Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Meteorology
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 878249, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/878249
Research Article

Climate Predictions: The Chaos and Complexity in Climate Models

1Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Dositej Obradovic Square 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
2Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Dositej Obradovic Square 5, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia

Received 8 October 2013; Revised 18 February 2014; Accepted 25 February 2014; Published 3 April 2014

Academic Editor: Sven-Erik Gryning

Copyright © 2014 D. T. Mihailović et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. F. Keller, “Climate, modeling, and predictability,” Physica D, vol. 133, pp. 296–308, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. N. Lorenz, “The statistical prediction of solutions of dynamic equations,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Numerical Weather Prediction, pp. 629–635, Tokyo, Japan, November 1960.
  3. E. N. Lorenz, “The predictability of hydrodynamic flows,” Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, Series 2, vol. 25, pp. 409–423, 1963. View at Google Scholar
  4. E. N. Lorenz, “Deterministic nonperiodic flow,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 20, pp. 130–141, 1963. View at Google Scholar
  5. E. N. Lorenz, “The problem of deducing the climate from the governing equations,” Tellus, vol. 16, pp. 1–11, 1964. View at Google Scholar
  6. V. Krishnamurthy, “A predictability study of Lorenz's 28-variable model as a dynamical system,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 50, no. 14, pp. 2215–2229, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. L. Hartmann, R. Buizza, and T. N. Palmer, “Singular vectors: the effect of spatial scale on linear growth of disturbances,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 52, pp. 3885–3894, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. N. Lorenz, “The predictability of a flow which contains many scales of motion,” Tellus, vol. 21, pp. 289–307, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. J. Shukla, “Predictability,” Advances in Geophysics, vol. 28, part B, pp. 87–122, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. N. Lorenz, “Climate predictability,” in The Physical Basis of Climate Modeling, vol. 16 of GARP Publication Series, pp. 132–136, WMO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  11. E. N. Lorenz, “Atmospheric predictability experiments with a large numerical model,” Tellus, vol. 34, pp. 505–513, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. J. Simmons and A. Hollingsworth, “Some aspects of the improvement in skill of numerical weather prediction,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 128, no. 580, pp. 647–678, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. N. Lorenz and E. A. Kerry, “Optimal sites for supplementary weather observations: simulation with a small model,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 399–414, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Shukla, “Dynamical predictability of monthly means,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 38, pp. 2547–2572, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Shukla, D. A. Paolino, D. M. Straus et al., “Dynamical seasonal predictions with the COLA atmospheric model,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 126, no. 567, pp. 2265–2291, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. F. W. Zwiers and V. V. Kharin, “Intercomparison of interannual variability and potential predictability: an AMIP diagnostic subproject,” Climate Dynamics, vol. 14, no. 7-8, pp. 517–528, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. F.-F. Jin, J. D. Neelin, and M. Ghil, “El Niño on the devil's staircase: annual subharmonic steps to chaos,” Science, vol. 264, no. 5155, pp. 70–72, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. B. P. Kirtman and P. S. Schopf, “Decadal variability in ENSO predictability and prediction,” Journal of Climate, vol. 11, pp. 2804–2822, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. Orell, “Model error and predictability over different time scales in the Lorenz '96 systems,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 60, pp. 2219–2228, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  20. J. Hunt, “Environmental forecasting and turbulence modeling,” Physica D, vol. 133, pp. 270–295, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Collins, “Climate predictability on interannual to decadal time scales: the initial value problem,” Climate Dynamics, vol. 19, pp. 671–692, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. Rosen, Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into the Nature, Origin and Fabrication of Life, Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1991.
  23. J. D. Collier, “Fundamental properties of self-organisation,” in Causality, Emergence, Self-Organisation, V. Arshinov and C. Fuchs, Eds., pp. 150–166, NIA-Priroda, Moscow, Russia, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  24. V. Arshinov and C. Fuchs, “Preface,” in Causality, Emergence, Self-Organisation, V. Arshinov and C. Fuchs, Eds., pp. 1–18, NIA-Priroda, Moscow, Russia, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  25. B. Edmonds, “What is complexity? The philosophy of complexity per se with application to some examples in evolution,” in The Evolution of Complexity, F. Heylighen and D. Aerts, Eds., pp. 1–18, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  26. S. Kauffman, The Origins of Order, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1993.
  27. F. Heylighen, “The growth of structural and functional complexity,” in The Evolution of Complexity, F. Heylighen, Ed., Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  28. F. Heylighen, “What is complexity?” in The Evolution of Complexity, F. Heylighen and D. Aerts, Eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  29. B. Edmonds, “Pragmatic holism,” CPM Report 96-08, MMU, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  30. R. L. Flood and E. R. Carson, Dealing With Complexity: An Introduction to the Theory and Application of Systems Science, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1993.
  31. E. N. Lorenz, “Some aspects of atmospheric predictability,” in Problems and Prospects in Long and Medium Range Weather Forecasting, D. M. Burridge and E. Killn, Eds., pp. 1–20, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  32. I. N. James, “Models of the predictability of a simple nonlinear dynamical system,” Atmospheric Science Letters, vol. 3, pp. 42–51, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. K. Gödel, “Über formal unentscheidbare sätze der principia mathematica und verwandter systeme I,” Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 173–198, 1931. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. R. Rosen, Anticipatory Systems: Philosophical, Mathematical and Methodological Foundations, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, USA, 1985.
