Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Meteorology
Volume 2014, Article ID 581756, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/581756
Research Article

Uncertainty Assessment: Reservoir Inflow Forecasting with Ensemble Precipitation Forecasts and HEC-HMS

Taiwan Typhoon and Flood Research Institute, National Applied Research Laboratories, 11 F, No. 97, Section 1, Roosevelt Road, Zhongzheng District, Taipei 10093, Taiwan

Received 3 June 2014; Revised 1 August 2014; Accepted 4 August 2014; Published 27 August 2014

Academic Editor: Hann-Ming H. Juang

Copyright © 2014 Sheng-Chi Yang and Tsun-Hua Yang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Lee, H. Ho, K. T. Lee et al., “Assessment of sewer flooding model based on ensemble quantitative precipitation forecast,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 506, pp. 101–113, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Li, M. Yang, R. Soong, and H. Huang, “Simulating typhoon floods with gauge data and mesoscale-modeled rainfall in a mountainous watershed,” Journal of Hydrometeorology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 306–323, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. L. Cheng and J. W. Liao, “Current situtation and sustainability of water resource in Taiwan,” in Proceedings of 1st Asian Water Saving Coouncil Conference, pp. 141–148, 2011.
  4. J. Huang, C. Yu, J. Lee, L. Cheng, T. Lee, and S. Kao, “Linking typhoon tracks and spatial rainfall patterns for improving flood lead time predictions over a mesoscale mountainous watershed,” Water Resources Research, vol. 48, pp. 1–15, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Cheng, K. Chau, Y. Sun, and J. Lin, “Long-term prediction of discharges in Manwan Reservoir using artificial neural network models,” in Advances in Neural Networks-ISNN 2005, vol. 3498 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 1040–1045, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. C. L. Wu, K. W. Chau, and Y. S. Li, “Predicting monthly streamflow using data-driven models coupled with data-preprocessing techniques,” Water Resources Research, vol. 45, no. 8, Article ID W08432, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Valipour, M. E. Banihabib, and S. M. R. Behbahani, “Comparison of the ARMA, ARIMA, and the autoregressive artificial neural network models in forecasting the monthly inflow of Dez dam reservoir,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 476, pp. 433–441, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. Y. Liu and H. V. Gupta, “Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: toward an integrated data assimilation framework,” Water Resources Research, vol. 43, no. 7, Article ID W07401, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. Hostache, P. Matgen, A. Montanari, M. Montanari, L. Hoffmann, and L. Pfister, “Propagation of uncertainties in coupled hydro-meteorological forecasting systems: a stochastic approach for the assessment of the total predictive uncertainty,” Atmospheric Research, vol. 100, no. 2-3, pp. 263–274, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Zappa, S. Jaun, U. Germann, A. Walser, and F. Fundel, “Superposition of three sources of uncertainties in operational flood forecasting chains,” Atmospheric Research, vol. 100, no. 2-3, pp. 246–262, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Rossa, K. Liechti, M. Zappa et al., “The COST 731 action: a review on uncertainty propagation in advanced hydro-meteorological forecast systems,” Atmospheric Research, vol. 100, no. 2-3, pp. 150–167, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. N. Palmer, “A nonlinear dynamical perspective model error: a proposal for non-local stochastic-dynamic parametrization in weather and climate prediction models,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 127, no. 572, pp. 279–304, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. S. Wilks, Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006.
  14. E. N. Lorenz, “The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion,” Tellus, vol. 21, pp. 289–307, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  15. H. L. Cloke and F. Pappenberger, “Ensemble flood forecasting: a review,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 375, no. 3-4, pp. 613–626, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. Van Steenbergen and P. Willems, “Rainfall uncertainty in flood forecasting: Belgian case study of Rivierbeek,” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. J. Knighton, E. White, E. Lennon, and R. Rajan, “Development of probability distributions for urban hydrologic model parameters and a Monte Carlo analysis of model sensitivity,” Hydrological Processes, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. L. Wilby and I. Harris, “A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: low-flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK,” Water Resources Research, vol. 42, no. 2, Article ID W02419, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. N. W. Arnell, “Uncertainty in the relationship between climate forcing and hydrological response in UK catchments,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 897–912, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Teng, J. Vaze, F. H. S. Chiew, B. Wang, and J. Perraud, “Estimating the relative uncertainties sourced from GCMs and hydrological models in modeling climate change impact on runoff,” Journal of Hydrometeorology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 122–139, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. L. F. Hsiao, M. J. Yang, C. S. Lee et al., “Ensemble forecasting of typhoon rainfall and floods over a mountainous watershed in Taiwan,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 506, pp. 55–68, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  22. S. S. Shih, S. C. Yang, and H. T. Ouyang, “Anthropogenic effects and climate change threats on the flood diversion of Erchung Floodway in Tanshui River, Northern Taiwan,” Natural Hazards, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 1733–1747, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. Q. Zhou, G. Liu, and Z. Zhang, “Improvement and optimization of thiessen polygon method boundary treatment program,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Geoinformatics, pp. 749–753, August 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. Halwatura and M. M. M. Najim, “Application of the HEC-HMS model for runoff simulation in a tropical catchment,” Environmental Modelling and Software, vol. 46, pp. 155–162, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. A. El Hassan, H. O. Sharif, T. Jackson, and S. Chintalapudi, “Performance of a conceptual and physically based model in simulating the response of a semi-urbanized watershed in San Antonio, Texas,” Hydrological Processes, vol. 27, no. 24, pp. 3394–3408, 201. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. USACE, “Hydrologic modeling system,” HEC-HMS Technical Reference Manual CPD-74B, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, Calif, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  27. USACE, Hydrologic Modeling System HEC-HMS v3.5, User's Manual, US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC), Davis, Calif, USA, 2010.
  28. C. J. Willmott and K. Matsuura, “Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance,” Climate Research, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 79–82, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus