Research Article
Sensitivity Study of Four Land Surface Schemes in the WRF Model
Table 1
Comparison of the STD, Noah, RUC, and CLM3 land surface schemes in WRF.
| | Vegetation | Soil | Snow | Lake | River routing |
| STD | N/A | 5 layer temperatures, but no moisture and frozen soil | N/A | N/A | N/A | Noah | One vegetation type in one grid cell without dynamic vegetation and carbon budget | 4 layer temperatures and moistures and frozen soil | 1 layer snow lumped with the top soil layer No liquid water fixed snow density | N/A | N/A | RUC | One vegetation type in one grid cell without dynamic vegetation and carbon budget | 6 layer temperatures and moistures and frozen soil | 2 layer snow No liquid water Fixed snow density | N/A | N/A | CLM3 | Subgrids with up to 10 vegetation types in one grid cell with dynamic vegetation and carbon budget | 10-layer temperatures and moistures and frozen soil | 5 layer snow with liquid water Variable snow density | 10 layer lake with lake ice and snow included | A Digital Elevation Model (DEM) to calculate water flow directions |
|
|