  35. R. Rosen, “Complexity as a system property,” International Journal of General Systems, vol. 3, pp. 227–232, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J. Curry, “Reasoning about climate uncertainty,” Climatic Change, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 723–732, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. Annan and W. Connolley, “Chaos and Climate,” 2005, http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/11/chaos-and-climate/%2016.02.2014.
  38. D. A. Stainforth, T. E. Downing, R. Washington, A. Lopez, and M. New, “Issues in the interpretation of climate model ensembles to inform decisions,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, vol. 365, no. 1857, pp. 2163–2177, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. A. Stainforth, M. R. Allen, E. R. Tredger, and L. A. Smith, “Confidence, uncertainty and decision-support relevance in climate predictions,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, vol. 365, no. 1857, pp. 2145–2161, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. K. Beven, “Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 458, no. 2026, pp. 2465–2484, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. L. A. Smith, “What might we learn from climate forecasts?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 2487–2492, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Heymann, “The evolution of climate ideas and knowledge,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 581–597, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. D. J. Frame, B. B. B. Booth, J. A. Kettleborough et al., “Constraining climate forecasts: the role of prior assumptions,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 32, no. 9, Article ID L09702, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. V. Kreinovich and I. A. Kunin, “Kolmogorov complexity and chaotic phenomena,” International Journal of Engineering Science, vol. 41, no. 3–5, pp. 483–493, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. D. T. Mihailović, “Preface,” in Essays on Fundamental and Applied Environmental Topics, D. T. Mihailović, Ed., pp. ix–xv, Nova Science, New York, NY, USA, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  46. H. R. van der Vaart, “A comparative investigation of certain difference equations and related differential equations: implications for model building,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, vol. 35, no. 1-2, pp. 195–211, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. D. T. Mihailović and I. Balaž, “An essay about modeling problems of complex systems in environmental fluid mechanics,” Idojaras, vol. 111, pp. 209–220, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  48. R. B. Stull, An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1988.
  49. D. T. Mihailović and G. Mimić, “Kolmogorov complexity and chaotic phenomenon in computing the environmental interface temperature,” Modern Physics Letters B, vol. 26, no. 27, Article ID 1250175, 14 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. C. M. Bhumralkar, “Numerical experiments on the computation of ground surface temperature in an atmospheric general circulation model,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 14, pp. 1246–1258, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  51. D. T. Mihailović, M. Budinčević, D. Kapor, I. Balaž, and D. Perišić, “A numerical study of coupled maps representing energy exchange processes between two environmental interfaces regarded as biophysical complex system,” Natural Science, vol. 3, pp. 72–81, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  52. R. A. Pielke Sr., Mesoscale Meteorological Modelling, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2002.
  53. G. Mimić, D. T. Mihailović, and M. Budinčević, “Chaos in computing the environmental interface temperature: nonlinear dynamic and complexity analysis of solutions,” Modern Physics Letters B, vol. 27, no. 26, Article ID 1350190, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. D. T. Mihailović, M. Budinčević, D. Perišić, and I. Balaž, “Maps serving the combined coupling for use in environmental models and their behaviour in the presence of dynamical noise,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 156–165, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. Y.-P. Gunji and M. Kamiura, “Observational heterarchy enhancing active coupling,” Physica D, vol. 198, no. 1-2, pp. 74–105, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001.
  57. A. Arenas, A. Díaz-Guilera, J. Kurths, Y. Moreno, and C. Zhou, “Synchronization in complex networks,” Physics Reports, vol. 469, no. 3, pp. 93–153, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. Y. Chen, G. Rangarajan, and M. Ding, “General stability analysis of synchronized dynamics in coupled systems,” Physical Review E, vol. 67, Article ID 026209, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. C. Zhou and C.-H. Lai, “Synchronization with positive conditional Lyapunov exponents,” Physical Review E, vol. 58, pp. 5188–5191, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. D. A. Randall, R. A. Wood, S. Bony et al., “Climate models and their evaluation,” in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning et al., Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  61. F. Boschetti, “Mapping the complexity of ecological models,” Ecological Complexity, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 37–47, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. J. P. Crutchfield and K. Young, “Inferring statistical complexity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 105–108, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. A. Lempel and J. Ziv, “On the complexity of finite sequences,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 75–81, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. Radhakrishnan, J. D. Wilson, and P. C. Loizou, “An alternate partitioning technique to quantify the regularity of complex time series,” International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1773–1779, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. V. Djurdjević and B. Rajković, “Verification of a coupled atmosphere-ocean model using satellite observations over the Adriatic Sea,” Annales Geophysicae, vol. 26, pp. 1935–1954, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. I. Arsenic, Z. Podrascanin, D. T. Mihailovic, B. Lalic, and A. Firanj, “Projection of Vojvodina climate using the regional climate model: preliminary results,” in Proceedings of the 6th Scientific-Tehnical Meeting (InterRegioSci '13), Novi Sad, Serbia, 2013.
  67. S. Gualdi, A. Navarra, E. Guilyardi, and P. Delecluse, “Assessment of the tropical Indo-Pacific climate in the SINTEX CGCM,” Annals of Geophysics, vol. 46, pp. 1–26, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. P. Liu, T. Li, B. Wang et al., “MJO change with A1B global warming estimated by the 40-km ECHAM5,” Climate Dynamics, vol. 41, pp. 1009–1023, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  69. F. Giorgi, “Regcm version 4.1 reference manual,” Tech. Rep., ICTP, Trieste, Italy, 2011. View at Google Scholar