species. The difference in the frequencies of the two species might be the result of the prevention and control measures employed in the study area that have higher impact on P. falciparum than P. vivax. In case of P. vivax the dormant stage of the parasite can relapse at any time and relatively maintain its prevalence in the community.

In this study the prevalence of malaria was higher in males 64.4% than females 35.6% but there was no statistically significant association . While other studies showed in Sierra Leone, females (53.4%) are more affected than males (46.6%) [8]. This might be due to the fact that males are sleeping outside their house for agricultural purpose and have greater chance to travel to malaria endemic area for crop cultivation or daily labor. In this study there was significant association between age and malaria . This might be due to low immune response against malaria infection, inappropriate use of bed nets, and in appropriate use of antimalarial drugs in case of children.

The prevalence of the typhoid fever using Widal titration test was comparable with the study in Ebonyi, 21.2% [21], and Ibadan, 16.7% [20], and less than that of the reports in Sierra Leone, 31.4% [8], Kaduna State, 36.6% [7], Akoko, 73.9% [17], Lagos, 27.6% [25], Benin, 39% [24], and Imo State, Nigeria, 42% [18], but higher than the reports from West Gojam 5.8% [19] and Sokoto, Nigeria, 10.3% [23]. This might be due to the differences in Widal test kits, year of study, season, difference in cultural practices, and toilet facility. In addition, the antibody titer levels found in a healthy population may vary from time to time and in different areas, so it is difficult to establish a cut-off level of baseline antibody in a defined area and community [11].

The frequency of typhoid fever was greater in females (22.5%) than males (16.7%), but not statistically significant ; however, other previous studies in Sokoto, Nigeria, showed that the frequency of typhoid fever was 29.4% among males and 22.9% among females [23]. Females may acquire infection during food preparation, child care, and other household activities, thus increasing the frequency of typhoid fever.

In this study, the result of malaria and typhoid coinfection using Widal test is comparable with the reports of Ebonyi State 5.6% [21] but higher than the result of study in west Gojam, 2.8% [19] and lower than the reports in Bo city Sierra Leone 14.1% [8], Akoko 18.4% [17], Ibadan 12% [20], Enugu 16% [22], Kaduna 10.1% [7], Sokoto 10.3% [23], and Imo state 22% [18].

The result of the coinfection using blood culture was 0.5% and this is in agreement with the study in Ibadan 0.4% [20], Kaduna 0.5% [7], Sierra Leone 0.6% [8], and Ebony, 0.8% [21] but less than the study in Sokoto, 1.33% [23], Lagos, 19.95% [25], and Enugu, 26.6% [22]. Even though blood culture is a gold standard test for typhoid fever diagnosis, it can be affected by duration of infection, intake of antibiotics [11], and laboratory setup.

Because of the high prevalence of typhoid fever and malaria in the tropics, coinfections are common [9]. The high rate of typhoid and malaria coinfection using Widal test may be responsible for the frequent treatment of mixed infections. However, blood culture results showed that this rate of coinfection is only 0.5%. Hence, typhoid fever could cross-react with malaria using Widal test [6, 11] and lead to overdiagnosis of typhoid fever. Thus, overdiagnosis of typhoid fever leads to unnecessary exposure of patients to the side effects of antibiotics. In addition, misdiagnosis may result in delayed diagnosis and treatment of malaria and other acute febrile illnesses. This emphasized the importance of a reliable diagnostic test for typhoid fever. Study subjects, with poor hand washing habit, were more likely to be affected by typhoid fever ( value = 0.04, OR = 2.893, 95% CI = 1.245–6.72).

5. Conclusions

Malaria was the most prevalent disease among febrile patients in the study area. There was a substantial result discrepancy among Widal test and blood culture for the diagnosis of typhoid fever. Poor hand washing habit was significantly associated with typhoid fever. Further studies should be done on the other potential risk factors of malaria and typhoid fever coinfection in different seasons and different study areas. The community should be encouraged to use latrine to reduce the burden of high prevalence of typhoid fever infection in the area. The continued development of better diagnostic tools for both malaria and typhoid fever is still crucial.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Meseret Birhanie recruited the patients, collected the data, analyzed it, and wrote the draft paper. Belay Tessema conceived the study, supervised the collection of data, and revised the draft paper. Getachew Ferede ensured quality of the laboratory results and revised the draft paper. Mengistu Endris performed laboratory tests and interpreted and analyzed them along with Meseret Birhanie. Bamlaku Enawgaw interpreted the data collected and wrote the draft paper along with Meseret Birhanie. All authors read and approved the final version of the paper.


The authors would like to extend their appreciation to Ayinba Health Center professionals for their help in the collection of data and processing and analyzing of laboratory tests. The authors also want to express their great thanks to the study participants for their patience and cooperation.


  1. WHO, World Malaria Report, 2011,
  2. Federal Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Health, National Guide Lines, 3rd edition, 2012.
  3. J. A. Otegbayo, “Typhoid fever: the challenging of medical management,” Annals of Ibadan Postgraduate Medicine, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 60–62, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  4. A. Malisa and H. Nyaki, “Prevalence and constraints of typhoid fever and its control in an endemic area of Singida region in Tanzania: lessons for effective control of the disease,” Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 93–99, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  5. G. C. Buckle, C. L. Walker, and R. E. Black, “Typhoid fever and paratyphoid fever: systematic review to estimate global morbidity and mortality for 2010,” Journal of Global Health, vol. 2, no. 1, Article ID 010401, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. P. Pradhan, “Co-infection of typhoid and malaria. Review,” Journal of Medical Laboratory and Diagnosis, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 22–26, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  7. F. A. Mbuh, M. Galadima, and L. Ogbadu, “Rate of co-infection with malaria parasites and Salmonella Typhi in Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria,” Annals of African Medicine, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 64–67, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  8. A. J. Sundufu, M. S. James, and I. K. Foday, “Role of co-infection with malaria parasites and Salmonella Typhoid in Bo City,” Southern Sierra Leone Public Health Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 204–207, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  9. C. J. Uneke, “Concurrent malaria and typhoid fever in the tropics: the diagnostic challenges and public health implications,” Journal of Vector Borne Diseases, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 133–142, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  10. E. F. Nsutebu, P. Martins, and D. Adiogo, “Short communication: prevalence of typhoid fever in febrile patients with symptoms clinically compatible with typhoid fever in Cameroon,” Tropical Medicine and International Health, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 575–578, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Cheesbrough, District Laboratory Practice in Tropical Countries (Part1), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2nd edition, 2006.
  12. WHO, Guidelines for the Treatment of Malaria, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2nd edition, 2010.
  13. M. M. Abdel-Wahab, K. A. Ismail, and N. M. El-Sayed, “Laboratory diagnosis of malaria infection in clinically suspected cases using microscopic examination, optimal rapid antigen test and PCR,” Parasitologist United Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 9–66, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  14. T. Leslie, A. Mikhail, I. Mayan et al., “Overdiagnosis and mistreatment of malaria among febrile patients at primary healthcare level in Afghanistan: observational study,” British Medical Journal, vol. 345, Article ID e4389, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. E.-D. H. Hassan, A. E. D. Haggaz, E. B. Mohammed-Elhassan, E. M. Malik, and I. Adam, “Fluorescence microscope (Cyscope) for malaria diagnosis in pregnant women in Medani Hospital, Sudan,” Diagnostic Pathology, vol. 6, no. 1, article 88, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. B. S. C. Uzochukwu, L. O. Chiegboka, C. Enwereuzo et al., “Examining appropriate diagnosis and treatment of malaria: availability and use of rapid diagnostic tests and artemisinin-based combination therapy in public and private health facilities in south east Nigeria,” BMC Public Health, vol. 10, article 486, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. E. A. Igharo, F. Osazuwa, S. A. Ajayi, A. Ebueku, and O. Igbinigie, “Dual infection with typhoid and malaria in febrile patients in Ikare Akoko, Nigeria,” International Journal of Tropical Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 49–52, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. U. Opara, J. K. Nnodim, B. E. Oluwafemi, and M. I. Nwachukwu, “Co-infection of malaria and typhoid fever among patients in owerri, imo state Nigeria,” Global Research Journal of Science, vol. 1, pp. 5–8, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  19. A. Animut, Y. Mekonnen, D. Shimelis, and E. Ephraim, “Febrile illnesses of different etiology among outpatients in four health centers in Northwestern Ethiopia,” Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 107–110, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  20. C. Igbeneghu, M. J. Olisek, and J. A. Onuegbu, “Malaria and typhoid fever among adult patients with fever in Ibadan south west Nigeria,” International Journal of Tropical Medicine, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 112–115, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  21. A. C. Nwuzo, R. A. Onyeagba, I. R. Iroha, O. Nworie, and A. E. Oji, “Parasitological, bacteriological, and cultural determination of prevalence of malaria parasite (Plasmodium falciparum) and typhoid fever co-infection in Abakaliki, Ebonyi State,” Scientific Research and Essays, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 966–971, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  22. M. E. Ohanu, A. U. Mbah, P. O. Okonkwo, and F. S. Nwagbo, “Interference by malaria in the diagnosis of typhoid using Widal test alone,” West African Journal of Medicine, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 250–252, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  23. H. M. Alhassan, N. N. Shidali, S. B. Manga, K. Abdullahi, and K. M. Hamid, “Co-infection profile of Salmonella typhi and malaria parasite in Sokoto-Nigeria,” Global Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 2, no. 201, pp. 13–20, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  24. J. O. Isibor, E. Igun, M. Okodua, A. O. Akhile, E. Isibor, and E. Adagbonyi, “Co-infection with malaria parasites and Salmonella typhi in patients in Benin city,” Nigeria Annals of Biological Research, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 361–365, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  25. K. O. Akinyemi, B. S. Bamiro, and A. O. Coker, “Salmonellosis in Lagos, Nigeria: incidence of Plasmodium falciparum-associated co-infection, patterns of antimicrobial resistance, and emergence of reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones,” Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 351–358, 2007. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Meseret Birhanie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.